Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to 19th-Century Music
BRIAN PRIMMER
0148-2076/82/030097 + 44$00.50 C 1981 by The Regents of Nothing outside of you matters, but solely you your-
the University of California. self.
97
For all their common debt to Rousseau and to throughout the eighteenth century-is revealed
the times of Sturm und Drang, Romantic atti-by the shape and emphasis of the critical articles
tudes in France took on a quite different coloring
it continued to evoke during the nineteenth. As
from those we find in Germany. This was nota general rule consideration of the text took prec-
only because French Romanticism was manifest edence over any assessment of the score; and this
at a later date than was its German counterpart, well-trodden formula held good throughout the
but also because of the quite distinct traditionsRomantic years. In the prior position which they
which environed each. The hold over French ar- accord to the names of the librettists, the follow-
tistic and intellectual life exerted by Neo-Clas- ing selected headings, taken from reviews of op-
sical values had achieved its firmest grasp in eras produced in Paris during the decade from
Tragedie, its musical embodiment in Tragedie 1828 to 1837, are typical of the general layout of
lyrique. To a Frenchman music meant first and contemporary criticism.
foremost opera-and French opera at that. From
the time of its foundation, when Lully had stud- LA MUETTE DE PORTICI, op6ra en cinq actes de
ied the vocal modulations of the actors at the MM SCRIBE et GERMAIN DELAVIGNE, musique
de M. AUBER
The6itre frangais, French opera and, by transfer- Le Globe, 5 March 1828
ence, French music in general, had been con-
structed on a literary and declamatory basis
Robert le Diable, op6ra en cinq actes, paroles de MM
rather than a purely musical one. The continu-Scribe et Germain Delavigne, musique de M. Meyer-
Beer
ing strength of this essentially Baroque tradition
Gazette de France, 23 November 1831
throughout the eighteenth century and into the
post-Revolutionary years is attested quite LA PRISON d'EDIMBOURG. Op6ra en trois actes,
clearly by Gr6try's remarks upon the trainingparoles de MM SCRIBE et PLANARD, musique de
CARAFA
proper to a composer who wished to write mov-
La Revue Musicale, 27 July 1833
ingly for the human voice.
La Esmeralda, opera en 4 actes: paroles de M. Victor
Yes, it is at the Theatre frangais, from the lips of the
Hugo, musique de Mademoiselle Louise Bertin
great actors, that declamation, accompanied by the-
Revue et Gazette Musicale, 20 November 1836
atrical illusions, gives us the ineffaceable impressions
which the best-analyzed precepts will never replace.
Stradella, op6ra en cinq actes, paroles de MM Emile
It is there that the musician learns to interrogate
Deschamps et Emilion Paccini, musique de M. Nied-
the passions, to sound the depths of the human heart,
ermeyer
to get a clear idea of all the impulses of the soul. It is
Journal des DBbats, 5 March 1837
in that school that he learns to recognize and to repro-
duce their true accents, to mark their nuances and
their limits.4 As the critic of the Journal des Dibats wrote
on December 9th 1824, after the premibre of
Robin des bois at the Oddon, "first we shall
The consequent relative importance of the
concern ourselves with the words and then come
text and music in French opera-a subject whose
niceties had occupied the Parisian journals on to the music." No wonder that Stendhal, a
100
104
II
"The representation of the Infinite in finite thedral of art was built by his exalted spirit."35
terms"33 had been the definition of Beauty And more than a decade later still, Robert Schu-
vouchsafed to his hearers by Schelling during a mann speaking through the mouth of Karl Voigt
course of lectures on the Philosophy of Art given described his reaction to a performance of the
at Jena during the winter of 1802-03, and re- Ninth Symphony by Beethoven in words which
peated at Wiirzburg some two years later. He had seem to betray the direct influence of Von
no doubt been thinking primarily of the plastic deutscher Baukunst: "I am the blind man who
arts and particularly of Gothic architecture, then is standing before the Strasbourg Cathedral, who
coming to be regarded by German Romantics as hears its bells but cannot see the entrance."36
essentially their own native, national and pecu- Goethe's almost more than metaphorical at-
liar style. tribution of the characteristics of living tissue to
The consecration of Gothic style to Roman- an apparently inanimate and complex Gothic
tic sensibilities, and its alliance with burgeoning structure was perhaps the first clear and outward
German nationalism, stemmed from a remark- manifestation of that belief in the correspon-
able essay on Strasbourg Cathedral published by dence of the immanent laws of Nature and of Art
Goethe in 1772, and entitled Von deutscher Bau- to which he subscribed throughout the rest of
kunst. In it Goethe hymns the minster's facade his life. Rousseau's call for a return to Nature
in terms of a biological vitality which, following had concentrated men's thoughts primarily
his example, all critics of the arts in Germany upon her outward show. Now Goethe led them
were soon to make the chief source of their own to ponder over the mysteries of her inner work-
ings. And music was seen to take its language
poetic imagery and metaphor. Having likened its
multifarious but harmonizing details to those from within the very heart of natural man and to
which made up "the trees of God," he extolled beholden to no external model whatsoever. As
the building as it gleamed toward him in the Novalis put it, "The musician takes the essence
fragrant morning light for its "great harmonious of his art out of himself-and not the slightest
masses alive in their countless tiny details, as in suspicion of imitation can befall him."37
the works of eternal nature, down to the smallest Thus it was that not only Nature, but also the
fibre, all form, and all contributing to the very nature of Nature, came to be under his clos-
whole."34 Some idea of the importance of the est scrutiny. Upon examination, however, the
insights contained within this slim volume and apparently simple and untutored whole was
of their significance and general influence dur- found to be the fruit of a multitudinous and vi-
ing the Romantic years can be caught in the brant complexity rivaling in its technical sophis-
echoes they evoked in the course of two articles tication the most minutely detailed works of
written more than a generation after its first men. Henceforth the methods of German art
appearance. "Sebastian Bach's individuality were to be inspired by those of this inner Nature.
was, in its own strength, intrinsically Romantic To her organic processes all art-works were re-
and was of true German basis," Carl Maria von ferred until what at first had been little more
Weber wrote in 1818. "His style was one of gran- than a highly illuminating metaphor, an appro-
deur, nobility and power.... A true Gothic ca- priate tool for criticism and philosophy, a clari-
105
III
If metaphor in Germany was largely biological, cept of more generalized genius had fostered the
that in France was often decked out in military personal intensities of Sturm und Drang in Ger-
terms or dramatized in those of elemental force many, helping to clear a path for full Romanti-
and cataclysm. In Napoleon-or, more accu- cism, so in France Romantic attitudes were
rately perhaps, in the idea of that Napoleon bathed in a radiance of remembered glory and
who had once described himself as a "volcano" culminated in the overwhelming image of Na-
which the Romantic generation formed-an-poleon. In his peculiar embodiment of genius-
tique ideals of glory and of heroism were com-made even more compelling, I suspect, by his
bined with those of genius. In the early nine-eventual defeat, exile, and lonely death-Ro-
teenth century the concept of that opera which
mantic artists discerned not only a vision to in-
had dominated France since Lully's time allied
spire their own conceptions of the hero and his
itself to Empire and imperial display. The spec-fate at bourgeois hands, but also a symbol
tacles to which they were accustomed on thethrough which the elemental pressures in their
stage flowed over into life, and Frenchmen found souls might be both realized and released. This
themselves involved in a living drama even moreimage of the Bonaparte hovers over Romanti-
arresting than that of the Revolution itself. cism I in France as an eagle soars above its moun-
often wonder if the popularity which Shake-tain-tops-another figure of speech which fre-
speare now enjoyed in France was not, at least inquently appears in contemporary literature-
part, encouraged by that poet's consciousness of and artists felt at one with him in their defiance
the stagelike qualities of the world and public of mediocrity. What personal experience had
life. For every man now had a real part to play, been to Germany, this image of daemonic energy
and the scenario provided by the imperial libret- now became for France-a spur to set the spirit
tists exceeded in theatrical effectiveness all pre-free from the aesthetic trammels of the past; a
vious combinings of contrasted opposites. If the spark to set alight the fuse of vengeance on the
concept of natural organic processes gave Ger- philistines; an upsurge of explosive power whose
many a path across the monstrous chasm sepa- aptest metaphor from Nature was "volcano." As
rating art from life, the notion of imperial societyEmperor he may have brought disaster on his
and its pursuit of glory did much the same fornation, but as symbol Napoleon gave French Ro-
France. manticism focus.
But however that may be, from the time of Evidence of his impact on Hugo's "young,
Hugo onward the effective legacy of Empire lay stem, vigorous generation"71 is discovered
in language, and in the state of mind which its everywhere, from the biographical pages of Sten-
imaginative use betrayed. The pride of contem- dhal who, in 1823, could adequately describe
porary Frenchmen in their imperial heritage is Rossini only in terms of imperial reincarnation,
obvious, and finds expression in nearly every-to those of Balzac's novels. He saw even Beetho-
thing they wrote-in their criticism of the arts ven's orchestral effects "like the disposition of
as well as in their social commentary. In a way regiments
it in a plan of battle."72
is an updating of the Golden Age syndrome, a
Napoleon is dead; but a new conqueror has already
gloss upon ideas of noble savageness and child-shown himself to the world; and from Moscow to
like innocence: Rousseau "revolutionized" and Naples, from London to Vienna, from Paris to Cal-
made imperial, if you will. And just as the con- cutta, his name is constantly on every tongue.73
111
p p ritard. . . . .
SExample 1-" I I
I I Example I
IV
lined by noise. The cult of circuses and simu- In the third place, and consequent upon
lated eruptions of Vesuvius, of low-grade farce other two, French approaches to musical
and garishly colored clubs which formed so were necessarily different from those we
prominent a part of Paris nightlife throughout Germany. With melody subservient to no
the nineteenth century, found its musical equiv- of prosody, and harmony colorfully illum
alent in the multicolored scores of Meyerbeer, linear
or shapes, French formal procedure
in the sham oriental lushness of F6licien David.
less organic and more repetitive than t
If, paradoxically, we seem to hear more of lands where the sonata principle held s
"art" and artifice in France than in Romantic seems to be a fact of music history that,
Germany, and find this difficult to reconcile melody rules, extension rather than de
with the flood of musical rubbish which caused ment is the formal norm. Repetition, tran
Berlioz such despair, it is because the best French tion, and reharmonization now become
composers recognized the depths of that vulgar- basic procedures, and these are sharpened
ity into which the cult of Romantic feeling sophisticated hands to yield all manne
might seduce them, and knew the ease with rhythmic subtleties and linear transform
which theatrical effectiveness could tumble All praise therefore to Liszt-in essence a
Francophile composer-for developing t
over into slapstick comedy or farce. In reaction
technical skill and professional nicety assumed
tion of the symphonic poem and for pro
a place of paramount importance in their aes-in his technique of thematic metamorp
French and other non-Germanic comp
thetic reasoning, and produced in both their
work and attitude an aristocratic and Byronic
with a working alternative to the sym
distaste for the obvious which threw up a barri-
Words are often stronger and more powerfu
cade against the onslaughts of the mob. In the
even the wisest may appreciate; and, after
Romantic years, therefore, as in the centuries
hoven, the very thought of "symphony"
terror in musicians' hearts. This was nowhere
which had preceded them, the best French music
was exclusive-a point which Berlioz never more so than in France. Whenever men like Ber-
ceased to labor in his writings-and made de- lioz or Gounod sat down to write a symphony
mands upon the listener as well as the performer the strains inherent in the undertaking were ob-
which only a selected few were able to fulfill. In vious for all to hear.
the words of Th6ophile Gautier, music was a It was not that they could not do it, but that
"hieroglyphic art," one which was not to be they could not do it in the German way. Not, that
understood without considerable effort and one is, unless they were content to plagiarize. And
125
While even the greatest and most renowned of characteristics of German art from early times
French musicians were thus entranced by mel- to the present day, and helps to distinguish it
ody and by the expressive possibilities of line, clearly from art produced in France, where aes-
German composers became immersed in har- thetic theory appears securely grounded in be-
mony-and not in the narrow sense alone. To havior, and for which the word "ethical" seems
them the concept of harmony was as much a to be an apt description.
matter of extended formal relationships as it was With the example of Goethe before them,
of immediate chordal combinations. And the German thinkers and aestheticians of the nine-
control of evolving masses rather than the teenth century were consumed with the idea of
sculpting of plastic lines became the chief preoc- natural, organic form, and rejected all other
cupation of their days. schemes as mechanical and in some way, there-
It was this feeling for overall harmonious re- fore, as ungenuine.
lationships which, in 1835, led Schumann to
Form is mechanical when it is imparted to any mate-
observe that "In music everything is dependent
rial through an external force, merely as an accidental
upon the relationship of the individual part to addition, without reference to its character.... Or-
the whole. This applies to the individual com- ganic form, on the contrary, is innate; it unfolds itself
position, whether large or small."'148 And it was from within, and reaches its determination simulta-
his own deep consciousness of the rapport exist- neously with the fullest development of the seed....
In the fine arts, just as in the province of nature-the
ing between the laws of art and those of morality
supreme artist-all genuine forms are organic (my
which caused him immediately to add "and this italics).s50
applies also to the artist's whole life." As Flores-
tan observed in his Journal of Poetry and As a consequence of this mode of thinking
Thought, "I do not love the men whose lives are they became increasingly unable to divorce art
not in harmony with their works."'49 This suf- from inner life, the essence of which for them
fusion of art with a religious-based or even secu- was best expressed through music. This compul-
lar moral atmosphere is one of the strongest sion to be organic in method and moral in pur-
126
ued."The endeavour to interest as a harmonist, We have learned to express the more delicate nuances
even in small details, may become very danger- of feeling by penetrating more deeply into the myster-
ous," Schumann warned in one of his reviews. ies of harmony.'67
"All the enharmonic art of Spohr is nothing be-
side Handel's freely flowing triads. Therefore a Just as organicism alone was not enough for
composer must, above all things, guard himself the German sensibility, just as it had to be suf-
against an overemphasis on harmony; such an fused by a conscious teleology, so mere penetra-
overladen chromatic maze in the middle voices tion of the mysteries of harmony was felt to be
can be dangerous even to the instrumental insufficient for the composition of expressive
parts.,,165 works of music. Once secured, the mysteries of
Despite being caught between the Scylla of harmony had to be manipulated in such a way
unharmonious proportion and the Charybdis of that the human soul was transported to those
Romantic sentiment, however, German com- distant realms of feeling which it was music's
posers of the day never lost their faith in the function to explore. Lacking this quality of imag-
ultimately superior expressive powers of chordal inative judgement-what Coleridge had called
harmony. Nor did they cease to exploit to the full in a memorable phrase the "shaping spirit of
its deep emotive strength. Thus, to the many Imagination"168-those technically competent
other confrontations and oppositions which af- and academically astute composers whom Sten-
flicted Europe at that time must be added that of dhal had dismissed as "fools and pedants" could
French melody and German harmony. These indeed be accused of "meddling in the art of
now faced one another, militantly, across the music."169
Rhine, and the words which each army's camp-
That composer alone has truly mastered the secrets of
following critics hurled across its strongly-flow- harmony who knows how, by their means, to work
ing waters were often insulting and condemna- upon the human soul.. ."170
tory in the extreme. Both German harmony and
French melody saw the expression of human In other words the crowning secret of harmonic
feeling as their chief raison d'etre, but both were aptitude was neither emotional surrender nor
conditioned by, and still confined within, the technical display, but imaginative control, artis-
distinct technical and philosophical traditions tic discipline. The true master of harmony was
which had nurtured and sustained them through he who had passed through the doors of harmo-
the centuries. However, the great advantage of niousness, and who in consequence possessed
organic notions was that, by definition, they pro- what Hauptmann termed "that instinct for ar-
moted growth. Thus Goethe's insight had pro- rangement-that feeling for form which should
vided German composers with a way out of their be proof against a torrent of sentiment."'17
formal impasse, a viable path by which the mon- From all this two interrelated and interde-
strous chasm separating Art from Nature could pendent points seem to emerge. In the first place
be safely overpassed. For the French, unfortu- we are returned to that concept of musical archi-
nately, no such route lay open. The idle fixe of tecture, to that impression of "one-ness, whole-
melody cooled into that aesthetic star which ness and greatness" which had so caught the
shone immovably in the static hierarchy of their imagination of the young Goethe as he stood
still additive and Cartesian universe. before the mass of Strasbourg Minster and
131
VI
Drawing together the various strands of thought can these two concepts be confused and thought
which have run through the preceding sections, to be synonymous. For whereas unity implies
they seem to knot themselves about two funda- a fusion, a wholeness whose quintessence is
mental and contrasting concepts, unity and en- greater than, and qualitatively different from,
semble. Only upon the most superficial level the mere sum of its individual parts, en-
135
137
REFERENCES
138
139
140