Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Direc&ons: The ILP should be completed with Mentor input. Complete blue cells prior to classroom implementa@on. Complete orange cells aBer POP Cycle is completed. Cells
will expand as needed. When submiGng completed ILP to instructor, please include copies/images of pre/post assessments/direc@ons and the Pre/Post Assessment Data
Table.
CST
Element Ini2al Ra2ng Descrip2on Goal Ra2ng Descrip2on
P
T - Guide students to think cri@cally through use of ques@oning
T - Facilitates systema@c opportuni@es for students to apply cri@cal
strategies, posing/solving problems, and reflec@on on issues in T–
Promo@ng cri@cal thinking T – Applying thinking by designing structured inquires into complex problems.
content. Innova@ng
1.5 through inquiry, problem S– S - Students pose and answer a wide-range of complex ques@ons and
S - Students respond to varied ques@ons or tasks designed to promote S-
solving, and reflec@on Exploring problems, reflect, and communicate understandings based on in depth
comprehension and cri@cal thinking in single lessons or a sequence of Innova@ng
analysis of content learning.
lessons.
Sec2on 3: Inquiry Focus and Planning (APach Pre/Post Assessments and Data Collec2on Tools)
Direc&ons: Your inquiry ques@on should be concise and likely no more than 8-10 words. Your hypothesis should indicate what you expect students to be able to do aBer the
lesson, and it should be able to be evaluated based on your assessment plan. Note that Semester 3 requires an inquiry ques@on that focuses on use of technology to support
teaching and learning.
Focus Students
Direc&ons: Iden@fy three focus students for your inquiry. Iden@fy special characteris@cs of the students and include performance data. Explain why you have selected them for
this inquiry focus. Do not use actual names of students. (Note: At least one focus student should be an English learner and at least one must have an ILP/504 accommoda@on.
The third is your choice, but please iden@fy someone that poses an instruc@onal challenge.) Iden@fy expected results for each focus student.
Administer Pre-Assessment Deliver Lesson(s) Administer Post-Assessment Analyze Results Discuss Results with Mentor
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induc@on Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 1 of 4
Discuss what went well
Go over the assessment
Final assessment will be on in the lesson and what
IdenFfy dates for Labeling and answering results of each post
Friday and it will consist of needs to be worked on.
acFviFes. mulFple choice Lessons Tuesday through assessment and
labeling a volcano and Discuss how
quesFons of how Thursday for 30 minutes. answering mulFple choice
intervene with students
intervenFons will be
volcanoes erupt. quesFons. who are not
made and enrichment
understanding.
be given to students.
Angela Brew (2003) Teaching and Research: New relationships and their
implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education, Smallhorn, M., Young, J., Hunter, N. & Burke da Silva, K. (2015). Inquiry-based
learning to improve student engagement in a large first year topic. Student Success, 6(2),
Higher Education Research & Development, 22:1, 3-18, DOI:
65-71. doi: 10.5204/ssj.v6i2.292
10.1080/0729436032000056571
This article goes into detail of how inquiry teaching can result in higher student
This article discusses the benefits of bringing research and teaching engagement.
together.
Colleagues (Summarize how two colleagues have addressed this issue in their classroom. Iden2fy grade level, subject, and summary of ideas.)
Grade: 3rd Grade: 4th
Math Science
This colleague has u2lized inquiry based learning by having students work in Inquiry based lesson was done in small groups and the teacher posed what students
groups and solve a math word problem without showing the students any steps. wonder about and then groups researched the topic to find answers.
Ac2on Items
For curriculum design,
lesson planning,
assessment planning
Semester 3 Only:
For future use of
technology
Other Notes
Direc&ons: Record student pre and post scores in this table. Do not use student’s actual names.
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induc@on Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 3 of 4
PRE-/POST- ASSESSMENT DATA TABLE
Student Pre-Assessment Score Post-Assessment Score Comments
1. Focus Student: EL 5/9 8/9
2. Focus Student: 504/IEP 4/9 7/9
3. Focus Student: Teacher
4/9 7/9
Choice
Student #4 5/9 8/9
Student #5 7/9 9/9
Student #6 8/9 9/9
Student #7 6/9 9/9
Student #8 7/9 9/9
Student #9 7/9 9/9
Student #10 5/9 9/9
Student #11 6/9 9/9
Student #12 7/9 9/9
Student #13 5/9 9/9
Student #14 7/9 9/9
Student #15 7/9 9/9
Student #16 7/9 9/9
Student #17 5/9 8/9
Student #18 6/9 8/9
Student #19 7/9 9/9
Student #20 6/9 9/9
Student #21 4/9 8/9
Student #22 3/9 6/9
Student #23 5/9 7/9
Student #24 4/9 7/9
Student #25 7/9 8/9
Student #26 6/9 8/9
Student #27 3/9 7/9
Student #28 4/9 8/9
Student #29 6/9 9/9
Student #30 7/9 9/9
910111213141516
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induc@on Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 4 of 4