You are on page 1of 24

Topic 2 to 10 Test ID: 8829325

Question #1 of 69 Question ID: 496355

Which of the following statements regarding concentration ratios is least accurate?

✗ A) A decrease in the concentration ratio results in a decrease in the default correlation.


✗ B) A lower concentration ratio and lower correlation coefficient both reduce the joint probability of
default.

✗ C) A higher concentration ratio and higher correlation coefficient both increase the joint probability of
default.

✓ D) A higher concentration ratio and lower correlation coefficient both reduce the joint probability of
default.

Explanation

A lower concentration ratio and lower correlation coefficient both reduce the joint probability of default. A decrease in the
concentration ratio results in a decrease in the default correlation.

Question #2 of 69 Question ID: 496360

Which type of distribution has the best fit for bond correlations?

✗ A) Lognormal distribution.
✗ B) Johnson SB distribution.
✗ C) Beta distribution.
✓ D) Generalized extreme value (GEB) distribution.

Explanation

The Generalized extreme value (GEB) distribution is the best fit for bond correlation distributions.

Question #3 of 69 Question ID: 439843

Which of the following most accurately describes the parameters of a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD)?

✗ A) β The scale parameter: 0 > β. The shape (tail) index: ξ, can be any real number.
✗ B) The scale parameter: β, which can be any real number. The shape (tail) index: ξ > 0.
✓ C) The scale parameter: 0 < β. The shape (tail) index: ξ, can be any real number.
✗ D) The scale parameter: β, can be any real number. The shape (tail) index: ξ, can be any real number.

Explanation

The two parameters are a scale parameter, which must be positive, and a shape parameter that can take on any value.

1 of 24
Question #4 of 69 Question ID: 439851

The International Bank has backtested its VAR models and has found four exceptions. Under the Basel Committee Penalty Zone
rules, how would this be classified and what would be the associated VAR multiplier?

Classification VAR multiplier

✗ A) Multiplier greater than


Green zone
3

✗ B) Yellow zone Multiplier of 3

✗ C) Yellow zone Multiplier greater than 3

✓ D) Green zone Multiplier of 3

Explanation

The Green Zone is for up to 4 exceptions, Yellow being 5 - 9, and Red 10 or more. Green has a multiplier of 3, Yellow ranges
from 3.4 to 3.85, and Red is 4.

Remember the multiplier multiplies the VAR estimate to provide an increased degree of caution in the estimate. The more
exceptions the greater the degree of caution needed with the VAR estimate because the model is less accurate.

Question #5 of 69 Question ID: 496366

A risk manager that wants to incorporate the effect of outliers into her statistical correlation measures would most likely use:

✓ A) Kendall's τ correlation.
✗ B) Pearson correlation.
✗ C) Ordinal correlation.

✗ D) Spearman's rank correlation.

Explanation

The Pearson correlation coefficient is preferred to ordinal measures when outliers are a concern. Spearman rank and Kendall τ
are ordinal correlation coefficients that should not be used with cardinal financial variables because they underestimate risk by
ignoring the impact of outliers.

Question #6 of 69 Question ID: 496362

A value at risk (VaR) model is most likely to be limited in usefulness most likely because of assumptions concerning the:

✗ A) mathematical inconsistencies of the model.


✗ B) market valuation inputs.
✓ C) underlying distribution of asset returns.
✗ D) volatility smile.

Explanation

Financial models require assumptions regarding the underlying distribution of the asset returns. Value at risk (VaR) models often

2 of 24
assume that asset returns follow a normal distribution. However, empirical studies actually find higher kurtosis in return
distributions, which suggest a distribution with fatter tails than the normal distribution.

Question #7 of 69 Question ID: 496363

Model risks that lead to incorrect pricing of securities are most likely caused by:

✓ A) mathematical inconsistencies.
✗ B) stress testing.
✗ C) return distribution inconsistencies.
✗ D) volatility smiles.

Explanation

Financial models at times may fail to accurately measure risk due to mathematical inconsistencies. Risk managers and traders
need to be aware of the possibility of mathematical inconsistencies causing model risk that leads to incorrect pricing and the
inability to properly hedge risk.

Question #8 of 69 Question ID: 496358

Suppose mean reversion exists for a variable with a value of 20 at time period t - 1. Assume that the long-run mean value for this
variable is 40 and ignore the stochastic term included in most regressions of financial data. What is the expected change in
value of the variable for the next period if the mean reversion rate is 0.4?

✗ A) -4.
✓ B) 8.
✗ C) 10.
✗ D) -10.

Explanation

The mean reversion rate, a, indicates the speed of the change or reversion back to the mean. If the mean reversion rate is 0.4
and the difference between the last variable and long-run mean is 20 (= 40 - 20), then the expected change for the next period is
8 (i.e., 0.4 × 20 = 8).

Question #9 of 69 Question ID: 439872

Suppose that 25 days ago the observed market variable percentage change was 2.3% with a daily volatility estimate of 2%.
What is the sample percentage change using the Hull and White (HW) approach if the current daily volatility is estimated at
2.8%?

✗ A) 0.8%.
✗ B) 2.2%.
✓ C) 3.2%.
✗ D) 0.3%.

Explanation

3 of 24
The historical percentage change is adjusted based on the ratio of current daily volatility to historically observed daily volatility 25
days ago. The sample percentage change is 3.2% and is calculated as follows:

σN * (ht / σt) = 2.8% * (2.3% / 2.0%) = 3.2%.

Question #10 of 69 Question ID: 496369

A Gaussian copula maps the marginal distribution of each variable to the:

✗ A) t-distribution.
✓ B) standard normal distribution.
✗ C) binomial distribution.
✗ D) uniform distribution.

Explanation

A Gaussian copula maps the marginal distribution of each variable to the standard normal distribution.

Question #11 of 69 Question ID: 439852

Within the Basel penalty zones, which of the following multipliers would most likely apply to a yellow zone with five to nine
exceptions?

✗ A) 3.00.
✗ B) 4.00.
✓ C) 3.65.

✗ D) 3.35.

Explanation

The yellow zone applies for five to nine exceptions with multiplier ranges from 3.40 to 3.85. The green zone applies for zero to
four exceptions with a multiplier of 3.00. The red zone applies for ten or more exceptions with a multiplier of 4.00.

Question #12 of 69 Question ID: 439846

The process of comparing losses predicted by a VAR model to those actually experienced over the test period is called:

✗ A) verification.
✓ B) backtesting.

✗ C) authentication.
✗ D) validation.

Explanation

Backtesting is the process of comparing losses predicted by a VAR model to those actually experienced over the testing period.

4 of 24
Question #13 of 69 Question ID: 439850

The Kupiec log-likelihood ratio is used for:

✓ A) backtesting VAR models.


✗ B) stress-testing VAR models.
✗ C) estimating interest-rate spread volatility.
✗ D) estimating the delta-normal VAR of option portfolios.

Explanation

The Kupiec log-likelihood ratio is used to backtest VAR models based on the probability of exceptions, the number of exceptions,
and the number of observations. The model is rejected if the ratio is greater than 3.84.

Question #14 of 69 Question ID: 439874

In the process of integrating various risks into value at risk (VaR) models, what are endogenous liquidity risks?

✗ A) Average transaction costs.


✗ B) Spectral effects on VaR.
✓ C) Elasticity of prices to volume.
✗ D) Market-specific risks.

Explanation

Endogenous liquidity is an adjustment for the price effect of liquidating positions. It depends on trade sizes and is applicable when
market orders are large enough to move prices. Endogenous liquidity is the elasticity of prices to trading volumes and is more
easily observed in instances of high liquidity risk.

Question #15 of 69 Question ID: 439839

The generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution is useful for: I. estimating VAR. II. stress testing. III. estimating correlation. IV.
backtesting.

✗ A) I and III only.


✓ B) II only.
✗ C) I only.
✗ D) I, II, III, and IV.

Explanation

The GEV distribution describes the distribution of the maximums from a large sample of identically distributed observations. It's
not particularly useful for VAR estimation since VAR does not consider the distribution of the maximum, but it is useful for stress
testing. GEV also has nothing to do with correlations and would not be used for backtesting to see if a VAR model was effective.

Question #16 of 69 Question ID: 439827

Which of the following statements regarding disadvantages of non-parametric methods is least accurate?

5 of 24
✓ A) Volatile data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too low.
✗ B) Analysis depends critically on historical data.
✗ C) Difficult to detect structural shifts/regime changes in the data.
✗ D) Cannot accommodate plausible large impact events outside of the sample period.

Explanation

One of the disadvantages of non-parametric methods is that volatile data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too
high.

Question #17 of 69 Question ID: 439859

The risk of a stock or bond which is NOT correlated with the market (and thus can be diversified) is known as:

✗ A) interest rate risk.


✗ B) model risk.
✗ C) FX risk.
✓ D) specific risk.

Explanation

Specific risk is uncorrelated with market movements (e.g., the risk that ABC will enter into unprofitable business and eventually
default). This type of risk can be minimized through diversification of the portfolio.

Question #18 of 69 Question ID: 439853

Which of the following causes for exceptions established by the Basel Committee would be considered more serious so that a
penalty should apply?

I. Model accuracy needs improvement.


II. Intraday trading activity.
III. Basic integrity of the model is lacking.

✗ A) II and III.
✗ B) I only.
✓ C) I and III.
✗ D) II only.

Explanation

Where the basic integrity of the model is lacking or model accuracy needs improvement, the penalty should apply.

Where there is intraday trading activity, the penalty should be considered.

Question #19 of 69 Question ID: 496352

Suppose an individual buys a correlation swap with a fixed correlation rate of 0.4 and a notional value of $1 million for one year.

6 of 24
The realized pairwise correlations of the daily log returns at maturity for three assets are ρ2,1 = 0.8, ρ3,1 = 0.4, and ρ3,2 = 0.3.
What is the correlation swap buyer's payoff at maturity?

✓ A) $100,000.
✗ B) $200,000.
✗ C) $300,000.
✗ D) $400,000.

Explanation

First, calculate the realized correlation as follows:

The payoff for the correlation buyer is then calculated as:

$1,000,000 × (0.5 - 0.4) = $100,000

Question #20 of 69 Question ID: 439842

Which of the following statements regarding generalized extreme value (GEV) and peaks-over-threshold (POT) is CORRECT?

✗ A) Both POT and GEV focus on the distribution of extreme values above a specified threshold.
✗ B) POT requires the estimation of one more parameter than GEV.
✗ C) Only one of the approaches has a tail parameter denoted ξ.
✓ D) POT approach may introduce additional uncertainty.

Explanation

The POT approach requires a choice of a threshold, which may introduce additional uncertainty.

GEV requires the estimation of one more parameter than POT.

GEV theory focuses on the distributions of extremes, whereas POT focuses on the distribution of values that exceed a certain
threshold.

Both approaches have a tail parameter denoted ξ.

Question #21 of 69 Question ID: 496361

The Johnson SB distribution is the best fit for:

✗ A) equities, only
✗ B) bond, equities and default correlations.
✓ C) The Johnson SB distribution is the best fit for:
✗ D) bond and default correlations, only.

Explanation

The Johnson SB distribution is the best fit for equities and default correlations.

7 of 24
Question #22 of 69 Question ID: 439823

Which of the following statements accurately describe filtered historical simulation? Filtered historical simulation:

✗ A) is not flexible enough to capture conditional volatility and volatility clustering.


✗ B) is the most comprehensive, and hence most complicated, of the parametric estimators.
✓ C) combines the historical simulation model with conditional volatility models.
✗ D) is only reasonable for small portfolios, and empirical evidence does not support its predictive ability.

Explanation

The filtered historical simulation is the most comprehensive, and hence most complicated, of the non-parametric estimators. The
process combines the historical simulation model with conditional volatility models (like GARCH or asymmetric GARCH). Thus,
the method contains both the attractions of the traditional historical simulation approach with the sophistication of models that
incorporate changing volatility. In simplified terms, the model is flexible enough to capture conditional volatility and volatility
clustering as well as a surprise factor that could have an asymmetric effect on volatility. From a computational standpoint, this
method is very reasonable even for large portfolios, and empirical evidence supports its predictive ability.

Question #23 of 69 Question ID: 496364

Which statement about Pearson correlation coefficient financial models is least accurate?

✗ A) The Pearson correlation coefficient requires that the variance calculations of the variables X
and Y are finite.
✗ B) The joint distribution between variables in Pearson correlation coefficient model must be elliptical in
order to have a meaningful interpretation.
✗ C) The Pearson correlation coefficient measures the linear relationships between two variables.
✓ D) A Pearson correlation of zero implies independence between two variables.

Explanation

A Pearson correlation of zero does not imply independence between the two variables. It does mean that there is not a linear
relationship between the variables.

Question #24 of 69 Question ID: 496365

Statistical correlation measures that are ordinal measures are:

✗ A) Pearson correlation, only.


✗ B) Kendall's τ correlation, only.
✓ C) Kendall's τ correlation and Spearman's rank correlation, only.
✗ D) Pearson correlation and Spearman's rank correlation only.

Explanation

The Kendall τ correlation and Spearman rank correlation are ordinal correlation measures.

8 of 24
Question #25 of 69 Question ID: 496367

Which of the following statements is least likely accurate about copula functions?

✗ A) Copulas can be used to describe dependence between random variables.


✗ B) Copulas are multivariate probability distributions.
✓ C) Copulas can only be created from distributions that are normally distributed.
✗ D) Copulas create a joint probability distribution two or more variables.

Explanation

Copulas are created from distributions that have unique shapes and are then mapped to a known distribution with well-defined
properties, such as the normal distribution.

Question #26 of 69 Question ID: 439830

The risk measure that extracts the dependence structure from the joint distribution function created from several continuous
marginal distribution functions is known by what name?

✗ A) Comonotonic.
✗ B) Multivariate correlation.
✗ C) Correlation.
✓ D) Copula.

Explanation

A copula is a risk measure that extracts the dependence structure from the joint distribution function created from several
continuous marginal distribution functions.

Question #27 of 69 Question ID: 439837

When ξ = 0, the generalized extreme value distribution (GEV) becomes which of the following distributions?

✗ A) Weibull distribution.
✗ B) Gaussian distribution.
✗ C) Frechet distribution.
✓ D) Gumbel distribution.

Explanation

When ξ = 0, the GEV becomes a Gumbel distribution and the tails are "light" as is the case for the normal and log-normal
distributions.

When ξ > 0, the GEV becomes a Frechet distribution and the tails are "heavy" as is the case for the t-distribution and the Pareto
distribution.

When ξ < 0, the GEV becomes a Weibull distribution and the tails are "lighter" than a normal distribution.

9 of 24
Question #28 of 69 Question ID: 439847

A Type I error occurs when a risk model is:

✗ A) accepted when it is accurate.


✓ B) rejected when it is accurate.
✗ C) accepted when it is inaccurate.
✗ D) rejected when it is inaccurate.

Explanation

If a risk model is rejected when it is accurate, a Type I error has occurred. A Type II error occurs when a model is accepted when
it is inaccurate.

Question #29 of 69 Question ID: 496359

A risk manager uses the past 400 months of correlation data from the Wilshire 5000 to estimate the long-run mean correlation of
common stocks and the mean reversion rate. Based on this historical data the long-run mean correlation of the Wilshire 5000
was 29% and the regression output estimates the following regression relationship: Y = 0.247 - 0.77X. Suppose that in June
2014, the average monthly correlation for all Wilshire 5000 stocks was 42%. What is the estimated one-period autocorrelation
for this time period based on the mean reversion rate estimated in the regression analysis?

✗ A) 23%.
✓ B) 32%.
✗ C) 26%.

✗ D) 30%.

Explanation

There is a -13% difference from the long-run mean correlation and June 2014 correlation (29% - 42% = -13%). The inverse of
the X coefficient in the regression relationship implies a mean reversion rate of 77%. Thus, the expected correlation for July
2014 is 32.0%:

Question #30 of 69 Question ID: 439876

Looking at the Basel regulatory framework, how would the Basel approach be best described?

✓ A) Non-integrated.
✗ B) Integrated.
✗ C) Non-compartmentalized.
✗ D) Idiosyncratic.

Explanation

The Basel approach is a "building block" approach, which is a non-integrated approach to risk measurement.

10 of 24
Question #31 of 69 Question ID: 439854

The Basel market risk charges require VAR to be computed over a horizon of:

✗ A) at least three months.


✗ B) at least one year.
✗ C) one month or 21 trading days.
✓ D) two calendar weeks or ten trading days.

Explanation

The Basel Accord requires VAR to be calculated over a 2-week period or 10 trading days.

Question #32 of 69 Question ID: 439858

The specific risk of an equities position can be defined as the risk that:

✗ A) can be explained for the liquidity spread of the position.


✗ B) cannot be measured by the use of volatility.
✗ C) is specific to the market.
✓ D) cannot be explained by the market beta.

Explanation

The risk that disappears in the portfolio construction process is called the asset's unsystematic risk (also called unique,
diversifiable, or firm-specific risk). In a well-diversified portfolio, the risk that is left cannot be diversified away. The risk that
remains is called the systematic risk (also called beta, nondiversifiable risk, or market risk).

Question #33 of 69 Question ID: 439861

The process of mapping a fixed-income portfolio to a set of risk factors is primarily associated with all of the following EXCEPT:

✗ A) duration mapping.
✗ B) cash flow mapping.

✓ C) credit risk mapping.


✗ D) principal mapping.

Explanation

Fixed-income portfolio risk factors are usually mapped to principal, duration, and cash-flow risk factors.

Question #34 of 69 Question ID: 439865

Which of the following is NOT a required step in using the delta-normal method to determine VAR for a fixed-income portfolio?

✓ A) Apply convexity adjustments to the mapped positions.


✗ B) Compute the mean, the standard deviation, and the VAR.

11 of 24
✗ C) Decompose and map the portfolio.
✗ D) Determine the changes in the values of the market factors.

Explanation

Convexity is not a required input in applying the delta-normal method to fixed-income portfolios, although it might prove useful if
interest rates, rather than bond prices were used as market factors.

Question #35 of 69 Question ID: 439863

Which of the following methods of mapping portfolios of fixed income securities is the most precise?

✓ A) Cash flow mapping.


✗ B) Principal mapping.
✗ C) Convexity mapping.
✗ D) Duration mapping.

Explanation

Cash flow mapping is the most precise method of the three because we map the present value of the cash flows (face amount
discounted at the sport rate for that maturity) onto the risk factors for zero coupon bonds of the same maturities and include the
intermaturity correlations.

Principal mapping includes only the risk of repayment of the principal amounts and considers the average maturity of the portfolio.

Duration mapping involves the risk of the bond being mapped to a zero-coupon bond of the same duration. Duration mapping uses
the duration of a portfolio (the duration measure is only an approximation) to calculate the VAR.

There is no such thing as convexity matching.

Question #36 of 69 Question ID: 439867

If a portfolio of assets are all perfectly positively correlated, the portfolio VAR will equal which of the following?

✗ A) Marginal VAR.
✓ B) Undiversified VAR.
✗ C) Diversified VAR.
✗ D) Component VAR.

Explanation

If all the assets are perfectly positively correlated there will be no diversification in that all assets will move together in the same
direction to the same magnitude. This, therefore, reflects the undiversified VAR (i.e., no diversification)—the worst possible
scenario of all assets defaulting together.

Question #37 of 69 Question ID: 439869

Which of the following develops more precise estimates of VAR?

12 of 24
✓ A) A full covariance matrix.
✗ B) The beta model.
✗ C) The component VAR.
✗ D) A diagonal matrix.

Explanation

Using a full covariance matrix will result in more precise estimates of VAR.

Question #38 of 69 Question ID: 496371

A Gaussian copula is a common approach for measuring:

✓ A) default risk.
✗ B) mark-to-market risk.
✗ C) liquidity risk.
✗ D) market risk.

Explanation

A Gaussian copula is a common approach for measuring default risk.

Question #39 of 69 Question ID: 439877

Which of following statements is(are) correct regarding the cyclical feedback loop from value at risk (VaR) constraints on
leveraged investors?

I. When net worth rises, leverage decreases, and when net worth declines, leverage increases.

II. Asset purchases increase when asset prices are rising, and assets are sold when asset prices are declining.

✓ A) Both I and II.


✗ B) Neither I nor II.
✗ C) I only.

✗ D) II only.

Explanation

Leverage (measured as total assets to equity) is inversely related to the market value of total assets. When net worth rises,
leverage decreases, and when net worth declines, leverage increases. This results in a cyclical feedback loop: asset purchases
increase when asset prices are rising, and assets are sold when asset prices are declining.

Question #40 of 69 Question ID: 496353

Suppose a creditor makes a $1,000,000 loan to company X and a $1,000,000 loan to company Y. Based on historical
information of companies in this industry, companies X and Y each have a 9% default probability and a default correlation
coefficient of 0.5. What is the expected loss for this creditor under the worst case scenario?

13 of 24
✗ A) $28,150.
✗ B) $53,650.
✗ C) $76,430.
✓ D) $49,060.

Explanation

The worst case scenario is the joint probability that both loans default at the same time. The joint probability of default is
computed as:

Thus, the expected loss for the worst case scenario for the creditor is:

EL = 0.04906 × $1,000,000 = $49,060

Question #41 of 69 Question ID: 439840

The Peaks Over Threshold (POT) approach serves as a basis for an expanded model of risk estimation. Which of the following
statements are false regarding POT?

I. Under the POT method, in the case of "fat" tails, not all moments are defined.
II. POT is often estimated with a Generalized Pareto Distribution.

✗ A) II only.
✗ B) Both I and II.
✗ C) I only.

✓ D) Neither I nor II.

Explanation

Both statements are correct (i.e., neither are false).

Question #42 of 69 Question ID: 496356

Risk managers should be aware correlation risk is a concern as it applies to:

✗ A) Market risk, credit risk, and systemic risk, only.


✗ B) Systemic risk and concentration risk, only.
✓ C) Market risk, credit risk, systemic risk, and concentration risk.
✗ D) Market risk and credit risk, only.

Explanation

Correlation risk applies to market risk, credit risk, systemic risk and concentration risk.

Question #43 of 69 Question ID: 439856

14 of 24
You are mapping risk factors in a large portfolio of 270 assets. How many covariance terms would be needed if the risk factors
were not reduced?

✗ A) 72,900.
✗ B) 36,450.
✗ C) 72,630.
✓ D) 36,315.

Explanation

Covariance
= n × (n − 1) / 2
terms
= 270 × 269 / 2
= 36,315

Question #44 of 69 Question ID: 439845

Extreme value theory can assist with VAR calculations by providing better probability estimates of
extreme losses than those indicated by a standard normal distribution. Using the generalized Pareto
distribution (GPD), the parameter that indicates the fatness of tails is the:

✗ A) scaling parameter, b.

✗ B) slope coefficient, b.
✓ C) shape parameter, ξ.
✗ D) threshold level, µ.

Explanation

A positive shape parameter, ξ, indicates fat tails.

Question #45 of 69 Question ID: 439857

Which of the following products is exposed to specific risk?

✓ A) None of these.
✗ B) S&P Futures Contract.
✗ C) German Government Bond.
✗ D) Japanese Government Bond.

Explanation

Specific risk exposure refers to securities that undergo adverse price movements as a result of idiosyncratic factors related to
individual issuers. Thus, government debt issues and futures contracts based on diversified indexes are not exposed to specific
risk.

Question #46 of 69 Question ID: 439860

15 of 24
Relative to return-based risk measures, position-based risk measures are:

✓ A) more difficult to implement but can detect style drift more quickly.
✗ B) easier to implement and can detect style drift more quickly.
✗ C) easier to implement but can detect style drift more slowly.
✗ D) more difficult to implement and can detect style drift more slowly.

Explanation

Position-based risk measures evaluate the manager's holdings on a current basis and can thus detect style drift more quickly. It
is more difficult to implement though. Return-based risk measures evaluate risk using historical returns whereas position-based
risk measures require an examination of each position a manager holds.

Question #47 of 69 Question ID: 439835

Under the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT), which of the following is (are) TRUE regarding the modeling of market risk?

I. The three key resulting distributions are: Gumbel, Weibull, and Frechet.
II. EVT permits the analysis of maxima and minima distributions.
III. EVT is does not account for "heavy" tails observed in the market place.
IV. EVT is dependent upon the normal distribution.

✗ A) None of these.
✗ B) I only.
✗ C) I and III only.

✓ D) I and II only.

Explanation

Statement III is incorrect because EVT allows for "heavy" tails as we see in the market place. Statement IV is incorrect because
EVT is not dependent upon the normal distribution.

Question #48 of 69 Question ID: 439848

You are backtesting a VAR model using analysing exceptions using failure rates. Which of the following statements is (are)
CORRECT?
I. The probability of rejecting an accurate VAR model is a Type II error.
II. The probability of accepting an inaccurate model is a Type I error.

✗ A) I only.
✗ B) II only.

✓ C) Neither I nor II.


✗ D) Both I and II.

Explanation

The probability of rejecting an accurate model is a Type I error. The probability of accepting an inaccurate model is a Type II
error.

16 of 24
Question #49 of 69 Question ID: 439844

Extreme value theory (EVT) can assist with value at risk (VAR) calculations by providing better probability estimates of observing
extreme losses than that indicated by a standard normal distribution because empirical distributions exhibit fat tails. If one uses
the generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) method to generate parameter estimates for the shape parameter, fat tails will indicate
a:

✗ A) positive parameter estimate and VAR calculations that are too large.
✓ B) positive parameter estimate and VAR calculations that are too small.
✗ C) negative parameter estimate and VAR calculations that are too small.
✗ D) negative parameter estimate and VAR calculations that are too large.

Explanation

Fat tails will generate a positive shape parameter, which indicates that VAR estimates are probably too small.

Question #50 of 69 Question ID: 439824

Which of the following non-parametric estimators combines the historical simulation model with conditional volatility models?

✓ A) Filtered historical simulation.


✗ B) Volatility-weighted historic simulation.
✗ C) Age-weighted historic simulation.

✗ D) Correlation-weighted historic simulation.

Explanation

The filtered historical simulation is the most comprehensive and most complicated of the non-parametric estimators. It contains
both the attractions of the traditional historical simulation approach with the sophistication of models that incorporate changing
volatility.

Question #51 of 69 Question ID: 439868

For which of the following options can the delta-normal VAR method be expected to provide an accurate estimate of true VAR?

I. Deep-out-of-the-money options.
II. Deep-in-the-money options.
III. At-the-money options.

✗ A) I only.
✗ B) III only.

✓ C) I and II.
✗ D) II only.

Explanation

The delta-normal VAR method cannot be expected to provide an accurate estimate of true VAR over ranges where deltas are

17 of 24
unstable. That would occur when options are at-the-money. Deep-out-of-the-money and deep-in-the-money options have
relatively stable deltas. Over those ranges, the relationship between the value of the underlying instrument and the value of the
option is very much like a forward currency contract. The delta-normal VAR can be calculated by assessing the volatility of the
underlying spot prices and the correlation between the price of the option and the spot price.

Question #52 of 69 Question ID: 439841

Which of the following is TRUE comparing VAR and extreme value theory (EVT)?

✗ A) VAR and EVT assume normality of the return distribution.


✗ B) EVT focuses exclusively on the upper half of the return distribution.
✗ C) The generalized Pareto distribution is fully parameterized by the mean and variance.
✓ D) Only EVT considers losses beyond a specified threshold.

Explanation

The principal shortcoming of VAR is that it does not consider losses beyond a specified threshold.

Question #53 of 69 Question ID: 439834

Which of the following statements about extreme value theory (EVT) is FALSE?

✓ A) EVT can be used to model everyday occurrences.


✗ B) EVT focuses on data that is generally considered outliers.
✗ C) Cluster analysis is appropriate for financial data with time dependency.
✗ D) POT models determine the cut-off between typical and extreme values.

Explanation

EVT models are appropriate for low probability, high impact events; not everyday occurrences.

Question #54 of 69 Question ID: 439864

There is a short position in 1 year bonds with a $150m face value and a 6% annual interest rate with interest paid semi-annually.
The annualized interest rate on zero coupon bonds is 3% for a 6 month maturity and 4.1% for a 12 month maturity. Decompose
the bond into the cash flows of the two standard instruments and then determine the total present value of all the cash flows of
the standard instruments?

✗ A) −$153,848,482.
✗ B) −$155,848,482.
✗ C) −$154,848,482.
✓ D) −$152,848,483

Explanation

We need to separate the individual cash flows of the bond are as follows:

1st Coupon = −$150m × (0.06 / 2) = −$4.5m after 6 months

18 of 24
2nd Coupon = −$4.5m after 12 months
Principal = −$150m = −$150m after 12 months

Next, we find the present value of these cash flows using the spot rates given in the question. Be careful to adjust the annual
rate/2 to find the 6 month rate.

PV 1st Coupon = −$4.5m / 1.015 = −$4,433,497


PV 2nd Coupon + Principal = (−$4.5m + −$150m) / 1.041 = −$148,414,986
Total PV = −$152,848,483

Question #55 of 69 Question ID: 496357

Which statement most accurately describes equity correlations and correlation volatilities throughout various economic states?
Historical correlation levels for stocks are:

✗ A) highest in a recession and correlation volatility is lowest in normal economic periods.


✗ B) lowest in a recession and correlation volatility is lowest in normal economic periods.
✓ C) highest in a recession and correlation volatility is highest in normal economic periods.
✗ D) lowest in a recession and correlation volatility is highest in normal economic periods.

Explanation

Historical correlation levels for common stocks in the Dow are highest during recessions. Correlation volatility for Dow stocks is
high during recessions but highest during normal economic periods.

Question #56 of 69 Question ID: 439833

Extreme value theory (EVT) helps quantify two key measures of risk. The magnitude of:

✓ A) an X year return in the loss in excess VAR.


✗ B) VAR and the level of risk obtained from scenario analysis.
✗ C) market risk and the magnitude of credit risk.
✗ D) market risk and the magnitude of operational risk.

Explanation

Extreme value theory (EVT) looks at the value of losses beyond an identified cutoff point.

Question #57 of 69 Question ID: 439826

With of the following items is not one of the advantages of non-parametric simulation methods?

19 of 24
✗ A) Not hindered by parametric violations of skewness.
✓ B) Data that requires adjustments is often readily available.
✗ C) Intuitive and often computationally simple.
✗ D) Can accommodate more complex analysis.

Explanation

An advantage of non-parametric methods is that data is often readily available and does not require adjustments (e.g., financial
statements adjustments).

Question #58 of 69 Question ID: 439866

Which of the following is NOT a required step in determining VAR for a fixed-income portfolio?

✗ A) Determine the changes in the values of the market factors.


✓ B) Regress the portfolio value changes against those of an identical hypothetical portfolio to determine
the appropriate market factors.
✗ C) Compute the mean and standard deviation of the changes in the portfolio value.

✗ D) Decompose and map the portfolio.

Explanation

Regression analysis against a hypothetical but identical portfolio is not used in the process of choosing appropriate market
factors.

Question #59 of 69 Question ID: 496370

In a Gaussian copula, the marginal distribution of each variable is mapped to the new distribution on:

✗ A) a marginal basis.
✓ B) a percentile basis.
✗ C) a random basis.
✗ D) a distributed basis.

Explanation

A Gaussian copula maps the marginal distribution of each variable to the standard normal distribution on a percentile basis.

Question #60 of 69 Question ID: 439862

The process of identifying variables that influence the value of an asset is called:

✓ A) risk factor mapping.

✗ B) value quantification.
✗ C) influence loading.
✗ D) variable decomposition.

20 of 24
Explanation

The process of identifying variables, or risk factors, that influence the value of an asset is known as risk factor mapping.

Question #61 of 69 Question ID: 439836

Extreme value theory (EVT) can assist with value-at-risk (VAR) calculations by providing better probability estimates of observing
extreme losses than that indicated by a standard normal distribution because:

✓ A) extreme losses appear to occur more frequently than indicated by a normal distribution.
✗ B) EVT is the most efficient method for estimating extreme losses.
✗ C) extreme losses appear to occur less frequently than indicated by a normal distribution.
✗ D) the observed empirical distribution of most asset returns tends to be platykurtic.

Explanation

Extreme losses appear to occur with a higher frequency than indicated by a normal distribution. EVT has been shown to generate
more realistic probability estimates for extreme losses than a normal distribution.

Question #62 of 69 Question ID: 439821

Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding bootstrap historical simulation? The bootstrapping technique:

✗ A) is a simple and intuitive estimation procedure.


✓ B) provides less precise estimates of coherent risk measures than historical simulation on raw data
alone.
✗ C) can be performed to estimate the expected shortfall (ES).
✗ D) draws a sample from the original data set, records the VAR from that particular sample and "returns"
the data.

Explanation

Empirical analysis demonstrates that the bootstrapping technique consistently provides more precise estimates of coherent risk
measures than historical simulation on raw data alone.

Question #63 of 69 Question ID: 439875

Which of the following is least likely to be identified as one of the primary types of stress testing exercises?

✗ A) Use of historical scenarios.


✓ B) Use of scenarios whereby traders can re-hedge their positions.
✗ C) Use of predefined scenarios.
✗ D) Use of mechanical search stress tests.

Explanation

Scenarios do not typically incorporate the possibility that traders will re-hedge positions during times of market shocks.

21 of 24
Question #64 of 69 Question ID: 496368

How many unknown distributions can be mapped to a known distribution in a correlation copula?

✗ A) One, only.
✗ B) Two, only.
✓ C) Two or more.
✗ D) Three, only.

Explanation

A correlation copula is created by converting two or more unknown distributions that may have unique shapes and mapping them
to a known distribution with well-defined properties, such as the normal distribution.

Question #65 of 69 Question ID: 439849

In using a log-likelihood ratio to backtest a VAR model, the reason to measure the conditional rather than the unconditional
coverage of the model is to consider the:

✓ A) timing of exceptions.
✗ B) the influence of the positions of individual traders.
✗ C) size of the portfolio.
✗ D) number of assets in the portfolio tested.

Explanation

The unconditional coverage test statistic allows for potential time variation of the data. A bunching of exceptions may indicate
that market correlations or trading positions have changed.

Question #66 of 69 Question ID: 439825

Which of the following items accurately describe a disadvantage of non-parametric methods?

✓ A) Difficult to estimate losses significantly larger than the maximum loss within the data set
✗ B) Analysis depends critically on forecasted data.

✗ C) Volatile data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too low.
✗ D) Quiet data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too high.

22 of 24
Explanation

Disadvantages of non-parametric methods include the following:

• Analysis depends critically on historical data.

• Volatile data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too high.

• Quiet data periods lead to VAR and ES estimates that are too low.

• Difficult to detect structural shifts/regime changes in the data.

• Cannot accommodate plausible large impact events if they did not occur within the sample period.

• Difficult to estimate losses significantly larger than the maximum loss within the data set (historical simulation cannot; volatility-
weighting can, to some degree).

• Need sufficient data, which may not be possible for new instruments or markets

Question #67 of 69 Question ID: 439822

Which of the following statements is least accurate regarding non-parametric density estimation?

✗ A) existing data points can be used to "smooth" the data points to allow for VAR calculation at
all confidence levels.
✗ B) One of the advantages of non-parametric density estimation is that the underlying distribution is free
from restrictive assumptions.
✓ C) The major downfall of the non-parametric approach compared to the traditional historical simulation
approach is that VAR can only be calculated for a continuum of points in the data set.
✗ D) Makes an adjustment that connects the midpoints between successive histogram bars in the original
data set's distribution.

Explanation

The major improvement of the non-parametric approach over the traditional historical simulation approach is that VAR can be
calculated for a continuum of points in the data set.

Question #68 of 69 Question ID: 496354

The relationship of correlation risk to credit risk is an important area of concern for risk managers. Which of the following
statements regarding default probabilities and default correlations is correct?

✓ A) The probability of default is higher in the short-term time horizon for non-investment grade
bonds.
✗ B) Creditors benefit by diversifying exposure across industries to increase the default correlations of
debtors.
✗ C) Changes in the concentration ratio are not directly related to changes in default correlations.
✗ D) The default term structure decreases with time to maturity for most investment grade bonds.

Explanation

The probability of default is higher in the immediate time horizon for non-investment grade bonds. The probability of default

23 of 24
decreases over time if the company survives the near-term distressed situation.

Question #69 of 69 Question ID: 439855

In large, diversified equity portfolios, it is often reasonable to ignore what type of risks in determining VAR?

✗ A) Beta.
✓ B) Specific.
✗ C) Market.
✗ D) Correlation.

Explanation

In large diversified portfolios, specific risk is minimized or eliminated through diversification.

24 of 24

You might also like