Dear President Kim, underscore us inauguration, ChUSEu

In regard of pending situation concerning so many rival faction parties separated only by luck
throughout what has been seen as a bleak world, for over ten years – we have finally come to a
conclusion:- that thee Eu brexit summit, that John was invited to, will always fail to understand.

Some say his political opinions aren’t worthwhile for instance he has no understanding of Policy or
political foreign exchange rates domestic or banking and barely has enough talent to run his own e-
commerce business without a business background, so he is freelancing however will tell you his
opinions that are often true when it comes to shooting down the line evil against honesty telling
factually correct truths overly so as stated by the Eu recently that they have as a reason for his
mistreatment in what we supposedly hope are pastimes, whether i believe that or not is another
matter but i’ve made my peace with the Eu forum for the sake of unified business.

Bringing me onto my first issue the African revolution, what happened? John was away at time of
conception and didn’t have a say in jurisdiction codes of conduct or rights, that was down to Bolton.

What he has seen in previous times is a cowardly reluctance to acknowledge or accept basic human
rights in Britain starting with my own next door neighbour, supposedly Afirca is on the move and
marching on the war path, sounds distant and foreign to me yet is brought home when my home is
invaded and stolen from. This is a negative sign yes we’ve traded blows but the whole scenic idea of
Africa rising from the bottom onto a new day is being spoilt by continues rebel actions damaging
online social society, we’ve seen it in Rap we’ve seen it on the news we hear about it on the radio we
read about it in the newspapers. The idea of Africa on the war path 10/60 is preposterous.

They are being tempted by some type of myth about money that no one nos anything about except
them, they claim to respect authority of leaders self recognised figures however show no alliegence
at a social level, maybe that’s there way of doing things however misconduct and havoc spells
danger, that we all are in if matters ever did out of control.

For instance Transatlantic beef: what if they threatened Britain or Weuro at a controlled summit
level and things got out of hand on the other side of the Atlantic would they invade terrorising any
that stood in there way? Would the ally forces with other rebel groups in region? And more
importantly would they use there summit strengths as bargaining at other summits?

That is there right and a valid expression of power that must be controlled by America and overseen
by neighbouring powers such as china, Africa are powerful and deserve there right to flex there
superiority (battlefield), however have to understand its a value (world value) that is to there
detriment, surely they are the most powerful fighting force on earth due to the number of people,
however does that give them the right to threaten at summits ? or is it a value that needs to be
systematically formatted by UN Asian.

The Eu don’t have seismic values like that without Russia and wont understand them until they are
confronted with contractual paperwork and Jonathan doubts whether Africa has the knowledge to
understand a systematic value like that, at this early 10/60 stage where honesty and pride and key.

It is down to forums as i said like UN and ASAIN to protocol structural adjustments that keep the
forces of evil and terror away, I’m not interest in street fighting politics in transatlantic beef.