who doesn't speak? -Helen Levitan, Haverhill, Massachusetts . . %
ou call her or him a deaf person, that's what.
Back in the not-so-good old days, hearing folks felt the need to make a distinction between deaf persons who "could talk like a normal person" and those who didn't. Those who didn't speak were branded "deaf-mutes" or "deaf-and-dumb."l Is it a question of the inability to speak?Hardly. We have yet to meet a deaf person who doesn't have the full complement of vocal equipment. And a22 deaf children, no matter what kind of school they attend, are subjected to an intensive regimen of speech therapy and auditory training. (Some, of course, refuse to continue. But many do because their parents insist on it.) This means that, technically, virtually all deaf children can speak. It is estimated, however, that a congenitally, profoundly deaf child has, at most, a 5%chance of developing intelligible speech. We have to be realistic. Because they cannot hear themselves talk, profoundly deaf people cannot control the pitch, inflection, or loudness of their voices. Some have had humiliating experiences when they tried to "talk normally" in public and were greeted by screwed-up, disdainful faces that said, "Ugh, you sound like a freak!" From our own observations, the quality of a deaf person's intonation has little, if anything, to do with the kind of education they've received-oral or sign-based.We've met alumni of the Clarke School, the best-known oral school in the country, who have become full-time signers and whose voices are just as unintel- ligible as any other deaf voice.
(Supporting Children) Derek Brinkley - Supporting Deaf Children and Young People - Strategies For Intervention, Inclusion and Improvement - Continuum International Publishing Group (2011)