Professional Documents
Culture Documents
© LVB archive
Issue 1
Fuel and drive train technologies ies according to the type of fuel used.
Over 90% of the urban bus fleet in the sample is die- Average values in figure 1 hide significant variations
sel powered. The remainder is mainly shared between in the choice and the range of alternative fuels used
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas), LPG (Liquified Petro- in each EU country. In some cases, the variation is due
leum Gas), bio-diesel and bio-gas, and full electric to a single city. A water-diesel emulsion is used by 6%
vehicles. The total proportion of other fuels (ethanol, of the diesel buses in France, and by just under 5% in
various diesel/bio-diesel mixtures, fuel cells) is less Italy, while it is very little used in other countries. CNG
than 0,5%. buses represent almost 20% of the bus fleet in Helsinki
In cooperation with
Issue 1 1
and Athens. LPG equips 100% of buses in Vienna and Of all undertakings which indicated that they planned
about 14% in Copenhagen. Bio-diesel is used by 29% to acquire new buses for the 2006-2008 period, 68%
of the bus fleet in Luxemburg, 18% in Austria (mainly opted for Euro 4, 33% for Euro 5, 27% for EEV, and
Graz) and 6% in Spain. The use of bio-gas is negligible, 10% for Euro 3 (please note that the choices are not
expect in Sweden (in Stockholm, use is also made of mutually exclusive).
ethanol). The proportion of electric buses in Italy is 5
times higher than the average of the whole sample.
The database provides information on the
Hybrid buses (mainly diesel-electric, with also some distribution of the urban bus fleet according
other technologies) represent 0.25% of the total bus to Euro type (Pre-Euro, Euro 0 to Euro 5, EEV).
fleet in the sample. With respectively 8% and 1%, Lux- This information is available by country, by
emburg and Italy are forerunners in the use of hybrid size of population covered by the urban (+sub-
buses. urban) network, and by Class of buses. The
Of all undertakings which indicated that they planned database also features two-entry tables with
to acquire new buses for the 2006-2008 period, 48% fuel/drive trail technology and Euro standard.
opted for CNG, 43% for diesel, 9% for bio-diesel, 5% This information is available by Class of buses.
for LPG, 4% for bio-gas and 4% for hybrid buses (please Finally, the database also contains information
note that the choices are not mutually exclusive). on the intentions of public transport undertak-
ings regarding the acquisition of new vehicles
in 2006-2008 (by type of fuel and drive train
The database provides information on the dis- technology, by Euro standard).
tribution of the urban bus fleet according to
fuel and drive train technology: diesel (with de-
tails for filters, water-diesel emulsion, U/LSD),
CNG (+ filters), LPG (+ filters), Bio-diesel (+ Accessibility features
filters), Bio-gas (+ filters), other fuels (+ filter),
The EU Bus Directive defines a low floor vehicle as a
electricity, fuel cells, H2 combustion, hybrid
vehicle of Class I or II in which at least 35% of the area
vehicles. This information is available by coun-
available for standing passengers forms an area without
try, by size of population covered by the urban
steps and includes access to at least one service door.
(+suburban) network, and by Class of buses
Figure 3 shows the proportion of buses and trolleybuses
(Class I, Class II).
which are, respectively, low floor according to the EU
Bus Directive, 100% low floor, and neither of the two.
Euro standards
In the sample, the most frequent categories are Euro 31.5
20 Figure 3
13
10 7.5 8.7 Distribution of urban buses and trolleybuses
1.4 0.4 2.4 according to accessibility level (%)
0
Pre-Euro Euro 0 Euro 1 Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5 EEV Based on a sample of Class I and Class II buses and trol-
leybuses operated on urban routes in the EU-27
Figure 2
Distribution of buses urban according to EURO
standard (%)
Based on a sample of Class I and Class II buses (running
on fuel) operated on urban routes in the EU-27
2 Issue 1
Proportion
Most frequent Average Average
of 100% low floor
EURO standard bus age trolleybus age
buses/trolleybuses
Cyprus
Figure 4
As a 100% low floor bus/trolleybus is by defini- fleet is 100% low floor in Germany, Greece(*),
tion low floor according to the EU Bus Directive, Luxemburg and Spain.
the total proportion of low floor buses and trol- Although a closer analysis should be made in
leybuses according to that Directive is 68% on order to confirm and to interpret this statement,
average in the sample. it seems that the accessibility level tends to be
Accessibility levels vary significantly from one higher in larger cities (figure 5).
country to another (cf. figure 4). According to the
sample, 80% or more of the bus and trolleybus
Issue 1 3
60
Average age of fleet
60
44 45
49
The average age of urban buses in the sample is 7.6
40
years. The average age of trolleybuses is 11 years.
20 Denmark, Finland, Ireland, and the UK(*) have the
youngest bus fleets as the average age is 6 years or
0
100,000 < x < 250,000 < x < 500,000 < x < 1,000,000 < x
less (cf. figure 4). The youngest trolleybus fleets are
250,000 500,000 1,000,000
found in Greece and France.
Figure 5
Percentage of the urban bus and trolleybus fleet
which is 100% low floor according to size of the The database contains information on the av-
population covered by the urban (+suburban) net- erage and the maximum age of buses and trol-
work leybuses. This information is available by coun-
Based on a sample of Class I and Class II buses and trol- try, by size of population covered by the urban
leybuses operated on urban routes in the EU-27 (+suburban) network, and by Class of vehicle.
This survey is the first of a series on public transport statistics which aims at providing fresh data for analysis and
advocacy of strategic aspects of public transport.