Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- This research study was on the development levels for admission into any higher institutions
of Computer Aided Software application package for Adetunji(2001), asserted that the rate at which student fail
teaching and learning matrices at senior secondary mathematics cannot be over emphasize. Whereas Ale,
school level. The application package was designed using (1989), the analysis at 2008 mathematics on the poor West
visual Basic, Version 6.0. Two research questions and Africa Examination Council (WAEC) result has shown that
two hypotheses were formulated and tested at 0.05 level only 13% of the student that sat for the examination pass
of significance respectively. The research design that was with credit in mathematics Uwadiae, (2008). The continue
adopted was pretest – posttest experimental research poor performance of subjects, generally in science and
design, which was carried out in two privately owned particularly in mathematics over the years has been of great
secondary schools in Bauchi metropolis. Sixty (60) concern researchers, classroom teachers, parents and
students of senior secondary schools were randomly educational policy makers in Nigeria. Adeniyi, (1988),
selected and used as subjects in the study which were attempted to find out factors that could be responsible for
grouped into two, the control and experimental group the poor performance in mathematics and instructional
respectively. The experimental group was taught with technique employed by the teachers as the major causes of
CAS package while the control group was taught using poor performance among secondary school students in
traditional teaching method. The instrument ADT was mathematics.
used for the collection of the data. Mean, standard
deviation and t-test were used in the analysis of the data, However, the problem of poor performance of students
answer the research questions and test the hypotheses in in mathematic can be minimize to a large extend if teachers
the study. The finding of the study shows that, there is are well expose to difference types of instructional learning
significance difference in the mean performance of techniques e.g problem solving strategy, which enhance the
students taught matrices with CAS package over those effectiveness in evaluating students learning outcome at the
taught with traditional teaching method and there is end of activity-based learning stability of the learner.
significant difference in the mean performance of Pretest Mathematics is an indispensable medium by which science
and Posttest students taught matrix with CAS package. expresses, formulate and communicate it. Thus, it is
There is also significant difference between the protest regarded as the basis of the greater part of the civilization
and posttest mean performance of students taught today, which served in the development human intelligent in
matrix using traditional teaching method. Thus, it is a greater variety of ways. In mathematics, a matrix or
recommended from the findings of this study that the matrices is a rectangular array of number, symbols or
teachers should employ the use of computer assisted expression. Therefore, the concept of matrices is applicable
instructions in teaching matrices and other aspects of in both pure and applied sciences. Individual items in a
mathematics in senior secondary school, since its usage matrix are called elements or entries. Matrices find
enhances students’ conceptual understanding in applications in most scientific fields. In physics, matrices are
matrices. used to study electrical circuits, optics and quantum
mechanics. In computer graphics, matrices are used to
Keywords:- Computer Aided Software (CAS), Learning, project a 3-dimentional images into a 2-dimentional severe,
Matrices, Secondary School. and to create realistic seeming motion.
Instrument 2. Check error in the package and the instrument, and offer
The research instrument used in this research is a suggestions.
mathematics achievement test which consist of multiple 3. Check clarity of the test item.
choice having four (4) options from (A-D) for each item 4. Check the appropriation for the instructions and time
with one (1) correct answer and it start from meaning of allocation for the achievement test.
matrix, matrix notation, addition, subtraction and
multiplication of matrices, determinants and inverse of After the validation exercise, all observations and
matrices has been covered in developed CAS learning suggestions were noted and corrected before preparing the
package. final draft of the instrument that was used in this study.
Figure 1
Table 1: Mean, Standard Deviation and t – test. Comparing the pretest and posttest mean performance of the experimental group.
The results of the pretest and posttest mean performance of students taught matrices shows that the students scored 6.10 and
21.70 respectively. The mean performance difference is 15.6 which shows that there is a significant difference between the pretest
and posttest mean achievement of the students. The t-calculated 15.88is greater than the t-critical of 2.00 showing that the
hypothesis is rejected.
Ha1: There is significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean performance of students taught matrices using CAS
(Experimental group).
Table 2: Mean, Standard Deviation and t – test. Comparing the pretest and posttest mean performance of the control group.
Ha1: There is significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean performance of students taught matrices using
traditional teaching method.
4.2.3 Research Question Two:To what extent does the use of (CAS) enhances students’ performance in learning the concept of
matrices in secondary school mathematics?
4.2.4 Hypothesis Two: There is no significant difference between students that were taught matrices by the CAS package and
those taught matrices without the package.
From Table 3, it can be seen that in the pretest, the mean performance of the experimental group was 6.20 and the mean
performance of the control group is 6.10 with a mean difference of 0.10. Therefore, it can be deduced from the pretest result that
the experimental group performed better than the control group. However, in the posttest, the mean performance of the
experimental group is 21.7 and the control group was 10.6 with a mean difference of 11.1. The mean gain of the experimental
group on both tests was 27.9 and that of the control group was 16.7 with a mean difference of 11.0. It can therefore be deduced
from the results that the experimental group which was exposed to the computer application software package performed better
than the control group.
Therefore;
Ha1: There is significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean performance of students taught matrices using CAS.
In Table 4, t- Calculated value 20.38 is greater than critical value 2.00. Therefore, this shows that there is a significant
difference between the mean performances of the two groups in the posttest. Results in table 4 clearly show that the CAS was very
effective in learning matrices. Both table 3 and 4 also answer research question two, as there is a significant difference in the
effect of CAS on students who learnt Matrices by using the CAS and those who learnt by TTM. Therefore, the Null hypothesis
H02 was rejected and the alternative hypothesis Ha2 would be accepted.
Ha2: There is significant difference between academic performance of learners taught matrix using software and those taught
matrices using traditional teaching method.
The significant difference observed between the indicates that the treatment administered to the experimental
control group and experimental group the posttest level group was effective. The researcher therefore assumed that