Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fingerprint Caudilla
Fingerprint Caudilla
2. To the SOUTH EAST of print No. 2 with ridge intervening point No.3 is an ENDING RIDGE.
3. To the SOUTH EAST of print No. 3 with ridge intervening point No. 4 is an BIFURCATION.
4. To the NORTH of print No.4 with ridge intervening point No.5 is an BIFURCATION.
5. To the NORTH of print No. 5 with ridge intervening point No. 6 is a DOT.
6. To the EAST WEST of print No.6 with ridge intervening point No. 7 is an EYELET
7. To the EAST WEST of print No. 7 with ridge intervening point No. 7 is a SHORT RIDGE
8. To the EAST WEST of print No. 8 with ridge intervening point No.8 is a BIFURCATION
9. to the EAST WEST of print No. 9 with intervening point No. 9 is a BIFURCATION.
FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION
Report No. F- -2018
CASE: Alleged Shooting Incident SUSPECT/S: 1.Breis, Roberto Arcinue III “Jun”
2. Bayonito, Jomar Nacion “Mar”
3. Colis, Princess Julia Bravo “Pj”
SPECIMEN SUBMITTED:
Five (5) Questioned prints placed in one (1) short bond paper dated 16 October 2018
marked as “Q-1” to “Q-5”.
FINDINGS:
Questioned prints marked “Q-2”, is identical with the LEFT THUMB finger appears on
the specimen marked “S-3”
Questioned prints marked “Q-1”,”Q-2”, “Q-4” and “Q-5”are not identical with any of the
fingers appears on the specimen marked “S-1” to “S-2”.
CONCLUSIONS:
Latent questioned prints marked “Q-2” was impress with LEFT THUMB finger of one
Colis, Princess Julia Bravo “Pj” whose standard fingerprints appear on the specimen marked “S-3”.
Latent questioned prints marked “Q-1”,”Q-3”, “Q-4” and “Q-5” were not impressed with
any of the fingers of the persons whose standard fingerprints appear on the specimen marked “S-1” to
“S-2”.
REMARKS:
The original copies of this report together with the specimen submitted are retained in
the laboratory for future reference.
EXAMINED BY: