DIFARTMINT OF AGRARIAN REFORM. POLO COCONUT PLANTATION CO.. INC “GR NO. 108787 SEPTINBER 3, 2008 faci tne late 1900, resporden! seaght ® cenverl its 160 teclorts of ‘Fs cane! plonlotion into o apse Saaseie Sel he OOS FET peal oad Re sabato Te FSIS isda lf Sees ad ms Tv eas a el ed ee) noes ea wa ee ee ce Scnnrtng Bol a BP ached i Gere ie a cselen fp fo Ak cates oer cunts oaee I =) tend vhen he BR paced TF oc Be GP The Duk otvrle Wal Be vclestrcoFen Ee Sma eee ana arr Issue : 7 eee eS WOU Re Bah echo) wih gave abe oy eewvlin hr phsing He Rh eslol® onder Be QP, RULING = iz Wo. Polesks mgorcing the implementohon ef the CARP all under the exclusive yrisdichn oy the DAR Socrelory. We delermives wheihor the Trach of land) 18 covered by er exemph [r2” CARP. likewise, qveshons regordling the eligibilly «7 CARP beneyicion pos] be aobhesied (0 him. The DAR Goralary decider fo whon londs placed wn CHAP sholl be chctribuied. In onoten decien enclered by the Gurl, stay held) Hal reelossified agrieviteral loncls musi wndenge the process of Conversion in the DAR berere Hoy moy be ved por ellen purposes Since the DAR never opproved the conversion of Tie Pole eslole pron agricultural 1 oncther ure, the lond woe never placed beyond He tape of te GR. The opronal We DAR ay Be omvcnin op OFeINSI Tong info o9 agostiol eslole ic @ condition precedent far ils conversion into on ecozone 4A proposed e22006 conte! be consiglerecl yor Presidentol Proclomolion wnless the ys ee Oe) ciaresca corlipisale’ prom OR. THs, biwever. redpoaden! failed Mdese