Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT NO.3
1. From the history of the Philippine government transition, are you satisfied of the government
we have right now? Support your stand.
After reading the articles about the transition of Philippine government, I gained more knowledge and
deeper understanding about the history of our government. Long before we are colonized, we already
had a government which they called "Barangay" and through times it has been replaced by colonizer
after colonizer. I must say that our government goes through a lot of changes and events for it to arrived
at its current and present form that we have now. Our ancestors, late Presidents, and revolutionaries
gave their lives and dedication just for us to gained independence and free government governed by
Filipinos. That is why there is no reason for me not to be satisfied with the government we have right
now. I would prefer this kind of government compared to those revolutionary, dictatorial, or military
government which power is centralized on colonizers. It is good to be a citizen of a country which has its
own sovereignty over its territory. I must say we are very lucky for we are born in a well organized and
we'll constituted government compared to the previous ones. Imagine if we still have those kinds of
government until now, maybe we are not so free to walk outside, enjoy the things our country has to
offer, and deprived of our freedom to express ourselves. Maybe we are revolutionaries and not students
if we did not gained independence. Therefore, as a Filipino born in this present form of government, I
am very satisfied and I appreciate what we have right now because I enjoy this so-called freedom and
independence that the previous generation died just to gained it.
2. Write a comparative analysis of the Philippine governments from pre-Spanish Era to the present
Republic in terms of:
a. Form of government
b. Ruler/Leader
c. Powers/Duties
Note: You may opt to use table for clear and vivid presentation
Transition
of Forms of Ruler/Leader Powers/Duties
Philippine Government
Governmen
t
Pre-Colonial —long before colonizers -datu —primary duty was to rule
occupied the Philippines, our and govern his people and
-rajah/raha
ancestors had their own ultimately to promote their
form of government which -lakan welfare and interests
they called the "Barangay",
originated from Malay word The position was —the datu serves as chief
obtain through executive, legislator, judge,
which means "sailboat"
succession and supreme commander of
the Barangay in times of war
*Judicial
MACAPAGAL: eradicate
corruption, and assured the
public that honesty would
prevail in his presidency.
Fourth Republic under 1973 Ferdinand Marcos —His first term was marked
Constitution with increased
industrialization and the
creation of solid
infrastructures nationwide
Fifth Republic under 1987 Article VII, Section —The President is the Head
Constitution 1, of the 1987 of State and Head of
Constitution vests Government, and functions
executive power on as the commander-in-chief
the President of the of the Armed Forces of the
Philippines Philippines.
3. What is your opinion/stand on the issue about changing the government we have right now?
Our government had gone through a lot of changes until we arrived at democratic country under the
1987 Constitution. Late President Marcos' dictatorship was put an end and given birth to 1987 Philippine
constitution ushering a new era of democracy with an emphasis on bringing about social justice. Past
Presidents attempted to make a change of the constitution in the hope of prolonging their stay in
power. And now Pres. Duterte attempted to make a constitutional change, making a federal form of
government. He aims to decentralize power from what he called imperialistic Manila and improve the
lives of those people living in rural areas (as reported in Aljazeera). I lack knowledge about constitution
and constitutional change however I believe what Ed Garcia—who helped to draft 1987 Constitution,
said "it is not the form of government that is problematic, but the quality of those people in the
government". Yes it is not about how the present constitution works, it is all about the ability and the
capacity of the leader that will make a change and development. If Pres. Duterte wanted to change the
form of government just to bring about a radical change, I think it is unnecessary. We can make a
change even without making constitutional change. They believe that by adapting federalism, it will
eliminate poverty and be freed from the shackle of a nationalistic government. Yet I still cannot fully
understand what are the pros and cons of charter change but I strongly believe that it is unnecessary. It
would just bring chaos, confusion, and would result to trial and error. If it succeed it would bring positive
results and if not, negative results and might even add more problems than it has before. In conclusion,
I'm against constitutional change and the best we could do is to select a wise and effective leader that
would bring prosperity to our country; and cleanse corruption that exists in the government.