2011 02 Milan JPrat Ris 24

SARDANA project
Scalable
Advanced SARDANA showcase
Ring-based passive Milan, February 2011
Dense FTTH Council Europe 2011
Access
Network
Architecture European Commission, 7th Framework Programme
Activity: FP7 ICT-1-1.1 - Network of the Future
Grant agreement n.217122 (SARDANA)
STREP 2008-2010, 2.6 MEuro
Participant name Short name Country
1 Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Spain

UPC
2 France Telecom / Orange France
FT
3 Tellabs Finland
TELLABS
4 Intracom S.A. Telecom Solutions Greece
IntraCOM
5 Instituto de Telecomumicações Portugal
IT
6 High Institute of Communication Italy
and Information Technology ISCOM
7 Research and Education Laboratory Greece
in Information Tech.
AIT
1 SARDANA showcase, Milan, February 2011, FTTH Council Europe 2011 jprat@tsc.upc.edu
ToC
1. Project organization
2. Concept and Architecture
3. Main Results
Back-up
SARDANA pre-history
ePhoton BONE
EC-NoE EC-NoE
networks
SCALING SARDANA
(UPC-TELLABS) EC-STREP
photonics
EuroFOS
EC-NoE
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Partner location, profiles, tasks
Profiles and expertises UPC FT TLB ICOM IT ISC AIT UPC: Coordination, ONU, RN subsystems.
Netw.&Serv. Operator X FT: Architecture definition, ONU, Field-trial,
PON equipment provider X plann Technical management, Techno-
ed Economic studies.
Service platform provider X Tellabs: GPON equipment, MAC, lab-

demonstration.
WDM-PON expertise X X
IntraCOM: Management &Control plane, Service
Monitoring techniques X X platform.
Impairment compensation X X IT: Monitoring system, non-linear
transmission.
Semiconductor photonics X X X
Remote amplification X X X ISCOM: Remote nodes, non-linear amplification.
High bit-rate systems X X AIT: Electronic PON impairment

compensation, Techno-Economic studies.
Task-time effort distribution
Project funded by the European

Commission with 4.2 / 2.6M€
/ 7 partners
/ 3 years
WP-Ar
Network Architecture
4 5
1 2 3
WP-Tr 6a 7
WP-Im WP-Mc
System Transmission 6b Impairment 8 MAC & Higher Layers
Monitor.
9a 10 9b
&
WP-Sy Compens. 12
Subsystems: RN, ONT, OLT 11

: Dependence
13 14 : Specif. asses.
WP-Dm
Demonstration and Field Trial
Project phases
•2008 •2009 •2010 •FTTHc
•Barcelona •Milan
•Barcelona
•Athens •Paris •Madeira •Espoo •Rome •Athens •Lanion
•Brussels • Espoo
•10-March Jun Sep Oct
DEMO DEMO
ORGANIZATION IMPLEM. IMPLEMENTATION INTEGRATION DEMOs
DESIGN
STUDY 1st PROT. FINAL PROTOTYPE.
RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH
•RISK
• Prototype and test Phases of Sardana:

– Current GPON-compatible 2.5G/1.25G
– 10G/2.5G for Demo
– 10G/10G with advanced techniques.
ToC
3. Main Results
Aim positioning
• SARDANA aims at achieving:
– higher performances than GPON (L, ONUs, BW, resilience),
– but at a similar cost (passive PON, reflective ONU, etc).
– and maximum compatibility with ngGPON
performances
AON
SARDANA
WDM/TDM PON
GPON
EPON
APON
cost
Fundamental goals
• Maximize:
– N. served users (>1000 per fibre ring)
– Served area (100Km)
– Served capacity (10Gbit/s x 32)
• Minimize: UNLIMITED PON
– Infrastructure COST
• N. Fibres / cables
• N. Cabinets
• N. Active areas
• Civil work investments
• Musts:
– Passive external plant
– Single fibre access SARDANA CO
Standard
– Scalability and upgradeability 10G-GPON
OLT
Optical
Interface MUX
SARDANA ONT
& Standard
– Compatibility with g/e-PON MAC SERVICE
Standard
Optical
PUMP SARDANA
refl.optical
Interface
10G-PON
10G-GPON & PON ONT
– Robustness: PLATFORM
OLT
Interface
ROUT.
&
• Protection Standard
xPON
Optical MONIT.
Interface
• Monitoring and electronic compensation OLT
CONTROL
(control&management, monitoring, compensation)
Future Networks Concertation meeting, Brussels 11-12 March 2008

Initiatives towards NG-PON
1. BIT-RATE INCREASE (XGPON, to 10G)

– IEEE 802.3av Task Force
• DS:1570nm, US: 1300nm
– FSAN XGPON 10G/2.5G
2. REACH EXTENSION
– GPON new TX/RX classes: C (30dB), C+(32dB)
+
– ITU-G.984.6 Mid-span Extender (20 to 60 Km)
3. WDM (NUMBER OF CHANNELS / SERVICES):

– ITU-G.984.5
– NG-PON-1 (coexistence, same fibre plant)
– NG-PON-2
Architecture basis
ACCESS TREE METRO RING
ONU
N2
ONU N1 N3
ONU
OLT λU ,…,λU
Ni
ONU NN
Nj
+
WDM-RING + TDM-TREE
1:K ONU
ON
(SARDANA) λD1,…, λDm

RN2 ONU
ON
RN1 λU 1,…, λU2N

ONU
ON • Resilience
TDM TREE
Upstream Signals
RNi • Access-metro all-optical
1:K ONU
ON
ONU convergence
CO WDM RING ONU
ON
RSOA
RNj
• Flexible RN allocation
λU1,…, λU2N PIN/APD
and routing
1:K
RNN Bidirectional Transmission • Fibre savings
RNN-1
ONU
ON
λ D
m+1,…, λD2N Downstream Signals
SARDANA architecture def.
• Resilient trunk
• Fully passive
• Hybrid: 1:K ONU
ON
• WDM Metro ring λD1,…, λDm
ONU
ON
• TDM Access trees RN2
RN1 λU 1,…, λU2N
ONU
ON
• Cascadable remote nodes RNi TDM TREE

Upstream Signals 1:K ONU
ON
ONU
• New adoption of remotely-
pumped amplification
CO WDM RING ONU
ON
RSOA
RNj
• Colourless ONU λU1,…, λU2N PIN/APD
• RSOA 1:K
RNN Bidirectional Transmission
• Tunable laser RNN-1
ONU
ON
• 10G-2.5G (1G-100Mb /user) λD m+1,…, λD2N Downstream Signals

• 100 Km
• 1000 users
• Multi-operator
• Based on GPON, but SARDANA PON
transparent.
• IP trafic
Approach and basic modules
• WDM ring: Resilience • Passive Remote Nodes (RN):

– Cascadable Add&Drop
• (up to 1.2Tbit/s) – 2-to-1 fibre interface
• TDM trees – Remotely pumped (from CO)
optical amplification by EDFs
1:K ONU
ON
– Athermal splitters and fixed
λD1,…, λ D
m
ONU
ON 1:K ONU filters
RN2 ON
RN1 λU 1,…, λUm ONU

ON
RNi TDM TREE

Upstream Signals 1:K ONU
ON
CO ONU
RSOA
WDM RING ONU
ON
RNj
λU m+1,…, λU2N
1:K
RNN Bidirectional Transmission
RNN-1
ONU
ON
λD m+1,…, λD2N Downstream Signals

• Simple colourless ONU:
• CO (OLT): – Reflective
– Centralizes the light generation and control – Single fibre & wavelength
– Stack of lasers serving TDM trees
– Standard G/E-PON equipment adapted to SARDANA
Sardana, how it works
Centralized light generation

Passive Outside Plant
Scalability
Resiliency
Traffic Balance
Multi Operability
Remote Amplification
Higher User Density >1000

Long reach – 100km
Symmetric 100Mbps
How it works?
CO
RNn RN1
λi1& 200GHz
2
Signals
The CO sends WDM signals RN i 50/50
to the Remote Nodes (RN)
Each RN drops its assigned
channels ast the Once amplified, the signals
corresponding wavelength are transmitted to the ONUs
by 2 filters and a 50/50 for Upstream signal path is
resilience that splits the marked with static figures
signals to 2 TDM trees
Signals are amplified by
EDFs
The Remote Nodes receive λi1
the pumping power for the 100GHz λi2
EDFs from the WDM ring
1:16
2:2
1:16
1km
1:32
The evolution towards…
Scalability
Back-scattering+
Protection
Ring
Another Ring
Pay as you grow RN
Scenarios for dimensioning study cases
Depending on :
Max Tree Pump
• Scenarios Tree Trees Guar.
distanc Ring Feede Splitte (W)
• Available technologies, Drop (λs) ONUs BW
e Km r Km r Goal
• PON standards, Km (2xRN) (10G)
Scenarios Km (max) tbd
• Performances aimed. 32
URBAN 1 20 17 2.9 0.1 1:64 2048 >140M 1.2
(2x16)
32
URBAN 2 20 10 9 1 1:32 1024 >280M 1.2
(2x16)
16
METRO 60 50 9 1 1:32 512 >280M 1.2 / 5
(2x8)
16
RURAL 100 80 19 1 1:16 256 >560M 5
(2x8)
COLLECTO
20-60 80 19 1 16 1:8 128x 300M /
R (2x8) 1G
WDM-PON 80 - 32 - 32 10G
LRNi LFE LDR
∆LRN
SARDANA CO
FEEDERi DROPij
10G-PON Optical
OLT Interface MUX
RN1 RN2 RNi-1 SARDANA ONTij
&
Standard
PUMP refl.optical
SERVICE 10G-PON Optical 10G-PON
PLATFORM OLT Interface
& RING RNi Interface
ONT
ROUT.
&
x PON Optical MONIT.
OLT Interface RNN RNN-1 RNi+1
CONTROL
(control&management, monitoring, compensation)
SARDANA PON
Remote Node as new Network Element
• ”Transparent Ring-Tree WDM/TDM-PON Architecture” (proposal of Sardana

architecture for NGPON2), Kyoto ● November 2009
L R
Ring (left) RNi Ring (right)
1-3 1-3
λWDM, λPUMP λWDM, λPUMP The presented ring-
tree ngPON2
1-4
D architecture enables
Tree (drop/add) resilient 10G/2.5G
λi, λi+1 access to scalable
1024 customers
Supporting ITU Standards distributed in 100Km
with 32 wavelengths,
ITU-T G.983 PON ITU-T G.808
Generic protection achieving:
protection
switching – higher performances
• L, ONUs, BW, resilience,
Ring-Tree – at a similar cost
Remote Node • passive PON, refl.ONU..
– maximum compatibility
ITU-T G.984.6 ITU-T G.973 • with ngPON
Extender Box ROPA for
submarine
Remote Nodes
• Add/drop
• Diversity resilience
FIXED RECONFIGURABLE
• Interface:
– Ring – tree
λi1, 2, 3, 4 200GHz
– 2 – 1 fibre Signals
50/50
λi1
• Passive (no powering)
RN i Rest
• Remotely pumped Common
optical amplification ONU

λi1 ONU
50GHz 100GHz λi3
• 2 wl dropped 1:16
λi1, i2 λi3, i4 50GHz
1:16
2km
• Burst tolerant 1:16

2:2 2:2
1:16
1km
• Fixed / Reconfigurable
Wavelength allocation
• In SARDANA there is a significant dependency of:
– the power budget
– on the wavelength allocation of US/DS channels
– on the pump generation for remote amplification.
• SARDANA wavelength allocation plan

– possible compatibility with XGPON1
– not with video overlay
SARDANA inter-operability & multi-operability
• Proposal of multi-operability models
SARDANA multi-operability
Physical layer L2/L3
Techno-economics aspects
SARDANA res-WDM/TDM-PON
• CAPEX
1 2 NSplitCe
– Analysis of:
RN
• PASSIVE: res-WDM-PON res-TDM-PON
– Fibre infrastructure
– Remote Node
• ACTIVE:
– ONU 3000
– OLT SA RDANA
WDM/TDM-P ON
2500
– Pump WDM/PON
– Monitoring and protection TDM-P ON
C o s t (e u ro s) p e r H o m e
2000
– Active equipment price estimation

1500
and learning curve
– CAPEX (overall for SARDANA & 1000
GPON): Cost/user vs. density 500
• SARDANA is cost effective in a 0 1,000 2,000 3 ,000

Home densi ty (Homes/Km2 )
4,0 00 5,000
wider range of user densities.

SARDANA GREEN TOUCH
Power per user per Gbit/s [W/Gbit/s]

100
P-t-P 1G Cu unlimited
• Deep analisys has been EPON 1G/1G
performed in order to compare P-t-P 10G
WDM PON 1G/1G
the SARDANA approach with the SARDANA 1

GPON
main access technologies.
10
• In principle two SARDANA

situations have been considered: SARDANA 2
SARDANA1 and SARDANA2. EPON10G/10G
1
First one is SARDANA with “non 1 10 100 1000
commercial” devices. Second is Total number of users per CO
Power per user per Gbit/s [W/Gbit/s]

SARDANA with market ready 1000
Cu = 100 Gbit/s P-t-P 10G
components. P-t-P 1G
WDM PON 1G/1G
EPON 1G/1G
100
SARDANA 1
• In figure are reported the results GPON
for unlimited and limited
upstream. SARDANA, especially 10
the version 2, express the best

performances in terms of power
EPON10G/10G SARDANA 2
efficiency. 1
1 10 100 1000
Total number of users per CO
Goals vs Approach
USERS:
ONE-ORDER OF MAGNITUDE
EXTENSION 64 -> 1000
HOMES 100Km LENGTH
SCALABLE & 1.25G -> 10Gbit/s, for Integrate: Metro &
UPGREADABLE symmetrical Access
300 Mbit/s
WDM RING +
< COST
TDM TREESPASSIVE EXTERNAL
INFRASTRUCTURE PLANT
MINIMIZED
BIDIRECTIONAL SINGLE-
FIBRE ACCESS
NO MAINTENANCE, NO
POWERING Identical reflective
COLOURLESS ONUs
CENTRALIZED
management and light
ROBUSTNESS generation DYNAMIC EE, and
resource allocation
GPON, xPON
COMPATIBLE
NEUTRAL NETWORK
MULTI-OPERATOR
ToC
3. Main Results
1. Research
2. Publications
3. Development
4. Demo
Transmission issues and proposed
solutions
PROBLEM PROPOSED SOLUTION REF
Rayleigh BS & Wavelength shifting at ONU by SC-SSB JLT 9-09 (pat)
reflections
“ Wavelength Conversion via Four-Wave Mixing in SOA-based OFC’10 OThG4,
ONUs JLT
“ OLT wavelength dithering ECOC P421
“ Optimal MUX positioning and ONU gain PTL 1-10
“ + burst mode Rayleigh Back-scattering reduction by means of Quantized ECOC’10
Feedback Equalization in WDM-PONs
Limited BW of RSOA Chirped-managed RSOA with offset-filtering and DFE/FFE 10G OFC’09 OThA7
“ RSOA electronic equalization using MLSE at 10G OFC’10 OWG2
“ Uncooled DML + EE OFC’09 OWE3
“ Direct 10-Gb/s Modulation of a Single-Section RSOA in PONs JLT, 7-2010.
With High Optical Budget
Wavelength reuse Integrated colorless optical FSK demodulation with Fabry- ECOC’09 We7.5.6
crosstalk Perot SOA/REAM at 10G (pat)
Multiple Down-stream cancellation techniques… ECOC’09 We8.5.4
“ Periodic filtering at ONU OFC’10 OWG4
(pat)
“ Colourless SCM/IM NFOEC’10 NWB5
…
PROBLEM PROPOSED & SHOWN SOLUTION REF
WL reuse + disper. SSB with Manchester coding ECOC’09 P6.26
Fibre non-linearities Genetic algorithm for wavelength and power allocation OFC’09 JThA77
BW inefficiency Homodyne PSK OFC’10 JThA3 (pat)
Limited reach RN EDFA Pump from ONU ASE OFC’10 JThA33
“ Reconfigurable RN ECOC’08 (pat)
“ Active/Passive Extender Box JOCN 9-09
“ C+L mixed pump ECOC’09 We.P6.19
“ Energy-Efficient Optical Access Networks Supported by a ECOC’10 (pat)
Noise-Powered Extender Box
Split + Reach + 10G Self-Pumped Dense (40λ×32 split) PON with Extended 30 ECOC10
bidirectional dB Loss Budget and ONUs Comprising a 10 Gb/s RSOA
EDF transients Burst pre-carving ECOC’09 We.P6.24
Cost efficiency Quantitative Techno-economic Comparison of Current ECOC’10
and Next Generation Metro/Access Converged Optical
Networks
• > 70 international publications

• 4 patents applications
• Invited papers to OFC, ECOC, OSA-ANIC, ICTON, MIT,
Multilayer integrated network
SERVICE
FUNCTIONALITIES: PLATFORM
• Resilience
SARDANA
• Multi-operator capability CONTROL & MANAGEMENT PLANES
• Multi-rate coexistence
• OMC Control&Management plane Standard
MAC SARDANA
• 10G XGPON MAC MONITORS
MAC LAYER
10G-GPON
SARDANA MAC
• DBA (simulation) IMPAIRMENT
MAC
COMPENS.
MONITOR.
• In-service monitoring
&
• Impairment-aware routing COMPENSAT. Standard
SYSTEMS PHY SARDANA
• Eye-safeness MONITORS
10G-GPON
PHYSICAL LAYER OLT-ONT
PHY
COMPENS.
INFRASTRUCTURE LAYER
Functional layered model of SARDANA.
Multilayer testbed
From Espoo to Lannion
• The stakeholder demo took place in Espoo Finland

28-10-10
• Services over SARDANA were successfully
demonstrated
• Experience from the demo was used to improve the
system performance
– MAC operation Upstream and Ranging
– Burst transmitter optics
– Protection and monitoring system
• System was shipped to Lannion in early December
– Reintegration took place December to January
SARDANA testbed ENSSAT ENSSAT
ScreenA
ScreenA’ HDTV ScreenB’ HDTV ScreenB ScreenC ScreenD PC
HDTV
1G 1G 1G
SERVICE #A SERVICE #B SERVICE #C SERVICE #A SERVICE #B SERVICE #C SERVICE #D SERVICE #E

CPC
VIDEO SERVER VCG BNG STB VidConf STB PC
CLI OMCI 1G 1G 1G 1G 1G 1G 1G 1G
ETHERNET SWITCHS (4xCX4+24xGE) Media CPC Media Media ETHERNET

Converter Converter Converter SWITCH
CX4 SFP 1G XFP 10G
SFP SFP SFP XFP

OMCI
10G 10G 1G 10G
(1G) 1G CLI 1G 1G 10G
SFP TriSpeed SFP XFP

XFP Ethernet ports
CX4 OLT.48 ONU.51
O/E O/E O/E O/E O/E
MAC MAC
EvBo-85 EvBo-85 EvBo EvBo EvBo
LVECL LVECL LVECL
LVECL LVECL
SER-DES SER-DES
LVECL
LVECL BE BE BE
Dt Dr BE LoS Dt Dr Dt Dr
Dt Dr Dt Dr Re Dt Dr Dt Dr
Dt Dr Dt Dr
doca
CML CML CML CML UPC CML UPC CML CML
UPC
TX-50 RX-50 TX-52 RX-52 SFP-5 TTX-63 RX-58 TX-21 RX-21 TX-23 RX-23 TX-22 RX-22 SFP-6 TTX-62 RX59
PIN PIN PIN APD APD APD 1550.52
& oSW PIN
1551.32 1552.93 1550.52 1553.73 RSOA RSOA RSOA
1552.93
Fuj Zen Fuj Fuj Fuj Fuj Fuj
monit ONU ONU

% % %
ONU21 ONU23 ONU22 50 62
SC/APC
PROTECTION & MONITOR PC OTDR

SC/APC
FC/PC
LC LC FD1
AWG1 AWG2 AWG3 AWG4
DROP
UPC 30ºC UPC-ISCOM TLB IT
Sp1a Sp1b Sp2a Sp2b Sp3a Sp3b
Pump1
DCF1 1480nm
FEEDER FF1a FF1b

BoW W FR1d 1550.52 1551.32 FR2d 1554.54 1553.73 FR3d 1552.17 1552.93
SC/APC FR1u RN-501 FR2u RN-54rec FR3u RN-52

PrW
PP RING ENSSAT
BoE E FR4d
RNN
FR4u
PrE
OPM OSA OSC BERT
OLT
Espoo demo setup 21.-28.10
CPC
10G Switch
ETHoUS
Video ePC Demos:
Server
OLT1 OLT2
1) HD-video DS
Pump P&M Pump 2) HD-video US
dMux Mux Mux dMux 3) p2p Ethernet
pamp bamp bamp pamp
4) Protection switch
5) Service control
X
E-5km W-5km
RN1 5km 5km RN2
RRN
split3 split1 split2
ETHoUS
2km 2km
ePC
CPC
ONU1 ONU2
Espoo - OLT- MAC and TX1/TX2
The services and management connect

Service Switch to the Service switch 1GE ports (on the
10G-1 10G-2
10G-3 back)
1) Service switch connects to OLT1-

Tx1 OLT2 MAC via 10GE (CX4) ports.
OLT3 10G-1
2) OLT1-2 MAC connects to TX1-TX2
OLT2 downstream transmitters via fiber.
10G-2
OLT1
10G-3
3) TX1-TX3 connect via multiplexers to
the downstream ring fibers.
Tx2
4) OLT MAC RX1-2 connect from
Tx3 upstream ring fibers via demultiplexers
Tx3
Espoo ONU – MAC and TXb
1) CPE STBs connect to ONU High

defintion video service port (HD-sp).
HD-sp
ONU2
2) The ONU1-2 MAC connects to TXb1-2
HD-sp
ONU1 via SMA cabling.
3) The ONU1-2 MAC RX connects to

TX2b
RX1-2 with fiber.
4) TXb1-2 connects to drop fibers (2-

5km).
TX1b
5) Drop fibers go to splitters 1-2 which
connect to feeder fibers.
split1 split2
Feeder1 6) Feeder fibers (5-15km) connect to the
Feeder2
RN1-2.
dropf
OLT- DWDM MUX/DEMUX
1) The OLT TX1-2 connect DS to

either East or West DWDM MUX
W-PA E-PA 2) The OLT RX1-2 connect US to
either East or West DWDM DEMUX
Wd-MUX When the protection and monitoring
Ed-MUX system is used the connections go
Wu-DMUX via it.
Eu-DMUX 3) There is a pre-amplifier (PA)

upstream for all wavelengths before
the DWDM DEMUX.
There is also a boost amplifier (BA)
downstream for all wavelengths
after the DWDM MUX.
PA1 4) DS and US fiber spools (5-25km) run

P&M between the OLT and the RN1-2
PA2
OLT- P&M + DWDM MUX + PUMP
W-PA E-PA
Wd-MUX
W-PUMP E-PUMP
Ed-MUX
Wu-DMUX
Eu-DMUX
E-U5km
W-U5km
RN1-3
RN3
Feeder1 RN1
Feeder2 RN2
From Espoo to Lannion
• The demo system in Espoo had all the equipment

co-located
• Lannion trial has distributed equipment on several
sites
– This makes it more challenging and exciting
• We continue to improve the robustness as we go
from Lannion to FTTH Council in Milan
– Next week testing continues
SARDANA Field-Trial (Lannion, 20th January 2010)
The Orange Labs

facilities are connected to
a 18 Km "open" fiber
network.
This fiber network is
located along the
Bretagne Lannion area,
and managed by the
cluster Media&Network.
12-fibre ring cable plus
distribution trees.
Reintegration of
SARDANA systems took
place December to
January
Field trial fibre connectivity
Imagin Lab
Showroom
12x18km Ring Fibers
Tree Fiber
Fibers to RN
Hotel Enterprises (up&dwn)
Y km X km
RNrec RN2
Y km X km 100/5%
2km 2km 2.5km
2.8dB
ONU23 Detailed
next slide
ONU22
Orange Lab 8700m ;
1,6dB Up (#13)
8800m ; 2dB Dwn (#14)
2,35dB Up (#13)
1.7dB Dwn (#14)
Boucle optique
RN1
lannionaise
12 x 16 km
2km 2km
Images & Réseaux
Entreprises
Lab LD910
(PERSYST)
Lab LF028
#14
ENSSAT
FTR&D
FTR&D
FTR&D
Hotel
Pôle
LZI
100/5%
#13
TR4 R4 59
TR1 R4 9
ENSSAT labs
11
10
13
1
3
3
5
5
-3,6 dBm
3,31 dBm 2000 m BU = 6.91 dB (th : 0,5 dB+4 con = 1,7 dB)
8790 m
#14 ONU21 ~ 10 800 m = 11.4 dB (th : 2,7 dB+8 con = 5,1 dB)
-8,1 dBm
#13
TR4 R4 60
TR1 R4 10
12
6
2
Kermaria
3,31 dBm
2000 m BU = 6.21 dB (th : 0,5 dB+4 con = 1,7 dB) -2,9 dBm
Note : Les tests au réflectomètre ont montré que le problème se situe au répartiteur LZI
(connectiques EC ?) (Nettoyage des connecteurs semaine prochaine)
(administrative)
1
Service Delivery with fs|cdc
Field trial tests
SARDANA network transmission over 55 Km, over the deployed

Lannion area cable infrastructure plus extra local spools.
Optical connections between ImaginLab, ENSSAT and OrangeLab.
Different communications services transmitted through:
2x Bidirectional 1G Ethernet using RSOA and SFPs.
10G / 2.5 XGPON scrambled burst data.
Bidirectional 10G Ethernet using tuneable laser ONU.
Functionality shown:
Channel protection (fibre cuts).
ONU colourlessness.
Multi-operability.
High bandwidth real time bidirectional HD multimedia
services.
Final Outcomes
• SARDANA project targets the ultimate extension of the limits

of FTTH Passive Optical Networks, as a practical transparent
approach to access&metro convergence.
– Sardana Test-Bed Demonstration in Espoo-Finland (28-Oct-2010)
– Sardana Field-Trial in 12-2010 in Lannion-France, with new broadband
services (20-1-2011)
– Public Demo at FTTH Council Conference, Milan (9/10-Feb-2011)
• FTTH SHOWROOM (YELLOW-2)
• Network/system/subsystem/component design guidelines and

prototypes for NGPON2.
• Contribution to:
– Regulatory Bodies on Broadband Access to citizens (multi-operator
infrastructure sharing strategy, etc).
– International Standards on next-generation FTTH like NGPON2.
Things for continuing R&D
• FEC has not been implmented and would be convenient.
• Connectors are critical (return loss near ONU, high-power at ring)
• RSOA technology has to evolve, for higher GAINxBW, (and injected power) from:
– 14 dB 1.2 GHz (TO-CAN), equalized for 2.5Gbit/s
– 18 dB 0.8 GHz (TO-CAN)
– 10 dB 3 GHz (Butterfly )
– -10 dB 10 GHz (REAM)
– 5 dB 10 GHz (SOAREAM chip)
• A secondary pump source is convenient to reach 100 Km
– Or from ASE from SOAs, as has been demonstrated.
• Rayleigh back-scatering is critical for distribution > 3Km.
– Increase ring, decrease drop, 2 fiber-feeder.
– Also can be reduced with several techniques developed.
• Many ideas have come up along the 3 years for future improvement.
• 1-2 year for Development.
• _x_? for Deployment
Thank you
from all SARDANA partners !!
www.ict-sardana.eu
Contact:
Josep Prat (project manager)
Tel: (+34) 93 401-6455 /-7179 /-6850 Fax: /-7200, e-mail: jprat@tsc.upc.edu
Dept. Signal Theory and Communications (TSC) www.tsc.upc.edu/gco
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) www.upc.edu
c/ Jordi Girona 1, ETSETB-TSC-D5
Barcelona, 08034, Spain

2011 02 Milan JPrat Ris 24

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2011 02 Milan JPrat Ris 24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SARDANA project

Participant name Short name Country

1 Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya Spain

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Service platform provider X Tellabs: GPON equipment, MAC, lab-

High bit-rate systems X X AIT: Electronic PON impairment

Project funded by the European

Subsystems: RN, ONT, OLT 11

• Prototype and test Phases of Sardana:

Future Networks Concertation meeting, Brussels 11-12 March 2008

1. BIT-RATE INCREASE (XGPON, to 10G)

3. WDM (NUMBER OF CHANNELS / SERVICES):

(SARDANA) λD1,…, λDm

RN1 λU 1,…, λU2N

• Cascadable remote nodes RNi TDM TREE

• 10G-2.5G (1G-100Mb /user) λD m+1,…, λD2N Downstream Signals

• WDM ring: Resilience • Passive Remote Nodes (RN):

RN1 λU 1,…, λUm ONU

RNi TDM TREE

λD m+1,…, λD2N Downstream Signals

Centralized light generation

Higher User Density >1000

LRNi LFE LDR

• ”Transparent Ring-Tree WDM/TDM-PON Architecture” (proposal of Sardana

• Remotely pumped Common

optical amplification ONU

• Burst tolerant 1:16

• SARDANA wavelength allocation plan

• Proposal of multi-operability models

Physical layer L2/L3

– Monitoring and protection TDM-P ON

– Active equipment price estimation

GPON): Cost/user vs. density 500

• SARDANA is cost effective in a 0 1,000 2,000 3 ,000

wider range of user densities.

Power per user per Gbit/s [W/Gbit/s]

the SARDANA approach with the SARDANA 1

• In principle two SARDANA

Power per user per Gbit/s [W/Gbit/s]

the version 2, express the best

Total number of users per CO

• > 70 international publications

Functional layered model of SARDANA.

• The stakeholder demo took place in Espoo Finland

SERVICE #A SERVICE #B SERVICE #C SERVICE #A SERVICE #B SERVICE #C SERVICE #D SERVICE #E

ETHERNET SWITCHS (4xCX4+24xGE) Media CPC Media Media ETHERNET

SFP SFP SFP XFP

SFP TriSpeed SFP XFP

monit ONU ONU

PROTECTION & MONITOR PC OTDR

Sp1a Sp1b Sp2a Sp2b Sp3a Sp3b

FEEDER FF1a FF1b

SC/APC FR1u RN-501 FR2u RN-54rec FR3u RN-52

The services and management connect

1) Service switch connects to OLT1-

1) CPE STBs connect to ONU High

3) The ONU1-2 MAC RX connects to

4) TXb1-2 connects to drop fibers (2-

1) The OLT TX1-2 connect DS to

Eu-DMUX 3) There is a pre-amplifier (PA)

PA1 4) DS and US fiber spools (5-25km) run

• The demo system in Espoo had all the equipment

The Orange Labs