omedira treet treet unter | (age uftaga site tremri raters) | National Highways Authori f Indi: = tater, IME ox Vd fect araicar gang, sea, 10-0, Gara, Sea (zs) 313001 RAAT AT Project Implementation Unit, Udaipur, 10-A, Panchwati, Udaipur: (Raj.) 313001] eo sairoe am FMA Mone (0294) 2412566, 2120004 8 mal: uda@nhaLorg NHAI/UDR/PKG-IN/2019/ 3 FEZ 08.03.2019 ‘M/s UCHIT Expressways Pvt Ltd 3rd Floor, Westend Building, Above P. C. Jewelers, Plot No. 20, Residency Road, UDAIPUR - 313 001 Sub: Six Laning of Chittorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 from design chainage Km 214+870 to Km 308+370 in the state of Rajasthan (length-93.500 Km) on DBFOT (Toll) mode under NHDP Phase-V (Package-lIl)-: Minutes of meeting held on 08.02.2019. Ref: Regional Office, Jaipur Letter No. NHAI/12022/2/2019-ROJ/Tech./5033 dated 27.02.2019 Sir, With reference to the subject cited above, it is to state that the Regional Office, Jaipur vide etter under reference above has forwarded the Minutes of mecting held on 08.02.2019 under the Chairmanship of CGM (T) cum RO, at Regional Office, wherein NHAI official, your representative & Independent Engineer were present. In the aforesaid MoM various issues discussed in the meeting pertaining to the subject contract package is mentioned. attached herewith for your information and taking The copy of MoM dated 08.02.2019 necessary actlon please. Yours faithfully, \ Wey (Sanit Yadav) General Manager (Tech.) Project Director Encl: As above. ‘Team Leader, M/s Aarvee Associates, Udaipur - for intormation and necessary action. F\PACKAGE-N\UCHAT-I\UCHITEPL-voti.doex. wos wraiet : wate #. Gi-s ua 6, Saet10, geen, ae feat — 110075 Sante | hip /wwwnhalgovin Corporate Office : Plot No. G-5 & 6, Sector - 10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 Website - hitp:/iwwaw.nnai.gov.inq < Gxt Tel: 0141-2292049 Hieetter ersela eroraret wrftrar ear sere! oer zane (ase oRaw ya ort sare) ere Fax :0141-2292n40 National Highways Authority of India EYE Email: rojainar@nhai ong (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways) deta wma (eRe) /Regional Office (Rajasthan) EH—120, OFT, RAH FTA, GTAYR-302019 1-120, Janpath, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur-302019 NHAI/12022/2/2619-ROI/Tech /5033 Date: 27.02.2019 Sh. Sunil Yadav Project Director NHAI, PIU-Udaipur 10-A Panchwati, Udaipur (Raj.) Sub: Six laning of Chitlorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 from Design Chainage km. 214+870 to Km. 308+370 in the State of Rajasthan {length 934590 Km.) on DBFOT {Toll) Mode under NHDP Phase-V (Package-II) - Minutes of Meeting: reg. Sir, ''am directed to convey Ihe Minutes of a Meeting held on 08.02.2019 in Regional Office, Jaipur under Chairmanship of CGM [T)/RO (at Annexure-I) for discussion regarding pending issue of Chittorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76, which wos also attended by you, representative of Concessionaire & IE. You are requested fo ensure necessary compliance by all concemod parties to the airections/ubservations of the (GM (1)/RO, Rajasthan. us issu val ous. (Manoj Khoda) Manager (T) Encl: Annexure-1 Copy to: (0) Sh. 8.K. Mishra, CGM (Raj,) NHAI H@ for kind information please. fi) Independent Engineer M/s M/s Aarvee Associates architects engineers & consultants Pvi. Lid. through concemed Project Director for necessary compliance. {ii Concessionaire M/s Uchit Expressway Pvt. Ltd through concerned Project Director for necessary compliance. Somes chs et 6. Sxex—t0, areer, 1g RRow=110076, GMM : 01128074100, 25074200 aRt 01125009607 / eaeTe Corporate Office : G-5 & 6, Sectort0, Dwarka New Dolhi-110075, Phone: 011-25074100, 25074200 Fax 011-25083807/25009514National Highways Authority of India Regional Office, Jaipur INUTES TING ‘A meeting was held under the Chairmanship of CGM (I) cum RO, Jaipur in Regional Office, Jaipur on 08.02.2019 with representative of Concessionaire M/s Uchit Expressway Pvt. Ltd., Independent Engineer and NHAI official as per the list enclosed at Annex-A for project of Chittorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 The issues were discussed for the subject project wise and outcome of the meeting is as under:- |. Widening of Approaches of Structures at 4 locations: The Concessionaire raised the issue of widening of approaches of Structure af Design Chainage 231, 232, 280 & 307 under Change of scope. The Independent Engineer and PD, PIU, Udaipur inferred that the structures width at Km 231, 292 & 260 wie imuie than 10 rir wide ‘and thus has to be retained as per Provision of Schedule-D. IE has mentioned that the approaches of these three structures which are less than 10 m are fo be widened and are under the scope of Concessionalre to widen the existing carriageway to élane. The Concessionaire submitted that as per provision of Schedvle-D the approaches of such structures (having carriageway width more than 10m) are to be retained hence if, these approaches are to be widened: it has to be considered under COS. The maiter was deliberated and i! was decided thal the Concessionaire shall commence the work of widening of approaches and the matter will he referred to intorprot. nN committee, NAL HQ for cluification se as to avoid delay and ensure timely completion of project highway. Further the IE and the Concessionaire was advised to explore the possibility of widening on inner side with providing proper tapering to minimize the cost and to use available ROW. AS regard to siructure at Km 307 (VUIP with ROB), the IE informed that tho Cartiageway width of the VUP as mentioned in the Schedule-A of the CA is 11.35 m and hence no widening/reconstruction has been proposed in Schedule-B, However, at site the width of the VUP is 8.4m on LHS and 8.7 m on RHS and the width of approaches is 13.<0 + 8,5 from ROB to VUP and 8.8 m from VUP to start of 2 Opproach towards Chittorgarh. PD/IE has expressed that the widening of this structure is must as it is less than 10m but the widening of this structure is not mentioned in Schedule-B of the CA. However, the widening of approaches is covered under widening mandate of Concessionaire os per CA. It was directed to the Concessionaire and the IE to submit separate proposal for this location with Proper justification for appraisal & approval of the Competent Authority. 2. Decision of PUP/CUP at Km 301 & Km 302; As per provision of the CA, PUP of size 7m x 4.5 mis to be constructed at Km 301+470. At this location there is Petrol pump (on RHS and on LHS there is a small Village road which ends after 300 mts. The Hon'ble MP, Chittorgarh has desired vide VIP reference to construct one additional PUP at Sheesham Ki Ghati at Km 302+360 as there is connecting road of 10 to 12 villages at this junction. A meeting in this regard was also held in the Ministry and Was directed to resolve the matter. The residents of these 10 to 12 villages had also staged Dhama for long time and only on the assurance by the Hon'ble MP, Chittorgarh the Dhama was called off. After deliberation uf Ihe issue it was observed that upon shifling of the PUP from Km 301+470 to 302+360 (Sheesham ki Ghati jn.) there will be smooth passage of vehicular and pedestrian traffic coming Mefrom 10 to 12 villages. The proposal was agreed principally by Authority and asked Independent Engineer to submit detail justification to this effect and concessionaire tosubmit the drawings accordingly for appraisal to C.A, and for approval Shitfing_of EHV Ines: The Competent Authority NHAI has conveyed approval for depositing Supervision charges and Shutdown charges of 08 Nos out of 11 Nos RRVPNL technically approved EHV line. 4s regard to (1) Modification of 220 KV D/C Debari-Madti line for NH crossing (NH ch. 304670) (2) Modification of 132 KV S/C Debari-Sukher and 132 KV §/C Dear - Madri line for NH crossing (NH ch, 304+721 and 304+698) (3) Modification of 132 KV SIC Debari-HZl line for NH crossing (NH ch. 305+200), the matter was discussed clong with Electrical expert. The Concessionaire informed that os per earlier Proposal the proposed centerine {PCL) it was possible to construct 5.5 m wide Service Road (SR) on LHS and avoid shifting of EHV towers. However, with the fecent problem of Land Acquisition on RHS near canal crossing the PCL is fo be shifted on LHS (towards the EHV Towers) by some 2.1 m to 2.5 m, thus there will be No space left for construction of Service Road on LHS. The Service road on RHS is already disconnected due to LA problem, Therefore, shifting of all the three lines is @ bare necessity for the construction of Service Road on LHS, which is also compulsorily required for the diversion of traffic for construction of VUP including its approaches at Km 305+973. Ample space is available in utility corridor for shifting of all the 3 EHV towers. The site was also inspected by the Electrical oxpert along with the RRVPML staff and the Shifting wus fuunid lo be: Justitied. in view of Ihe above, It Was decided to consider the shifting of above mentioned 08 Nos of EHV lines, which hos already been technically sanctioned by RRVPNL. The PD was directed to re-submit the proposal for approval of the Competent Authority keeping in view of the actual site requirement. ind for CUP by Hon’! IP: The additlonal structures as Proposed by Hon'ble MP have. alreckly Leen approved under COS. Al this stage, the Construction of further more additional structures demanded by Hon'ble MP under COS will not be feasible as it may require additional time from the slipulated period Cf completion. As regard to siructure at vilage-Delwas, the Hon'hle MP curing tite vill Of St.U1-2014 it wus uppised that possibilty will be explored for providing the service road to be extended along approach of Major bridge and connected through 1st span of Major bridge. the Concessionaire was advised to submit the Proposal along with technical justification, Additional structure in -Vana: In vilage-Vana there are already two existing CUP along with one proposed PUP within siretch of 300 mis. The matter wes Giscussed and the demand of villagers and Hon'ble MP for addifional CUP in this stretch was not found technically feasible. The Concessionaire was advised to take Recessary administrative help from District administration if the work is stopped by ihe vilogers. I! was also assured to take up this issue with State Government during the next meeting of High Power Committee. ‘Structures in Nardharl jes: These two structures have been Proposed by Hon'ble MP, Chittorgarh under VIP reference and has already been approved by Competent Authority NHAI under COS. The Concessionaire informed the problem of land for access near the Subway entry and exit point. The PD/IE was directed fo examine the site condition technically and take necessary action accordingly. Mae7. Works of Saniora Ka kheco & Haraikhedi; The land in tho ROW of Banjaro Ka Kheda on RHS side is Government land for which the occupants are demanding ‘compensation of land whereas during the acquisition of land for 4-4ane project no compensation was given for Government land. Ouring é4ane, the cost of the structures on the Govt. land has been sanctioned and deposited in the CALA account under Ex-gratia, Even after the sanction of Ex-gratia amount the occupants are not vacating the land. The Concessionaire informed that they have Proposed two slage constructions of PUP approaches without any additional financial implication and ensuring proper safely of traffic within the given timeframe for which the IE has also consented, The PD was directed to liaison with District Administration for vacating the occupanis from the acquired Govt. land in Banjaro Ka Kheda & for possession of land within ROW at Hazaikheci. 8. 5 man Te id Maz ns: It was advised to construct the Service road as per LA availability. Meanwhile, for slow moving traffic a 2.5m wide lane may be considered together with 3-anes at Mazaar Location only. The service road fo be constructed to the full length on both sides of Temple, Mazcar and necr Mazaar merges with MCW. Beyond mazaar towards Udaipur side the service road shall be formed by hill cutting. The shifting of the Temple issue shall be taken with district administration. 9. Reduction in Servi in colions: The concessionaire was advised to identify the stretches where there is hindrance in construction of Service road due to land acquisition. It was decided to construct service road with width no! less than 5.5 m in these locations and for the balance land, proposal for acquisition through gazette notification may be initicted at the earliest. And in case ROW is not sufficient for even 5.5m service road then proposal under Purchase through mutual consent may be Initiated and submitted for approval of Competent Authority as per the NHAI guidelines issued in this regard. Ihe. ing ended with vote of thanks to CGM [T}/RO. Mat