ARSTANG LIMEER, INC, ON. COURT OF APPEALS GR No. HTH nt 16, 1996 ne Peiloner ts 8 deneshe eeipcroken engaged O limber aealerregislered wilh the Burcow Gy farted Declpmeot Respenderls are TRIP See Tecan ond diy PEERS of the Specvol | Johons god laeshgohens Gnvtion (EA) of Be DINK. Aching bared en an wpormatcn, the SAD ‘eon veel B he Tomboryord of pelivarer oad based ono torch worranl, were able qrecule On Gawniatrahie Some op dipper Winds ef corv@spencing cerhpicale of lumber, yp which We pelihort jailed e prockce upon cemonel the sbcumenls. such 08 cerrespendiing Cerlpeole — lume erg Gnd Ovary maces which hal prove the legitimacy oF Tein Scarce Gncl engin. Robles Ben ésbmibed@ memerondeo reperd te Pocteron,erekeing he cancelofcn ey poliheaer's akobre peril, pling op eriminal charges, aod corpiscalied OF Be fucks ood lonbers lover courl ruled 10 poror of respondents, sboling That essession of lnber witht perm er oollrily 13 ral o erme issot Won lumber connel be Sasidered aber Oral fol pehener shale nol be reld hoble Far legal BG wider Geel GB ep We Revised Jeresky Ge FUNG [oownle Pb 705 explally provides thal timber ve nckded io the term forest prochels, “He form uaber 18 fend I porograph Coa) of Geelen 3 which Siales thal the lalier jee processed Ieger processed forts (ow molerial Clearly, the law uses the werd lumber 101fs plain ond Cammen usage, Ond-in the absence of legielahre Talend fe the conlrory zi) hal) be inferpreleg! os such. hence Ti8 Sape To Zanchde Tigh Be low makes ro aishachon whether jhe peres! produch 1s Processed or vol Trerepere, Shdge Copslong commi¥ed grove abuse oF Giecrehen 10 dismissieg the case