Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
Learning Goal: I can solve addition or subtraction problems using the vertical method and
place value chart.
Measurable Objectives:
By the end of the lesson students will be able to accurately solve the addition and
subtraction problems at 85% accuracy in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
The students will solve addition problems using the place value chart at 80%
accuracy in 3 out of 5 opportunities.
Students will be able to solve the problems using the vertical method with or
without regrouping in 75% of the time in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
If you would like feedback on your pre-assessment for alignment prior to administering, copy it
in here.
Pre-Assessment - Copy and paste the pre-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’
knowledge of the topic prior to implementing the unit lessons. Include the scoring criteria used
to determine whether the student is Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient, Minimally
Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
I can add and subtract using the vertical method and place value chart. We will begin with a we
do problem then move to a you do problem. The students will be placed in a breakout room with
some of their peers and they will each explain their answer and how they solved it. The teacher
will move from breakout room to breakout room to check for understanding.
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Proficient
(80%-89%) 12
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 10
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 5
32 students total
Exit tickets
Collaborate with your Cooperating Teacher/Mentor to design a unit of instruction that aligns to state content standards. Be sure to
include technology integration and demonstrate how you will differentiate your lessons to meet the needs of individual students.
Note: When implementing the unit of study, you will be choosing one of these activities to video record, review, and reflect on your teaching in
the STEP process.
Unit/Subject: Math
Level 4- Check for Level 4- Check for Level 4- Check for Level 4- Check for Level 4- Check for
correct correct correct correct correct
answer/review steps answer/review steps answer/review steps answer/review steps answer/review steps
Anticipatory Set I do the problems I do the problems I do the problems I do the problems I do the problems
Use an online video platform such as Loom, YouTube, or Vimeo to upload your completed video.
Be sure that others can access and view your linked video prior to submitting.
Summary of Unit Implementation: Math unit addition with regrouping using place value
chart. The students worked on completing math addition problems using the vertical
method and place value chart.
Summary of Student Learning: The students were learning how to add two-three-digit
problems using their place value chart.
Reflection of Video Recording: After watching the video I realized that my lesson was too
long to include so I had to edit some of the video such as the exit ticket problems and
questions from the students. It was a really good experience and it seems to get easier the
more I am teaching.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient 0 11
(90%-100%)
Proficient
6 6
(80%-89%)
Partially
Proficient 15 8
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient 11 6
(69% and below)
Post-Test Analysis: Whole Class
Based on the evidence, I found that the students learned best when we did the I do, we do, and
you do technique. When they saw me model how the problems were solved, they seem to
understand the concepts more. I also found that when we completed the we do more students
were willing to ask questions seeing that others may have had the wrong answer. It made them
more comfortable with one another. The you do help to show me which students understood, and
which students may need more we do’s as a group.
Based on the post-test scores I found that my instruction was clear and easy to navigate. I believe
that if we model for students what we are going to teach them, they seem to understand the
concepts more. It also helped working as a group on a few of the problems. They had the
opportunity to see what their peers we are doing and how they solved the problems. It helped
putting them in breakout rooms and they took turns explaining how they received the answer they
did. The groups lasted about five minutes. Once the groups were over, we then reviewed the
problem as a whole and find out who received what answer. It all flowed very well, and the
lesson only lasted about 45 minutes, so it was short and simple. The lesson was done on white
boards and the exit ticket was under assignments in google classroom.
The students in this group seemed to make progress it was just at a slower pace. I worked with
them in a small group setting and gave them more individualized attention. This helped them
understand the concepts and lots of modeling was included.
Based on the ELL group that I have chosen my instruction seemed to be pretty self-explanatory. I
modeled explained and walked them thru the steps. I of course did the I do, we do, and you do.
Most of the students picked it up pretty quickly, however my ELL group seemed to struggle more
with the concepts that I was teaching. It was then that I decided to create breakout room and I
walked them thru each step, and I went deeper into the modeling process. I also asked them
questions and gave them the opportunity to ask questions. One thing that I may have done
differently is I would have maybe simplified the instructions more and allowed more peer review
time. I have found that sometimes students feel more comfortable asking questions to their friend
rather than a teacher. I would put them in breakout rooms together so they can review the
answers.
The effectiveness of my instruction I believe was overall well. Majority of the students seem to
make progress and growth. The smallest progress is always a plus that means that we are moving
forward even if the growth was not significant.
The next step is to now show them how to add two-digit number with regrouping without having
to do the place value chart. I want them to be able to add and regroup by just counting and they
can check if their answer is correct by using the place value chart. I want them to not rely on a
place value chart to solve problems.
2. Give more wait time for children can I plan to not rush students to respond, to be
respond. patient and allow more wait time.
3. Implement lesson plan with clear I plan to make lessons clear enough for the
directions. children to understand and maybe include
them in reviewing standard.