Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Babano appealed the decision of the OP by petition for review on the ground,
among others, that both petitioner and her husband were Muslims whose
property regime was that of complete separation of property as provided by
Presidential Decree No. 1083 (Code of Muslim Personal Laws)
3. The CA denied the petition for review on October 21, 2011, and affirmed the
ruling of the OP in toto.
Issue:
Whether or not the regime of separation of property will govern the property relations of Babano
and her husband despite absence of a marriage settlement.
Ruling: Yes. Both petitioner and her husband were Muslims. She was his second wife.
Article 38 of the Code of Muslim Personal Laws specifically defines their regime of
property relations as Muslims to be one of complete separation of property, to wit: