Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PC BRAKE Hydraulic2013
PC BRAKE Hydraulic2013
12/22/2020 06:59:41
FxFOPT FxROPT E m Fconstant E m Rconstant NFxRO NFxFO NCONFR NCONFF 0 FxF/W FxR/W FxF/W
259.77 120.37 257.73 124.64 0.027 0.058 0.028 0.057 0 0.057 0.027 0.000
580.56 245.37 571.33 265.68 0.055 0.129 0.059 0.127 0 0.118 0.055 0.000
860.78 336.08 842.15 379.04 0.075 0.191 0.084 0.187 0 0.178 0.075 0.000
1077.47 395.82 1050.10 461.27 0.088 0.239 0.103 0.233 0 0.239 0.088 0.000
1346.21 458.64 1306.75 557.45 0.102 0.299 0.124 0.290 0 0.299 0.101 0.000
1617.65 510.61 1565.04 648.81 0.113 0.359 0.144 0.348 0 0.359 0.113 0.000
1954.24 560.69 1884.66 754.97 0.125 0.434 0.168 0.419 0 0.420 0.126 0.000
2355.25 601.88 2265.48 872.47 0.134 0.523 0.194 0.503 0 0.480 0.139 0.000
2836.28 627.99 2723.67 1002.34 0.140 0.630 0.223 0.605 0 0.541 0.151 0.000
3421.77 630.00 3285.49 1146.66 0.140 0.760 0.255 0.730 0 0.601 0.164 0.000
4146.59 593.79 3990.58 1307.98 0.250 0.750 0.400 0.667 0 0.662 0.177 0.750
5062.03 496.64 4901.75 1489.48 0.110 1.125 0.331 1.089 0 0.722 0.189 0.000
6246.15 300.92 6124.81 1695.20 0.067 1.388 0.377 1.361 0 0.782 0.202 0.000
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0.000 1.688 0.422 1.688 0 0.843 0.215 0.000
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0.000 1.688 0.422 1.688 0 0.903 0.227 0.000
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 FRONT NFxRO NCONFF NFxFO REAR NFxFO NCONFR
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.027 0.057 0.058 0 0.058 0.028
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.031 0.068 0.069 0 0.129 0.059 0.1
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.059 0.139 0.141 0 0.191 0.084 0.2
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.082 0.213 0.218 0 0.239 0.103 0.3
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.102 0.290 0.298 0 0.299 0.124 0.4
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.117 0.370 0.383 0 0.359 0.144 0.5
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.129 0.454 0.471 0 0.434 0.168 0.6
12/22/2020 06:59:41
MARC V1 Empty
psi chi
12/22/2020 06:59:41
Empty Braking Forces Diagram Hydraulic Brakes
Project ID: _____
2.000
1.800
___ Optimum
___ Design
___ Constant m
1.600
___ Deceleration a
1.400
FxF (Normalized)
1.200
1.000
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
FxR (Normalized)
12/22/2020 06:59:41
Project ID: Test1
12/22/2020 06:59:41
FxFOPT FxROPT L m Fconstant L m Rconstant NFxRO NFxFO NCONFR NCONFF 0 FxF/W FxR/W
259.77 120.37 257.73 124.64 0.027 0.058 0.028 0.057 0 0.057 0.027
531.09 243.89 523.25 244.76 0.054 0.118 0.054 0.116 0 0.118 0.055
804.42 333.28 787.87 356.91 0.074 0.179 0.079 0.175 0 0.178 0.075
1079.33 392.00 1051.88 461.95 0.087 0.240 0.103 0.234 0 0.239 0.088
1354.20 449.57 1314.36 560.22 0.100 0.301 0.124 0.292 0 0.299 0.101
1628.49 504.45 1575.33 652.34 0.112 0.362 0.145 0.350 0 0.359 0.113
1901.71 554.38 1834.80 738.88 0.123 0.423 0.164 0.408 0 0.420 0.126
2173.46 596.03 2092.78 820.33 0.132 0.483 0.182 0.465 0 0.480 0.139
2443.40 624.47 2349.28 897.12 0.139 0.543 0.199 0.522 0 0.541 0.151
2711.23 632.29 2604.32 969.64 0.141 0.602 0.215 0.579 0 0.601 0.164
3938.59 608.18 3786.95 1263.44 0.250 0.750 0.400 0.667 0 0.662 0.177
4759.27 534.53 4597.47 1431.88 0.119 1.058 0.318 1.022 0 0.722 0.189
5798.91 383.18 5656.21 1620.87 0.085 1.289 0.360 1.257 0 0.782 0.202
7148.18 107.74 7097.83 1834.41 0.024 1.588 0.408 1.577 0 0.843 0.215
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0.000 1.688 0.422 1.688 0 0.903 0.227
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 FRONT NFxRO NCONFF NFxFO REAR NFxFO NCONFR
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.027 0.057 0.058 0 0.058 0.028
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.031 0.068 0.069 0 0.118 0.054
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.058 0.139 0.142 0 0.179 0.079
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.081 0.213 0.219 0 0.240 0.103
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.100 0.291 0.300 0 0.301 0.124
7594.20 0.00 7594.20 1898.55 0 0.114 0.372 0.386 0 0.362 0.145
2801354.87 -3061693.69 -13966.20 8322.52 0 0.124 0.458 0.476 0 0.423 0.164
12/22/2020 06:59:41
MARC V1 Empty
psi chi
12/22/2020 06:59:41
Laden Braking Forces Diagram Hydraulic Brakes
Project ID: _____
2.000
1.800
___ Optimum
___ Design
___ Constant m
___ Deceleration a
1.600
FxF (Normalized)
1.400
1.200
1.000
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
FxR (Normalized)
12/22/2020 06:59:41
Empty - Rear Braking Efficiency
Project ID: E=k,m______
Rear Braking Efficiency
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Rear Tire-Road Friction
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Front Tire-Road Friction
2.0
1.9
Deceleration, g
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Brake Line Pressure, psi
2.0
1.9
Deceleration, g
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Brake Line Pressure, psi
1.000
0.700
0.600
F
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
Brake Line Pressure, psi
1.8
1.7___ Front Axle This chart is the basis for complying with friction-
utilization requirements of European braking
1.6
___ Rear Axle standards such as
EEC 71/320, ECE R13
___ Optimum
m Tire-Road Friction
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
a Deceleration, g
1.8
1.7___ Front Axle This chart is the basis for complying with friction-
utilization requirements of European braking
1.6
___ Rear Axle standards such as
EEC 71/320, ECE R13
___ Optimum
m Tire-Road Friction
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
a Deceleration, g
This Module contains the following: (Click on the link or Button to access worksheet)
Booster
iameter (single or dual diaphragm) required to produce a specific
Brake System Design - Hydraulic Brakes
5. Vacuum Booster Design
Project ID: Test1
Input Data
FRONT REAR
DwcF1 = 2.25 Diameter Wheel Cylinder, in DwcR1 = 0.63
DwcF2 = 0 Diameter Wheel Cylinder, in DwcR2 = 0.00
BFF = 0.64 Brake factor BFR = 1.9
rF = 3.8 Drum or Effective Disc Radius, in rR = 4
hcF = 0.98 Wheel Cylinder Efficiency hcR = 0.96
Calculated Data
AwcF1 = 3.98 Wheel Cylinder Area, in2 AwcR1 = 0.31
AwcF2 = 0.00 Wheel Cylinder Area, in2 AwcR2 = 0.00
AwcFTotal = 3.98 Total Wheel Cylinder Area, in 2 AwcRTotal = 0.31
Input Data
Fp = 100 Pedal Force, lb
lp = 5.3 Pedal Lever Ratio
hp = 0.8 Pedal Efficiency
pk = 0 Knee-point Pressure, psi
SL = 1 Valve Slope Reduction
W= 2755 Weight of Vehicle, lb
a= 0.90 Deceleration, G
R= 11.80 Tire radius, in
Fb = 67 Booster Spring Force, lb
PVac = 11.6 Vacuum Pressure of Booster, psi
PoF = 0 Pushout Pressure, psi PoR = 80
Input Selected* Data
*i.e.: Teves.pdf
dmcSel(mm) = 28.57 Master Cylinder Diameter, mm
ABCql = 489.47 Calculated Booster Area, cm2
ABCql = 75.87 Calculated Booster Area, in 2
Input Selected* Data
ABCql = 475.00
Booster Area Selected from Manufacterer based on ABCal, cm 2
ABCql = 73.60
Booster Area Selected from Manufacterer based on ABCal, in 2
Calculated Selected* Data
AmcSelect = 0.99 Master Cylinder Cross-Sectional Area, in 2
pl = 1245 Brake Line Pressure, psi
BRatio = 3.08 Boost Ratio
pBSat = 1325 Brake Line Pressure at Booster Saturation for a Pedal Force of 125 lbs.
Brake System Design – Hydraulic Brakes
6. Hydraulic Booster Design. [Ch. 5]
It is used to determine the hydro-boost, and if necessary, accumulator characteristics, to produce a specific vehicle deceleration
at the maximum cutout pressure. The final booster sizes are selected from brake manufacturer design catalogues.
This Module contains the following: (Click on the link or Button to access worksheet)
Design Process:
Process
cumulator characteristics, to produce a specific vehicle deceleration
6. Hydro-Boost Brake Systems
Design Process:
From Module 4 – Master Cylinder Design - obtain the minimum master cylinder cross-sectional area required for braking with the
boost primary energy source disabled if appropriate. Then select the proper master cylinder listed below or from the manufacturer’s
catalog. With the master cylinder selected use “ Hydraulic Booster Performance Analysis” (Module 4) to determine the design
performance hydraulic brake line pressure of the laden vehicle for specified pedal forces. The design performance brake line pressure
should be 30 to 40% less than the brake line pressure associated with booster saturation point. This design method ensures that braking
effectiveness reserves exist when the brakes get hot and fade.The pump must be large enough to supply both brakes and power steering
6.1 Hydraulic Booster with Gas-Charged Accumulator (Continental Teves – Ate)
Detailed information on boosters available can be obtained from the Continental Teves (Ate) Catalogwww.ate.com
Continental Teves (Ate) provides two master cylinder sizes:
22.2 mm (7/8 in) diameter with 18/16 mm stroke split
26.99 mm (1-1/16 in) diameter with 17/19 mm stroke split.
The accumulator pressure, and hence pedal force boost, ranges between a minimum and maximum of 36 bar (522 psi) to
57 bar (826 psi).
For the 22.2 mm master cylinder diameter the maximum hydraulic brake line pressure ranges from 130 bar (1885 psi) to
214 bar (3103 psi).
The corresponding values for the 26.99 mm master cylinder are 89 bar (1290 psi) and 154 bar (2233 psi).
The input force at the booster pushrod for both master cylinder sizes ranges between 1150 N (258 lb) and 1680 N (378 lb)
corresponding to the minimum at maximum accumulator pressures and should be designed such that for a pedal force of
approximately 175 lb (800 N) a brake line pressure of 3000 psi (200 bar) (booster saturation) is not exceeded.
6.2 Hydro-Boost Booster (Bosch)
Variable gains ranging from 4:1 to 8.2:1 are available with a maximum relief pressure of 1800 psi.
Master cylinder diameters range from 25.4 to 40 mm.
The system uses a gas-charged accumulator and manual push-through application to meet safety standards for brake failure conditions.
6.3 Hydro-Max Hydraulic brake Booster (Bosch)
Under normal non-failure conditions the Hydro-Max booster typically saturates at approximately 1800 to 1900 psi master cylinder
brake line pressure (2 in. master cylinder diameter) for a booster pushrod input force of approximately 325 lb.
For the backup electric pump driven system with manual push through ability a booster pushrod force of 325 lb produces a hydraulic
brake line pressure in the 2-in. master cylinder of approximately 800 psi, that is, approximately 42% of the design braking effectivenes
without primary boost failure.
The manual effort push through without electric pump backup produces approximately 100 psi for a booster push rod force of 175 lb.
ter cylinder listed below or from the manufacturer’s
imately 100 psi for a booster push rod force of 175 lb.
Brake System Design – Hydraulic Brakes 2013
7. Brake Fluid Volume Analysis. [Ch. 5]
It is used to determine the brake fluid volume requirements of all fluid users including non-pressurized and
for normal and hot brakes, as well as normal and partial brake failure conditions. The final result is obtained
in terms of brake pedal travel, pressurized components pedal force and vehicle deceleration.
Here, all individual brake fluid volumes used by the brake system are computed for normal and hot brakes.
The volume required is compared with the volume provided by the master cylinder determined (selected) in
Module 2. The brake pedal travel required to produce certain decelerations for different operative conditions
including partial brake failure are computed.
The Accident Reconstructionist will use this Module to determine Pedal Travel and Deceleration for a Partial
Brake Failure condition. See PCB 9 - 2006 at www.pcbrakeinc.com.
Calculated Data
VFL = 0.097865 Brake Fluid Volume Loss due to Fluid Compression, in3
7.2.2 Rear Caliper Pad - Rotor Clearance and Gas Inclusions (brake line pressure equals zero).
Input Data
LEFT REAR RIGHT REAR
LROLR = 0 Rear rotor Lateral Run Out, in LRORR = 0
Calculated Data
Input Data
LEFT FRONT RIGHT FRONT
LROLF = 0 Rotor Lateral Run Out, in LRORF = 0
Calculated Data
VCLF = 0.051 Fluid Volume, Caliper, in3 VCRF = 0.051
7.3.2 Volume Loss Due to Air and Gas Inclusions in Drum Brakes (Brake Line Pressure = 0)
kGR = 0.014
VGR = 0.009
7.3.3 Volume Loss Due to Brake Shoe Return Travel (Brake Line Pressure = 0)
kSR = 0.051
VSR = 0.032
7.3.4 Volume Loss Due to Thermal Drum Expansion (Brake Line Pressure = 0)
Input Data
aT = 1.67E-05 Thermal Expansion Coefficient, in/in oF
D= 10.00 Drum Diameter, in
Tdr = 300 Drum Temperature , oF
Calculated Data
VdT = 0.031 Volume Loss Due to Thermal Drum Expansion, in3
Surface cracks/rupture of brake rotors will be less when the following are small:
thermal expansion coefficient, elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, thermal diffusivity, rotor thickness 2L
and thermal conductivity will be large.
er should realize that, as pad or lining materials improve,
8. SPECIFIC DESIGN MEASURES. NOTE: Allowable Values of Design Measures May Change!
8.1 DISC FRONT - DISC REAR.
Project ID: Test1
Input Data
FRONT REAR
DwcF1 = 2.25 Diameter Wheel Cylinder, in DwcR1 = 1.50
DwcF2 = 0 Diameter Wheel Cylinder, in DwcR2 = 0.00
BFF = 0.76 Brake factor BFR = 0.7
rF = 4 Drum or Effective Disc Radius, in rR = 4.1
hcF = 0.98 Wheel Cylinder Efficiency hcR = 0.98
1-f F 0.68 Relative Rear Brake Force f= 0.32
= Calculated Data
AwcF1 = 3.98 Wheel Cylinder Area, in2 AwcR1 = 1.77
AwcF2 = 0.00 Wheel Cylinder Area, in2 AwcR2 = 0.00
AwcFTotal = 3.98 Total Wheel Cylinder Area, in 2 AwcRTotal = 1.77
Input Data
pk = 300 Knee-point Pressure, psi
SL = 0.3 Valve Slope Reduction
W= 3700 Weight of Vehicle, lb
ad = 0.5 Design Point Deceleration, g's
R= 12.50 Tire radius, in
PoF = 5 Pushout Pressure, psi PoR = 5
Vmax,mph = 100 Maximum Velocity, mph
Vmax,ft/sec = 147 Maximum Velocity, ft/sec
Calculated Selected* Data
pl = 789 Brake Line Pressure, psi
pl eff = 793 Front Brake Line Pressure at Design Point, lbs.
Rear Brake Line Pressure at Design Point, pl effR = 448
8.2 Disc Brakes.
8.2.1 Mechanical Pressure between Pad and Rotor.
8.2.1.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Front Brake Line Pressure at Design Point.
Front Actual Mechanical Pressure.
ApadF = 4 Area of one pad in contact with rotor, in2
pmpF = 789 Front Actual Mechanical Pressure, psi
Allowable Mechanical Pressure Between Pad and Rotor.
pmpal = 1700 Allowable Mechanical Pressure Between Pad and Rotor, psi
8.2.1.2. Rear Disc Brakes.
Rear Brake Line Pressure at Design Point.
Actual Rear Mechanical Pad Pressure.
ApadR = 3 Area of one pad in contact with rotor, in2
pmpR = 264 Rear Actual Mechanical Pressure, psi
8.2.2. Specific Braking Energy per Unit Pad Area.
8.2.2.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Actual Specific Front Pad Braking Energy.
epAF = 52528 lb ft/in2
8.2.2.2. Rear Disc Brakes.
Rear Actual Specific Pad Braking Energy.
epAR = 32958 lb ft/in2
8.2.3. Specific Braking Energy per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface.
8.2.3.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Front Actual Specific Braking Energy per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface.
ros = 5 Outer radius of swept disc surface, in
ris = 3 Inner radius of swept disc surface, in
ASF = 12.57 Swept surface of one front brake of one side, in2
eSRAF = 16720 lb ft/in2
8.2.3.2. Rear Disc Brakes.
Rear Actual Specific Braking Energy per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface.
ros = 4.8 Outer radius of swept disc surface, in
ris = 2.8 Inner radius of swept disc surface, in
ASR = 11.94 Swept surface of one rear brake of one side, in2
eSRAR = 8282 lb ft/in2
8.2.4. Nominal Brake Temperature and Specific Braking Energy per Unit Weight of Active Rotor Weight
8.2.4.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Active Front Rotor Weight
rRF = 0.263 Rotor specific weight, lb/in3
lRF = 0.85 Rotor thickness, in
ros = 6 Outer radius of swept disc surface, in
ris = 2.5 Inner radius of swept disc surface, in
WRAF = 5.22 Active Front Rotor Weight (without hub), lbs
eWF = 40225 Specific Braking Energy per Unit Weight of Active Rotor Weight, lb ft/lb
Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight of Front Brakes.
cRF = 0.1 Specific heat of rotor material, BTU/lb oF
DTF = 517 Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight of Front Brakes, oF
D T Fallw = 440 Allowable Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight, oF
8.2.4.2. Rear Disc Brakes.
Rear Active Rotor Weight
rRR = 0.263 Rotor specific weight, lb/in3
lRR = 0.75 Rotor thickness, in
ros = 4.8 Outer radius of swept disc surface, in
ris = 2.3 Inner radius of swept disc surface, in
WRAR = 2.75 Active Rear Rotor Weight (without hub), lbs
eWR = 35957 Specific Braking Energy per Unit Weight of Active Rotor Weight, lb ft/lb
Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight of Rear Brakes.
cRR = 0.1 Specific heat of rotor material, BTU/lb oF
DTR = 462 Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight of Rear Brakes, oF
DTRallw = 440 Allowable Brake Temperature Increase of Active Rotor Weight, oF
8.2.5. Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad Surface.
8.2.5.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad Surface.
qpadAF = 11532 Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
qpadallwF = 13000 Allowable Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
8.2.5.2. Rear Disc Brakes.
Rear Actual Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad Surface.
qpadAR = 7236 Actual Specific Rear Braking Power per Unit Area of Pad
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
8.2.6. Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface.
8.2.6.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Front Actual Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor
Surface (at onset of braking), lb-ft/sec-in2
qSRAF = 3671 Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Swept Area of Rotor Surface
, lb-ft/sec-in2
Allowable Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Rotor Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
TF = 400 Front Brake Temperature, oF
qSRallwF = 1146 Allowable Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
8.4.6. Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface.
8.4.6.1. Front Disc Brakes.
Front Actual Specific Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor
Surface (at onset of braking), lb-ft/sec-in2
qSRAF = 3779 Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
Allowable Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
TF = 400 Front Brake Temperature, oF
qSRallwF = 1146 Allowable Actual Specific Front Braking Power per Unit Area of Swept Rotor
Surface, lb-ft/sec-in2
10Turn1 Brake System Design Performance Check for Braking in a Turn. Data Input.
10Turn2 Brake System Design Performance Check for Braking in a Turn. Calculated.
See detailed discussion of optimum brake line pressures (Fig. 7-34) for braking-while-turning in Chapter 7 of Brake Design and Safety, 3rd ed.
Brake System Design - Hydraulic Brakes
10. Brake System Design Performance Check for Braking in a Turn.
Input Data
pl = 800 Hydraulic Brake Line Pressure, psi
REAR
DwcF1 = 2.75 Diameter Wheel Cylinder (1), in DwcR1 = 1.75
DwcF2 = 0.00 Diameter Wheel Cylinder (2), in DwcR2 = 0.00
BFF = 0.7 Brake factor BFR = 0.7
poF = 5 Pushout Pressure, psi poR = 5
RF = 11.9 Tire Radius, in RR = 11.9
rF = 3.97 Drum or Effective Disc Radius, in rR = 4.57
hcF = 0.98 Wheel Cylinder Efficiency hcR = 0.98
Calculated Data
AwcF1 = 5.94 Wheel Cylinder Area (1), in 2 AwcR1 = 2.41
AwcF2 = 0.00 Wheel Cylinder Area (2), in 2 AwcR2 = 0.00
AwcFTotal = 5.94 Total Wheel Cylinder Area, in 2 AwcRTotal = 2.41
FxF = 2161 Braking Force, lb FxR = 624
Input Data
pmc = 100 Master Cylinder Pressure, psi
pk = 250 Knee-point Pressure, psi
SL = 0.45 Valve Slope Reduction
kmc = 1.000 Master Cylinder Ratio
W = 4500 Weight of Vehicle, lb
h = 22 Height of CG, in
L = 104.8 Wheelbase, in
Rear Brake Line Pressure, psi PR = 497.5
Rear Static Axle Load, lb FzR = 1500
Calculated Data
Y = 0.33 Relative Rear Axle Load
C = 0.21 Relative CG Height
a = 0.62 Deceleration
Y/C = 1.59 Deceleration for Rear Axle Load = 0, g
FzFdyn = 3585 Dynamic Axle Load, lb (Lateral Accel=0) FzRdyn = 915
wF = 100 Front/Rear Suspension Unsprung Weight, lb wR = 100
hCG = 24 Height of CG, in
WS = 4250 Vehicle Sprung Weight, lb
pF = 0.25 Height of Front/Rear Suspension Roll Center, in pR = 11.75
KF = 27217 Front/Rear Suspension Roll Stifness, lb-ft/rad KR = 10772
tF = 63 Front/Rear Track Width, in tR = 63
hF = 8 Height of CG of Front/Rear Unsprung Mass, in hR = 8
hr = 18 Perpendicular distance CG and Roll Axis, in
ay = 0.3 Lateral Acceleration, g-units
Rc = 300 Curve Radius, ft
Brake System Design - Hydraulic Brakes
10. Brake System Design Performance Check for Braking in a Turn.
Project ID: Test1
Calculated Data:
FRONT REAR
SF = 0.252 Front/Rear Suspension Normalized SR = 0.162
Roll Stifness, lb-ft/rad
FzF,i = 1524 Normal Force at Inner Front Wheel, lb
FzF,o = 2060 Normal Force at Outer Front Wheel, lb
FzR,i = 285.538 Normal Force at Inner Rear Wheel, lb
FzR,o = 630 Normal Force at Outer Rear Wheel, lb
FyF,i = 319 Tire Side Force on Inner Front Wheel, lb
FyF,o = 431 Tire Side Force on Outer Front Wheel, lb
FyR,i = 117 Tire Side Force on Inner Rear Wheel, lb
FyR,o = 258 Tire Side Force on Outer Rear Wheel, lb
FxF,i = 1081 Braking Force on Inner Front Wheel, lb
FxF,o = 1081 Braking Force on Outer Front Wheel, lb
FxR,i = 312 Braking Force on Inner Rear Wheel, lb
FxR,o = 312 Braking Force on Outer Rear Wheel, lb
Traction Coefficient on Individual Wheel. Wheel with highest traction coeff. locks first.
mTF,i = 0.73916 Inner Front Wheel Itterate brake line pressure untill traction
mTF,o = 0.56469 Outer Front Wheel coefficient first reaches tire road friction
mTR,i = 1.16723 Inner Rear Wheel coefficient to determine pressure at lockup.
mTR,o = 0.64302 Outer Rear Wheel
Note: The Friction Circle is only valid if the vehicle mass is thought of being concentrated
in a single point. In the Evaluation of Braking in a Turn the engineer must distinguish
between low to medium, and high braking deceleration. Yaw velocity is a mesure for
directional stability, lateral acceleration is for steerability. These parameters are
normally analyzed 1 second after beginning of braking.