Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bi SJK - 2013 PDF
Bi SJK - 2013 PDF
INSTRUMEN PENTAKSIRAN
Kertas 2 Bahasa Inggeris UPSR ini mengandungi tiga bahagian, iaitu Bahagian A, Bahagian
B dan Bahagian C.
Bahagian A terdiri daripada soalan respons terhad yang mesti dijawab. Markah yang
diperuntukan ialah 10
Bahagian B terdiri daripada soalan respons terhad yang mesti dijawab. Markah yang
diperuntukan ialah 15.
Bahagian C terdiri daripada satu soalan respons terbuka yang mesti dijawab. Markah yang
diperuntukan ialah 15.
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
On the whole, most of the candidates attempted all 3 sections. The performance of the
candidates ranged from low to high. There were many high achievers in all three sections.
Most of the candidates were able to develop ideas competently and provide relevant details
stylistically to support their responses.
Most of the high achievers used a wide range of vocabulary, variety of sentence structures
and interesting expressions in their responses.
The average achievers managed to understand the requirement of the task for all three
sections. Errors made were due to inappropriate vocabulary, grammar and failure to
transfer the information and clues given.
The low achievers were not able to develop ideas competently due to language, structural
errors and lack of vocabulary. Their responses were confusing and distorted. They
resorted to stringing with chunks of meanings. Generally, their responses were
disorganized and less developed.
For Section B, candidates were able to identify, extract and lift the information correctly
from the dialogue into the framework.
For Section C, candidates were able to fulfill the task given with some grammatical errors.
However, some could not produce a good piece of work creatively. They strung the notes
given into simple sentences as they were not able to expand the notes using interesting
expression and new vocabulary with a good flow of story-line.
Candidates in this group were able to do well in all the three sections of the paper. They
were able to express ideas creatively using simple, compound and complex sentences.
They wrote confidently using relevant similes, proverbs and idioms reflecting good command
of the language.
Candidates in this group encountered difficulties in all the three sections and were unable to
understand the requirement of the task. In Section B, they merely extracted word or phrase
from the given notes. They used the given words and made minor inclusion of own words
resulting in meaningless sentences for Section A and Section C. A few candidates resorted
to writing the answers in their mother tongue rather than in English.
SECTION A
Candidates were given 10 pictures with two words for each picture. The words could be
nouns, verbs, adjectives or adverbs. They were required to construct one sentence to
describe the picture by using the words given. Candidates may change the order but not
the form of the words.
The high achievers were able to construct grammatically correct sentences using the two
words given. The average achievers were able to construct sentences with occasional
errors while low achievers strung the words given with mere insertions.
Question 1
High Achievers
The candidate described the picture using the collective noun correctly. The verb-to-be is
correctly coordinated with the pronoun „It‟.
Average Achievers
The correct subject-verb agreement was used, though a very simple sentence.
Low Achievers
The wrong use of verb-to-be „is‟ with the plural noun „shoes‟.
Bahasa Inggeris SJKC-SJKT 3 Kupasan Mutu Jawapan UPSR 2013
Question 2
High Achievers
Candidates were able to use both the nouns correctly. Ability to use the past continuous
tense „was feeding‟ and the quantifier „some‟ for the uncountable noun „grass‟ was well
depicted here.
Average Achievers
This candidate was able to construct a sentence in the present continuous tense although it
is a simple sentence. The definite articles „the‟ were appropriately used.
Low Achievers
Spelling error occurred for the word “feding”. It shows the candidate‟s carelessness. The
candidate may not be a low achiever as the sentence was correctly structured.
High Achievers
Average Achievers
The definite article „the‟ should be used instead of „a‟ when this sentence was constructed.
This candidate was unable to use the correct preposition „on‟. An incorrect preposition
„through‟ was used instead of the correct one „on‟ .
Low Achievers
The sentence was constructed with the omission of the preposition „to‟ the radio.
High Achievers
The candidate was able to use both the words correctly as this candidate had the
knowledge of the kind of animal a porcupine is.
Average Achievers
The sentence was constructed with the omission of the article „a‟.
Low Achievers
The candidate showed confusion in the usage of wild and tame. The possessive adjective
„his‟ was wrongly used.
High Achievers
Candidates were able to construct a compound sentence correctly. The sentence was
further explained with the correct tool used.
Average Achievers
This candidate managed to write a correct sentence but used the noun „long scissors‟
incorrectly.
Low Achievers
The common sight word „bushes‟ was wrongly used due to lack of vocabulary.
High Achievers
The word „water-lily‟ was correctly used as an adjective for the type of plant in the sentence.
Ability to use the correct preposition was shown in the candidate‟s answer.
Average Achievers
Grammatically correct sentences with the given words were constructed while there was a
common error using the wrong preposition „on‟.
Low Achievers
An attempt was made to write based on the stimulus but the quantifier „many‟ was wrongly
used.
High Achievers
Grammatically correct sentence was constructed based on the stimulus .Candidate was able
to give a clear description.
The adjective „lit‟ was correctly inserted in this sentence showing a good command of the
language.
Average Achievers
The candidate tried to construct a correct sentence but made mistakes in using the wrong
verb and the given word is written in the singular.
Low achievers
The phrasal verb „blows out‟ should be used instead of „blows off‟ showing a level of
confusion.
Bahasa Inggeris SJKC-SJKT 9 Kupasan Mutu Jawapan UPSR 2013
Question 8
High Achievers
Ability to construct a good compound sentence was shown here although the stimulus was
just a single object.
Average Achievers
A grammatically correct sentence was constructed but to generalize „things‟ does not
explain the specification of a carpenter‟s scope of work.
Low achievers
Redundancy of „by‟ was detected in this sentence. This is a common mistake detected when
the conjunction ‟with‟ should be used in the sentence.
High Achievers
The stimulus given was easily recognized by the candidate and able to construct
grammatically correct sentence.
Average Achievers
Redundancy is detected in this sentence – ‘the’ bread. The word „bread‟ can stand on its
own.
The preposition „as‟ in this sentence was an error instead of the word „for‟.
High Achievers
The activity in the stimulus was easily recognized and the candidate was able to use the
preposition „into‟ aptly.
Average Achievers
Confusion of preposition was detected. The wrong preposition „in‟ and „from‟ were used
instead of „into‟ respectively.
Low Achievers
The candidate omitted the preposition thus changing the meaning of the sentence and
consequently got the sentence wrong.
Bahasa Inggeris SJKC-SJKT 12 Kupasan Mutu Jawapan UPSR 2013
DETAILED PERFORMANCE – SECTION B
This question required the candidates to understand the content of the notice in order to
transfer the relevant information to an email.
The average achievers managed to transfer the correct information with some grammatical
and punctuation errors.
Bahasa Inggeris SJKC-SJKT 14 Kupasan Mutu Jawapan UPSR 2013
Most low achievers were unable to place the correct information into the respective blanks.
For this question, a series of three pictures with notes was given. Candidates may use the
notes to make sentences about the pictures. This section assessed the writing skills of the
candidates. It assessed their ability to produce a piece of continuous prose in accurate
Standard English expressively and creatively by introducing new words in the form of
adjectives, adverbs, idioms, similes and descriptive language. To gauge their proficiency in
the language, candidates had to construct a variety of sentence structures both simple and
compound. They must also be able to sequence the paragraph well using appropriate
connectors.
These candidates showed minimum understanding of the task. Their ideas were barely
developed. Serious errors in grammar and sentence structures were detected. There was
stringing of words in the sentences. The responses were mostly disorganized and almost
incomprehensible due to poor command of the language and limited vocabulary. Some
merely direct lifted the given words with no changes. The language used was inaccurate.