Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/241269337
CITATIONS READS
0 41
1 author:
Andrey Petrin
Joint Institute for High Temperatures
86 PUBLICATIONS 317 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Andrey Petrin on 18 December 2013.
724 JETP 85 (4), October 1997 1063-7761/97/100724-04$10.00 © 1997 American Institute of Physics 724
The solution of the magnetostatic equations for given distribution of this force, and can be represented in the form
currents is given by the Biot–Savart law, g (r)5kw(r), where k is modulus of the force and the func-
E
tion w(r) is assumed to be zero outside the solid, unity in-
m0 j~ 2 ! 3r12
B~ 1 ! 5 dV 2 , side the solid, and continuously integrable in the vicinity of
4p V r 312 its boundary. If the coefficient k is large enough, the velocity
where the integration extends over all points in the volume V of the fluid inside the solid will be negligible. It will then be
at which currents exist. The symbol 1 refers to the coordi- assumed that in the limit where k tends to infinity, the fluid
nates of the point at which the field B is determined, the velocity near the surface and inside the object will be zero,
symbol 2 indicates the coordinates of points over which in- and the boundary conditions at the surface of the object will
tegration is performed, and r12 is the position vector from the automatically be satisfied. Physically it is clear that the in-
point of integration 2 to point 1; its length is coming stream of fluid will flow around this retarded, almost
stationary fluid as if it were a solid.
r 125 A~ x 1 2x 2 ! 2 1 ~ y 1 2y 2 ! 2 1 ~ z 1 2z 2 ! 2 . Using the frictional force introduced above, Eq. ~1! can
If we replace B by v and m 0 j by V in the magnetostatic be written over all space in the form:
equations, we obtain Eqs. ~5! and ~6!. Thus, the solution of ]v ¹p fv k
these equations for a given vorticity field V is 1 ~ v•¹ ! v52 2¹ w 1 2 w ~ r! v. ~12!
]t r r r
v~ 1,t ! 5
1
4p
E V
V~ 2,t ! 3r12
r 312
dV 2 . As before, we take the curl of Eq. ~12! and introduce the
vorticity field; we then obtain the differential equation
Since the vorticity field only differs appreciably from
zero near the object, this solution tends to zero with increas- ]V h k
1¹3 ~ V3v! 5 ¹ 2 V5 ¹3 ~ w ~ r! v! . ~13!
ing distance from the object. ]t r r
Note that Eqs. ~5! and ~6! are a linear system of equa-
As in Sec. 2, we transform to dimensionless primed vari-
tions, so that its solution is also the velocity field
ables in accordance with Eq. ~4!. We then obtain an equation
v~ 1,t ! 5e1
1
4p
E V
V~ 2,t ! 3r12
r 312
dV 2 . ~10!
similar to ~7!:
] V8 1
The velocity field calculated according to Eq. ~10! not 1¹8 3 ~ V8 3v8 ! 5 ¹ 8 2 V8 5K¹8 3 ~ w ~ r8 ! v8 ! ,
]t8 R
only satisfies Eqs. ~5! and ~6! but also the boundary condi- ~14!
tion ~9! far from the object.
Thus, if the distribution of the vorticity field is known at where K5kD/ r V, and R5 r VD/ h is, as before, the Rey-
a certain time, this field can be found at the next instant via nolds number for the given problem.
the integrodifferential equation Omitting the primes, we finally obtain
] V~ 1,t !
]t F
1¹3 V~ 1,t ! 3 e1
1
4p S E
V
V~ 2,t ! 3r12
r 312
dV 2 DG ¹•v50,
¹3v5V,
~15!
~16!
1 2
5 ¹ V~ 1,t ! , ~11! ]V 1
R 1¹3 ~ V3v! 5 ¹ 2 V2K ~ ¹3 ~ wv! 1wV! . ~17!
]t R
where the nabla operator acts on the coordinates denoted by
the index 1. The first term in parentheses in Eq. ~17! is nonzero near
However, the problem is that integration in Eq. ~11! is the boundary of the object around which fluid flows, since
performed over all space, and if the vorticity field inside the the vector field ¹w is nonzero near this boundary and is
object is assumed to be zero, the vorticity field distribution directed into the object. The integral of ¹w along any curve
obtained from Eq. ~11! will automatically fail to satisfy the beginning outside the object and ending inside the object will
boundary condition at the surface of the object around which be unity. Thus, this term is determined by the tangential
the fluid flows. component of the velocity at the boundary.
The second term in parentheses in Eq. ~17! is only non-
zero inside the object, and is zero outside.
3. SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM
The solution of Eqs. ~15! and ~16! that satisfies the
To satisfy this boundary condition, either the problem boundary condition at infinity is given by Eq. ~10!, as in Sec.
must be formulated over all space, or the boundary condi- 2. Thus, the integrodifferential equation for the problem has
tions must be determined for the vorticity field. the form
F S DG
To automatically allow for the boundary conditions at
the surface of the object, we assume that the object consists
of the surrounding incompressible fluid which is exposed to
] V~ 1,t !
]t
1¹3 V~ 1,t ! 3 e1
1
4p
EV
V~ 2,t ! 3r12
r 312
dV 2
F S D
the action of an external, fairly large, effective bulk frictional
force f f r 52 g (r)v inside the object around which the fluid
flows. The coefficient g (r) takes into account the spatial
5
1 2
R
¹ V~ 1,t ! 2K ¹w3 e1
1
4p
EV
V~ 2,t ! 3r12
r 312
dV 2
S S S DD D
tends to zero, will tend to the solution of Eqs. ~5!–~7! with ¹w ~ r! 52 . ~23!
s 1 1 2
r
the boundary conditions ~8! and ~9!. exp r2 11
s 2
Substituting expressions ~22! and ~23! into the system
4. TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM ~19! and ~20!, we obtain an integrodifferential equation for
the approximate problem of two-dimensional flow around a
We consider two-dimensional flow around a cylinder of
cylinder. Solving this equation and making the coefficient K
arbitrary cross section. We direct the z axis of a rectangular
tend to infinity and the coefficient s tend to zero, we obtain
Cartesian coordinate system along the generatrix of the cyl-
a rigorous solution of this problem.
inder; the velocity field will then only have components in
Knowing the distribution of the velocity field from the
the x and y directions, and the vorticity field will only have
solution of Eqs. ~19! and ~20!, we can determine the dimen-
a z component which will be a function of x and y. Then for
sionless drag and lift coefficients of a circular cylinder. In
this component of the vorticity field, Eq. ~18! has the form
fact, the force acting on the cylinder from the fluid is equal to
]Vz ]Vz ]Vz 1 2 the modulus of the resultant effective frictional force intro-
1vx 1vy 5 ¹ V z 2K @~ ¹w3v! z 1wV z # ,
]t ]x ]y R duced earlier. If the fluid velocity at infinity is directed along
~19! the x axis, the dimensionless drag coefficient C d and the
dimensionless lift coefficient C a can be expressed in terms of
where the nabla operator only acts on the x and y coordinates
the dimensionless velocity:
~two-dimensional operator!, and the velocity field is
v~ x 1 ,y 1 ,t ! 5e1
1
2p
E @ V z ~ x 2 ,y 2 ,t ! r12#
r 212
dx 2 dy 2 , ~20! C d5
Fd
r V 2 DL/2
52K E w ~ x,y !v x ~ x,y ! dx dy, ~24!
S S DD
w ~ r! 5 , ~21! acts not only inside the cylinder but outside as well. In the
1 D
exp r2 11 calculations this leads to a slight overestimate of the dimen-
d 2
sionless drag coefficient C d compared with its experimental
where D is the cylinder diameter, r5 Ax 2 1y 2 , and d is ap- value, since the layers of fluid outside the volume are addi-
proximately equal to the distance from the surface of the tionally retarded. This additional retardation is observed up
cylinder, on which the function is essentially unity inside the to distances of several s from the cylindrical surface, so that
cylinder and zero outside the cylinder ~similar to the Fermi– as s decreases, the coefficient C d should approach its accu-
Dirac distribution, whose properties are well-known!. Cast in rate value.
dimensionless coordinates, the function ~21! has the form The calculations showed that this is in fact the case. The
calculations were performed on a uniform grid with
1
s 50.005, K540, and R5400. The drag coefficient ob-
S S DD
w ~ x,y ! 5 , ~22!
1
Ax 2 1y 2 2
1 tained in the calculations was approximately C d 51.8. The
exp 11
s 2 value of C d varied slightly with time ~less than by 0.1! as a