You are on page 1of 3

Identical ridge characteristics have been found in their nature and relative position and both questioned

print and standard print and are prescribed below:

1. No.1 starting point is a BIFURCATION.

2. To the SOUTH EAST of print No. 2 with ridge intervening point No.3 is an ENDING RIDGE.

3. To the SOUTH EAST of print No. 3 with ridge intervening point No. 4 is an BIFURCATION.

4. To the NORTH of print No.4 with ridge intervening point No.5 is an BIFURCATION.

5. To the NORTH of print No. 5 with ridge intervening point No. 6 is a DOT.

6. To the EAST WEST of print No.6 with ridge intervening point No. 7 is an EYELET

7. To the EAST WEST of print No. 7 with ridge intervening point No. 7 is a SHORT RIDGE

8. To the EAST WEST of print No. 8 with ridge intervening point No.8 is a BIFURCATION

9. to the EAST WEST of print No. 9 with intervening point No. 9 is a BIFURCATION.

10. to the EAST WEST of print No. 10 is an ENDING RIDGE


Naga College Foundation
Liboton St. Naga City 4400, Philippines
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION

FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION
Report No. F- -2018

CASE: Alleged Shooting Incident SUSPECT/S: 1.Breis, Roberto Arcinue III “Jun”
2. Bayonito, Jomar Nacion “Mar”
3. Colis, Princess Julia Bravo “Pj”

TIME AND DATE RECEIVED: 16 OCTOBER 2018

REQUESTING PARTY: City Director


Naga City Police Office
City of Naga

SPECIMEN SUBMITTED:

Five (5) Questioned prints placed in one (1) short bond paper dated 16 October 2018
marked as “Q-1” to “Q-5”.

Standard fingerprint of the following persons:


Breis, Roberto Arcinue III “Jun” - “S-1”
Bayonito, Jomar Nacion “Mar” - ”S-2”
Colis, Princess Julia Bravo “Pj” - “S-3”

PURPOSE OF LABORATORY EXAMINATION:

To determine the identify or non-identify of the standard prints to the questioned


prints.

FINDINGS:

Questioned prints marked “Q-2”, is identical with the LEFT THUMB finger appears on
the specimen marked “S-3”

Questioned prints marked “Q-1”,”Q-2”, “Q-4” and “Q-5”are not identical with any of the
fingers appears on the specimen marked “S-1” to “S-2”.

CONCLUSIONS:
Latent questioned prints marked “Q-2” was impress with LEFT THUMB finger of one
Colis, Princess Julia Bravo “Pj” whose standard fingerprints appear on the specimen marked “S-3”.

Latent questioned prints marked “Q-1”,”Q-3”, “Q-4” and “Q-5” were not impressed with
any of the fingers of the persons whose standard fingerprints appear on the specimen marked “S-1” to
“S-2”.

REMARKS:

The original copies of this report together with the specimen submitted are retained in
the laboratory for future reference.

TIME AND DATE COMPLETED: 1300H 19 0ctober 2018.

EXAMINED BY:

Renta, Hazel Veridiano


Student
Criminalistics 1

You might also like