Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.1 Introduction
World Plastic for Construction Industries is provided with one 30 kW air compressors as shown
in figure 5.1 operating on 7 bar pressure to serve different processes in the facility.
The compressor is connected to 1500 liters receiver (air tank) then to compressed air network
that serve 9 production lines (6 extrusion lines and 3 injection lines) and the raw material mixer,
energy audit tem measured the compressor power consumption during 24 hour period and
conducted FAD test and leakage test in order to find the potentials of saving.
It was noted that the average loading power is 20 kW and there is unloading periods due to
large amount of air leaks.
25.00
20.00
Power (kW)
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
:0 :5 :4 :3 :2 :1 :0 :5 :4 :3 :2 :2 :1 :0 :5 :4 :3 :2 :1 :0 :5 :5 :4 :3 :2 :1 :0 :5 :4
12 12 13 14 1 5 1 6 17 17 18 19 2 0 2 1 22 23 23 0 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11
Time
20.00
15.00
Power (kW)
10.00
5.00
0.00
9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7
9 :5 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:1 0:1 0:1 0:1 0:1 0:2 0:2 0:2 0:2 0:2 0:3 0:3 0:3 0:3 0:3 0:4 0:4 0:4 0:4 0:4 0:5 0:5 0:5 0:5
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Time
5.3 Compressed air flow rate measurement: Free Air Delivery (FAD) of
Compressors
The compressors are designed to deliver a certain amount of compressed air per unit time at a
specified pressure. Normally compressor capacity is specified in terms of liters per second at a
specific delivery pressure.
Compressed air flow rate can be measured and calculated by three methods:
1. Inserted hot wire flow meter. The air flow rate was measured at the discharge
compressed air pipe by inserting an air velocity sensor through the pipe that is crossing
the main discharge.
2. Suction Velocity method. This method is based on the measuring the velocity of
the air sucked by the compressor, then multiplying this value by the cross
sectional area of the air inlet.
3. Pump up method, it is the simplest method and can easily be carried out without
complicated measurements. This method will be explained later.
Free Air Delivery (FAD) test was conducted in the facility for all compressors. The method used
to calculate the Free Air Delivery (FAD) for every compressor is called the "pump up method".
This method depends on measuring the time needed to fill a certain volume (air receiver). The
following steps illustrate how this test can be performed:
6- Keep the watch running until you notice that the compressor in unloading. At that instant
stop your watch, and record the time the compressor took to fill the receiver, also record
the pressure at which the compressor was unloaded.
7- Now , to calculate the FAD of the compressor , the following equation is followed:
FAD = [VR × (P2-P1) / t] × (273 +Tamb) / (273+T2)
Where,
t :Time needed to fill the receiver and the interconnecting pipes, in seconds.
It should be mentioned here that this test should be carried out periodically, in order to use it
as an indicator about the presence of a problem in the compressor, in order to fix this problem
as soon as possible to avoid unnecessary additional cost when the compressed air system is
operated inefficiently. The FAD test results are shown below:
The specific energy consumption depends on the type of compressor, capacity, and compressed
air flow rate, operating pressures, etc. In calculating the specific power consumption in
compressor, the power consumption by the compressor was measured by using power quality
analyzer.
The specific energy consumption was calculated for all compressors and the results are given in
table 5.2
The previous table shows the Specific Power Consumption (SPC) and Free Air Delivery for the
existing compressor, which is the main two factors to compare compressors with each other’s.
A new 30 kW compressor deliver around 99 L/S of compressed air at 7.5 bars with SPC less than
0.3 kW/(L/S), which is more efficient than the existing air compressor.
Loading Time
Leakage % =
Loading Time+Unloading Time
Leakage is expressed in terms of the percentage of compressor capacity lost. The percentage
lost to leakage should be less than 10% in a well-maintained system.
The leakage test was conducted in World Plastic for Construction Industries and it was 49%,
which means about 50% of the compressor consumption during the tear are going to recover
air leaks in the compressed air network and should be reduced to reach at least 10%, figures
below shows the major air leaks in the facility.
As shown in section 5.4 before, the percentage of air leaks is 49% based on the leakage test
that applied in the factory during off day. Air leaks can be reduced through maintenance and
replacing some of the fittings on the compressed air network to be reduced to 10% which is the
maximum acceptable percentage of air leaks in any compressed air network.
To calculate the amount of savings we have to calculate the annual energy consumption for the
compressor based on the following data:
Annual operation hours = 6,240 hour (5 days of operation per week for 24 hours)
Annual energy cost for air compressor = 124,800 kWh/year X 0.09 JOD/kWh = 11,232 JOD/year
The minimum saving percentage should be 35% of compressor consumption by repairing air
leaks, the savings:
Capital Cost = 1,000 JOD (cost of replacing some pipes and fittings)
As shown in section 5.3 before, the free air delivery test shows that the compressor delivers
68.4 l/s of compressed air at 7 bars with SPC of 0.38 kW/(l/s), comparing this number with new
compressors, new compressors with same capacity can deliver 99 l/s at SPC of less than 0.3
kW/(l/s) as shown in table 5.4 below.
In order to calculate the percentage of savings by installing new more efficient air compressor,
we have to calculate difference between specific power consumptions for both the existing and
the proposed air compressors.
Saving % = 21%
Capital Cost = 15,000 JOD (estimated cost for new air compressor)
7.6.3 Install Air Blowers for Cleaning Process Instead of Using Compressed Air.
Some of bad practices were noted during the energy audit, such as using of compressed air for
cooling process as shown in figure 5.5 below.
This process used for two production lines which operates according to the following table.
Production Line OH in 2016 Pipe Diameter (mm) Air Velocity (m/s) Flow Rate (L/s)
EX 2 3,769 9 15 0.95
EX 3 4,350 9 15 0.95
The average air speed were measured by Anemometer and also the pipe diameter that used for
the cooling process, and the average flow rate for air were calculated and it was around 0.95
L/s.
In order to calculate how much energy lost from this process we have to consider in the
calculation the amount of air flow and SPC for the compressor and also the operational hours of
each production line, and table 5.7 below show all these parameters.
Table 5.6: energy losses due to cooling process using compressed air.
Air blowers can be used Instead of using compressed air for such process, a 200 Watt air blower
can produce air flow similar to the air flow from the compressed air pipe.
(kW)
EX 2 3,769 0.2 753.8
EX 3 4,350 0.2 870
Total 1,623.8
As shown in table above the annual consumption for the new air blowers around 1,620
kWh/year instead of 2,930 kWh/year due to using compressed air.
Capital Cost = 300 JOD (estimated cost for new two air blowers)