You are on page 1of 2

CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY that the crime be committed by another.

- There must be a meeting of minds by the


S.120A of PC conspirators to do the act
It states that when two person/more persons - The offence is complete when two or more
agree to do / cause to be done : agreed to do or cause to be done an illegal act
(a) An illegal act , OR even thought the act has not been committed
(b) An act, which is legal by illegal means yet.

- A criminal conspiracy must consists of an Yashpal Mital v State of Punjab


agreement to commit an offence and there It does not necessarily means that each
must be accompanied with the act done by conspirator to know each and every detail of
one or more parties to the agreement. the conspiracy. It is sufficient for them to be
- It is immaterial whether the act is the the co-conspirators in the main object of the
ultimate object of the agreement or conspiracy.
incidental to the object.
Abdul Rahman & Ors v Emperor
PP v Khoo Ban Hock & Ors Criminal conspiracy may come into existence
The essence of a conspiracy is that a number and persist so long as they remain in the
of persons have joined together to carry out agreement and are acting in the furtherance
their illegal purpose. The essence of the of the object of the agreement.
offence is the agreement.

- Illegal is defined in S.43 of PC - Offence or Conspiracy to commit an act which is legal


prohibited by law which furnishes ground for by illegal means
a civil action.
- Under S.120A(b), it is necessary to establish
NMM Momin that the act was committed by one or more
Criminal conspiracy relates to an agreement parties to the agreement.
between two or more persons to do or cause
to be done , an illegal act or a legal act by Marji Balayya v State of Orissa
illegal means. It is differs from other offences The court held there was no direct
which is there is mere agreement and it is an communication for committing robbery but
offence even there is no step is taken to carry for the distribution of the richness of the rich
out the agreement. The substantive offence to the poor which is noble intention though
of criminal conspiracy is wider than abetment the method is by robbing people which is
by conspiracy. illegal. The act must be done by one or more
parties to such agreement, however there is
Elements : none to suggest it.
The actus reus of the offence depends on :
 To commit an offence : Conspiracy to commit the imposible
The actus reus is the agreement to commit Emperor v Hiremath
the act OR The two accused had agreed to do an illegal
 To commit a legal act by illegal means : act of murdering Z. The second accused tried
The actus reus comprises the agreement to to kill Z by administering poison into Z’s food
commit the act and there must be established and kidnapped for the purpose to kill Z. Then
the commission by one of the parties to the the second, third and sixth accused in
agreement. furtherance of their criminal conspiracy, killed
Z by drowning Z. Actually, the planned to kill Z
Conspiracy to commit an illegal act by using black magic.
- There must be unity of object or purpose. Held : The court held that they had agreed to
- At the time of agreement, each conspirator use black magic in which it is not an offence
should intend that the crime be committed under S.120B of PC but they had agreed in
and that he will fulfill role in their agreement, their criminal conspiracy to kill Z, then this is
even if that role be no more than agreeing an offence under S.120B of PC. All the

1
accused were found guilty.

S.120B of PC - Punishment for criminal


conspiracy
(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal
conspiracy to commit an offence punishable
with death, imprisonment for a term of two
years or upwards shall, where no express
provision is made in this Code for the
punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished
in the same manner as if he had abetted such
offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal
conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to
commit an offence punishable as aforesaid
shall be punished with imprisonment for a
term not exceeding six months or with fine or
with both.

Liability in criminal conspiracy


- There must be a real agreement and involve
at least two parties.
- It must be beyond the stage of negotiation
or exhortation and a decision to commit must
have been reached.
- When there are no evidence to implicate
anyone else, if all are acquitted except one,
that one must be acquitted.
- But one person alone may be convicted
where there is evidence implicating other
persons in the conspiracy

You might also like