You are on page 1of 4

Check List of Quality Control of Damage Assessment Report of PEA

Name [University Labratory School and College] [4677271930] [29.06.2020]

Assessment Results : (by QC JV) Flag Type

No. Subjects Type of Results Results


of of
Comments QC-Ausp. QC-JV Remarks
1 Reports

All folders are provided.


7-Reports of tests results
1-Checklists 8- Existing documents,
2-photos 9- of online Monitoring
1-1 Minor Not Available online monitoring video
3- Damage Assessment report,
4-sketches,
5 ,6- As built AR & ST drawings,

1-2 Structural and architectural drawings are presented in the report in the pdf format. Minor

1-3 The compatibility between the damage assessment report and checklist is admirable. Major

1-4 The lateral bearing system has been correctly identified. Major MRF

1-5 The irregularity identification of building is correctly identified. Minor Regular

1-6 The separation joint are clearly identified and presented in the report. Major N/A

1-7 The distance to the adjacent building is clearly reported Major N/A

1-8 Short columns are reported. Major Short columns observed

1-9 The material and detail (Common detail) of floor finishing are provided in the report. Major NCF, Tiles, Mosaic

1-10 Dimension and connection type of lintels are provided in the report. Major
Results Results
Type of
2 Results of NDT tests and Survey Comments
of of Remarks
QC-Ausp. QC-JV

2-1 It is confirmed that about 20% of columns have been tested. Minor N.O of tests: 6. Total N.O of columns:29

The compatibility between the results of UV and SH tests are proper .


2-2
When the difference between the results of SH and UPV are less than 20% the smaller one , the Major Ave SH=23.52 MPa , Ave UPV=22.94 MPa
answer is yes. Otherwise convincing justification should be mentioned in the report.
A <= 20% (B-A) --> Yes

2-3
The estimation mean and standard deviation results of compressive strength of concrete should be Minor Sd SH=7.4206 Sd UPV=1.3467
provided.

2-4 The locations and distribution of columns tested are clearly presented. Major Location Present at NDT test report

2-5 For the masonry cases, the shear strength of mortar is reported. Major Shear Strength: (N/A)

2-6
If the structure have ol irregularities such as geometric irregularities, soft story, weak story Major N/A
even the structure was constructed in different phases all floors shall be surveyed.
Type of Results Results
3 Drawings of of
Comments QC-Ausp. QC-JV Remarks

3-1 Architectural and Structural drawings are compatible.


Major
3-2 The lintel type and its connection to the columns are presented. Major

3-3
The type, thickness and connection of masonry walls are presented in the report and
drawings. Major
Interior walls:125 mm , Exterior walls= 125 mm

3-4 The arrangement of longitudinal reinforcements is correctly reported. Major


shape and dimensions shoub be compatible.

3-5 The tie arrangement along the height of column is clearly presented. Major

3-6 The separation joint are clearly identified and presented in drawings. N/A
Major

3-7 The distance to the adjacent building is clearly presented in site plan. N/A
Major
3-8 The locations of damages of columns and walls are presented. Major
3-9 The estimation of top of foundation level is presented. Major NA
3-10 The bottom and top of all windows and doors are presented in the drawings. Minor
3-11 All lintels are demonstrated in the drawings. Major
3-12 The common details of stair are presented in the drawings. Major
3-13 The Type of all ceilings is presented clearly in AR and ST drawings Major
Concrete ceiling

3-14 The number of bays and columns are compatible in AR and ST drawings Major
Number of bays should be written here .8

3-15
The height of floor is presented correctly in AR and ST drawings Major
In the AR drawings, the following items are
presented:
- Location of buildings
- Expansion Joint - Story Height
- Room Function - Wall type
3-16
- Slab Covering - Dimension of Windows and doors Major
- Any extraordinary equipment and heavy equipment - Stair
should be identified in furniture plans. - Any re-entrant and setback shall be presented
in the drawings.
-- If the functions (usage) of floors are different,
it shall be clarified in the drawings.

The AR drawings consists of :


- Site Plan
3-17 - Dimension and Furniture Plans of floors Major
- Two sections
- All facades
4 Contradictions (Filled by QC JV)
1

5 Missing Information (Filled by QC JV)

You might also like