Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 57
2 58
3
4
Factors That Influence Breastfeeding 59
60
5
6 Initiation Among African American 61
62
7 63
8
9
Women 64
65
10 Tyonne D. Hinson, Asheley Cockrell Skinner, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, and Diane L. Spatz Q11 66
11 67
12 68
13 Correspondence ABSTRACT 69
14 Tyonne D. Hinson, DrPH, 70
Objective: To examine cultural and socioenvironmental factors that affect breastfeeding initiation among African
15 Q1 MSN, RN, NE-BC. 71
tyonnehinson@gmail.com; American women.
16 72
thinson0210@cs.com Design: Qualitative descriptive design and conventional content analysis.
17 73
18 Keywords Setting: A large, inner-city, primary care center affiliated with a 500-bed children’s hospital within a large, North- 74
19 African American mothers eastern U.S. city. 75
barriers and facilitators
20 breastfeeding initiation Participants: Participants were 34 U.S.-born African American mothers of healthy term infants 0 to 3 months of age. 76
21 culture Methods: Six focus groups were conducted using a 16-question, scripted interview guide. 77
22 qualitative research 78
social environment Results: A number of complex issues that influenced breastfeeding initiation included certain cultural beliefs about
23 79
sexuality, the influence of family and peer networks, information sources, intentions, and a variety of other barriers and
24 80
facilitators.
25 81
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the decision to initiate breastfeeding is not solely determined by the woman
26 82
within the African American community. Because this decision is contingent on multiple factors external to the woman,
27 83
it is important to recognize the role that partners, grandmothers, communities, information sources, and health care
28 84
providers/organizations play in women’s decisions. Implementation of multilevel strategies is critical to increase
29 85
breastfeeding initiation among African American mothers.
30 86
31 JOGNN, -, -–-; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.02.007
87
32 Accepted February 2018
88
33 89
34 90
35 91
36 92
37 93
T he breastfeeding initiation rate among The short- and long-term nutritional, anti-
Tyonne D. Hinson, DrPH,
38 MSN, RN, NE-BC. women in the United States is approxi- inflammatory, and immunologic benefits of hu- 94
39 Asheley Cockrell Skinner, mately 81.1% (Centers for Disease Control and man milk are well established. Human milk 95
40 PhD, is an associate Prevention [CDC], 2016). Although this rate is decreases mortality and infectious disease 96
41 professor in the Duke
less than that of most industrialized nations (Eidelman et al., 2012; Ma & Magnus, 2012; 97
Clinical Research Institute
42 and the Department of worldwide, the U.S. breastfeeding initiation Reeves & Woods-Giscombé, 2015; Spatz & 98
43 Population Health Sciences, rate has continued to improve since 1972. Lessen, 2011). This is critically important 99
44 Duke University, Durham, However, in the United States, African Amer- because African American infants and children 100
NC.
45 ican women initiate breastfeeding at a rate of are at greater risk for the development of dis- 101
46 only 66.3% (CDC, 2016). This indicates a eases such as asthma (13.4% African American 102
47 striking disparity when compared with women vs. 7.6% White at ages < 18 years), obesity 103
48 of other races/ethnicities, particularly White (23.8% African American vs. 13.1% White at ages 104
49 and Hispanic women (84.3% and 83.0%, 6–11 years), infant mortality (2.2 times the rate 105
50 respectively; CDC, 2016). These rates indicate of White infants), and SIDS (1.9 times the rate of 106
51 that African American women are less likely to White infants). Human milk decreases the risk of 107
(Continued)
52 initiate breastfeeding, which increases the lower respiratory tract infections, asthma, otitis 108
53 risk for African American infants to experience media, gastrointestinal infections, necrotizing 109
54 infant mortality, sudden infant death syndrome enterocolitis, SIDS, and obesity (Eidelman et al., 110
The authors report no con-
55 flict of interest or relevant (SIDS), childhood morbidities, and chronic 2012; Hildebrand et al., 2014; Spatz & Lessen, 111
56 financial relationships. health conditions (Spencer & Grassley, 2013). 2011; Ware, Webb, & Levy, 2014). 112
http://jognn.org ª 2018 AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. 1
Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
FLA 5.5.0 DTD JOGN328_proof 15 March 2018 4:49 am ce
RESEARCH Breastfeeding Initiation in African American Women
225 (time and date) and transportation fare for their pediatric PhD-prepared nurse researcher with 281
226 sessions; they received follow-up reminder calls formal education in qualitative research design, 282
227 24 to 48 hours before the sessions. Focus groups methods, and analysis independently read and 283
228 were held in a conference room at the ambulatory coded transcripts to ensure coding accuracy and 284
229 center location. At the completion of the focus consistency. Independent analyses were 285
230 group, participants were given a meal, return compared to reconcile differences regarding 286
231 transportation fare, and a $25 gift card. codes and to approve primary themes and sub- 287
232 themes. The use of sequential, prescripted 288
233 Focus groups were conducted with the use of a questions for all focus groups and double coding 289
234 16-question, open-ended script. These pre- of transcripts enhanced methodologic rigor. 290
235 scripted questions were developed on the basis 291
236 of a review of the literature and prior research to 292
237 broadly elicit participants’ perceptions of the fa- Results 293
238 cilitators and barriers of breastfeeding initiation Six focus groups were conducted with a total of 294
239 among African American women with a specific 34 participants. Focus groups ranged in size, and 295
240 focus on cultural and socioenvironmental factors three to nine women participated in each session. 296
241 and the modifiable factors of the conceptual A total of 22 participants were breastfeeding at 297
242 model of breastfeeding behavior (Lee, Elo, the time of the study, and 12 participants were not 298
243 McCollum, & Culhane, 2009). The interview (see Table 1). 299
244 questions were pilot-tested by three African 300
245 American women of different demographic The primary themes that emerged from focus 301
246 backgrounds who met study inclusion criteria groups were analogous to most factors of the two 302
247 (see Supplemental Table S1). The focus group central modifiable factors of the conceptual 303
248 interview script included probes to encourage model for breastfeeding behavior, Cultural 304
249 additional description or clarifiers to ensure that Context and Social Environment Factors, and the 305
250 each focus group had a consistent approach, external domain Breastfeeding Intention. Key 306
251 regardless of diversity among participants in perceived facilitators and barriers were high- 307
252 each group or breastfeeding decision. Each lighted in the primary themes. In total, we identi- 308
253 focus group was audiorecorded. A co-facilitator fied 7 primary themes and 40 subthemes. 309
254 took field notes to capture impressions, ideas, Although it is not feasible to address all 40 sub- 310
255 gestures, and key words during each session. themes in this article, they are listed in Table 2. 311
256 The focus group facilitator and co-facilitator were The two primary themes in the Cultural Context 312
257 African American women. domain were Beliefs About Breastfeeding and 313
258 Issues of Sexuality. 314
259 Each focus group lasted approximately 120 mi- 315
260 nutes. Questions focused specifically on personal Cultural Context: Beliefs About 316
261 and familial beliefs about breastfeeding, relevant Breastfeeding 317
262 issues of sexuality, social network interactions, 318
Benefits to Baby and Mom’s Health. Participants
263 social support, social influence, and information 319
in the breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding focus
264 sources. To protect confidentiality, participants 320
groups frequently mentioned benefits to the infant
265 were able to select pseudonyms instead of using 321
and mother as a prevailing belief about breast-
266 their first names during the recorded session, but 322
feeding. Although some participants cited bene-
267 none opted to do so. Data collection was 323
fits to the infant (e.g., intellect, protection from
268 completed in 2016. 324
illness) as being most important in breastfeeding,
269 325
other participants cited maternal benefits (e.g.,
270 Data Analysis return to pre-pregnancy weight, illness protec-
326
271 After transcription, all data were analyzed using 327
tion) as critical reasons to breastfeed.
272 Atlas.ti 7.0 qualitative software and conventional 328
273 qualitative content analysis to elucidate experi- 329
274 ences, facilitators, and barriers and to preserve Increased Bonding. The phenomenon of 330
275 intended meanings. We inductively developed a increased bonding among breastfeeding 331
276 codebook from the primary results as transcripts mothers and infants was highlighted several 332
277 were reviewed. Additions and revisions to the times by participants in both focus groups. 333
278 codebook and coding process were made itera- Despite not breastfeeding, non-breastfeeding 334
279 tively as new themes and subcategories focus group participants also identified the act 335
280 emerged. The first author and an experienced of breastfeeding as a positive exchange between 336
337 393
338 Table 1: Demographics of Focus Group Participants 394
339 395
Breastfeeding Group (n ¼ 22) Non-breastfeeding Group (n ¼ 12)
340 396
Demographic Variable n (%) n (%)
341 397
342 Age in years mean ¼ 26.5 mean ¼ 24.7 398
343 18–21 4 (18.2) 4 (33.3) 399
344 22–25 6 (27.3) 2 (16.7)
400
345 401
26–29 5 (22.7) 4 (33.3)
346 402
347 30–35 6 (27.3) 2 (16.7) 403
348 36–40 1 (4.5) 0 (0) 404
349 405
Number of children
350 406
351 1 10 (45.5) 7 (58.3) 407
352 2 4 (18.2) 1 (8.3) 408
353 409
3 3 (13.6) 2 (16.7)
354 410
355 4 4 (18.2) 1 (8.3) 411
356 5þ 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 412
357 413
Previous breastfeeding experience 11 (50) 2 (16.7)
358 414
Initiation of breastfeeding with this infant 22 (100) 7 (58.3)
359 415
360 Employment status 416
361 Working 0–20 hours per week 0 (0) 2 (16.7) Q8 417
362 418
Working 21–40þ hours per week 13 (59.1) 5 (41.6)
363 419
364 Not working 9 (40.9) 5 (41.6) 420
365 Monthly income 421
366 422
$0–$833 12 (54.5) 8 (66.7)
367 423
368 $834–$1,666 5 (22.7) 2 (16.7) 424
369 $1,667–$2,449 2 (9.1) 0 (0) 425
370 426
Not disclosed 3 (13.6) 2 (16.7)
371 427
372 School status 428
373 Enrolled 6 (27.3) 2 (16.7) 429
374 Not enrolled 16 (72.7) 10 (83.3)
430
375 431
Highest level of education
376 432
377 Some high school 3 (13.6) 2 (16.7) 433
378 High school graduate/high school equivalency 6 (27.3) 6 (50) 434
379 435
Some college/vocational school/associate’s degree 9 (40.9) 4 (33.3)
380 436
381 Bachelor’s degree 1 (4.5) 0 (0) 437
382 Other (master’s degree) 3 (13.6) 0 (0) 438
383 439
Enrolled in WIC 19 (86.4) 12 (100)
384 440
385 Note. WIC ¼ Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. 441
386 442
387 443
388 a mother and her child through more skin-to-skin some, the reference to the word natural was 444
389 contact and enhanced connection. focused on the connection to spirituality and a 445
390 divine design by God. Although other partici- 446
391 It’s Natural. Many breastfeeding participants pants in both groups did not reference the spiri- 447
392 referred to breastfeeding as being “natural.” For tual connection, they did mention the perfect 448
449 505
450 Table 2: Primary Themes and Subthemes 506
451 507
Primary Themes Subthemes
452 508
Cultural Context (Factors)
453 509
454 Beliefs About Benefits to Baby and Mom’s Health 510
455 Breastfeeding Increased Bonding 511
456 512
It’s Natural
457 513
458 Historic Cultural Events Have Influenced Beliefs, Exposure and Perceptions of Breastfeeding 514
459 (Non-Normalized) 515
460 Formula Is as Good as Breast Milk 516
461 517
Racism/Community Disparities Supporting African American Maternal Breastfeeding
462 518
463 Issues of Sexuality Breasts for Both Nutrition and Sexuality 519
464 Breastfeeding for Sexuality/Sexual Act Q9 520
465 521
Oversexualization of African American Females
466 522
467 Social Environment (Factors) 523
468 Familial/Network Influence Self-Influence 524
469 525
Matriarchal Influence
470 526
Partner Influence
471 527
472 Sister Influence 528
473 Friend/Peer Network Influence 529
474 530
Religious Community Influence
475 531
476 Informational Sources Prenatal Clinics 532
477 WIC 533
478 534
Physicians
479 535
480 Nurses 536
481 Lactation Consultants 537
482 538
Internet Sources
483 539
484 Breastfeeding Intention 540
485 Intention Positive Intention 541
486 Negative Intention/Ambivalence
542
487 543
Barriers and Facilitators
488 544
489 Barriers Competing Priorities 545
490 Pain 546
491 547
Embarrassment of Public Exposure
492 548
Lack of Knowledge and Support of Breastfeeding in African American Community and Home Q10
493 549
494 Lack of Information and Education About Breastfeeding Prenatally 550
495 551
Lack of Access to Equipment and Resources
496 552
497 Aversions to Breastfeeding 553
498 Convenience of Formula and Bottle-Feeding 554
499 555
Independence
500 556
National Policy
501 557
502 (Continued) 558
503 559
504 560
561 617
562 Table 2: Continued 618
563 619
Primary Themes Subthemes
564 620
Facilitators Engaged/Involved Fathers
565 621
566 Prior Positive Experience/Exposure 622
567 Cost and Convenience of Breastfeeding 623
568 624
Peer Counselors/Peer Support Groups
569 625
570 Supportive Family (Home) Environment 626
571 Baby-Friendly Hospital Influence 627
572 628
WIC
573 629
574 Note. WIC ¼ Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. 630
575 631
576 632
577 creation and exactness of the breastfeeding there are stores that have rooms. . You know 633
578 phenomenon: “I just think God created everything that you can go in and you can nurse and 634
579 kind of perfectly. you know, it just seems like, things like that. In our community, you don’t 635
580 okay, this is what’s supposed to happen” find that at all. (Breastfeeding group) 636
581 (breastfeeding group). 637
582 638
Cultural Context: Issues of Sexuality
583 Historic Cultural Events Have Influenced Beliefs, 639
Breasts for Both Nutrition and Sexuality. Many
584 Exposure, and Perception of Breastfeeding (Non- 640
breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding focus
585 Normalized). In African American culture, the 641
group participants offered positive perspectives
586 view of breastfeeding has changed during the 642
about the dual purpose of the female breast. They
587 course of history, and this change was referenced 643
spoke about the abilities of their breasts to
588 by participants in the breastfeeding and non- 644
appropriately provide nutrition for their infants
589 breastfeeding focus groups. Participants dis- 645
and be viewed sexually by their partners during
590 cussed the implications of slavery and the lack of 646
moments of intimacy:
591 knowledge and non-normalized experience in the 647
592 Black community as significant in current day 648
I believe that it’s for both purposes, like I do
593 perceptions of African American mothers and the 649
believe that it’s for the sexual purpose for your
594 community about breastfeeding: 650
husband, but it’s also for nurturing your child
595 651
when that time comes. And um. even for me,
596 There are a lot of people in the African Amer- 652
like before I started, I even wondered myself.
597 ican community that don’t even know that 653
(Breastfeeding group)
598 much, like that we were forced to feed, you 654
599 know, our master’s children. Like well, if they 655
600 thought we were. you know, that if we were Breasts for Sexuality/Sexual Act. The beliefs that 656
601 good enough to do that, that we should be breasts are solely for the purpose of sexuality and 657
602 made to do that, then maybe it’s better that we that the act of breastfeeding is sexual in nature 658
603 do it for our kids. (Breastfeeding group) were mentioned primarily by non-breastfeeding 659
604 focus group participants. These participants 660
605 Racism/Community Disparities Supporting had reservations about the act of breastfeeding 661
606 African American Maternal Breastfeeding. The based on reactions of their partners, personal 662
607 issues of racism and disparities within African skepticism, or concerns about feeding children 663
608 American communities were mentioned in both directly from the breast: 664
609 focus groups, and participants highlighted extant 665
610 disparities in African American communities Like the reasons why I don’t breastfeed is 666
611 compared with neighboring White communities. because I do think it’s sexual and it’s just 667
612 They perceived White privilege as critical in the creepy. The fact of having to put my boob in 668
613 final decision to initiate breastfeeding: my baby’s mouth. I know it sounds like, you 669
614 know, it’s harmless, and I know that’s the way 670
615 I noticed that. stores and stuff like that in for them to eat, but I just, I can’t see me doing 671
616 White, predominately White communities, it. (Non-breastfeeding group) 672
673 Q2 The second external domain included two pri- So people who are, you know, who have a 729
674 mary themes: Familial/Network Influence and spirituality about them, um, it seems like they 730
675 Informational Sources. These themes captured understand better the natural order of things, 731
676 the effects of interpersonal and organizational so they accept it more and they support it 732
677 interactions on participants’ decisions regarding more, because it’s like this is what you should 733
678 breastfeeding initiation. do ’cause this is what God intended you to do. 734
679 (Breastfeeding group) 735
680 736
Social Environment: Familial/Network
681 However, other participants maintained that reli- 737
Influence
682 gion does not dictate personal choice in breast- 738
Matriarchal Influence. Matriarchal influence was
683 feeding initiation decisions. 739
identified often by participants when they referred
684 740
to the familial and network influences on de-
685 741
cisions about breastfeeding initiation. Matriarchal Social Environment: Informational
686 742
influence, which refers to the positive and nega- Sources
687 743
tive influences of the infant’s maternal or paternal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for
688 744
grandmother/great-grandmother, was the most Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). The WIC
689 745
common type of influence identified by partici- Program, sponsored by the U.S. Department of
690 746
pants: “Because my mom and my stepmom, they Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service, is a
691 747
both done it and they. I got a lot of information federal program that was frequently mentioned as
692 748
from them and how they experienced it” (breast- a source for breastfeeding information, particu-
693 749
feeding group). “One of my most negative influ- larly during the prenatal period. Although many
694 750
encers was my mother. She just made it seem participants highlighted WIC as a consistent
695 751
like, you know, you should be bottle-feeding” source of informational support, some reported
696 752
(breastfeeding group). that they did not talk with staff or that the focus on
697 753
breastfeeding dwindled after birth: “If you ask for
698 754
Partner Influence. Participants in both groups the help, they provide it, but pretty much they like
699 755
commonly agreed that African American women you get the formula, here go your checks, you’re
700 756
are influenced by the perspectives of their part- on your way” (non-breastfeeding group).
701 757
702 ners and sometimes yield their personal desire to 758
703 breastfeed because of a partner’s reluctance: Physicians. Various health care providers were 759
704 “His dad. was reading more books than me frequently mentioned as critical resources for in- 760
705 about it and talking to more people about it, so he formation and influential in breastfeeding de- 761
706 was often like the biggest cheerleader for me cisions. For example, participants shared mixed 762
707 when I was like I can’t do it” (breastfeeding experiences they had with physicians and 763
708 group). “You know, but I think they see it for a described engaged experiences in some in- 764
709 sexual purpose, ’cause he’s like, ‘I don’t want my stances and closed-minded or absent discus- 765
710 son to be eating like that. Give him the bottle’ ” sions in others: 766
711 (non-breastfeeding group). 767
712 I think another barrier could be also, you know, 768
713 Friend/Peer Network Influence. In addition to with the doctors. Like I, you know, definitely 769
714 family members and partners, participants experienced that a lot, like they’re really not 770
715 commonly mentioned that friends influenced their open-minded. They really just like, “You need 771
716 viewpoints (positive and negative) and decisions to do this, you need to do that,” you know. 772
717 about breastfeeding initiation. Friends and co- (Non-breastfeeding group) 773
718 workers were most commonly identified as 774
719 the social network external to family that provided 775
720 Nurses. Nurses were identified as positive sour- 776
the most influence, support, and encouragement.
721 ces of information by participants in both groups. 777
722 Respondents described multiple supportive 778
723 Religious Community Influence. Spanning Chris- encounters with nurses, regardless of whether or 779
724 tian and Muslim faiths, participants discussed the not they eventually breastfed: “It was just so 780
725 influence of their religious beliefs. In several welcoming and comforting that I did not have to 781
726 comments, participants who breastfed referred to struggle and try to like do this boob thing by 782
727 breastfeeding as “created perfectly by God” and myself, ’cause I didn’t know what I was doing” 783
728 “a child’s right.” (breastfeeding group). 784
785 Lactation Consultants. Although lactation con- three other kids to worry about, you. it’s too 841
786 sultants were seen as positive and supportive demanding. (Breastfeeding group) 842
787 sources of information for some participants, 843
788 many breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding Embarrassment of Public Exposure Participants, 844
789 participants voiced frustration about their primarily from the non-breastfeeding group, 845
790 hospital experiences. Lactation consultants were expressed a sense of embarrassment and stigma 846
791 described frequently as lacking knowledge/ associated with breastfeeding in public. They re- 847
792 information and being rushed and unavailable ported that they felt self-conscious about “bearing 848
793 during hospital stays: their body parts in public places” and discomfort in 849
794 breastfeeding in front of other people. 850
795 The lactation consultants, they may have 851
796 come. like they’d either come in there for like Lack of Knowledge and Support of Breastfeeding 852
797 five minutes, and if your baby don’t get right in the African American Community Breastfeed- 853
798 on the nipple, they’re like, “Oh well, we be ing participants highlighted the lack of knowl- 854
799 back. ” So yeah, they act like they don’t have edge, support, and exposure as another 855
800 time. (Non-breastfeeding group) significant barrier to breastfeeding initiation. 856
801 Many highlighted the tremendous challenge of 857
802 Breastfeeding Intention initiating breastfeeding in a culture in which for- 858
803 In the domain Breastfeeding Intention, partici- mula and bottle-feeding are the norm. Other 859
804 pants indicated the desire and interest to initiate participants mentioned the level of ignorance that 860
805 breastfeeding. This domain included positive currently exists within the community and 861
806 intention and negative intention. Positive Intention mentioned this as the reason for lack of openness 862
807 was most often reported by breastfeeding par- to the behavior: “I do think it’s. ignorance in the 863
808 ticipants who had prior experience or exposure to Black community because we don’t talk about 864
809 breastfeeding and felt positively empowered by breastfeeding. It’s not common in our community, 865
810 providing for their infants or “doing something and Caucasian. in the Caucasian community, 866
811 different.” Many non-breastfeeding participants it’s very common. It’s almost like normal for them” 867
812 expressed Negative Intention or ambivalence (breastfeeding group). 868
813 about breastfeeding initiation and made their 869
814 decisions long before information was shared: “I Lack of Information and Education About 870
815 knew I was going to bottle-feed. I didn’t even Breastfeeding Prenatally Lack of information and 871
816 want to think about breastfeeding” (non-breast- education about breastfeeding before birth was 872
817 feeding group). also mentioned frequently by participants. Pri- 873
818 marily, breastfeeding participants highlighted a Q3 874
819 lack of information sharing about breastfeeding 875
820 Barriers and Facilitators initiation before birth in contrast to being 876
821 Barriers and facilitators were identified as specific “swarmed” with information after birth: “I didn’t 877
822 factors that facilitated or hindered the positive get no information. While I was pregnant, they 878
823 adoption of breastfeeding based on personal or didn’t ask. I didn’t receive any information about 879
824 professional experiences and knowledge. breastfeeding” (non-breastfeeding group). 880
825 881
826 Barriers to Breastfeeding Initiation. Competing Independence Some participants discussed the 882
827 Priorities The challenge of juggling multiple re- desire for an independent infant for the purpose of 883
828 sponsibilities was one of the most commonly “mommy time,” and others focused on the impor- 884
829 mentioned barriers among participants during tance of not creating a spoiled or coddled infant 885
830 focus groups. Participants frequently mentioned who needed additional attention and support. 886
831 the demands of additional children, work, home Participants noted that family members (e.g., 887
832 schedule, school, and lack of time for breast- mothers and partners) voiced these perceptions: 888
833 feeding and pumping as rationales for this “I’d rather just. I want an independent baby, 889
834 subtheme: nothing like it’s going to be stuck to me twenty- 890
835 four–seven ’cause I might have to be like, okay, I 891
836 The time, the job, it requires a lot and some need mommy time” (non-breastfeeding group). 892
837 African American women are not able to stay 893
838 at home to do this. I mean, yeah, you can Facilitators of Breastfeeding Initiation. Engaged/ Q4 894
839 pump, but if you ain’t pumped already, you’re Involved Fathers Participants highlighted the 895
840 working a twelve-hour shift and you got two or importance of involving fathers and partners early 896
1121 formula feed. Journal of Human Lactation, 30(2), 209–216. Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1150
1122 https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334413508338 109019818801500401 Q6 1151
Golden, S. D., & Earp, J. A. L. (2012). Social ecological approaches to Reeves, E. A., & Woods-Giscombé, C. L. (2015). Infant-feeding
1123 1152
individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of health education practices among African American women: Social-ecological
1124 & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Education & analysis and implications for practice. Journal of Transcultural
1153
1125 Behavior, 39(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/ Nursing, 26(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1154
1126 Q5 1090198111418634 1043659614526244 1155
1127 Gross, T. T., Powell, R., Anderson, A. K., Hall, J., Davis, M., & Hilyard, Spatz, D. L., Froh, E. B., Flynn-Roth, R., & Barton, S. (2015). Improving 1156
K. (2014). WIC peer counselors’ perceptions of breastfeeding practice at the point of care through the optimization of the
1128 1157
in African American women with lower incomes. Journal of breastfeeding resource nurse model. Journal of Obstetric, Gy-
1129 Human Lactation, 31(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/ necologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 44(3), 412–418. https://doi.org/
1158
1130 0890334414561061 10.1111/1552-6909.12570 1159
1131 Hildebrand, D. A., McCarthy, P., Tipton, D., Merriman, C., Schrank, M., Spatz, D. L., & Lessen, R. (2011). The risks of not breastfeeding. 1160
1132 & Newport, M. (2014). Innovative use of influential prenatal Spencer, B. S., & Grassley, J. S. (2013). African American women and 1161
counseling may improve breastfeeding initiation rates among breastfeeding: An integrative literature review. Health Care for
1133 1162
WIC participants. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Women International, 34(7), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/
1134 46(6), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.05.005 07399332.2012.684813 Q7
1163
1135 Lee, H. J., Elo, I. T., McCollum, K. F., & Culhane, J. F. (2009). Racial/ U.S. Breastfeeding Committee. (2010). Core competencies in breast- 1164
1136 ethnic differences in breastfeeding initiation and duration feeding care and services for all health professionals. Retrieved 1165
1137 among low-income inner-city mothers. Social Science Quarterly, from http://www.usbreastfeeding.org/core-competencies 1166
90(5), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The Surgeon
1138 1167
00656.x General’s call to action to support breastfeeding. Retrieved
1139 Ma, P., & Magnus, J. H. (2012). Exploring the concept of positive devi- from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52682/pdf/
1168
1140 ance related to breastfeeding initiation in black and white WIC Bookshelf_NBK52682.pdf 1169
1141 enrolled first time mothers. Maternal and Child Health Journal, Ware, J. L., Webb, L., & Levy, M. (2014). Barriers to breastfeeding in 1170
1142 16(8), 1583–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0852-3 the African American population of Shelby County, Tennessee. 1171
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An Breastfeeding Medicine, 9(8), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1089/
1143 1172
ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health bfm.2014.0006
1144 1173
1145 1174
1146 1175
1147 1176
1148 1177
1149 1178