Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/340849485
CITATIONS READS
0 162
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Philipp Eversmann on 29 April 2020.
ABSTRACT
Today’s challenges in Architecture and Engineering arise from ever more complex networks of boundary
conditions, which often address contradicting environmental, social and economic aspects. Within this
context, finding a single best solution for a construction type or planning method to solve these
challenges, is often not possible. In pursuit of efficient solutions for both digital modelling and actual
construction, we are discovering new hybrids as forerunners of our creative profession. In this context,
we are also discovering new fields of application for textile architecture for both products and planning
techniques beyond their classic application for membrane structures. The current paper on ‘new
hybrids’ will address this potential and show new fields of application, where knowledge from textile
architecture is the starting point for developing new design and construction methods, using traditional
building materials. The current paper reviews some recent developments of design and construction
principals in textile architecture and gives an outlook, towards how these can be transferred, onto the
development of a new filament-based timber material.
1. Introduction
A significant amount of research and industrial developments have aimed to overcome the anisotropic
behaviour of textiles by developing building products with uniform orthotropic behaviour, for example,
through pre-stressed weaving processes in membranes or triaxial textiles in FRP (see Figure 1(B)). More
recent research and industrial developments are shifting their focus towards the potentials of tailored
material behaviour by means of cnc controlled weaving, knitting and bespoke fibre placement (see
Figure 1(C)). The following examples highlight some current research and practice where mechanical
properties are geared towards project-specific behaviour is textile architecture.
Figure 1(A) shows the membrane structure for a retractable roof, which follows a consequent textile
logic with polyester belts (sewn into the fabric) as edge and ridge reinforcement. In this pre-stressed
system, the challenge lies in fabrication where the different and non-linear stiffness behaviours of PTFE
membrane and PES belts have to be aligned in their compensation ratios. In order to guarantee the
target pre-stress of both membrane and belts in the final installation state, multiple belt and seam types
are tested to find the best match in stiffness behaviour. Figure 1(B) shows a hinge less shading
mechanism, which explores the potentials of tailored material behaviour in fibre composites. Here, the
high strength to low stiffness ratio in GFRP is the starting point to designing a shading mechanism, which
changes its shape through elastic
Figure 1. (A) Retractable membrane roof Buchs CH (Lienhard & Kugel, 2015). (B): Flectofin (Lienhard et al., 2011). (C): Textile
Hybrid at CCA 333 workshop 2014 with Ahlquist, Lienhard and Soto).
material deformation. Stiffness gradients, in the layup and local fibre reinforcement, control the shape
and minimise stress concentrations. In Figure 1(C) elastically bent GFRP rods and a CNC-knitted textile
are combined into the complex equilibrium state of a textile hybrid. The change in fibre density and
knit type within the textile generates an integrated cable net with varying cell dimensions and edge
reinforcements.
2. Design principles
2.1. Principles of lightweight design
Traditionally, lightweight design is divided into three main categories of material, structure and system
(Sobek, 1995). Lightweight design in material and structure, relies on specific expertise which lies in the
competence of civil engineering. Lightweight systems explore the potential of reducing material use, by
means of functional integration, for example, by combining a building’s envelope, structure and heat
emission into a single layer of a low-E coated textile membrane roof. As such the development of
lightweight systems inherently relies on interdisciplinary collaboration.
Figure 2. Material fabrication of solid willow filament. Left: Raw willow rods. Middle: Raw and homogenised willow withe.
Right: Joined, endless solid willow filament (images: Experimental and Digital Design and Construction, University of Kassel).
4
Figure 3. The results obtained from the topology optimisation model for a beam with two supports and a central load and
with four different element orientation angles. Left: the results are shown with intermediate densities. Right: the results
are shown where the post-processing filter is applied. The filtering lengths were set to respectively 2, 16, 32 and 64 (images:
Experimental and Digital Design and Construction, Deetman, University of Kassel).
While topology optimisation is often solely used to decrease the use of material, the presented
material developments use topology optimisation for fibre orientation. The material for the wood
filament is the widely available willow and therefore comparatively cheap. The aim was to reduce the
fabrication time and energy by using less material. This modelling method also enables design at the
resolution of the additive manufacturing method itself, which is a very high resolution compared to how
normal building components are designed. This high-resolution is possible with topology optimisation
(Wu et al., 2018) (Challis, Roberts, & Grotowski, 2014) and it helps to design structures, where the
natural fibers of the continuous wood filament are used very efficiently. A range of printing samples
were effectuated as well as tests for solid, spaced and topology optimised lay-ups (see Figure 4). As a
binder between layers, a contact adhesive was used. This enables to pre-impregnate the filament with
adhesive and use the pressure applied by the robot for adhesive activation, resulting in an extremely
fast additive manufacturing process compared to traditional 3d-printing like Fused Deposition Modelling
(Dawod et al., 2019).
Current investigations explore additive manufacturing techniques, using the principals of braiding, for
three-dimensional components such as winding of hollow profiles (see Figure 5).
Figure 4. Results of printing tests of a solid lay-up with no distances between filaments and printing of the result of a
topology optimisation (images: Experimental and Digital Design and Construction, University Kassel).
Figure 5. Results of printing tests of a three-dimensional winding component (images: Experimental and Digital Design and
Construction, University Kassel).
References
Andreassen, E., Clausen, A., Schevenels, M., Lazarov, B. S., & Sigmund, O. (2011). Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB
using 88 lines of code. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43(1), 1–16.
Bendsøe, M. P., Ben-Tal, A., & Zowe, J. (1994). Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Structural
Optimization, 7(3), 141–159.
Challis, V. J., Roberts, A. P., & Grotowski, J. F. (2014). High resolution topology optimization using graphics processing units
(GPUs). Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 49(2), 315–325.
Dawod, M., Deetman, A., Akbar, Z., Heise, J., Böhm, S., Klussmann, H., & Eversmann, P. (2019, September). Continuous
timber fibre placement. Impact: Design with all senses: Proceedings of the design modelling symposium, Berlin, 2019 (p.
460). Springer.
Lienhard, J., & Knippers, J. (2015, March). Bending-active textile hybrids. Journal of the International Association for Shell
and Spatial Structures, 56(1), 37–48.
Lienhard, J., & Kugel, N. (2015). Design of a retractable membrane roof in Buchs, CH. IASS 2015 Future Visions, Amsterdam;
08/2015.
Lienhard, J., Schleicher, S., Poppinga, S., Masselter, T., Milwich, M., Speck, T., & Knippers, J. (2011). Flectofin: A hingeless
flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 6(4), 1–7. special issue on Biomimetics of
Movement, 045001.
Miyamoto, Y., Kaysser, W. A., Rabin, B. H., Kawasaki, A., & Ford, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Functionally graded materials: design,
processing and applications (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media.
Modler, N., Hufenbach, W., Cherif, C., Ulbricht, V., Gude, M., Maron, B., … Langkamp, A. (2016). Novel hybrid yarn textile
thermoplastic composites for function-integrating multi-material lightweight design. Advanced Engineering Materials,
18(3), 361–368.
Schmid, F. C., Haase, W., & Sobek, W. (2015, March). Textile and film based building envelopes – lightweight and adaptive.
Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 56(1), 61–74. (14) n. 183.
Sobek, W. (1995). Zum Entwerfen im Leichtbau. Bauingenieur, 70), H. 7/8, S. 323–332.
Udupa, G., Rao, S. S., & Gangadharan, K. V. (2014). Functionally graded composite materials: An overview. Procedia
Materials Science, 5, 1291–1299.
6
Wu, J., Age, N., Westermann, R., & Sigmund, O. (2018). Infill optimization for additive manufacturing—approaching Bonelike
Porous structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1127–1140.