1.

1NATURE

Established in 1967, Hyundai Motor Co. has grown into the Hyundai-Kia Automotive Group
which was ranked as the World’s Fifth-Largest Automaker in 2007 and includes over two
dozen auto-related subsidiaries and affiliates. Employing over 75,000 people worldwide,
Hyundai Motor posted sales of US$74.9 billion in 2007 on a consolidated-basis and US$32.8
billion on a non-consolidated basis (using the average currency exchange of 929 won per US
dollar).

Hyundai vehicles are sold in 193 countries through some 6,000 dealerships and showrooms.
Further information about Hyundai Motor Co. and its products is available at www.hyundai-
motor.com.

Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hyundai Motor
Company (HMC), South Korea and is the second largest and the fastest growing car
manufacturer in India. HMIL presently markets 34 variants of passenger cars across segments.
The Santro in the B segment, the Getz Prime and the i10 in the B+ segment, the Accent and the
Verna in the C segment, the Sonata Embera in the E segment and the Tucson in the SUV
segment.

1|Page
 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

Objectives can be defined as a specific result that a person or system aims to achieve within a
time frame and with available resources.

The main Objectives for taking up this topic are:-

1. To study the various training and development activities exist in Hyundai Motor
India Limited.

2. To find out the quality of training programme in Hyundai Motor India Limited.

3. To find out training programme is productive to improve their performance or not.

4. To find out whether they are implementing the knowledge and skills or not.

5. To find out the changes the employees required in their training program.

6. To make suitable suggestion and recommendations for the improvement of training

and development programme based on the opinion of the employees and findings of
the study.

2|Page
 1.3 RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGY

It is the process which is used to collect information and data for the purpose of making business
decisions. The methodology may include publication research, interviews, surveys and other
research techniques, and could include both present and historical information.

It is necessary for the researcher to know only the research method or techniques but also the
methodology.

a. Primary Source

Primary sources provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under
investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or
conditions being documented.

Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring, but
primary sources can also include autobiographies, memoirs, and oral histories recorded later.
Primary sources are characterized by their content, regardless of whether they are available in
original format, in microfilm/microfiche, in digital format, or in published format.

b. Secondary Sources

Secondary data is data collected by someone other than the user. Common sources of secondary
data for social science include censuses, organizational records and data collected through
qualitative methodologies or qualitative research. Primary data, by contrast, are collected by the
investigator conducting the research.

Secondary data analysis saves time that would otherwise be spent collecting data and,
particularly in the case of quantitative data, provides larger and higher-quality databases that
would be unfeasible for any individual researcher to collect on their own. In addition, analysts of
social and economic change consider secondary data essential, since it is impossible to conduct a
new survey that can adequately capture past change and/or developments.

I will be using Primary Source of Data in order to complete My Project report.

3|Page
 1.4 LIMITATIONS

Any research study will be restricted in scope by certain inherent limitations that are
participated by the choice of the research design, sampling procedure and respondent selection.
This study has the following limitations.

A) Since the survey was conducted among the certain employees it may not reflect the
real opinion of the entire population.

B) The samples may behave of give opinions differently at different times because of
their psychological temperament. This will affect the survey.

C) Though the respondents are clear about the answers they may not be in position to
explain in the manner related to this study.

D) Since the study was restricted to, majority of findings are applicable only to this
company and cannot be generalized.

4|Page
 CHAPTER TWO

PROFILE OF THE COMPANY

5|Page
 2.1 COMPANY’S PROFILE
ABOUT HYNDAI MOTOR COMPANY

Established in 1967, Hyundai Motor Co. has grown into the Hyundai-Kia Automotive Group
which was ranked as the World’s Fifth-Largest Automaker in 2007 and includes over two
dozen auto-related subsidiaries and affiliates. Employing over 75,000 people worldwide,
Hyundai Motor posted sales of US$74.9 billion in 2007 on a consolidated-basis and US$32.8
billion on a non-consolidated basis (using the average currency exchange of 929 won per US
dollar). Hyundai vehicles are sold in 193 countries through some 6,000 dealerships and
showrooms. Further information about Hyundai Motor Co. and its products is available at
http://www.hyundai-motor.com.

Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hyundai Motor
Company (HMC), South Korea and is the second largest and the fastest growing car
manufacturer in India. HMIL presently markets 34 variants of passenger cars across segments.
The Santro in the B segment, the Getz Prime and the i10 in the B+ segment, the Accent and the
Verna in the C segment, the Sonata Embera in the E segment and the Tucson in the SUV
segment.

Hyundai Motor India, continuing its tradition of being the fastest growing passenger car
manufacturer, registering total sales of 327,160 vehicles in the calendar year (CY) 2007, an
increase of 9.2 percent over CY 2006. In the domestic market it clocked a growth of 7.6 percent
as compared to 2006 with 200,412 units, while overseas sales grew by 11.8 percent, with exports
of 126,748 units.
HMIL’s fully integrated state-of-the-art manufacturing plant near Chennai boasts of the
most advanced production, quality and testing capabilities in the country. In continuation of its
commitment to provide the Indian customer with global technology,

HMIL has set up its second plant, which produces an additional 300,000 units per annum, raising
HMIL’s total production capacity to 600,000 units per annum.

6|Page
 2.2 PRODUCT LINE-UP:

The Santro Xing is a stunning combination

of contemporary looks and functional
luxury. It also incorporates the
revolutionary EUROSAFE Passenger
Protection System that meets the latest
European safety standards. The new Santro
Xing combines a fresh new attitude,
warmth and comfort

ative ideas and good design that will put pleasure into every moment you spend behind the wheels.

The first glimpse of the Sonata V-6 will always

take your breath away. Your quest for
automotive perfection ends with Sonata. This is
a carEven
worthy of a modern
though dayofCaesar
the styling .
the Verna seems
contemporary you always end up comparing
it with the Accent. The external additions of
the body of the Verna seem to blend together
with the shape and this sets it apart from the
Accent

7|Page
 The Tucson 2.0 CRDi, 1991cc, 4 cylinder, 16
valve engine comes with amazing power 122ps
and 245Nm of torque. This soft-roader is highly
fuel economic and yet is very good at engine
performance. Dual airbags provide very high
level of safety.

Getz's space/comfort and Santro's engine

make Getz Prime. A very practical car.
Fuel economy had been a concern but with
1.1L engine, it's not any more. Getz 1.3 is
still available as top-end versions. never
sell like Swift but in essence Getz scores
over Swift on many parameters.

This car sits between the Santro and Getz

Prime presents itself as a good looking VFM
family car. There are options like ABS and
airbags along with features like sunroof to opt
for. All this in a small-car!
HMIL is investing to expand capacity in line with its positioning as HMC’s global export
Won Car of the Year - 2008
hub for compact cars. Apart from expansion of production capacity, HMIL plans to expand its
dealer network, which will be increased from 232 to 260 this year.

The year 2007 has been a significant year for Hyundai Motor India. It achieved a significant
milestone by rolling out the fastest 400,000th export car. Hyundai exports to over 90 countries
globally; even as it plans to continue its thrust in existing export markets, it is gearing up to step
up its foray into new markets.

8|Page
 The year just ended also saw Hyundai Motor India attaining other milestones with the launch
of the i10 and yet another path-breaking record in its young journey by rolling out the fastest
1,500,000th car.

2.3 THE HYUNDAI LOGO

 The symbol represents an image of Car Company that produces refined cars with cutting
edge technology.
 Expresses the will of the management for harmony and stability
 The oval shape symbolizes the earth to expresses the global nature of HMC car.
 The H logo stands for the first letter of Hyundai motor company
 The slanted shape of the H represent progress and a company that will successfully face
future challenges as it continues to raise its standard of quality.

2.4 GOALS OF HMIL

 The ultimate goal is to join the ranks of the world’s top 10 automakers.
 Focus on developing advanced technology.
 Hyundai cars known as world-class cars
 Concentrating on building cars that are more environments conscious and further
improving the quality of life for everyone in future.

2.5 BASIC OBJECTIVES OF HMIL

 Best customer service

 Best technology
 Best quality products
 Best value for people

9|Page
This has helped the company deliver consistently producing some of the finest cars of the
company.

2.6 HMIL VISION

 DREAM
 STRIVE
 ACHIEVE TOGETHER
 INNOVATION FOR HUMANITY

2.7 HMIL MISSION

Vision of Hyundai is “Innovation for humanity”.

2.8 UNIQUE HR INITIATIVES

 Morning Department Standing Meeting – done by all

 My Machine and My Station concept
 Music Extravaganza in the Plant – once a year at Founders day
 Free Help Line services to serve employees
 Employees Family Visit Program – Gift from Management thanking the family
 Publicity for Outstanding Work
 By display of achievement and Photograph in Department Notice Board
 By distribution of Prizes in meetings attended by all employees
 Annual Picnics to promote “ ONENESS ”
 Birthday Greeting with flower bouquet & Plantation of trees named after them
 Marriage Gift to newly married employees
 Welfare benefits over and above what is prescribed by law
 Meditation for Managers – and follow up
 Tax Saving Gift vouchers / Gift Credit Card on Festive occasions

10 | P a g e
 CHAPTER THREE
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

11 | P a g e
 TABLE 4.1

Table showing the sex wise classification of respondents

Sex Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Male 80 80%

Female 20 20%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 32% of
respondents are belonging to male sex and 68% of the respondents are belonging to female sex.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (68%) are female.

TABLE 4.2

12 | P a g e
 Table showing classification of respondents on Age

Age Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Below 21 48 48%

21-30 24 24%

Above 30 28 28%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 77% of
respondents are married. Only 23% of the respondents are belonging to female sex.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (48%) belong to the age group of below 21.

Chart showing age wise classfication

Above 30, 28%

Below 21, 48% Below 21

21-30
Above 30

21-30, 24%

TABLE 4.3
Table showing classification of respondents on educational qualification

13 | P a g e
 Educational qualification Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

UG 35 35%

PG 65 65%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, vast majorities 65% of
respondents have studied PG. Then another 35% of the respondents are UG.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents 65% are PG

TABLE 4.4

Table showing the classification of respondents on Year of service

14 | P a g e
 Year of service Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Below 3 years 56 56%

3-6 years - -

Above 6 years 44 44%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, a majority 56% of respondents is
having a work experience of Below 3 years. And 44% of the respondents are having a work
experience of more than Above 6 years.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (56%) are belonging to the category of below 3 years of
service.

Chart showing year of service

Above 6 years, Below 3 years

44%
Below 3 years, 3-6 years
56% Above 6 years
3-6 years, 0

TABLE 4.5
Table showing weather the company providing training program or not

Training program Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

15 | P a g e
 Yes 100 100%

No - -

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 100% of respondents said
company provide training program.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (100%) agree that their company provide training program.

Chart showing weather company provide training

or not

No, 0

Yes
No

Yes, 100%

TABLE 4.6
Table showing type of training provided by the company

Training program Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

On the job training 52 52%

16 | P a g e
 48

Off the job training 48%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, a vast majority 52% of
respondents are gone for on-the Job Training and 48% of respondents are gone for Off-the job
Training.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (52%) have attended the on the job training.

Chart showing which type of training they provide

53%
52%

51%
50%
Percentage
49%
48%

47%
46%
On the job training Off the job training

TABLE 4.7

Table showing the duration of the training Program conducted

Duration Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Less than one week 12 12%

17 | P a g e
 One to three week 20 20%

Above three week 68 68%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 12% of the respondents said less
than one week, 20% of the respondents said one to three week and 68% of the respondents said
above three week.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (68%) have attended the training program above three weeks.

Chart showing the duration of the training

program conducted

80%
70%
60%
50%
40% Percentage
30%
20%
10%
0%
Less than one One to three Above three week
week week

TABLE 4.8

Table showing the opinion regarding the duration of the training Program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Highly satisfied 84 84%

satisfied 12 12%

18 | P a g e
 Moderate - -

Dissatisfied 4 4%

Highly dissatisfied - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents said
highly satisfied, 12% of the respondents said satisfied, 4% of the respondents said dissatisfied.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the duration of the training program is highly
satisfied.

Chart showing the opinion of the duration of the training

program

90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Percentage
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Highly satisfied Moderate Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied dissatisfied

TABLE 4.9

Table showing the feel of the respondents regarding the training Program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Highly satisfied 84 84%

satisfied 16 16%

No idea - -

19 | P a g e
 Dissatisfied - -

Highly dissatisfied - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents feel highly
satisfied, 16% of the respondents feel satisfied.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the training program is highly satisfied.

Chart showing the opinion about the training program

90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Percentage
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Highly satisfied No idea Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied dissatisfied

TABLE4.10

Table showing the quality of the trainers

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Very good 84 84%

Good 16 16%

Moderate - -

Poor - -

20 | P a g e
 Very poor - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents feel very good,
16% of the respondents feel good.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (84%) feel that the quality of trainers is very good.

Chart showing the opinion about the quality of trainers

90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
Percentage
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Very good Good Moderate Poor Very poor

TABLE 4.11

Table showing the opinion regarding the practical demonstration

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Highly satisfied 52 52%

satisfied 48 48%

No idea - -

Dissatisfied - -

Highly dissatisfied - -

21 | P a g e
 Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 52% of the respondents feel highly
satisfied, 48% of the respondents feel satisfied.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (52%) feel that the practical demonstration is highly satisfied.

Chart showing the opinion regarding the practical demonstration

60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
Highly satisfied No idea Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied dissatisfied

TABLE 4.12

Table showing the opinion regarding the training aids

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Highly satisfied 40 40%

satisfied 60 60%

No idea - -

Dissatisfied - -

Highly dissatisfied - -

Total 100 100

22 | P a g e
Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 40% of the respondents feel highly
satisfied, 60% of the respondents feel satisfied.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (60%) feel that the training aids is satisfied.

Chart showing the opinion regarding the training aid

80%
60%
40% Percentage
20%
0%
Highly satisfied No idea Dissatisfied Highly
satisfied dissatisfied

TABLE 4.13

Table showing the changes after attending the training

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Confidence 40 40%

Better performance 60 60%

Skill - -

All the above - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

23 | P a g e
 The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 40% of the respondents feel
confidence level has increased, 60% of the respondents feel better performance.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (60%) feel that there is better performance after attending the
training program.

Chart showing the changes after attending the training program

70%
60%
50%
40%
Percentage
30%
20%
10%
0%
Confidence Better Skill All the above
performance

TABLE 4.14

Table showing the various fields in which training is provided

Training Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Process training 84 84%

Technical training 14 14%

Both - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 84% of the respondents said process
training and 14% of the respondents said technical training.

24 | P a g e
Inference:

Majority of the respondents (84%) have attended the process training.

Chart showing the various feilds in which training is

provided

100%

80%
60%
Percentage
40%
20%

0%
Process training Technical training Both

TABLE 4.15

Table showing that whether the training program is related to the work

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Highly related 68 68%

Related 28 28%

Not related 4 4%

Highly not related - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 68% of the respondents feel that the
training program is highly related to the work, 28% of the respondents feel that the training

25 | P a g e
program is highly related to the work and 4% of the respondents feel that the training program is
highly not related to the work .

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (68%) of the respondents feel that the training program is highly
related to the work

Chart showing opinion weather the training is realeted to

the work

80%
70%
60%
50%
40% Percentage
30%
20%
10%
0%
Highly related Related Not related Highly not
related

TABLE 4.16

Table showing that whether they got opportunity to practice the training methods after
attending the training program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Strongly agree 96 96%

Agree 4 4%

Disagree - -

Strongly disagree - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 96% of the respondents strongly agree
that they got opportunity to practice the training methods after the training and 4% of the
respondents agree that they got opportunity to practice the training methods after the training.
26 | P a g e
 Inference:

Majority of the respondents (96%) of the respondents strongly agree that they got opportunity to
practice the training methods after the training.

Chart showing the opinion weather they got

opportunity to practise the training methods

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree

TABLE 4.17

Table showing the objective of the Organizations training plan

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Organization goal 4 4%

Individual development 20 20%

Increase productivity and update new 56 56%

technology

All the above 20 20%

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 4% of the respondents feel that
Organizations training plan is for Organization goal 20% of the respondents feel that
Organizations training plan is for individual development, 56% of the respondents feel that
Organizations training plan is to increase productivity and update new technology and 20% of
the respondents feel that Organizations training plan is for all the above mentioned things.

27 | P a g e
Inference:

Majority of the respondents (56%) feel that Organizations training plan is to increase
productivity and update new technology.

Chart showing the opinion about the objective of the

organization training plan

60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
Organization Individual Increase All the above
goal developm ent productivity and
update new
technology

TABLE 4.18

Table showing the accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Strongly agree 92 92%

Agree 8 8%

Disagree - -

Strongly disagree - -

Total 100 100

Interpretation:

28 | P a g e
The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 92% of the respondents strongly agree
that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program and 8% of the respondents agree
that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (92%) strongly agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the
training program.

Chart showing the opinion weather the accidents and mistakes

are reduced after the training program

Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree

TABLE 4.19

Table showing the performance has improved after the training program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Yes 100 100%

No - -

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 100% of the respondents feel that
performance has improved after the training program.

29 | P a g e
Inference:

Majority of the respondents (100%) feel that performance has improved after the training
program.

Chart showing weather the performance has

increased after training

120%
100%
80%
60% Percentage
40%
20%
0%
Yes No

TABLE 4.20
Table showing when they need training program

Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Regularly 4 4%

Occasionally 48 48%

Periodically 16 16%

At the time of appointment 32 32%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

30 | P a g e
 The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 4% of the respondents feel that
they need training program regularly, 48% of the respondents feel that they need training
program occasionally, 16% of the respondents feel that they need training program periodically
and 32% of the respondents feel that they need training program at the time of appointment .

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (48%) feel that they need training program occasionally.

Chart showing the opinion about when they need

training program

60%
50%
40%
30% Percentage
20%
10%
0%
Regularly Occas ionally Periodically At the time of
appointment

TABLE 4.21

Table showing which type of training program to be conducted

Training Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

On the job training 48 48%

Off the job training 52 52%

31 | P a g e
 Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 48% of the respondents want on
the job training and 52% of the respondent want off the job training.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (52%) want off the job training.

Chart showing what type of training they need

On the job
Off the job

TABLE 4.22
Table showing by whom the training program to be conducted

32 | P a g e
 Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Insiders 88 88%

Outsiders 12 12%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 88% of the respondents want to
conduct training by insiders and 12% of the respondents want to conduct training by outsiders.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (88%) want to conduct the training by the insiders.

Chart showing the opinion about by whom

they need to conduct the training program

Insiders
Outsiders

TABLE 4.23
Table showing the assistance needed from supervisor to apply the learned techniques

33 | P a g e
 Opinion Number of respondents Percentage of respondents

Yes 60 60%

No 40 40%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation:

The above table explains that among 100 respondents, 60% of the respondents want the
assistance from the supervisor and 40% of the respondents do not want to the assistance from the
supervisor.

Inference:

Majority of the respondents (60%) want the assistance from the supervisors.

Chart showing the opinion weather they need

assistance from the supervisor

Yes
No

34 | P a g e
 CHAPTER FOUR

FINDINGS
AND
CONCLUSIONS

4.1FINDINGS

a) 80% of the respondents are male.

b) 48% of the respondents belong to the age group of below 21.

35 | P a g e
c) 65%of the respondents are below PG.
d) 56% of the respondents are belonging to the category of below 3 years of service.
e) 100% of the respondents agree that their company provide training program.
f) 52% of the respondents have attended the on the job training.
g) 68% of the respondents have attended the training program above three weeks.
h) 84% of the respondents feel that the duration of the training program is highly satisfied.
i) 84% of the respondents feel that the training program is highly satisfied.
j) 84% of the respondents feel that the quality of trainers is very good.
k) 52% of the respondents feel that the practical demonstration is highly satisfied.
l) 60% of the respondents feel that the training aid is satisfied.
m) 60% of the respondents feel that there is better performance after attending the training
program.
n) 84% of the respondents have attended the process training.
o) 68% of the respondents of the respondents feel that the training program is highly related to
the work
p) 96% of the respondents of the respondents strongly agree that they got opportunity to
practice the training methods after the training.
q) 56% of the respondents feel that Organizations training plan is to increase productivity and
update new technology
r) 92% of the respondents strongly agree that accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training
program.
s) 100% of the respondents feel that performance has improved after the training program.
t) 48% of the respondents feel that they need training program occasionally.
u) 52% of the respondents want off the job training.
v) 88% of the respondents want to conduct the training by the insiders.
w) 60% of the respondents want the assistance from the supervisors.

4.2CONCLUSIONS

From this research work it can be concluded that most of the employees in the organization have
the opinion that training is essential for the growth of the organization and also for developing

36 | P a g e
themselves. Also most of the employees feel that proper feedback is essential so that training can
be made more effective, And so the off job training is more effective than on job training.

37 | P a g e
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Websites:-

38 | P a g e
 a) www.hyundai.com/in/

b) www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyundai_Motor_Company

c) www.facebook.com/Hyundai/

d) www.twitter.com/hyundaiindia

e) www.carwale.com/hyundai-cars/

39 | P a g e
 ANNEXURE

QUESTIONAIRRE

40 | P a g e
 1. Name:
2. Age:
Below21 [ ] 21-30 [ ] above 31[ ]
3. Year of service:
Below 3 years [ ] 3-6 years [ ] above 7 years [ ]
4. Qualification:
UG [ ] PG [ ]
5. Marital status
Single [ ] Married [ ]
6. Nature of work
Technical [ ] Non-Technical [ ]
7. Does your company provide training program?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
8. What type of training are they providing?
On the job training [ ] off the job training [ ]
9. What is the objective of your organization’s training plan?
Organizational Goal [ ] Individual development [ ]
Increase productivity and Update new technology [ ] All of the above [ ]
10. What is the duration of the training program conducted?
Less than 1 week [ ] one-three week [ ] above three weeks [ ]
11. What is your opinion regarding duration of the training program?
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] Moderate [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
12. How do you feel about the training program?
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] No Idea [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
13. What do you feel about the quality of the trainers?
Very Good [ ] Good [ ] Moderate [ ] poor [ ] very poor [

14. What is your opinion regarding the following?

41 | P a g e
Practical Demonstration:
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] No idea [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
Training aids:
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] No idea [ ] Dissatisfied [ ]
Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
15. What changes you have noted in your work place after training?
Confidence [ ] better performance [ ] skill [ ] all the above [ ]
16. What are the various fields in which training is provided?
Product Training [ ] Process Training [ ] Technical Training [ ]
All the above [ ]
17. Was the training programme related to your work?
Highly related [ ] Related [ ] Not related [ ] highly not related [ ]
18. Have you got opportunity to practice the training methods after the training
programme?
Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] No idea [ ] Disagree [ ]
Strongly Disagree [ ]
19. Accidents/mistakes are reduced after the training program. Do you agree?
Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] No idea [ ] Disagree [ ]
Strongly Disagree [ ]
20. Are you satisfied the training program?
Yes [ ] No[ ]
21. After the training program whether your performance has improved.
Yes [ ] No [ ]
22. According to you when do you need training?
Regularly [ ] occasionally [ ] periodically [ ]
At the time of appointment [ ]
23. Which method of training do you needed to be conducted.
On the job training [ ]
Off the job training [ ]
24. According to you whom do you want to conduct the training programs?

42 | P a g e
Insiders [ ] Outsiders [ ]
25. Do you need any assistance from your supervisors to apply the techniques learned?
Yes [ ] No [ ]

43 | P a g e