You are on page 1of 32

Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

Received June 26, 2018;


Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Cryogenic Machining of Titanium Ti-5553


Alloy
Yusuf Kaynak1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technology Faculty, Marmara University,
Goztepe Campus, Kadikoy,34722, Istanbul-TURKEY

d
yusuf.kaynak@marmara.edu.tr, yusuf_kaynak@yahoo.com

te
ASME Membership Number: 000100060982

di
Armin Gharibi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences,

e
Marmara University, Goztepe Campus, Kadikoy,34722, Istanbul-TURKEY

py
armin.gharibi@gmail.com

Co
ABSTRACT

ot
Titanium alloy Ti-5Al-5V-3Cr-0.5Fe (Ti-5553) is a new generation of near-beta titanium alloy that is
tN
commonly used in the aerospace industry. Machining is one of the manufacturing methods to produce
parts that are made of this near-beta alloy. This study presents the machining performance of a new
generation near-beta alloys, namely Ti-5553, by focusing on a high-speed cutting process under cryogenic
rip

cooling conditions and dry machining. The machining experiments were conducted under a wide range of
cutting speeds, including high speeds that used liquid nitrogen (LN2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) as cryogenic
sc

coolants. The experimental data on the cutting temperature, tool wear, force components, chip
breakability, dimensional accuracy and surface integrity characteristics are presented and was analysed to
evaluate the machining process of this alloy and resulting surface characteristics. This study shows that
nu

cryogenic machining improved the machining performance of the Ti-5553 alloy by substantially reducing
the tool wear, cutting temperature and dimensional deviation of the machined parts. The cryogenic
Ma

machining also produced shorter chips as compared to dry machining.


ed

Keywords
Titanium Ti-5553 alloy, Cryogenic machining, Machining performance, Surface integrity
pt
ce
Ac

1
Corresponding author information can be added as a footnote.

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, titanium alloy Ti-5Al-5V-3Cr-0.5Fe (Ti-5553) has attracted the

attention of the aviation industry [1]. It has been used since 2005 to fabricate the large

d
structural components in the landing gear for 787 airframes because it has a high yield

te
strength, excellent fatigue crack growth resistance, good hardenability and corrosion

di
resistance [1-3]. The mechanical properties of Ti-5553, such as its enhanced strength

e
py
(approximately 1250 MPa at room temperature for certain types of microstructures)

Co
and high cycle fatigue compared to Ti-6Al-4V, make it an ideal candidate for a number of

applications [4]. This alloy is especially applicable for thick section aerospace

ot
tN
components due to its deep-hardenability that is caused by its slower precipitation

kinetics [4]. Although this new generation titanium alloy has certain advantages in terms
rip

of mechanical and physical properties, there are issues with its forming processes,
sc

including machining and cutting. The other properties of Ti-5553, such as a low thermal
nu

conductivity, chemical reactivity, high strength at elevated temperatures and low


Ma

modulus of elasticity [5] make it difficult to machine [6].


ed

The challenges in machining Ti-6Al-4V alloys include the tendency to weld to the

cutting tool during machining as a result of a chemical reaction, an increased cutting


pt
ce

temperature due to the low thermal conductivity and reduced tool life [6]. The Ti-5553
Ac

alloy that has a much higher strength, and can potentially cause additional problems

during the cutting process. However, chip formation processes that include turning,

milling and drilling during fabrication of products made from this alloy are essential.

Thus, problems in cutting process need to be resolved. Consequently, an investigation of

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

the chip formation process in the Ti-5553 alloy is required to determine the challenges

and develop appropriate approaches to optimize the machining process.

The main issue is that Ti-5553 is a relatively new alloy for industrial applications

and research about its machining performance is very limited. To the best knowledge of

d
te
the authors, there is very little work that has focused on machining processes and the

di
machining-induced surface integrity of this alloy [7-13]. Also, to the best knowledge of

e
the authors, there has been no systematic and extensive study to understand the role of

py
cryogenic coolant on chip formation that particularly focuses on the turning operation

Co
of this alloy. It is well known that during the machining of such aerospace alloys, the

ot
cooling method might play a critical role in improving the machining performance and
tN
controlling the surface characteristic [14]. Cryogenic cooling can decrease the
rip

temperature during the cutting process and increase tool life [15, 16]. In the literature,
sc

both liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide were considered as cryogenic coolants to be
nu

utilized in metal cutting processes [16, 17]. The use of liquid nitrogen and carbon
Ma

dioxide in machining processes for different materials was presented in various studies

[17, 18]. Based on the literature, cryogenic cooling seems to be a promising approach
ed

for fabricating difficult-to-machine materials, including Ti-based and Ni-based alloys [19-
pt

21].
ce

A few researchers studied the cutting process for Ti-5553 by utilizing liquid
Ac

nitrogen [10]. However, the missing critical point in these studies is the contribution of

the cooling method (liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide) at a wide range of cutting

speeds. Indeed, at a reasonable temperature, a conventional coolant might still be used.

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

However, better cooling is required for high cutting speeds, where the cutting

temperature can reach high values and cause issues with the chip formation process. A

high temperature also affects the microstructural characteristics and phase state of the

alloy. This might lead to additional complex processes during the plastic deformation of

d
te
this alloy because it has an 850 ºC beta transus temperature [4].

di
The challenges with high temperatures during the machining of the Ti-5553 alloy

e
are caused by the high cutting speeds and its low thermal conductivity (8.6 W/m °C) [8].

py
The delivery of liquid nitrogen or carbon dioxide into the hot deformation zone might

Co
decrease the temperature significantly. This change would be expected to cause

ot
alteration of the surface and subsurface characteristics of the machined parts. Thus,
tN
investigating only the machining performance under cryogenic cooling conditions might
rip

not be helpful to evaluate the product quality. Additional analysis and examination of
sc

the surface and subsurface of machined Ti-5553 alloys might be very useful for
nu

researcher purposes and industrial applications.


Ma

In this study, extreme and applicable machining conditions were selected to be

able to provide useful data to both academia and industry. The maximum temperature
ed

is expected to be recorded during the dry cutting of engineering materials and the
pt

minimum temperature is expected to occur during cryogenic cooling conditions. Thus,


ce

this study has the potential to provide results for both the machining performance and
Ac

surface integrity at both extreme conditions.

This study aimed to determine the chip formation process for the new beta

titanium alloy, Ti-5553, under a wide range of cutting speeds, including high speeds

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

under cryogenic cooling and dry conditions. The measured outputs for the machining

performance included wear rate, temperature, forces, chip breaking and surface

integrity characteristics, such as microhardness and phase transformation.

d
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

te
The workpiece used in this study was a round bar of a near β titanium alloy,

di
namely Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr-0.5Fe (Ti-5553), with a diameter of 20 mm and in the hot

e
rolled condition. Elongation of the work material was 10% and the average hardness

py
was measured to be 317 ± 5 HV. The thermal conductivity of this alloy was 8.6 W/m °C

Co
[8]. The microstructure of the Ti-5553 alloy is presented elsewhere [11]. It has a bimodal

ot
microstructure (BM) [22] that contains both the hcp α phase and bcc β phase [11].
tN
Because it has a bimodal microstructure, it contains a certain amount of globular α_p
rip

(primary α phase) particles [22]. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) and microstructure
sc

characterization of this material revealed the beta transus to be at around 845 °C - 850
nu

°C, according to various references [23, 24].


Ma

Uncoated 883 grade carbide inserts, which are convenient for the machining of

superalloys with the ISO designation CNMG120408-M1, were used in this study. Its nose
ed

radius was 0.8 mm. The tool holder was PTJNL2525M16JET with a 95° approach angle,
pt

−6° normal rake angle and −6° end cutting edge angle. The machining experiments were
ce

conducted on a DOOSAN CNC turning centre with 18 KW power and maximum spindle
Ac

speed of 4500 rpm. During the machining experiments, a constant feed rate, f, of 0.15

mm/rev, constant depth of cut, ap, of 1.2 mm, and five different cutting speeds, namely

30, 90, 120, 150 and 210 m/min, were utilized.

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

The machining experiments were conducted under dry machining conditions

without any coolant or lubricant. The cryogenic machining was done by delivering liquid

nitrogen and carbon dioxide through the tool holder. The liquid nitrogen was applied

under 1.5 MPa pressure and approximately 10 g/s mass flow rate. The pressure of the

d
te
carbon dioxide was 5.4 MPa. The implementation of the liquid nitrogen and carbon

di
dioxide during the machining process is shown in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 1, the

e
liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide were delivered through the rake face and flank face

py
of the cutting tool.

Co
The cutting force components and tool wear were measured using a three-

ot
component piezoelectric KISTLER 2129AA dynamometer and Keyence digital optical
tN
microscope, respectively. The dimensional accuracy of each of the machined samples
rip

was measured using a Liberty LH 87 coordinate measurement machine. The


sc

measurements were repeated to minimize any error made by the user. The
nu

temperature around the cutting zone was monitored using an Optris PI 400 infrared
Ma

camera and the emissivity of the work material was determined to be 0.63 [10]. To

validate that this emissivity value was applicable for this work material sample, the
ed

calibration was repeated. The work material sample was cooled and heated to a
pt

temperature range of − 50 to 600 °C by using the carbon dioxide coolant and Instron
ce

furnace, respectively [11]. At seven target temperatures within this temperature range,
Ac

the work material’s temperature was measured with type K thermocouple that was

placed on it. It was simultaneously monitored with the infrared camera to validate the

calibration [11]. An example of the measured temperature profile is shown in Figure 2.

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

A Future-Tech FM-310e microhardness tester was used to measure the

microhardness of the machined surface and subsurface for the components with 25 gf

load. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted with a Bruker AXS D2 Phaser with

a CuKα1 wavelength, λ, of 1.54060 A ̇. The scanning 2θ angle was between 34° to 42°

d
te
based on Bragg’s law.

e di
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

py
Machining temperature

Co
Heat is generated during machining by the work done in the plastic zone [25].

ot
Chips are formed and by friction at the tool-chip interface [25]. Thus, during the cutting
tN
process, high temperatures are generated in the region of the tool cutting edge, and
rip

these temperatures have a controlling influence on the rate of wear of the cutting tool
sc

and on the friction between the chip and tool [26]. Consequently, the tool life and
nu

cutting force components are affected by the generated temperature. In addition, the
Ma

machined surface and subsurface are potentially influenced by the generated

temperature because it may alter the microstructure of the material. In contrast to


ed

many engineering materials, the high temperature is a concern for titanium alloys
pt

because of their low thermal conductivity, which is about 1/6 of steel’s thermal
ce

conductivity [27]. The heat builds up at the tool-chip interface and substantially affects
Ac

machining process [27]. Cryogenic cooling seems to be one of the most promising

approaches to eliminate the detrimental effects of high temperature because it has a

temperature around -196 ºC [18, 28].

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

The temperature recorded during the cutting process under cryogenic cooling

conditions and dry machining is presented in Figure 3. The argument presented above is

supported by the obtained results. The recorded temperature difference in between the

dry and cryogenic cooling conditions is large. The dry machining almost doubled the

d
te
cutting temperature compared to the cryogenic cooling. For instance, while the dry

di
machining generated a temperature of 516 ºC temperature, machining with liquid

e
nitrogen generated a 264 ºC temperature at the lowest cutting speed. This indicates that

py
liquid nitrogen caused temperature reduction. This statement is true for the majority of

Co
the cutting speeds presented in here. The liquid nitrogen seems to be a much more

ot
effective cooling approach than the carbon dioxide based on the measured temperature
tN
values presented in this figure. The liquid nitrogen generated a much lower temperature
rip

at the higher cutting speeds, namely 150 and 210 m/min. Machining with liquid nitrogen
sc

generated 340 ºC at 210 m/min, whereas the maximum recorded temperature was 395
nu

ºC when machining with the carbon dioxide coolant.


Ma

It should be noted that this temperature was the maximum recorded

temperature in the cutting zone but not at the tool-to-chip interface. Considering this
ed

point, it is possible to say that the real temperature at the tool-to-chip interface was
pt

expected to become much higher, but the difference between the cooled and dry
ce

machining was not expected to show a large difference. Overall, the cryogenic cooling
Ac

utilizing both liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide substantially reduced the temperature

compared to dry machining of the titanium Ti-5553 alloy.

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Tool wear

The tool life or tool wear during the machining process of difficult-to-machine

materials are important parameters to evaluate to determine the machining

performance. This factor is important for manufacturing cost, the dimensional accuracy

d
te
of the machined parts and surface quality [29]. However, it should be also noted that

di
during the machining process of functional components, particularly components that

e
are used in aerospace industry, the tool’s effect on the dimensional accuracy and

py
surface characteristics of the components are a more significant concern than the cost

Co
of the cutting tool [30]. That is why, it is important to understand the progression of

ot
wear and associated wear mechanisms that take place during machining of such an
tN
alloy.
rip

The experimentally measured flank wear as a function of the cutting speed in dry
sc

and cryogenic cooling conditions is presented in Figure 4. No considerable difference in


nu

terms of flank wear was observed at a lower cutting speed for the three different
Ma

conditions. The effect of cooling on a reduction of the tool wear is much more apparent

at higher cutting speeds, particularly 150 and 210 m/min. For instance, the carbon
ed

dioxide resulted in a 22% reduction, whereas the liquid nitrogen led to an approximately
pt

59% reduction in the maximum flank wear when the dry machining condition was taken
ce

as the reference. The difference in between liquid nitrogen and liquid carbon dioxide is
Ac

mainly because of the temperature difference in these two cooling conditions. While

the temperature of liquid carbon dioxide is approximately -79 ºC, liquid nitrogen

temperature is much lower (its boiling point is approximately -196 ºC) [18, 20]. Thus, as

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

the cutting speed increased, the effectiveness of the liquid nitrogen became visible

when machining the Ti-5553 alloy. These results confirmed that at higher cutting

speeds, the cryogenic coolants were much effective at suppressing wear as compared to

the lower cutting speed.

d
te
The tool-to-chip contact areas for the cutting tools used in the experimental

di
study were also measured, and the obtained data is presented in Figure 5. The contact

e
area as a function of cutting speed shows good agreement with the measured maximum

py
flank wear when the cutting speed was 150 and 210 m/min. At the lower cutting speeds,

Co
the difference was negligible. At higher cutting speeds, the cooling conditions helped to

ot
reduce this area as compared to the dry machining process. At high cutting speeds, the
tN
measured tool-to-chip contact area needs to be considered as crater wear. As shown in
rip

the following images, the tool wear was obvious at higher cutting speeds on the rake
sc

face of the cutting tool. Again, liquid nitrogen made a substantial difference as
nu

compared to dry machining and reduced both the tool chip contact length and crater
Ma

wear by approximately 45%. The carbon dioxide also reduced the wear and tool-to-chip

contact length as compared to dry machining, but it was not as effective as the liquid
ed

nitrogen.
pt

The two-dimensional profiles of the rake and flank faces for the cutting tools are
ce

presented in Figure 6. The geometry of the cutting tools used in the dry and carbon
Ac

dioxide-assisted machining changed dramatically when considering the flank and rake

face as compared to a new and fresh tool.

10

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

In addition, a large built-up-edge was observed during the dry machining. The

cutting tool used in liquid nitrogen-assisted machining did not seem to be worn out

throughout the tool-to-chip contact length. On the rake face of the cutting tool, local

plastic deformation was observed, as shown in Figure 7(c). This wear mechanism was

d
te
also observed in the high-speed machining of a Ti-6Al4V alloy [6]. But the interesting

di
finding is that while plastic deformation was observed in the liquid nitrogen-assisted

e
machining, the diffusion and adhesion wear mechanisms dominated during the carbon

py
dioxide-assisted machining of the Ti-5553 alloy. Adhesion also played a main role in the

Co
dry machining, as clearly shown in Figure 7.

ot
This part of the study demonstrated that after a certain cutting speed (150
tN
m/min and beyond), the tool wear was extremely severe and rapidly increased. The
rip

coolant was used to help reduce tool wear at even higher cutting speeds. Compared to
sc

carbon dioxide, it is apparent that liquid nitrogen was much efficient in reducing the tool
nu

wear. However, based on the observed tool wear results, 150 m/min cutting speed and
Ma

beyond did not seem to be applicable in machining of this alloy.

This finding was related to the elevated temperature in the cutting zone that the
ed

cutting tool was subjected to. It is well known fact that carbide cutting tools lose their
pt

resistance and hardness at a certain temperature. According to the literature, the


ce

softening point for a carbide tool is approximately 1,100 °C [14]. It should be also noted
Ac

that the hardness of a carbide cutting tool decreases more than 50% at around 800 °C

when compared to the hardness of carbide tool at the room temperature [14]. It is clear

that at the 150 m/min cutting speed, the recorded was is above 500 °C and it should be

11

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

noted that this temperature was not measured at the tool-to-chip interface where the

maximum temperature occurs. The increased temperature directly affects the wear

resistance of any material, as shown in the wear model below [31]:

𝐾 𝐹𝐿
𝑊= (1)

d
3 𝐻

te
where W is the volumetric wear of the material, K is the Archard wear coefficient, F is

di
the contact force, L is the cutting length and H is the hardness of the softest material

e
py
[31], which in this case was the cutting tool. The only variables applicable to this work

Co
are the contact force and hardness of the cutting tool. Figure 8 shows the cutting tool’s

hardness as a function of the temperature changes. This temperature is the maximum

ot
that was measured in the cutting region but not at the tool-to-chip interface, where
tN
temperature should be much higher than the presented values. Nonetheless, these
rip

recorded temperatures can be still useful to show the difference. Considering the
sc

measured temperature during the dry cutting from 150 to 210 m/min, the hardness of
nu

the tool reduced approximately 16.5%, whereas during the cryogenic machining, the
Ma

hardness reduced by approximately 3.5%. This large difference resulted in the large

difference in the tool wear that occurred during machining.


ed

This evidence supports the difference between the dry and cryogenic cooling
pt

conditions. Although the measured temperature variation for the carbon dioxide was
ce

close to the liquid nitrogen, the carbon dioxide did not provide an improvement in the
Ac

wear resistance as the liquid nitrogen did. Figure 7 shows a CO2 cutting, in which there is

a large crater wear on the rake face of tool. This indicates that the temperature in

12

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

between the tool’s rake face and chip was much higher than the temperature during the

liquid nitrogen-assisted cutting.

Force components

d
te
Force components are the fundamental and significant indicators of the power

di
requirements and energy consumption during machining processes. Force components

e
are influenced by many parameters, such as tool–to-chip friction; properties of the

py
work, tool and coating materials; the geometry of the cutting tool and cutting

Co
conditions, to name a few [32]. The obtained results from this study support the

ot
argument given in the previous sentence that the trend for the forces varies with both
tN
the cutting speeds and cutting conditions, as illustrated in Figure 9. While the main
rip

cutting forces were reasonably high at the lower cutting speeds, in all three conditions,
sc

it reduced as cutting speed increased. This change was attributed to the thermal effect,
nu

in which the increased cutting speed led to an increased temperature that helped to
Ma

reduce the energy requirement to plastically deform the workpiece.

After a certain cutting speed, the trend completely changed and the force
ed

components increased as the cutting speed is increased. At the highest cutting speed,
pt

the maximum forces associated with the largest error bars were recorded. As shown in a
ce

previous section of this study, the tool wear rapidly increased as the cutting speeds (150
Ac

m/min and beyond) led to increasing the force components as well. The effects of the

various cooling conditions and cutting speeds on the feed force and radial forces are

presented in Figures 10 and 11, respectively.

13

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

At lower cutting speeds, the force variation in different conditions was not

notable, although the carbon dioxide generated slightly lower forces. However, a clear

difference was observed at higher cutting speeds in both the feed force and radial force

figures. The forces increased substantially in all three conditions. The liquid nitrogen had

d
te
slightly higher feed forces at the lowest cutting speed and noticeably higher forces at

di
the highest cutting speeds compared to the dry machining. However, carbon dioxide

e
almost always lowered the feed and radial forces as compared to dry machining, as

py
shown in Figures 10 and 11.

Co
The effects of the strain rate and temperature on the deformation response of

ot
the Ti-5553 alloy are presented in Figure 12. As shown in Figure 12(a), after a certain
tN
strain rate, the increased strain rate caused the forces to increase. Indeed, during
rip

machining, the strain rate is expected to be much higher than 1000 mm/s, so increased
sc

cutting forces with an increased strain rate are expected to be associated with an
nu

increased cutting speed. However, the temperature dominated the force required to
Ma

plastically deform the work material, and consequently the forces reduced with an

increased cutting speed. This argument can be supported by the evidence provided in
ed

Figure 12(b), where increasing the temperature from room temperature to 600 ºC
pt

caused the force requirement for permanent deformation to reduce approximately


ce

50%; however, the increasing strain rate from 100 to 1000 caused an approximately
Ac

10% increase in the force requirement.

The specific cutting force, (Ks), was calculated from the following equation [33]:

𝐹
𝐾𝑠 = 𝑎 𝑐.𝑓 (2)
𝑝

14

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

where Fc is the main cutting force, ap is the depth of cut and f is the feed rate. The

material removal rate for each experiment was calculated using the following equation

[33]:

1000
𝑀𝑅𝑅 = 𝑎𝑝 . 𝑓. 𝑣𝑐 . (3)
60

d
te
The calculated specific cutting forces and material removal rates are presented in Figure

di
13. As shown in the figure, the minimum specific cutting forces were obtained with a

e
py
120 m/min cutting speed, where the material removal rate was much higher than at the

Co
lower cutting speeds. At this cutting speed, tool wear was also close to the measured

minimum values. Thus, in terms of tool wear, energy requirement and material removal

ot
rate, this cutting speed provided the best performance among all selected cutting
tN
speeds.
rip

Chip breaking and thickness


sc

Chip control is an important issue in many machining operations, particularly in


nu

machining of ductile [33] or strain hardened work materials. Breaking chips into small
Ma

and manageable sizes and shapes is a basic requirement for automated machining and

for disposing of chips for recycling and/or reuse [34]. Long and snarled chips with a large
ed

size are not desirable for the surface quality of the machined products and also for the
pt

prevention of tangling of the cutting tool [35]. For these reasons, smaller chips are
ce

desirable in the machining process. The chips resulting from various machining
Ac

conditions and cutting speeds are illustrated in Figure 14. A large difference in the chip

breakability for the cooled and dry conditions is clearly seen in Figure 14. While dry

machining produces continuous, long and snarled chips at almost all cutting speeds, the

15

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide help to produce shorter chips. These cooling

conditions also generated helical chips that were attributed to cooling effect.

The thickness of the collected chips was also measured, as presented in Figure

15. At a low cutting speed, the chips were much thicker than those produced at the high

d
te
cutting speed for all three conditions. The increased cutting speed affected the shear

di
angle in the deformation zone and changed the chip thickness. Among all three

e
conditions, thinner chips were produced during dry machining while thicker chips were

py
produced during the carbon dioxide-assisted machining process.

Co
ot
Dimensional accuracy of machined parts
tN
The dimensional accuracy of machined aerospace alloys is one of the common
rip

quality concerns that needs to be strictly satisfied. The dimensional deviation that
sc

occurred after various machining conditions under two different cutting speeds is
nu

presented in Figure 16. It is an apparent that the dimensional accuracy of the machined
Ma

parts was affected by the different conditions. While the maximum deviation from the

nominal diameter was measured on the parts machined in the dry cutting condition, the
ed

minimum deviation was obtained from the liquid nitrogen-assisted machining


pt

conditions. The cutting speed was also an effective way to obtain precious parts, as
ce

shown in Figure 16. Higher cutting speeds seemed to increase the dimensional deviation
Ac

that was attributed to rapid tool wear at the nose region of the cutting tool. The

reduced tool wear with liquid nitrogen also helped to obtain machined parts with a

much higher dimensional accuracy.

16

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Surface integrity characteristics

In machining of Ti-5553, the surface integrity characteristics induced from chip

formation have not been comprehensively studied yet, but it is also beyond the scope of

d
te
this study. However, in this study, two important characteristics of machining-induced

di
surface integrity are discussed, namely the microhardness and XRD results. These two

e
are expected to provide information about how the mechanical properties and phase

py
state of the surface and subsurface are affected by the chip formation process under

Co
given conditions. Figure 17 shows the variation in the microhardness of components

ot
machined under dry and cryogenic cooling (liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide)
tN
conditions at a cutting speed of 120 m/min. The results are consistent and indicate that
rip

the microhardness is not substantially affected by the cutting conditions. In all


sc

conditions, the microhardness of the parts decreased as compared to the hardness of


nu

the as-received work material. The softening was approximately 10% and in the closest
Ma

layer to the surface. The depth of softened layer from the surface was approximately 80

µm. The role of various machining conditions on the softening response was not clearly
ed

discernible because all three were close to each other. However, this result showed that
pt

softening took place on the surface and subsurface of the machined Ti-5553 alloy.
ce

Figure 18 shows the XRD analysis of parts machined under dry and cryogenic
Ac

cooling conditions (liquid nitrogen and carbon dioxide). Among all peaks in the XRD

pattern of the Ti-5553 alloy, the (100)α , (002)α , (101)α and (110)β are the dominant

reflection peaks, and the intensity of the other diffraction peaks was extremely low [22,

17

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

36]. For this reason, the area of interest was between 34o to 42 o 2θ because it includes

those mentioned peaks. The first observation from these results was that after

machining, the diffraction peak intensities decreased remarkably in all conditions.

Besides, the peaks from the machined parts broadened substantially as

d
te
compared to peaks of the as-received material. The peak broadening was attributed to

di
residual stress and/or grain refinement [36, 37] induced by the machining process.

e
Among all three conditions, the (110)β peak was the broadest after liquid nitrogen-

py
assisted machining . The (100)α diffraction peak disappeared for parts machined under

Co
all three conditions. This indicated that severe plastic deformation from the machining

ot
process led to the phase transformation from the alpha to the beta phase. However, it
tN
should be noted that the machining process itself mainly altered the XRD pattern of this
rip

alloy rather than the cooling conditions. It should be also noted that lubrication did not
sc

remarkably influence the surface integrity characteristics of the Ti-5553 alloy [40].
nu

Conclusions
Ma

This study presented a comprehensive and systematic investigation of the

performance of the Ti-5553 alloy during a high-speed machining process under


ed

cryogenic cooling conditions and compared the results with dry machining. The
pt

following conclusions can be drawn from this study:


ce

- Cryogenic coolants substantially reduced the cutting temperature during the


Ac

turning operation of this alloy.

- Up to the 120 m/min cutting speed, the tool wear was close for all three

conditions. The cryogenic coolants did not make a considerable difference.

18

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Above the 120 m/min cutting speed, an effective coolant was needed to

suppress the increasing tool wear. The experimental data provided evidence that

utilizing a cryogenic coolant, particularly liquid nitrogen, enabled the

implementation of high-speed machining of this material when considering tool

d
te
wear.

di
- Plastic deformation on the rake face dominated the tool wear mechanism during

e
liquid nitrogen-assisted cryogenic cooling. On the other hand, the adhesion and

py
diffusion were dominant during the carbon dioxide and dry machining processes.

Co
- In terms of material removal rate and specific cutting force, 120 m/min was the

ot
most preferable cutting speed among all selected cutting speeds in machining
tN
this alloy. Above the 120 m/min cutting speed, the force components suddenly
rip

increased due to extreme tool wear.


sc

- Compared to dry machining, the cryogenic cooling helped to shorten the chip
nu

lengths and improve the chip breakability for this Ti-5553 alloy.
Ma

- The reduced tool wear by the cryogenic coolants helped to reduce dimensional

deviation of the machined parts and improve the quality of the parts.
ed

- Regardless of cutting conditions, the machining process decreased the surface


pt

and subsurface hardness of the machined Ti-5553 alloy. The maximum reduction
ce

in the area closest to the surface was approximately 10%.


Ac

- The XRD analysis showed that the crystal structure and phases on the surface of

the machined material were affected from the machining process.

19

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We would like to acknowledge TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research

Council of Turkey) for its support to this work under project number 214M068. We also

thank to Mr. Emre Taşcıoğlu for helping us to plot the figures.

d
te
REFERENCES

di
[1] Hua, K., Xue, X.Y., Kou, H.C., Fan, J.K., Tang, B., Li, J.S., High temperature deformation
behaviour of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr during thermomechanical processing. Materials

e
Research Innovations, 2014. 18: p. S4-202-S4-206.

py
[2] Hua, K., Xue, X.Y., Kou, H.C., Fan, J.K., Tang, B., Li, J.S., Characterization of hot
deformation microstructure of a near beta titanium alloy Ti-5553. Journal of Alloys and

Co
Compounds, 2014. 615: p. 531-537.
[3] Dehghan-Manshadi, A. and Dippenaar, R.J., Development of α-phase morphologies
during low temperature isothermal heat treatment of a Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr alloy.

ot
Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2011. 528(3): p. 1833-1839.
tN
[4] Nag, S., Banerjee, R., Hwang, J.Y., Harper, M., Fraser, H.L., Elemental partitioning
between α and β phases in the Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–0.5 Fe (Ti-5553) alloy. Philosophical
Magazine, 2009. 89(6): p. 535-552.
rip

[5] Ezugwu, E., Bonney, J., Yamane, Y., An overview of the machinability of aeroengine
alloys. Journal of materials processing technology, 2003. 134(2): p. 233-253.
sc

[6] Ezugwu, E., Wang, Z., Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, 1997. 68(3): p. 262-274.
nu

[7] Arrazola, P.-J., Garay, A., Iriarte, L.M., Armendia, M., Marya, S., Le Maitre, F.,
Machinability of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti555. 3). Journal of Materials Processing
Ma

Technology, 2009. 209(5): p. 2223-2230.


[8] Wagner, V., Baili, M., and Dessein, G., The relationship between the cutting speed,
tool wear, and chip formation during Ti-5553 dry cutting. The International Journal of
ed

Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015. 76(5-8): p. 893-912.


[9] Baili, M., Wagner, V., Dessein, G., Sallaberry, J., Lallement, D., An experimental
investigation of hot machining with induction to improve Ti-5553 machinability. in
pt

Applied mechanics and Materials. 2011. Trans Tech Publ.


ce

[10] Sun, Y., Huang, B., Puleo, D.A., Jawahir, I.S., Enhanced Machinability of Ti-5553 Alloy
from Cryogenic Machining: Comparison with MQL and Flood-cooled Machining and
Ac

Modeling. Procedia CIRP, 2015. 31: p. 477-482.


[11] Kaynak, Y., Gharibi, A., Ozkutuk, M., Experimental and numerical study of chip
formation in orthogonal cutting of Ti-5553 alloy: the influence of cryogenic, MQL, and
high pressure coolant supply. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology, 2017: p. 1-18.

20

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

[12] Braham-Bouchnak, T., Germain, G., Morel, A., Furet, B., Influence of high-pressure
coolant assistance on the machinability of the titanium alloy Ti555–3. Machining Science
and Technology, 2015. 19(1): p. 134-151.
[13] Wagner, V., Baili, M., Dessein, G., Lallement, D., Experimental study of coated
carbide tools behaviour: application for Ti-5-5-5-3 turning. International Journal of
Machining and Machinability of Materials, 2011. 9(3): p. 233-248.
[14] Ezugwu, E., Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace

d
superalloys. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2005. 45(12): p.

te
1353-1367.
[15] Ezugwu, E., Bonney, J., Effect of high-pressure coolant supply when machining

di
nickel-base, Inconel 718, alloy with coated carbide tools. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 2004. 153: p. 1045-1050.

e
[16] Kaynak, Y., Karaca, H.E., Noebe, R.D., Jawahir, I.S., Tool-wear analysis in cryogenic

py
machining of NiTi shape memory alloys: A comparison of tool-wear performance with
dry and MQL machining. Wear, 2013. 306: p. 51-63.

Co
[17] Machai, C., Biermann, D., Machining of β-titanium-alloy Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al under
cryogenic conditions: Cooling with carbon dioxide snow. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 2011. 211(6): p. 1175-1183.

ot
[18] Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., Munoz-Escalona, P., Newman, S.T., State-of-the-art
tN
cryogenic machining and processing. International Journal of Computer Integrated
Manufacturing, 2013. 26(7): p. 616-648.
[19] Courbon, C., Pusavec, F., Dumont, F., Rech, J., Kopac, J., Tribological behaviour of
rip

Ti6Al4V and Inconel718 under dry and cryogenic conditions—Application to the context
of machining with carbide tools. Tribology International, 2013. 66: p. 72-82.
sc

[20] Jawahir, I.S., Attia, H., Biermann, D., Duflou, J., Klocke, F., Meyer, D., Newman, S.T.,
Pusavec, F., Putz, M., Rech, J., Schulze, V., Cryogenic manufacturing processes. CIRP
nu

Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2016. 65(2): p. 713-736.


[21] Trabelsi, S., Morel, A., Germain, G., Bouaziz, Z., Tool wear and cutting forces under
Ma

cryogenic machining of titanium alloy (Ti17). The International Journal of Advanced


Manufacturing Technology, 2017. 91(5-8): p. 1493-1505.
[22] Huang, C., Zhao, Y., Xin, S., Zhou, W., Li, Q., Zeng, W., Effect of microstructure on
ed

tensile properties of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–1Zr alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds,


2017. 693: p. 582-591.
[23] Kar, S.K., Ghosh, A., Fulzele, N., Bhattacharjee, A., Quantitative microstructural
pt

characterization of a near beta Ti alloy, Ti-5553 under different processing conditions.


ce

Materials Characterization, 2013. 81: p. 37-48.


[24] Nag, S., Banerjee, R., Srinivasan, R., Hwang, J.Y., Harper, M., Fraser, H.L., ω-Assisted
Ac

nucleation and growth of α precipitates in the Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–0.5 Fe β titanium


alloy. Acta Materialia, 2009. 57(7): p. 2136-2147.
[25] Oxley, P.L.B., The mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assessing
machinability. 1990. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood Publisher.
[26] Knight, W.A., Boothroyd, G., Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools.
Vol. 198. 2005: CRC Press.

21

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

[27] Campbell Jr, F.C., Manufacturing technology for aerospace structural materials.
2011: Elsevier.
[28] Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., Newman, S.T., Environmentally conscious machining of
difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. International Journal of
Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2012. 57: p. 83-101.
[29] Jawahir, I.S., Ghosh, R., Fang, X.D., Li, P.X., An investigation of the effects of chip
flow on tool-wear in machining with complex grooved tools. Wear, 1995. 184(2): p. 145-

d
154.

te
[30] Guo, Y., Li, W., Jawahir, I.S., Surface integrity characterization and prediction in
machining of hardened and difficult-to-machine alloys: a state-of-art research review

di
and analysis. Machining Science and Technology, 2009. 13(4): p. 437-470.
[31] Manivannan, R., Kumar, M.P., Improving the machining performance characteristics

e
of the µEDM drilling process by the online cryogenic cooling approach. Materials and

py
Manufacturing Processes, 2017: p. 1-7.
[32] Kaynak, Y., Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel

Co
718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. The International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014. 72(5-8): p. 919-933.
[33] Stephenson, D.A., Agapiou, J.S., Metal cutting theory and practice. 2016: CRC press.

ot
[34] Wanigarathne, P.C., Liew, J., Wang, X., Dillon Jr, O.W., Jawahir, I.S., Assessment of
tN
process sustainability for product manufacture in machining operations. in Proceedings
of the Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle
Engineering, Berlin, Germany. 2004.
rip

[35] Jawahir, I.S., On the controllability of chip breaking cycles and modes of chip
breaking in metal machining. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 1990. 39(1): p. 47-
sc

51.
[36] Qin, D., Lu, Y., Guo, D., Zheng, L., Liu, Q., Zhou, L., Tensile deformation and fracture
nu

of Ti–5Al–5V–5Mo–3Cr–1.5 Zr–0.5 Fe alloy at room temperature. Materials Science and


Engineering: A, 2013. 587: p. 100-109.
Ma

[37] Mishra, R.S., Stolyarov, V.V., Echer, C., Valiev, R.Z., Mukherjee, A.K., Mechanical
behavior and superplasticity of a severe plastic deformation processed nanocrystalline
Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2001. 298(1): p. 44-50.
ed

[38] Groover, M.P., Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: materials processes, and


systems. 2007: John Wiley & Sons.
[39] Germain, G., Morel, A., Braham-Bouchnak, T., Identification of material constitutive
pt

laws representative of machining conditions for two titanium alloys: Ti6Al4V and Ti555-
ce

3. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 2013. 135(3): p. 031002.


[40] Kaynak, Y., Gharibi, A., Yilmaz, U., Koklu, U., Aslantas, K., A comparison of flood
Ac

cooling, Minimum quantity lubrication and High pressure coolant on machining and
surface integrity of titanium Ti-5553 alloy, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2018.
34:p.503-512.

22

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Figure Captions List

Fig. 1. Experimental setup for cryogenic machining application


Fig. 2. Example of measured temperature profile

d
Fig. 3. Measured maximum temperature during machining under Dry, LN2 and CO2

te
conditions
Fig. 4. Measured maximum flank wear under Dry, LN2 and CO2 conditions

di
Fig. 5. Tool-chip contact area resulting from Dry, LN2 and CO2 machining conditions
Fig. 6. Cross section of cutting tools used under Dry, LN2 and CO2 conditions at 210

e
m/min and comparison with fresh tool

py
Fig. 7. 3-D images of cutting tools used in various conditions at 210 m/min cutting speed
Fig. 8. Temperature vs hardness relationship for tungsten carbide cutting tool, adapted

Co
from Groover [38]
Fig. 9. The main cutting force under Dry, LN2 and CO2 machining conditions at varying
cutting speeds

ot
Fig. 10. The feed force under Dry, LN2 and CO2 machining conditions at varying cutting
tN
speeds
Fig. 11. The radial force under Dry, LN2 and CO2 machining conditions at varying cutting
speeds
rip

Fig. 12. The effects of strain rate and temperature on deformation response of Ti-5553
alloy adapted from Germain et al [39]
sc

Fig. 13. Specific cutting forces and material removal rate under Dry, LN 2 and CO2
machining conditions at varying cutting speeds
nu

Fig. 14. Generated chips under Dry, LN2 and CO2 machining conditions at varying cutting
speeds
Ma

Fig. 15. Average chip thickness as a function of cutting speed for Dry, LN 2 and CO2
machining conditions
Fig. 16. Dimensional deviation of workpiece produced resulting from Dry, LN2 and CO2
ed

machining conditions
Fig. 17. The effects of various machining conditions on surface and subsurface
microhardness of machined parts at 120 m/min
pt

Fig. 18. XRD analysis of parts machined under dry, LN2, and CO2 conditions at 120 m/min
ce

cutting speed
Ac

23

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

FIGURES

d
Thermal camera
CO2

te
di
Dynamometer
LN2 storage

e
CO2 tube tank

py
Dry
Data

Co
acquisition
Amplifier

LN2

ot
tN
rip

Fig. 1
sc
nu

Cutting tool
Chip
Ma

Workpiece
ed
pt
ce

Hot point
Ac

Fig. 2

24

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

800
Maximum Temperature, T (ºC)
Dry LN2 CO2
700

Decrease, T (°C)
600

d
te
500

di
400

e
300

py
200

Co
0 50 100 150 200
Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min)

ot
Fig. 3
tN
fit_wave2
rip

fit_wave5
fit_wave4
sc

Dry LN2 CO2


800
nu

% 22

600
VBmax (µm)

% 59
Increase VBmax

Ma

400
% 34
% 57
ed

200
pt

0
ce

0 50 100 150 200 250 300


Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min)
Ac

Fig. 4

25

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

1.0
Tool-Chip Contact Area, A (mm )
Dry LN2 CO2
2

0.8

d
% 17
te % 45
0.6

di
0.4

e
py
0.2

Co
0.0 Effect of cutting speed

0 50 100 150 200


Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min)

ot
Fig. 5tN
rip
sc
nu
Ma
ed
pt
ce
Ac

Fig. 6

26

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Dry
Dr CO2
CO LN
LN2
y 2 2

d
te
di
Plastic deformation

e
py
Co
Fig. 7

ot
tN
90
150 m/min
80
210 m/min
150 m/min
rip

70
210 m/min
Hardness (Rockwell C)

60
sc

Expected hardness
50 of the cutting tool
at cryogenic
nu

40 Expected hardness of the


machining cutting tool at dry
30 machining
Ma

20

10
ed

0
30 90 140 170 200 230 260 290 315 345 370 400 435 460 490 520 550 580 600 630 660 690 720 750 770
Temperature ( C)
pt

Fig. 8
ce
Ac

27

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Thermal effect Effect of wear

d
te
e di
py
Co
Fig. 9

ot
tN
rip

Effect of wear
sc
nu
Ma
ed

Fig. 10
pt
ce
Ac

28

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Effect of wear

d
te
e di
py
Fig. 11

Co
ot
tN
rip
sc
nu

(a) (b)
Fig. 12
Ma
ed
pt
ce
Ac

29

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

3
Material Removal Rate, MRR (mm /sec)
0 150
50 300
100 450
150 600
200

Specific cutting force, Ks (MPa) 3400


3200 Dry LN2 CO2
3000

d
2800

te
2600

di
2400
2200

e
2000

py
0 50 100 150 200
Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min)

Co
Fig. 13

Dry LN2
ot CO2
tN
Vc =30 m/min Vc =90 m/min Vc =120 m/min Vc =150 m/min Vc =210 m/min
rip
sc
nu
Ma
ed
pt
ce
Ac

Fig. 14

30

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

Dry LN2 CO2


280

Chip Thickness (µm)


240

200

d
te
160

di
120

e
py
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240
Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min)

Co
Fig. 15

ot
tN
rip
sc
nu
Ma
ed

Fig. 16
pt
ce
Ac

31

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Received June 26, 2018;
Accepted manuscript posted January 01, 2019. doi:10.1115/1.4042605
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Insert ASME Journal Title in the Header Here

350
Dry LN2 CO2 As Received
340
330
Microhardness (HV) 320
310
300

d
290
Softening

te
280
270

di
260

e
250

py
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Depth beneath the surface (µm)
Fig. 17

Co
ot
tN
rip
sc
nu
Ma
ed

Fig. 18
pt
ce
Ac

32

Downloaded From: https://manufacturingscience.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on 02/09/2019 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use

You might also like