Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analyst Certification and Required Disclosures begin on last two pages – Click
Page 1
here
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
LIFE INSURANCE SECTOR
Challenges Galore
Despite COVID-related challenges, Life Insurance Industry in FY21 has managed to do better than expected in APE growth, product diversification,
profitability, and EV growth. Strong demand for protection due to COVID scare in 1H, price hike in individual protection (due to reinsurance rate hardening)
SECTOR UPDATE
and favorable forward rate agreement market (FRA) aiding insurers to offer higher IRRs on guarantee products (thus competing directly with deposits which
were underutilized by banks due to weak credit demand) arrested the sharp APE decline. While tactical cost savings measures (esp. employee & admin cost)
28 December 2020
provided support to VNB margins, strong rebound in capital markets (both bonds & equity) aided in EV growth driven by economic variance.
Company CMP Reco TP
However, we believe, with the reversal of most of these macro/tactical benefits & regulatory challenges, growth/profitability shall be under pressure due to
following factors. 1) New Labour Law shall impact discretionary individual savings, thus leading to potential cut in insurance ticket size (which was a key
IPRU 496 REDUCE 430
growth driver in FY16-20, volume growth was muted), 2) Double whammy of Yield curve flattening & improvement in bank CD ratio shall impact Non-Par
savings growth, 3) Elevated life segment combined ratio for reinsurers can trigger another round of price hike, thus impacting protection growth (COVID scare
demand is also dissipating), 4) Lower incremental policies sold in protection business (growth was led by higher share of limited pay policies), 5) Strong BS SBILIFE 874 BUY 950
agency reach/higher profit sharing of LIC shall make it hard for private peers to gain market share in Par segment & 6) Sustained weakness in ULIP demand.
Coupled with these growth challenges, the VNB margin shall also be under pressure due to 1) Sharp increase in lapse rate in ULIP business (discontinued HDFCLIFE 657 REDUCE 515
funds or slippage to discontinued funds is 2x of Mar’20 level), 2) Normalization of cost ratios with salary hike & higher admin cost & 3) Another potential
round of reinsurance rate hardening. Hence, with lower operating variance (with persistency & opex under pressure), unwind rate (decline in interest rate) MAXF 682 ADD 630
and VNB gearing (due to lower APE growth), we believe operating ROEVs shall be structurally lower vs. ROEVs experienced by insurers in FY17-20E.
#1. New Labor Laws to impact ticket size: Higher Provident Fund (PF) deduction under new labor laws shall impact the discretionary savings. This could BJFIIN 8,993 BUY 11,000
potentially reduce the insurance ticket size (ATS) which was the key growth driver in FY16-20. As per our estimates, 80C-related life insurance ATS could correct
by 30-50%. Further, EEE tax treatment & interest rate on PF (5 years of employment) vs. insurance shall give tough fight to the life insurance savings business.
Stock performance (%)
#2. Product diversification benefit is limited: Most insurers have managed to optimize their product mix over the last 2-3 years by increasing the contribution of
traditional savings products. Hence, any growth/margin levers from product diversification (esp. savings business) shall be limited going ahead. 1m 6m 12m
#3. Slope normalization of yield curve and banking system CD ratio: FRA market, which is still favorable for life insurance (to improve margin in FY21 as IRRs
have been stable but FRA rates improved) could potentially reverse. RBI efforts to lower the slope of the yield curve and increase credit growth shall improve CD IPRU 9.2% 17.2% 0.5%
ratio. This should impact growth of non-par products/ par products in banca channel. However, loan growth shall be positive for credit protect for life insurers. SBILIFE 2.6% 11.4% -11.8%
#4. LIC’s market leadership in Par business is impregnable: With strong balance sheet, operating efficiency and higher surplus sharing, LIC’s revisionary &
HDFCLIFE -0.5% 21.3% 3.4%
terminal bonus rate for long-term Par policies remain unmatched by private peers, thus making hard for them to gain market share in Par segment.
#5. Reinsurance rate hardening risk remains for protection business: Combined ratio of reinsurers in the life segment remains elevated. Further, the slowdown MAXF 7.1% 32.3% 29.3%
of one of the largest reinsurers in the life reinsurance market can lead to supply-side pressure. Hence, we believe, another round of reinsurance price hike in BJFIN 2.1% 51.2% -3.8%
protection can happen and shall impact the growth & profitability of this segment.
#6. Value-led growth in protection business suggests peaking of demand: Like savings business, incremental individual protection growth is driven by ticket size
largely due to higher share of limited pay policies. However, a few insurers (such as IPRU) have seen a decline in the number of policies. Hence, we expect RESEARCH ANALYST
moderation in protection growth going ahead, thus indicating limited scope in margin expansion due to an increase in the contribution of protection business.
SANKETH GODHA
#7. Sharp deterioration in ULIP persistency: Slippage to discontinued fund and contribution of discontinued funds to ULIP AUM have doubled from FY19/FY20. sanketh@sparkcapital.in
Given the fund management fees on discontinued fund capped at 0.5% vs. 1.35% for standard ULIP, this shall have a bearing on operating variance/VNB margins.
+91 22 6176 6821
#8. Cost ratio savings measures are unsustainable: Tactical cost savings measures especially employee & admin cost, which aided in reporting better-than-
ARJUN N
expected margin in 1HFY21, shall reverse in the normal environment. Given the growth pressures, we believe a higher opex ratio shall impact future profitability.
arjun@sparkcapital.in
#9. Banca productivity at risk; agency channel remains suboptimal: With improvement in CD ratio, bank branch productivity shall come down. To overcome
+91 44 4344 0081
ICICI Bank productivity challenges, IPRU has diversified its banca relationship with new tie-ups such as IIB & RBL. Private life insurers’ agency remains sub-optimal.
find SPARK RESEARCH on Bloomberg [RESP SPAK <go>] | FACTSET | REFINITIV EIKON Page 2
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Sharp increase of
discontinuation &
surrender ratio in ULIP,
does not bodes well for
VNB margins and
operating variance New labour laws to impact
Banca productivity at risk
discretionary individual
and agency continue to savings into life insurance
remain sub-optimal
Product mix is
Opex ratio almost diversified,
improvement led by
Lower Operating variance limited scope for
lower employee & + VNB gearing + Unwind margin expansion
admin cost not Rate = Structurally Lower due to mix change
sustainable for long ROEVs vs. FY17-20
term
Page 3
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Brokerage Industry
Table of Contents
7 Industry Trend
10 Non-Participating Savings
16 Participating Savings
28 ULIP
Page 4
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1 (a). New ‘Labour Laws’: Potentially could lead to lower allocation to Insurance savings, thus impacting growth
▪ In new proposed ‘Labour Laws’ there shall be only one definition of wages vs. 12 different definitions which are applicable now.
▪ As per the new definition of wages, if the aggregate of the excluded components exceeds 50% of the total remuneration, the amount that exceeds the one-half will be deemed
to be 'wages’ (Basic Salary). This new definition would be used to calculate gratuity, retrenchment compensation and provident fund (PF) deductions, which could potentially net
lower net cash monthly salary per employee and increase the employee cost of the employer.
▪ PF contribution was mandatory for every ▪ Mandatory PF contribution would reduce the
establishment with >20 employees and ▪ Mandatory for every establishment with monthly take home salary, which would lower
for employees drawing <Rs. >20 employees (Salary condition discretionary financial savings (outside PF)
15,000/month salary). withdrawn). and consumption.
Provident Fund ▪ Optional if employees drawing > Rs. ▪ The contributions paid by the employer ▪ A large portion of life insurance customers
(PF) 15,000/month salary. shall be 10% of the wages (Basic) (it may would buy policies to avail 80C benefit on
▪ The contribution paid by the employee be increased to 12% by the Central Govt.). income tax. If the share of PF contribution
was 12% of basic salary and an equal ▪ Existing PF scheme will continue for one under 80c increases, then this would
contribution was payable by the more year for smooth transition. indirectly reduce the allocation towards life
employer also. insurance savings.
Page 5
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1 (b). New ‘Labour Laws’: Higher PF deduction could potentially lower 80C related life insurance allocation by 30-50%
Tax Status
▪ Exempt/ Exempt/ Exempt tax treatment for
Attractiveness
of Products
Public Provident Fund 8.5% Non-Par Products 4.5% to 6.2% PF (after 5 year of continuous employment)
and Life Insurance (which usually have min. 5-
year Premium Paying Term)
If the share of PF contribution in the Rs.150K exemption available under 80c increases, then this could potentially impact life insurance savings products significantly
CTC (Rs. Per month) Rs. 1,00,000 40-60% of Life policies have ticket less than Rs 125K (could be potentially bought
Pre-Regulation for 80C), which should be impacted by higher PF deductions
Basic as % of 80c Min (15,000) 30% 35% 40% FY20 - Composition of Individual Regular premium Ticket size (Rs.mn)
EPFO 21,600 43,200 50,400 57,600
10%
Other investments (ELSS/ Housing loan) 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 10%
45% 45% 42% 44%
Amount available for insurance Investment 78,400 56,800 49,600 42,400 63% 29%
Total 80C Investments 1,50,000 1,50,000 1,50,000 1,50,000
18% 21% 24% 19%
Post-Regulation
15% 27% 51%
Contribution to 80C(Rs.0.1mn*50%*12%*12) 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 29% 26% 28%
17%
Other investments (ELSS/ Housing loan) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 4% 8% 7% 6% 11%
Amount available for insurance Investment 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC LIC
Drop in eligible amount for 80C exemption <25,000 25,000-75,000 75,000-1,25,000 >1,25,000
-64% -51% -44% -34%
post PF
Source: Spark Capital Research
Page 6
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2 (a). Value vs. Volume (Individual APE): Entire life insurance industry growth during FY16-20 was driven by ticket size increase
Both for Pvt life insurers and LIC, the growth in APE over FY16-20 was driven by increase in the ticket size, as no of policies grew just ~2% during FY16-20
Pvt Insurers FY16-20 CAGR LIC FY16-20 CAGR Industry FY16-20 CAGR
Coverage universe growth is also ticket size led but better than industry Number of individual policies remained flat for industry
Page 7
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2 (b). Value vs. Volume (Individual APE): Ticket size led growth for HDFCLIFE / Max while growth in policies is supporting SBILIFE / BALIC in FY21
supported by increase in no
1.1% -11.8% -10.9% policies vs. ticket size, potentially
indicating higher share of
12.3% -8.4% 2.8% protection business
1.8%
MAX’s 3Q growth is driven by high
6.6% 8.6%
ticket size policies (newly launched
-0.8% 26.1% 25.1% non-par savings product)
-60.0%-40.0%-20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% -60.0% -40.0% -20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0%
1QFY21 2QFY21 3QFY21*
#3 (a). Product Mix: Product diversification in the savings business achieved for most of the insurers, hence see limited mix change going ahead
IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC
1%4% 5% 1%
1% 4% 4% 0%
11% 7% 8%
26% 24%
43%
FY18
29%
59%
ULIP
Par
11% 35%
34%
67%
21%
33%
19% 19%
ULIP
Par
We see limited, change in individual product mix (esp. savings business ) going ahead for most of the insurers and hence expect limited expansion in margin due to change in the product mix
#3 (b). Product Mix: Non- Par Savings is supporting growth; moderation in protection business (after strong demand in 1Q)
57% 78%
21% 66%
13% 110%
MAXF
3% 4% 25%
11% 11%
20% -6%
-27% -26%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
1. Individual APE growth for last ~2 years have been driven by Non-Par Savings. Further, favourable macros with respect to the yield curve supported this growth in FY21E
2. Par growth improved for HDFCLIFE and IPRU. Product diversification / conscious decision to lower contribution of non-par savings (HDFCLIFE) led to PAR segment growth
3. After strong demand for protection in 1Q, growth moderated for life insurers. IPRU market leader witnessed decline in 1H (due to price competition & lower share of Limited Pay Plans)
Page 11
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1. Non- Par Savings: Further steepening of yield curve is Forward Rate Agreement (FRA) conductive, thus supporting near term growth
With no significant change in IRRs on Non- Par Savings, VNB margins shall
Yield curve slope increased further – better FRA rates for life insurers
improve in near term with better FRA rates
8.0 Current FD Highest IRR
G-Sec Bond Yield Curve < 1yr < 3yr < 5yr 5-10yr Life cos.
7.5 Rates offered
7.0
6.5 HDFC Life 6.2%
6.0
HDFC Bank 4.4% 5.15% 5.50% 5.50%
5.90 TATA AIA 5.8%
%
5.5
5.0 ICICI Bank 4.9% 5.15% 5.35% 5.5% IPRU 5.3%
4.5
4.0 MAXF 5.7%
3.5
3.35 Axis Bank 5.15% 5.25% 5.4% 5.5%
BALIC 6.5%
3.0
ON 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y 30Y
SBI 4.4% 5.10% 5.30% 5.40% SBI Life 5.3%
Current 3M back 1yr back 2yrs back
Source: Bloomberg, Spark Capital Research Source: Company, Spark Capital Research
Difference in overnight rate and 10yr/30yr G-Sec yield is highest since global Spread between 10yr G-Sec and 1yr OIS + Bank Margin (assuming 100bps) is at all
financial crisis time high, leading to better FRA rates for life insurers
6
Spread between Overnight rate and G-Sec rate Spread between 10yr G-Sec and 1yr OIS + Bank Margin*
3.00
4 2.00
1.53
1.00
2
1.00
0.00
0 -1.00
-2.00
-2
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
Dec-11
Jun-12
Dec-12
Jun-13
Dec-13
Jun-14
Dec-14
Jun-15
Dec-15
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
-3.00
Jun-17
Jun-18
Jun-19
Jun-20
Dec-17
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-20
Oct-17
Oct-18
Oct-19
Oct-20
Apr-17
Feb-18
Apr-18
Feb-19
Apr-19
Feb-20
Apr-20
Aug-17
Aug-18
Aug-19
Aug-20
Difference Between overnight rate and 10yr Gsec rate
Difference Between 3M rate and 10yr Gsec
Source: Bloomberg, Spark Capital Research
Source: Bloomberg, Spark Capital Research
Page 12
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2. Non-Par Savings: Future growth in this segment is function of favourable FRA rate environment and supply of partly paid debentures (PPD)
Except for HDFCLIFE (which is a conscious decision), Non- Par Savings contribution sharply increased for most of the life insurers
60% 59%
53%
43% 45%
34% 32% 31% 34%
29%
26%
19% 18%
12% 11%
7% 8% 9% 8%
4% 6% 3% 3% NA
1% 0% 0% 0%
Partly Paid debenture (PPD) supported Non-Par growth for SBILIFE, IPRU and BALIC While HDFCLIFE and Max relied on FRA market to underwrite guarantee business
Partly Paid Up Bonds (Rs bn) Forward Rate Agreement + Interest Rate Swap (Notional), Rs bn
31 31 With FRA being attractive
119
and cheaper, Max
incrementally hedged
21 20 90 87 through FRAs and closed IRS
14 14 14
12
7 9 46 45
6 7 6
4 5 26 26
1 2 2
0 0 15
0 0 4 4
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20
HDFCLIFE Max TATA ABSLI
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU BALIC ABSLI
Source: Company, Spark Capital Research Source: Bloomberg, Spark Capital Research
Page 13
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#3. Non-Par Savings: HDFCLIFE relied on back book (credit protect) to under write Non- Par Savings in FY20, PPD + FRAs exposure lower than peers
BALIC has highest capacity of PPD to underwrite non-par savings business. SBILIFE & IPRU capacity is lower while Max relied on interest rate derivative market to underwrite
non-par. Lower coverage of PPD & FRA for HDFCLIFE (in FY20) could be also to be due to lower persistency assumptions
PPD + FRAs % of last 3 yrs cummulative Non-Par Savings APE
600%
490%
500%
400% 313%
300% 235%
190% 490%
200% 154%
114% 115%
313%
100% 132% 235%
114% 154% 79%
58% 36%
0% 0%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC TATA ABSLI
PPD FRAs
Non-Par contribution to life fund (largely individual traditional business) increased sharply for HDFCLIFE and steadily for MAX and BALIC. Any significant increase from the current level shall
remain a concern, as it could potentially increase balance sheet volatility.
0%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
1H21
1H21
1H21
1H21
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC TATA ABSLI
Page 14
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#4. Non- Par Savings: Larger banks have lower credit growth vs. deposit growth – an environment highly favourable for high IRR non-par products
Credit growth lower than deposit growth shall lead to better growth in individual
Historically, APE growth rate is negatively correlated with CD ratios
APE, esp. guarantee business
80
17
78 15
76 13 11.3
11
%, yoy
74
72.0 9
72 7
70 5
5.7
3
68
1
Jun-12
Dec-12
Jun-13
Dec-13
Jun-14
Dec-14
Jun-15
Dec-15
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Jun-18
Nov-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Nov-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Nov-20
Jul-18
Oct-18
Jul-19
Oct-19
Jul-20
Oct-20
Apr-18
Sep-18
Feb-19
Apr-19
Sep-19
Feb-20
Apr-20
Sep-20
May-18
Aug-18
May-19
Aug-19
May-20
Aug-20
Jan-19
Mar-19
Jan-20
Mar-20
Credit Deposit Ratio (%)
Deposit growth Credit growth
Larger banks which distribute life insurance product of coverage universe are witnessing lower credit growth vs. deposit growth
ICICI Bank Credit and Deposit State Bank Credit and Deposit HDFC Bank Credit and Deposit
HDFC Bank Credit and Deposit Growth 30% 50% Growth Growth
Growth
28% 25% 40% 28%
8% 0%
0% 8%
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Credit Growth Yoy Deposit Growth YoY
Page 15
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#5. Non- Par Savings: Cash flow hedging is reflected in the manageable interest rate sensitivity for most of the covered insurers.
SBILIFE’s EV sensitivity is higher due to group fund based business (where interest rate are re-set every quarter).
EV Sensitivity + 1% change in Risk Free Rate (%) EV Sensitivty: - 1% change in Risk Free Rate (%)
5.0%
-1.2%
-1.5%
-1.8% -1.7%
-2.1% -2.0% -1.9% -1.7% -1.8% 4.0%
3.6% 3.4%
-2.5% -2.5%
-2.9% 2.6%
-3.4% 2.2% 2.0%
1.9%
-4.0% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.8%
-5.0% 0.6% 0.7% 0.5%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX
HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX
IPRU’s VNB sensitivity to interest rates is higher due to ULIP business, were AUM growth (hence the fee income) is linked to interest rate (negative correlation). Max
Sensitivity is higher due to Par- business exposure. Non-Par sensitivity is function of unhedged cash flows
VNB Sensitivity + 1% change in Risk Free Rate (%) VNB Sensitivity - 1% change in Risk Free Rate (%)
6.8% 5.2%
4.4%
4.9% 2.2%
3.4%
3.0% 0.2% 0.9% 0.8% 0.0%
1.7% 1.6%
1.0% -1.7% -2.0% -1.8%
0.3% -0.2% -3.0%
-0.4%
-2.8% -2.4% -5.6% -6.2%
-3.6% -6.7%
-4.9% -4.3% -9.0%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX
Page 16
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Participating Products
Page 17
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1. Participating products: After normalization of yield curve, focus would be on Par segment to grow APE (if ULIP demand remains muted)
Reducing heavy reliance on Non- Par for HFCLIFE and ULIP for IPRU is driving Par growth; while others have defocused on this segment in last 2 years
28% 30%
26% 24% 23% 24%
19% 18% 17% 19%
15% 16% 16%
11% 11% 12%
9% 9%
LIC’s lucrative revisionary bonus rates and terminal bonus rates (for long term plans) shall limit scope for most of the private life insurers to gain market share in Par business
over medium to long terms LIC’s huge balance sheet, higher surplus sharing and lower cost ratios gives them ability to give better bonus rates
Premium Paying Terminal Bonus
Insurer Par - Product Policy Term Revisionary Bonus Insurers Par - Product Policy Term
Term Rate*
(Yrs) (Yrs) % of GMB Yrs % of GMB
LIC All Particating plans 15 2%
LIC Jeevan Anand 20 20 4.0%
All Particating plans 20 7%
Jeevan Labh 16 10 4.4%
All Particating plans 25 45%
IPRU Savings Surksha (LP) 20 10 3.0% All Particating plans 30 110%
Savings Surksha (RP) 20 10 1.8% All Particating plans 35 230%
Lakshya LT Wealth 20 10 3.2% All Particating plans 40 & above 355%
Future Perfect 20 10 2.3% IPRU Cash Back 15 25%
Save 'n' Product 15 30%
Sachay Par Advantage - Immediate
HDFCLIFE NA 10 3.6%** Forever Life RP 15 40%
income
HDFCLIFE Assurance Plan 15 67.3%
Classic Assure Plus 20 10 4.5%
Endowment Assurance 15 36.3%
Super Income Plan 20 10 4.5%
Money Back 15 44.0%
SBILIFE Smart Money Back 20 20 3.0% SBILIFE Money Back 15 40.0%
Smart Bachat 20 10 3.0% Sanjeevan Supreme 15 40.0%
BALIC Invest Assure 20 10 3.0% BALIC Invest Assure 20 0.50%
Young Assure 20 12 3.0% Young Assure 20 0.5%
Source: Company, Spark Capital. * GMB is Guaranteed Maturity Benefit, **Cash Bonus. ** Terminal bonus for most the pvt. insurers not available as these popular products have not
Page 18
completed one maturity cycle yet
Few product offer guranteed value addition which are rewarded to policyholder irrespective of surplus created.
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2. Participating Products : PAR AUM has failed to grow for most the Pvt insurers, which could be a hindrance to improve bonus rates
PAR contribution to Life funds (largely individual traditional AUM) remined broadly stable for life insurers.
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
18.3 19.9 22.0 22.6
Page 19
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Protection & Reinsurance
Page 20
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1. Protection: Sharp growth in reinsurance premium ceded vs. sum assured (SA) growth, reflect significant hardening of reinsurance rates
Despite sharp decline in new business sum assured in 1HFY21, the life reinsurance market grew by 34% YoY, clearly indicating sharp hardening of reinsurance rates
Total new business sum assured (Rs tn) Life reinsurance market (Rs bn)
60 12% 15% 40 50%
48 11% 34.0
50 43 42%
39 10% 3.0 34% 40%
8 30 24.0
40 11 28% 21.3
5% 17.9 20.8 30%
30 12 3.2 15.5
22 20 20 3.7 1.1
0% 11.8 15.0
10.9 2.9 12% 1.0 20%
20 40 3 3 2.2
33 10 1.4 1.8 19% 19%
27 -8% -5% 10%
10 19 17
9.4 8% 9.9 12.8 15.0 17.6 20.8 31.0 14.5 19.8
0 -10% 0 0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21
Pvt LIC YoY (%, RHS) Private LIC YoY growth (%, RHS)
Source: Company, IRDA, Spark Capital Source: Company, IRDA, Spark Capital
Slowdown in sum assured for the industry was more acute for group business, which we believe is due to lower off take of credit protect
Individual new business sum assured (Rs tn) Group new business sum assured (Rs tn)
28
25 25% 30 26 15%
20 24 2
22% 10%
20 17 20% 25 10%
5 6% 19
14 6 14% 15% 7 5%
20 16
15 6 12 11 14 1 0%
8 10% 15 12 1
5 8 26 1 -5%
10 6% 4 3 1
2 5% 10 21
13 2 18 18 -10%
5 12 13 15
9 8 9 0% 5 10 -15% -13%-15%
6 7
-3%
0 -5% 0 -20%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21 8MFY20 8MFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21 8MFY20 8MFY21
Pvt LIC YoY (%, RHS) Pvt LIC YoY (%, RHS)
Source: Company, IRDA, Spark Capital Source: Company, IRDA, Spark Capital
Page 21
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2. Protection: Reinsurance rate hardening is witnessed across the covered life insurers
Higher growth for reinsurance premium vs. sum assured reflect significant rate hardening for HDFCLFE, SBILIFE and IPRU. BALIC increase is due to higher share of protection
214%
6 250%
5 200%
4 84% 68% 64% 79% 66% 150%
35% 49% 36% 57% 44% 29% 31% 41% 39% 40% 24% 12% 20% 100%
3 -13% 50%
2 -49% 0%
1 1.9 2.6 4.8 1.9 2.8 1.9 1.0 3.1 1.7 2.9 2.6 3.5 5.5 2.5 3.6 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.0 1.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.1 2.0 0.9 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.5 1.2 1.5 -50%
0 -100%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC TATA ABSL
125% 110%
10 150%
8 50% 47% 100%
28% 21% 35% 33% 29% 19% 33% 26% 12% 23% 9%
6 4% -8% -10% 3% -7% 50%
4 -50% 0%
2 4.7 6.1 9.1 4.4 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.6 2.1 2.1 3.3 4.4 5.7 2.7 2.5 1.7 2.6 3.0 1.3 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.8 1.2 1.1 0.6 1.4 2.9 1.2 1.2 1.9 2.3 2.2 1.0 1.1 -50%
0 -100%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC TATA ABSL
265%
3 300%
250%
2 112% 200%
73% 71% 62% 150%
33% 40% 40% 25% 100%
1 16% 22% 12% 6% -19% 18% 11% 7% 11% -3%
-14% -11% 50%
1.6 1.9 2.3 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.3 0.6 0.5 2.0 2.4 2.7 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.8 0.8 1.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.2 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0%
0 -50%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
1H20
1H21
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC TATA ABSL
Page 22
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#3. Protection: HDFLCIFE, IPRU and MAX heavily dependent on reinsurers to underwrite high Sum Assured Individual protection
SBILIFE largely immune to reinsurance hardening as it had significantly lower ceding of sum assured. This was largely due to their focus on Return of Premium Plans (ROP)
where sum assured are lower than pure term insurance policies
67%
63%
62%
62%
59%
57%
70%
48%
48%
46%
60%
43%
47%
39%
39%
43% 43%
36%
50% 38% 41%
30%
36%
30%
27%
26%
40%
24%
23%
23%
22%
21%
19%
19%
18%
18%
16%
30%
14%
14%
12%
20%
10%
0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20
Individual - Sum assured ceded Group - Sum assured ceded Total - Sum assured ceded
IPRU and Max has higher sum assured per individual policies (due to higher contribution of individual protection) while sum assured per group is higher for SBILIFE due to
higher mortgage-based credit protect exposure
Individual sum assured per policy (Rs mn) Group Sum Assured per Life (Rs '000)
1,396
1,392
1,236
6.0 1,500
5.0
4.8
4.5
5.0
973
3.9
949
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.5
4.0
3.1
1,000
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
593
2.4
581
570
558
2.3
547
2.2
3.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
445
440
1.8
1.8
1.8
424
416
413
404
1.6
377
1.3
2.0
260
500
1.1
1.0
205
204
0.9
198
0.8
0.8
0.8
163
0.7
0.6
114
113
112
103
102
100
96
1.0
91
82
72
62
56
47
0.0 0
TATA MAX IPRU HDFCLIFE BAGIC ABSL SBILIFE ABSLI TATA SBILIFE MAX IPRU HDFCLIFE BAGIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 8M21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 8M21
Page 23
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#4. Protection: Further deterioration of combined ratios for reinsurers in life segments does not bodes well for life insurance companies
Foreign reinsurers provided maximum support to life reinsurance market; RGA conscious decision to slowdown life reinsurance in India, could potentially lead to lower supply
and increase in life reinsurance rates
FY18 - Life Reinsurance market FY19 - Life Reinsurance market FY20 - Life Reinsurance market
GICRE
GICRE
GICRE 20% Cross
24%
18% Border
Cross
Munich 31%
Border
8%
38%
Swiss Munich
Cross 4% 10%
Munich
Border
Hannover Swiss 10%
62% GenRE
1% 8%
Scor… 4%AXA Swiss
RGA Hannover 1% 9%
GenRE Scor
GenREAXA 3%
7% AXA RGA 3%
1% RGA ScorHannover
3% 0% 2% 11% 17% 3% 1%
Combined ratio of reinsurers in the life segment further deteriorated in FY20 and 1HFY21.
203%
240%
153%
200%
133%
127%
125%
124%
123%
123%
121%
121%
118%
118%
117%
115%
116%
113%
160%
110%
106%
106%
104%
103%
103%
102%
98%
84%
120%
79%
80%
1425%
40%
NA
0%
GICRE Munich Swiss Hannover Scor RGA AXA GenRE Total (ex- GICRE) Total
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
Source: IRDAI, Spark Capital.
Page 24
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#5. Protection: IPRU life lost market share in individual sum assured which is reflected in decline the individual protection business in 1HFY21
IPRU lost market share in individual SA and HDFCLIFE in group SA (slowdown in credit protect); Group Term Life (GTL) led to group SA growth for SBILIFE and IPRU
Market Share : Individual new business sum assured (%)
14.1%
13.7%
13.4%
13.0%
13.0%
12.6%
12.5%
12.5%
12.1%
11.7%
11.6%
11.4%
11.0%
10.9%
10.9%
15%
9.8%
9.2%
8.5%
7.2%
7.2%
6.7%
6.6%
10%
6.3%
5.8%
5.0%
4.5%
4.2%
2.9%
2.5%
2.4%
2.4%
2.2%
1.7%
1.7%
5%
1.2%
0%
HDFCLIFE IPRU MAX TATA SBILIFE BAGIC ABSL
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 8M21
30%
16.1%
14.9%
14.3%
12.8%
12.7%
12.5%
11.5%
20%
10.9%
10.7%
9.6%
8.7%
8.4%
8.3%
7.9%
7.7%
7.7%
7.3%
7.0%
6.8%
6.5%
6.4%
5.9%
5.7%
5.6%
5.4%
5.1%
4.3%
3.3%
10%
2.4%
2.2%
2.1%
1.9%
0.3%
0.0%
0%
HDFCLIFE IPRU MAX TATA SBILIFE BAGIC ABSL
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 8M21
18.9%
12.6%
12.5%
12.2%
11.8%
11.6%
11.3%
11.1%
10.7%
10.2%
15%
9.5%
8.8%
8.6%
8.0%
7.9%
7.3%
6.3%
6.2%
5.9%
5.9%
5.8%
5.7%
5.7%
5.6%
5.4%
5.4%
5.3%
10%
5.1%
5.0%
4.9%
4.5%
4.5%
3.1%
1.6%
5%
0%
HDFCLIFE IPRU MAX TATA SBILIFE BAGIC ABSL
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 8M21
#6. Protection: With slowdown in number of person insured in individual protection, we believe, growth for this segment to peak out
Though individual protection contribution has higher for IPRU, it witnessed decline in APE . Higher contribution is optical due to sharper decline in savings business
12.1%
12.0%
10 517% 600%
14.0%
10.4%
500%
12.0% 8
400%
7.9%
7.8%
7.2%
10.0% 6 300%
6.5%
6.3%
5.8%
5.6%
5.5%
8.0% 200%
4.7%
4.7%
4 69% 43% 76% 78%
31% 59% 43% 66% 49%
4.1% 28% 38% 38% 13%
3.8%
3.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0% 0 -100%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
1HFY21
0.0%
SBI life IPRU Max HDFC Life BALIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 HDFC Life SBI life IPRU Max BALIC
Ind Protection APE (Rs bn) YoY
Source: Company, Spark Capital Source: Company, Spark Capital
Individual protection APE growth driven by higher contribution of limited pay polices, coverage universe insuring less people, indicating plateauing of growth in this segment.
COVID scare demand (witnessed in 1Q) is also moderating for most of the life insurers.
No of new indivdual protection policies ('000) Indivdual protection APE per policy (Rs' 000 )
176% 127%
400 200% 25 150%
92%
150% 20 100%
300
100% 15 32% 43%
41% 46% 54% 51%
200 28% 16% 7% 8% 18% 50%
20% 50% 10 -2%
5% -7%
-8%
100 -38% 5 0%
0%
91 250 321 300 362 332 114 175 183 121 7 15 16 9 12 23 12 13 19 19
0 -50% 0 -50%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
No of individual protection policies ('000) YoY Protection Ticket size (Rs '000) YoY
Page 26
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#7. Protection: Any reinsurance rate hardening shall increase premium rates which could potentially impact growth further
Companies increase pure protection rates reflecting the increase in reinsurance rates Premium comparison between pure protection policies and return of
Mar'20 Apr'20 Jul'20 Nov'20 Increase in premium protection policies
Insurers Premium per policy Aug vs. Mar
Premium per policy Return of premium policies
ICICI Prudential Life 9,739 11,616 13,391 12,173 25%
Tata AIA 9,440 12,744 12,744 12,744 35% Insurers Nov'20 Nov'20 Difference
SBI Life 11,092 11,092 11,092 11,092 0%
ICICI Prudential Life 12,173 24,713 103%
LIC 11,007 11,007 11,007 11,007 0%
HDFC Life 9,718 10,648 10,648 10,648 10% Tata AIA 12,744 16,824 32%
ABSL 8,469 10,372 10,372 10,372 22% HDFC Life 10,648 24,968 134%
Max Life 8,378 8,378 9,912 9,912 18%
Max Life 9,912 17,472 76%
Bajaj Allianz 7,033 7,033 9,626 9,626 37%
Kotak Life 8,968 8,968 8,968 8,968 0% Bajaj Allianz 9,626 17,793 85%
PNB MetLife 8,732 8,732 8,732 10,384 19% PNB MetLife 10,384 22,050 112%
Edelweiss Tokio 7,228 7,228 7,950 7,950 10%
Future Generali 7,682 7,682 7,682 NA NA Source: Policy bazaar, Spark Capital * Premium per policy is for Sum
assured of Rs 10mn for a non-smoker at an entry age of 30 yrs and with a
Aegon Life 7,087 7,087 7,087 7,087 0% premium paying term of 30yrs. #Above prices include GST
Lower credit protect growth in 1HFY21 supported VNB margin for HDFCLIFE in 1H, Strong growth in home loan disbursals and growth in GTL led to higher share of
which could be under pressure if MFI/ ST loan related credit growth improves group protection for SBILIFE
10.9%
10.9%
100% 12%
7.8%
31% 38% 10%
7.4%
80% 40% 44% 47% 48% 39% 40% 41% 39%
53% 44%
6.8%
59% 65% 63%
6.0%
8%
5.3%
60%
4.9%
87%
4.7%
4.7%
4.5%
4.3%
4.2%
3.7%
40% 6%
3.0%
69% 62%
56% 53% 52% 61% 60%
2.3%
60% 59% 61%
20% 41% 35% 37% 47% 56% 4%
13% 2%
0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 0%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU Max SBI life IPRU Max HDFC Life
Source: Company, Spark Capital Research Source: Company, Spark Capital Research
Page 27
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
SBILIFE sensitivity to mortality could be higher due to higher retention and IPRU due to higher sum assured per policy
-5.6%
-8.0%
-7.0%
-8.9%
-9.2%
-5.4%
-9.4%
-9.5%
-3.7%
-3.5%
-5.0%
-4.3%
-10%
-10%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX
-1.8%
-1.2%
-1.6%
-1.0%
-2.0%
-2.3%
-1.9%
-1.0%
-1.4%
-1.6%
-1.3%
-1.4%
-1.8%
-1.7%
-1%
-1%
-2%
-2%
-3%
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY18
FY19
FY20
1H21
1H21
1H21
HDFC LIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX
Page 28
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
ULIPs
Page 29
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1. ULIP: Most of the insurers have reduced reliance on linked business; even weak demand for ULIP also impacted contribution
SBILIFE now has the highest contribution of ULIP to total APE in IHFY21; followed by IPRU
Increase in ULIP AUM (due to MTM gains) shall be EV positive, driven by economic variance. IPRU to be the biggest beneficiary
-4%
-12% -15% -15%
975 1,109 971 1,174 549 691 786 935 572 634 542 653 171 199 192 208 226 193 239
230
FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1H21
IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC
Page 30
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2. ULIP: Persistency key for ULIP profitability has been clearly under pressure for all insurers
IPRU, BALIC and MAXF has seen highest dent in their persistency ratio Lower impact in policy persistency, indicate higher lapses in larger ticket size ULIPs
13 Month (incl single premium) - Premium Persistency (%) 13Month - Policy Persistency (%)
82.0%
81.9%
80.7%
80.0%
79.8%
79.6%
79.5%
79.0%
78.8%
90.5%
90.1%
77.0%
77.0%
89.1%
75.3%
74.3%
87.2%
87.1%
73.9%
73.8%
87.0%
86.8%
86.8%
73.5%
72.8%
86.2%
86.1%
85.9%
72.2%
85.8%
85.1%
85.1%
71.0%
84.6%
84.0%
68.7%
68.3%
83.0%
83.0%
68.2%
82.0%
65.7%
81.0%
80.4%
64.5%
80.0%
79.2%
62.6%
77.2%
77.2%
IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY20 1HFY21
Fund management fees of discontinued funds is 0.5% vs. 1.25-12.35% for standard
Slippage into discontinued fund sharply increased which shall impact EV and VNB.
ULIP funds hence significant on VNB margins & ROEVs
ULIPs fund slipped in discontinued funds as % of opening linked AUM Discontinued funds % of total ULIP AUM (%)
9.9%
9.6%
9.3%
9.3%
9.1%
8.8%
7.2%
7.1%
6.7%
6.5%
6.5%
6.3%
6.2%
6.2%
6.0%
5.9%
5.7%
5.3%
5.3%
5.2%
5.0%
4.8%
4.6%
4.5%
4.5%
4.3%
4.3%
4.1%
4.1%
3.9%
3.7%
3.3%
3.3%
3.2%
3.0%
2.8%
2.4%
2.3%
2.2%
1.8%
IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC
Page 31
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#3. ULIP: Surrender ratio at elevated level and hence weak net addition to ULIP AUM
Except for SBILIFE, all insurers have witnessed sharp increase in ULIP surrender ration and out flow from ULIP AUMs
Surrender ratio as % of avg ULIP AUM Net addition to opening ULIP AUM (%)
18.8%
17.8%
17.7%
17.5%
17.1%
16.1%
15.2%
14.6%
14.0%
13.2%
13.1%
6.3%
11.3%
4%
10.7%
10.0%
0% 0.3% 1%
0% 0% -0.1%
-3% -2% -2.0%
-5% -4%
-5% -5.8% -7%
-13%
IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC IPRU SBILIFE HDFCLIFE MAXF BALIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
With increase in contribution of non-ULIP business, EV and VNB sensitivity to persistency has declined
VNB Sensitivity to 10% increase in lapse rate VNB Sensitivity to 10% increase in lapse rate
-0.9%
-0.9%
-1.2%
-1.2%
-2.1%
-2.1%
-2.9%
-2.9%
-3.7%
-3.7%
-3.9%
-3.9%
-4.1%
-4.1%
-5.0%
-5.0%
-5.5%
-5.5%
-5.6%
-5.6%
-5.8%
-5.8%
-6.0%
-6.0%
-7.0%
-7.0%
-8.5%
-8.5%
-8.6%
-8.6%
Page 32
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Distribution & Operating efficiency
Page 33
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1. Distribution: Bancassurance supported the growth, which could be at risk if CD ratio and yield curve normalizes
7%
31%
15%
-25% -26% -22%
28% 27%
8% 7% 16% -37%
6%
IPRU
30%
24% 22% 22%
MAXF
87% 82%
76% 38%
29%
57% 20%
BALIC
9% 25%
0% 11% 11%
-10% -13% -35%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
1. Lower credit growth vs. deposit and better IRR on non-par business led to significantly better growth in bancassurance channel for HDFCLIFE (HDFC Bank) and Max Life ( Axis bank)
2. Lock-down impact 1Q bancassurance growth for SBILIFE
3. ICICI Bank reluctance to sell traditional products and lower demand for ULIPs impacted bancassurance growth for IPRU
#2. Distribution: Agency channel remains sub-optimal for most of the insurers
Despite increase in agency additions, agency channel contribution has not improved for most of the insurers
IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
Source: Spark Capital Research Source: IRDA, Spark Capital Research
Agency productivity remains sub-optimal for HDFCLIFE & IPRU, lockdown impacted SBILIFE’s productivity in 1HFY21
Agent Productivity Premium (000s) Avg. No. of Policies per Agent (000s)
265 108.8
249 238
234 238
216 88.5 89.4 89.2
76.1 80.2 83.3
75.4
160 168 67.2 70.4 69.2
150 141 58.6 54.7 61.7
138 134 52.3 50.7 52.3
105 47.0
100 40.9
86 80 80 87
58 66
21.2
IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC
Source: IRDA, Company, Spark Capital Research Source: IRDA, Company, Spark Capital Research
Page 35
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#3. Distribution: Bank branch productivity was also under pressure for HDFCLFE (due to market share loss) and IPRU
Banca contribution has been under pressure in HDFCLIFE, IPRU and Max Life (due to Yes Bank), while it increased for BALIC
Contribution of Banca to Individual APE Major Bank Branch Productivity (Rs mn)
70.6% 69.3%
68.0% 71.6%
69.9%
66.0% 67.4%
58.5%
64.0%
60.0% 7.7 7.5 8.0
53.8% 6.6 6.4
48.9%
45.0% 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.5 5.9 5.7
5.0
IPRU HDFC Life SBI Life MAXF BALIC IPRU (ICICI Bank) HDFCLIFE (HDFC Bank) SBILIFE (SBI) Max (Axis)
Source: Company, Spark Capital Research Source: Company, Spark Capital Research
Page 36
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#4. Operating expenses: Cost control measured improved opex ratio and VNB margin; which we believe is unsustainable
HDFCLIFE’s segmental opex allocation towards Par segment is significantly higher than the company average
Par Opex (ex-commission) Ratio Non-Par Opex (ex-commission) Ratio Linked Opex (ex-commission) Ratio Total Opex (ex-commission) Ratio
18%
26%
18%
18%
21%
24%
24%
20%
22%
15%
18%
18%
21%
14%
17%
17%
20%
20%
20%
16%
16%
16%
13%
13%
13%
15%
16%
13%
11%
15%
15%
12%
12%
9%
8%
10%
8%
8%
8%
8%
7%
8%
8%
8%
7%
7%
6%
7%
6%
6%
7%
5%
6%
6%
5%
6%
6%
5%
5%
3%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC
FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
Profit dynamic of HDFC Bank channel for HDFCLIFE under pressure with higher opex towards the channel
HDFC Bank related Opex (ex-Commissions) HDFC Bank Related opex % of total Opex HDFC Life - Banca APE growth (%) Banca % of individual APE
7 6.3 100% 19% 18% 30% 26% 75%
78% 71%
6 18% 25%
4.9 80% 70%
5 17% 64%
4.1 20%
60% 16% 65%
4 3.2 15% 60%
3 15% 15% 10% 60%
28% 40% 55%
22% 23%
2 14% 13% 13% 10% 55%
20% 13%
1 5% 2% 50%
0 0% 12% -2%
11% 0% 45%
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
10% -5% 40%
HDFC Bank (Rs bn) YoY (%, RHS) FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
Page 37
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#5. Operating expenses: Cost control measures seen in employee & other admin cost; which shall normalize thus putting pressure on margin
Lower holding company expenses, narrowed VNB margin gap between
Admin cost contribution to total cost declined in 1HFY21
reported and net of hold expense margins
FY20 - Operating expense (ex-commission) 1HFY21 - Operating expense (ex- MAXF - Holding Company Expense (Rs mn) MAX - VNB margin
Mix (%) commission) Mix (%) 31%
1,200 40%
24.1%23.0%
18% 27% 24% 17% 22% 1,000 20% 20.8% 21.6%
32% 36% 29% 31% 23% 5% 20.2% 19.7%
800 17.6% 18.0%
18% 12% 1% 16% 10% 0%
39% 4% 39%
29% 29% 600
-29%
-20%
60% 400 -45%
56% 53% 64% 58% 63%
39% 36% 40% 38% 200 -40%
851 1,113 786 210
0 -60%
HDFCLIFE IPRU SBILIFE MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE IPRU SBILIFE MAX BALIC FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
Employee Adv & Prom IT Others MAXF -Holding company expenses (Rs
Employee Adv & Prom IT Others VNB margin VNB margin - Adj for Holdco exp
mn)
Cost control measures seen in employee & other admin cost; which shall normalize thus putting pressure on future VNB margin
Total Opex (% YoY) Employee cost (% YoY) Advertisement & Promotion cost (%, YoY) Other Opex (% YoY)
46%
29%
28%
24%
23%
22%
21%
34%
20%
19%
19%
19%
18%
21%
29%
16%
16%
14%
13%
14%
12%
11%
10%
19%
167%
9%
16%
15%
34%
34%
57%
61%
8%
4%
12%
12%
1%
4%
5%
10%
3%
9%
6%
1%
-61%
-27%
-1%
-5%
-2%
-9%
-10%
-12%
-12%
-17%
-13%
-19%
-14%
-17%
-22%
-24%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC
Page 38
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Key Financials & Valuation
Page 39
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#1 Profitability: Negligible operating variance + Decline in Unwind + Weak VNB Gearing = Structurally lower ROEVs
Key contributors to operatingg ROEVs – Unwind rate (due to lower interest rates), VNB gearing (lower APE growth) and Operating Variance ( pressure on persistency & Opex)
shall structurally have bearing operating ROEVs of life insurers
6.3%
11.0%
10.5%
9.7%
10.3%
10.1%
10.0%
7% 14% 11%
10.0%
9.3%
4.7%
9.1%
9.0%
6%
9.0%
8.8%
12% 10%
8.4%
8.5%
8.5%
8.5%
8.5%
8.5%
8.1%
8.4%
8.4%
7.9%
8.1%
7.4%
8.1%
8.0%
5%
8.0%
7.1%
3.0%
10%
2.9%
9%
7.6%
7.5%
5.7%
4%
5.2%
8%
1.7%
6.9%
1.5%
1.4%
1.4%
3% 8%
1.2%
1.0%
0.9%
0.7%
6%
2%
0.2%
1.7%
7%
1.3%
1.2%
1% 4%
2% 6%
0%
-1% 0% 5%
-0.1%
-0.2%
-0.2%
-0.9%
-0.2%
-2% -2% 4%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC
FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21 FY18 FY19 FY20 1HFY21
22.7%
25.2%
24.6%
21.9%
23.6%
21.5%
22.4%
21.7%
20.6%
20.4%
30%
20.3%
20.2%
20.1%
20.6%
25%
20.1%
19.5%
18.9%
18.7%
17.7%
18.1%
17.0%
17.9%
16.5%
16.2%
25%
17.4%
16.9%
16.6%
15.2%
20% 20%
9.9%
15%
6.9%
10.7%
5.8%
15%
10%
8.4%
8.2%
5%
10%
0%
-1.0%
-5% 5%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAX BALIC HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC
Page 40
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#2. Profitability: Muted EVOP growth; EV growth driven by economic variance in FY21E
VNB growth is not translating into EVOP growth due to lower operating variance and decline in unwind rate
107%
93%
150%
47%
100%
39%
34%
31%
25%
25%
24%
21%
20%
20%
17%
N.M
9%
50%
3%
0%
-12%
-13%
-50%
-15%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC
60%
100%
55%
38%
37%
24%
21%
14%
12%
50%
8%
6%
3%
3%
2%
2%
0%
-13%
-14%
-50%
-26%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC
EV Growth (%)
22%
30%
21%
20%
19%
19%
17%
17%
16%
15%
14%
13%
13%
13%
12%
12%
20%
10%
5%
4%
3%
10%
0%
HDFCLIFE SBILIFE IPRU MAXF BALIC
#3. EV Walk: EV growth in FY21 to driven by economic variance; operating ROEVs to be lower than historical average
SBILIFE IPRU HDFCLIFE MAXLIFE BALIC
EV
FY20 FY21E F22E F23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Opening EV 2,24,020 2,62,720 3,14,347 3,60,344 2,16,240 2,30,310 2,75,344 3,12,069 1,83,000 2,06,590 2,50,115 2,89,185 89,380 99,780 1,16,551 1,34,940 1,29,890 1,34,381 1,52,610 1,65,152
Assumption changes 0 0 0 0 -2,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -251 0 0 0
Adjusted opening EV 2,24,020 2,62,720 3,14,347 3,60,344 2,13,990 2,30,310 2,75,344 3,12,069 1,83,000 2,06,590 2,50,115 2,89,185 89,380 99,780 1,16,551 1,34,940 1,29,639 1,34,381 1,52,610 1,65,152
VNB 20,100 19,915 23,153 26,807 16,050 15,765 17,734 19,599 19,190 18,908 21,428 24,519 8,970 9,562 10,946 12,553 2,266 2,720 3,703 5,075
Unwind 19,000 22,590 25,926 29,913 17,250 19,648 22,545 25,984 13,700 17,599 20,516 23,971 8,526 9,925 11,404 13,207 9,838 8,881 10,378 11,448
Operating variance 6,700 -525 -314 0 1,830 -576 -275 312 300 826 1,000 1,157 1,030 -998 -583 -337 -938 -672 -382 -413
Operating EV earnings 45,800 41,980 48,765 56,720 32,880 34,837 40,004 45,896 33,190 37,334 42,945 49,647 18,526 18,489 21,767 25,422 11,166 10,930 13,699 16,110
Economic variance -7,100 12,085 0 0 -14,760 11,285 0 0 -10,000 9,785 0 0 -3,170 2,095 0 0 -5,149 7,299 0 0
EV Earnings 38,700 54,066 48,765 56,720 18,120 46,122 40,004 45,896 23,190 47,119 42,945 49,647 14,960 19,781 21,087 24,653 6,017 18,229 13,699 16,110
EV before capital
2,62,720 3,16,786 3,63,112 4,17,064 2,34,360 2,76,432 3,15,348 3,57,964 2,06,190 2,53,709 2,93,059 3,38,833 1,04,340 1,19,561 1,37,638 1,59,593 1,35,656 1,52,610 1,66,309 1,81,262
changes
Dividends 0 -2,438 -2,768 -3,164 -4,050 -1,088 -3,280 -3,356 0 -3,594 -3,874 -4,309 -4,560 -3,010 -2,698 -2,355 -1,275 0 -1,158 -1,149
Capital infusion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Closing EV 2,62,720 3,14,347 3,60,344 4,13,900 2,30,310 2,75,344 3,12,069 3,54,608 2,06,590 2,50,115 2,89,185 3,34,524 99,780 1,16,551 1,34,940 1,57,237 1,34,381 1,52,610 1,65,152 1,80,112
Operating EV earnings 45,800 41,980 48,765 56,720 32,880 34,837 40,004 45,896 33,190 37,334 42,945 49,647 18,526 18,489 21,767 25,422 11,166 10,930 13,699 16,110
EV earnings 38,700 54,066 48,765 56,720 18,120 46,122 40,004 45,896 23,190 47,119 42,945 49,647 14,960 19,781 21,087 24,653 6,017 18,229 13,699 16,110
Operaing ROEV 20.4% 16.0% 15.5% 15.7% 15.2% 15.1% 14.5% 14.7% 18.1% 18.07% 17.2% 17.2% 20.7% 18.5% 18.7% 18.8% 8.6% 8.1% 9.0% 9.8%
ROEV 17.3% 20.6% 15.5% 15.7% 8.4% 20.0% 14.5% 14.7% 12.7% 22.8% 17.2% 17.2% 16.7% 19.8% 18.1% 18.3% 4.6% 13.6% 9.0% 9.8%
ROEV Tree FY20 FY21E F22E F23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
Assumption changes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VNB Gearing 9.0% 7.6% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 6.8% 6.4% 6.3% 10.5% 9.2% 8.6% 8.5% 10.0% 9.6% 9.4% 9.3% 1.7% 2.0% 2.4% 3.1%
Unwind 8.5% 8.6% 8.2% 8.3% 8.0% 8.5% 8.2% 8.3% 7.5% 8.5% 8.2% 8.3% 9.5% 9.9% 9.8% 9.8% 7.6% 6.6% 6.8% 6.9%
Operating variance 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% -0.3% -0.1% 0.1% 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.2% -1.0% -0.5% -0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%
Operating ROEV 19.9% 16.2% 15.6% 15.7% 15.2% 15.1% 14.5% 14.7% 18.8% 18.1% 17.2% 17.2% 20.7% 18.5% 18.7% 18.8% 9.4% 8.8% 9.3% 10.1%
Economic variance -3.2% 4.6% 0.0% 0.0% -6.8% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% -5.5% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% -3.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
ROEV 16.7% 20.8% 15.6% 15.7% 8.4% 20.0% 14.5% 14.7% 13.3% 22.8% 17.2% 17.2% 17.2% 20.6% 18.7% 18.8% 9.4% 8.8% 9.3% 10.1%
VIF % of EV 65.6% 62.6% 63.0% 63.5% 73.7% 69.5% 70.6% 71.9% 70.7% 67.3% 67.5% 67.9% 77.4% 76.7% 76.9% 76.7% 24.2% 29.2% 30.4% 36.2%
Key Assumptions FY20 FY21E F22E F23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
APE 1,07,500 1,05,116 1,22,598 1,41,272 73,810 64,340 73,563 83,385 74,070 75,421 86,924 99,987 41,490 43,479 50,563 57,824 22,945 24,868 28,775 33,120
APE growth 10.8% -2.2% 16.6% 15.2% -5.4% -12.8% 14.3% 13.4% 18.3% 1.8% 15.3% 15.0% 5.0% 4.8% 16.3% 14.4% 3.1% 8.4% 15.7% 15.1%
VNB Margins 18.7% 18.9% 18.9% 19.0% 21.7% 24.5% 24.1% 23.5% 25.9% 25.1% 24.7% 24.5% 21.6% 22.0% 21.6% 21.7% 9.9% 10.9% 12.9% 15.3%
VNB 20,100 19,915 23,153 26,807 16,027 15,765 17,734 19,599 19,190 18,908 21,428 24,519 8,970 9,562 10,946 12,553 2,266 2,720 3,703 5,075
Page 43
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
VNB sensitivity SBILIFE –Sep’20 IPRU – Mar’20 HDFCLIFE –Sep’ 20 MAXF – Sep’20
Interest rates
+ 100bps interest rate / discount rate -0.20% -2.40% -3.6% 3.00%
- 100bps interest rate / discount rate 0.00% 2.20% 0.8% -6.00%
- 10% Equity value -0.40% -0.7% -0.4% 0.00%
Expenses
+ 10% maintainance expenses -2.60% -3.00% -2.4% -8.00%
- 10% maintainance expenses 2.60% 3.00% 2.5% 8.00%
+ 10% acquisition expenses N.A. -11.6% -11.6%. N.A.
- 10% acquisition expenses N.A. 11.6% 11.6%. N.A.
Policy/ Premium discontinuance
+10% multiplicative increase in discountinuance rate -3.90% -5.0% -1.2% -1.00%
-10% multiplicative decrease in discountinuance rate 5.00% 5.1% 0.8% 1.00%
Insurance risk
+5% mortality & morbidity rates -4.60% -4.75% -2.8% -2.00%
-5% mortality & morbidity rates -4.60% 4.80% 2.8% 2.00%
Taxation
Assumed corporate tax increased to 25% -16.30% -11.40% -19.9% -22.00%
Page 44
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Embedded Value - Sep'22 (Rs. bn) 333 387 312 146 173
Distribution discount 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Appraisal Value (Rs. Bn) 618 950 1,040 336 233
Value of Holding in Business (Rs. bn) 618 950 1,040 269 172
Average Op. EV Earnings - Sep'22 (Rs. bn) 42.9 52.7 46.3 21.1 14.9
Page 45
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
SOTP valuation for BJFIN % holding Basis of Valuation on Sep'22E Rs per share % of total SOTP
Total 13,073
CMP 5,873
Page 46
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Page 47
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Company EV p/s (Rs) EVE P/s (Rs) Operating EVE P/s (Rs) NBV p/S
FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
IPRU 160.4 191.8 217.3 247.0 12.6 32.1 27.9 32.0 22.9 24.3 27.9 32.0 11.2 11.0 12.4 13.6
SBILIFE 262.7 314.3 360.3 413.9 38.7 54.1 48.8 56.7 45.8 42.0 48.8 56.7 20.1 19.9 23.2 26.8
HDFCLIFE 102.3 123.8 143.2 165.6 11.5 23.3 21.3 24.6 16.4 18.5 21.3 24.6 9.5 9.4 10.6 12.1
MAXF 231.3 270.2 312.8 364.5 34.7 45.9 48.9 57.2 42.0 41.0 48.9 57.2 20.8 22.2 25.4 29.1
Company EV p/s growth (%) EVE P/s growth (%) Operating EVE P/s growth (%) NB p/s growth (%)
FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E FY20 FY21E FY22E FY23E
IPRU 6.5% 19.6% 13.3% 13.6% -50.7% 154.5% -13.3% 14.7% -13.5% 5.9% 14.8% 14.7% 20.7% -1.6% 12.5% 10.5%
SBILIFE 17.3% 19.6% 14.6% 14.9% 8.3% 39.7% -9.8% 16.3% 37.8% -8.3% 16.2% 16.3% 16.9% -0.9% 16.3% 15.8%
HDFCLIFE 12.8% 21.0% 15.6% 15.7% -32.3% 103.1% -8.9% 15.6% 8.2% 12.4% 15.0% 15.6% 24.6% -1.5% 13.3% 14.4%
MAXF 11.6% 16.8% 15.8% 16.5% -26.3% 32.2% 6.6% 16.9% -4.5% -2.5% 19.2% 16.9% 9.0% 6.6% 14.5% 14.7%
Source: Spark Capital. Note: Per share number for MAXF are adjusted to % holding of MAXF in Max Life: Note: MAXF is for 80% economic interest in Max Life
Page 48
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#10. SBILIFE: At CMP, it is trading at ~2 std dev below average 1-yr fwd P/EV and ~1std dev below 1-yr fwd P/EVOP and NBx
1 yr – fwd P/EV 1 yr – fwd P/EVOP 1 yr – fwd NBx range No. of days traded % of of no. of days
No. of days traded % of of no. of days No. of days traded % of of no. of days
range range
< 15x 29 2%
< 2x 10 1% < 14x 162 14% 15 - 17x 148 13%
2 - 2.2x 35 3% 14 - 15.5x 119 10% 17 - 19x 187 16%
2.2 - 2.4x 293 25% 15.5 - 17x 19 - 21x 166 14%
SBILIFE
79 7%
2.4 - 2.6x 194 16% 21 - 23x 222 19%
17 - 18.5x 262 22%
23 - 25x 197 17%
2.6 - 2.8x 121 10% 18.5 - 20x 187 16% 25 - 27x 112 9%
2.8 - 3x 184 16%
20 - 21.5x 181 15% 27 - 29x 16 1%
3 - 3.2x 166 14% 29 - 31x 74 6%
21.5 - 23x 155 13%
3.2 - 3.4x 173 15% 31 - 34x 30 3%
23 - 24.5x 37 3%
3.4 - 3.6x 6 1% 33 - 35x 1 0%
Total Days 1182 Total Days 1182
Total Days 1182
Source Bloomberg, Spark Capital
SBILIFE is trading at 2 std dev below avg 1-yr fwd P/EV and ~1std dev below 1-yr fwd P/EVOP and NBx
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Page 49
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#11. IPRU: At CMP, it is trading at ~2 std dev below average 1-yr fwd P/EV, P/EVOP and NBx
IPRU is trading at 2 std dev below avg 1-yr fwd P/EV, P/EVOP and NBx
4.0 IPRU - 1yr Fwd. P/EV Chart 25.0 IPRU - P/EVOP Chart IPRU – 1-yr fwd NBx
36.0
3.5
20.0
3.0 26.0
2.5
15.0 16.0
2.0
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Feb-18
Oct-18
Feb-19
Oct-19
Feb-20
Oct-20
Apr-18
Aug-18
Apr-19
Aug-19
Apr-20
Aug-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Oct-17
Oct-18
Oct-19
Oct-20
Feb-18
Apr-18
Feb-19
Apr-19
Feb-20
Apr-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Aug-18
Aug-19
Aug-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Page 50
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#12. HDFCLIFE: At CMP. it is still expensive on 1yr fwd P/EVOP and NBx multiples for its ROEV profile
HDFCLIFE is the only insurer still trading above the listing multiples
Jun-19
Jun-20
Dec-17
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
18.0 20.0
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Oct-18
Oct-19
Oct-20
Feb-18
Apr-18
Feb-19
Apr-19
Feb-20
Apr-20
Aug-18
Aug-19
Aug-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
P/EV Mean +1 SD
P/EVOP Mean +1 SD
-1 SD +2 SD -2 SD
-1 SD +2 SD -2 SD P/NBx Mean +1 SD
Page 51
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
#13. MAXF is trading at lowest multiple among peers due to promoter pledge share issue
MAXF is not trading significantly below mean 1yr fwd P/EVOP at CMP
MAXF is trading below ~1 std dev of average 1yr fwd P/EV and NBx
0.0
0.8 4.0
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Oct-18
Oct-19
Oct-20
Feb-18
Apr-18
Feb-19
Apr-19
Feb-20
Apr-20
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Aug-18
Aug-19
Aug-20
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Page 52
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Spark Disclaimer
Absolute Rating BUY Stock expected to provide positive returns of >15% over a 1-year horizon REDUCE Stock expected to provide returns of <5% – -10% over a 1-year horizon
Interpretation ADD Stock expected to provide positive returns of >5% – <15% over a 1-year horizon SELL Stock expected to fall >10% over a 1-year horizon
Products and services, other than Broking products and services e.g. Research Reports are not exchange traded products. Disputes relating to the research activities of Spark Capital do not have access to exchange investor redressal or Arbitration mechanism.
For any grievances, please write to investorgrievance@sparkcapital.in
Page 53
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25
Life Insurance Sector
Certification by each of the authors of this Report: The analyst certifies that the views expressed in this document are an accurate representation of the analyst's personal opinions on the stock or sector as covered and reported on by the analyst herein. The analyst furthermore certifies that no part of the analyst's compensation was, is or will be related,
directly or indirectly, to the specific recommendations or views as expressed in this document. The information and any opinions expressed in this Report do not constitute an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.
SPARK CAPITAL DISCLAIMER:
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited ("Spark Capital") and its affiliates are engaged in investment banking, investment advisory and institutional equities. Spark Capital is registered with SEBI as a Stockbroker (corporate member on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange), Research Analyst, Category I Merchant Banker and
Depository Participant (with CDSL). We hereby declare that our activities were neither suspended nor have we defaulted with any stock exchange authority with whom we are registered in the last five years. We have not been debarred from doing business by any Stock Exchange/SEBI or any other authorities, nor has our certificate of registration
been cancelled by SEBI at any point of time.
Spark Capital’s subsidiaries include, (1) Spark Family Office and Investment Advisors (India) Private Limited which is engaged in the services of providing investment advisory services and stock brokerage services and is registered with SEBI as Investment Advisor and Stock Broker and as a Distributer with AMFI (2) Spark Alternative Asset Advisors
India Private Limited investment manager to Category II Alternate Investment Fund (3) Spark Fund Managers Private Limited which is engaged in the business of Portfolio Management Services and is registered with SEBI as a Portfolio Manager and (4) Spark Fund Advisors LLP investment manager to Category III Alternate Investment Fund.
Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as it deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult its own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. This
document is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in
any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject Spark Capital and/or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all
jurisdictions or to a certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves of and to observe such applicable restrictions. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation
would be illegal.
Emerging securities markets may be subject to risks significantly higher than more established markets. In particular, the political and economic environment, company practices and market prices and volumes may be subject to significant variations. The ability to assess such risks may also be limited due to significantly lower information quantity
and quality. By accepting this document, you agree to be bound by all the provisions as may be applicable pursuant to it. Spark Capital makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Spark Capital , its affiliates, and the employees of
Spark Capital and its affiliates may, from time to time, effect or have effected an own account transaction in, or deal as principal or agent in or for the securities mentioned in this document. They may perform or seek to perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any company referred to
in this report.
This report has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through an independent analysis by Spark Capital. While we would endeavour to update the information herein on a reasonable basis, Spark Capital and its affiliates are under no obligation to update the information. Also,
there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that prevent Spark Capital and its affiliates from doing so. Neither Spark Capital nor its affiliates or their respective directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be responsible or liable in any manner, directly or indirectly, for views or opinions expressed in this report or the contents or
any errors or discrepancies herein or for any decisions or actions taken in reliance on the report or the inability to use or access our service in this report or for any loss or damages whether direct or indirect, incidental, special or consequential including without limitation loss of revenue or profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of
or reliance on this report.
Products and services, other than Broking products and services e.g. Research Reports are not exchange traded products. Disputes relating to the research activities of Spark Capital do not have access to exchange investor redressal or Arbitration mechanism. For any grievances, please write to investorgrievance@sparkcapital.in.
Analyst Certification of Independence
The views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the analyst’s personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and no part of the research analyst’s compensations was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendation or views expressed in the report.
NOTICE TO US INVESTORS:
Rule 15a6 Disclosure: This Report was prepared, approved, published, and distributed by Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited, a company located outside of the United States (the "Foreign Counterparty"). Avior Capital Markets US LLC ("Avior US"), a US registered broker-dealer, distributes this Report in the US on behalf of the Foreign
Counterparty. Only major U.S. institutional investors (as defined in Rule 15a-6 under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") may receive this Report under the exemption in Rule 15a-6. A US institutional investor must effect any transaction in the securities described in this Report through Avior US.
Neither the Report nor any analyst who prepared or approved the Report is subject to US legal requirements or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") or other US regulatory requirements concerning research reports or research analysts. The Foreign Counterparty is not a registered broker-dealer under the Exchange Act nor is
it a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or any other US self-regulatory organisation.
Analyst Certification: In connection with the companies or securities that; each analyst identified in this Report certifies that: The views expressed on the subject companies and securities in this Report reflect their personal views. No part of his or her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly dependent on the specific recommendations
or views expressed in this Report.
Note that:
(i) The Foreign Counterparty is the employer of the research analyst(s) responsible for the content of this Report, and
(ii) Research analysts preparing this Report are resident outside the United States and are not associated persons of any US regulated broker-dealer. Therefore, the analyst(s) are not subject to supervision by a US broker-dealer and are not required to satisfy the regulatory licensing requirements of FINRA or required to otherwise comply with US
rules or regulations regarding, among other things, communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies
Analysts of the Foreign Counterparty produced this material solely for informational purposes and the use of the intended recipient. No person may reproduce, this Report under any circumstances. No person may copy or make this Report available to any other person other than the intended recipient.
Avior US distributes this Report in the United States of America. The Foreign Counterparty distributes this Report elsewhere in the world. This document is not an offer, or invitation by or on behalf of Avior US, the Foreign Counterparty, their affiliates, or any other person, to buy or sell any security.
Avior US and the Foreign Counterparty and their affiliates obtained the information contained herein from published information and other sources, which Avior US and the Foreign Counterparty and their affiliates reasonably consider to be reliable.
Avior US and the Foreign Counterparty accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the accuracy or completeness of any such information. All estimates, expressions of opinion and other subjective judgments contained herein are valid as of the date of this document. Avior US assumes responsibility for the Report content with regards to
research distributed in the US.
Neither Avior US nor the Foreign Counterparty has managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for the subject company in the past 12 months, have not received compensation for investment banking services from the subject company in the past 12 months and do not expect to receive and does not intend to seek compensation for
investment banking services from the subject company in the next three months. Avior US and the Foreign Counterparty have not owned any class of equity securities of the subject company. There are no other actual, material conflicts of interest of Avior US and the Foreign Counterparty at the time of the publication of this Report. As of the
publication of this Report, Avior US nor the Foreign Counterparty makes a market in the subject securities.
Avior US and its affiliates, to the fullest extent permissible by law, accept no liability of any nature whatsoever for any claims, damages or losses arising from, or in connection with, the contents of this Report or the use, reliance, publication, distribution, dissemination, disclosure, alteration or reproduction of this Report, or any views or
recommendations recorded therein.
ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER FOR UK INVESTORS:
Spark Capital’s research, including the recommendations recorded therein, have been objectively prepared from public sources which it believed to be reliable and therefore constitutes independent investment research, and is presented as such. Note that Spark Capital has concluded an agreement with Avior Capital Markets International Limited
("ACMI"), regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 191074), pursuant to which ACMI promotes and markets the products and research of Spark Capital, and to provide investment advice in respect thereof to the extent permissible, and in return for which Spark Capital pays a monthly fee and commissions earned on certain qualifying
transactions to ACMI. Spark Capital’s research reports, including any recommendations in respect thereof, may only be distributed to, and relied on by, qualifying investors, who are permitted to receive same in the UK. A list of Spark Capital’s research reports disseminated in the UK over the past 12 months is available on request.
This material produced by Spark Capital is solely for information purposes only and for the personal use of the recipient. It is not to be reproduced under any circumstances and is not to be copied or made available to any person other than the recipient. It is distributed in the UK by ACMI and elsewhere in the world by Spark Capital or an authorized
affiliate of Spark Capital. This document does not constitute an offer of, or an invitation by or on behalf of Spark Capital or its affiliates or any other company to any person, to buy or sell any security.
Securities, money market instruments, strategies, financial or investment instruments mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. The information and opinions provided in this note do not constitute a personal recommendation and take no account of the investor's individual circumstances. Investors should consider this research as
only a single factor in making any investment decisions and, if appropriate, should seek advice from an investment advisor.
Spark Capital or its affiliates does not accept any liability or responsibility whatsoever for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in its research reports. All estimates, expressions of opinion and other subjective judgments contained herein are made as of the date of this document. Emerging securities markets may be subject to
risks significantly higher than more established markets. In particular, the political and economic environment, company practices and market prices and volumes may be subject to significant variations.
Save as specifically disclosed otherwise, Spark Capital’s relationship with ACMI is not reasonably expected to impair the objective presentation of the recommendations in respect of in the research report, including any interests or conflicts of interest concerning any financial instruments or the issuers to which the recommendations, directly or
indirectly, relate. The research report is deemed to be first disseminated at the date and time recorded on Spark Capital’s distribution platform or data network, and which information is available on request.
ACMI does not assume any responsibility, or liability of any nature whatsoever, arising from or in connection with the contents, use, reliance or dissemination of Spark Capital’s research or any recommendation in respect thereof and disclaims any such liability.
Avior Capital Markets US LLC is a FINRA registered broker-dealer (CRD # 172595) formed for that purpose in the State of Delaware with its principal office at 733 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited is a financial services company incorporated in India, with its registered address at 'Reflections' New No.2 | Leith castle center street, Santhome high road, Chennai-600 028
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited,'Reflections' New No.2, Leith castle center street, Santhome high road, Chennai-600 028 | Avior LLC | 733 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017
Spark Capital Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. is a SEBI registered Research Analyst bearing SEBI Registration No. INH200001459
Page 54
This file was downloaded from Spark Research website by eq.researchportal1@gmail.com|December 28, 2020 09:20:25