Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
a) b)
congested with static and dynamic obstacles and narrow Fig. 1. Standard wheels
aisles. These environments are commonly found in factory a) Fixed wheel b) Centered orientable wheel
workshops offices, warehouses, hospitals and elderly care c) Off-centered orientable wheel (Castor wheel)
facilities. A large variety of omnidirectional robots are
presented in specialized literature, [1] - [4]. In contrast omnidirectional wheels are complex and hard
These robots can be divided in two categories: robots with to procure. Omnidirectional wheels are wheels, that enable
special wheels and robots with conventional wheels. perform robot's movement in all directions without
Usually, an omnidirectional robot has three or more of these necessary turning around vertical robot's axis
types of wheels. An omnidirectional wheel is created by a hub, its
The standard wheels are chosen because of their perimeter is surrounded by rolling segments - spherical
simplicity and are available in all sizes and shapes. In figure roller, cylindrical, conic or circular (fig. 2). Wheels are
1 there are presented a few standard wheels. divided according to orientation of rolling segments to the
Conventional wheels are inherently simple, have high load wheel hub.
capacity, and high tolerance to floor irregularities such as
bumps, cracks, dirt and debris. The most common designs
are those using steered wheels. Vehicles based on this design
have at least two active wheels, each of which has both
driving and steering actuators. They can move in any
direction from any configuration.
One major drawback of conventional wheels design is the
high friction and scrubbing during the steering as the wheel
Fig. 2. Examples of omnidirectional wheels
a) Universal, b) Double Universal, c) Swedish 45°(Mecanum)
O. Tatar is Associate Professor within the Technical University of Cluj- Most special wheel designs are based on a concept that
Napoca, Department of Mechanisms, Precision Engineering and
achieves traction in one direction and allow passive motion
Mechatronics, B-dul Muncii 103-105, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, phone:
0264-401681; fax: 0264-415490; e-mail: olimpiut@yahoo.com. in another. The Mecanum wheel is an example of the special
D. Mandru is Professor at the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, wheel design that has a number of small passive rollers
Department of Mechanisms, Precision Engineering and Mechatronics, B- mounted on the periphery of a normal wheel. The axes of the
dul Muncii 103-105, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, phone: 0264-401646; fax:
rollers are perpendicular to that of the wheel.
0264-415490; e-mail: mandrud@yahoo.com.
A. Mateiu is MSc student within the Technical University of Cluj- The design in figure 3 show a traditional Mecanum wheel
Napoca, Romania, phone: +40-751-244-926; e-mail: with the peripheral rollers held in place from the outside.
adrian_mateiu@yahoo.com
69
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
a)
a)
Mechanical design
70
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
steering; the motors use geared systems composed of The following annotations are used in this scheme: nM1 –
cylindrical gears with straight teeth. The minirobot weights the motor’s maximum rpm (nM1 = 4750 rpm); nR – wheel
900 g, has a high of 200 mm, a width of 160 mm and the rpm, Z1 = 10; Z2 = 50; Z3 = 20; Z4 = 40; Z5 = 40; Z7 = 20
wheels have a radius of 45 mm. The 3D model of the – gear number of teeth, Z6 = 1 – worm gear number of
omnidirectional minirobot is presented in figure 9, [7]. threads.
Another three identical geared mechanisms are used for
steering.
.
3’ 4’ 5’
1’ nm2 2’
ME2
nax
71
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
Model: N 2738-125
Nominal voltage: 12 V/DC
Maximum current: 0.35 A
No-load speed: 5800 rpm
Nominal speed: 4750 rpm
Power: 2.5 W
Torque: 5 Nmm
Weight: 66 g
The minirobot’s DC motors can be controlled from a PC
or using a joystick. For making the control circuit of the
minirobot an ATMega8535 microcontroller and a serial
interface MAX232 were used. Figure 14 shows the
connecting scheme of the MAX232 circuit to the
microcontroller and the PC.
For the control of the DC motors a specialized L293E Fig. 14 The connecting scheme of the MAX232 circuit to the microcontroller
circuit is used. This circuit can control the motors using two and the PC
integrated H bridges. The Two H Bridges in the L293E Every channel is controlled by TTL compatible logical
circuit can constantly supply 600 mA on the channel and inputs. The connecting scheme of the L293E circuit to the
approximately 1 A in impulse regime. microcontroller is presented in figure 15.
For the manual control of the minirobot we can use a The minirobot uses a Canyon CN-WlutAM21 (Fig. 17)
joystick (Fig. 16) that is connected to the same video camera that has the following features: - sensor
microcontroller acquisition board. The switch between PC resolution: 0.1 Mpixels; - image sensor technology: CMOS;
and manual control is made automatically when the joystick - maximum image resolution: 640x480; - maximum rate of
is disconnected from the control unit. The joystick has 6 frame caption: 15 fps; - interface: USB.
relays that disconnect the 6 wires of the L293E circuit and
power the DC motors trough the microcontroller.
72
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
Fig. 16. The Atari joystick Fig. 17. The Canyon camera
73
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
74
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
75
DESIGN OF OMNIDIRECTIONAL MINIROBOTS
III. CONCLUSION
This paper presents an omnidirectional minirobot with
conventional wheels that uses a synchronous geared
transmission and an omnidirectional robot with
omnidirectional wheels.
The first minirobot is not energetically autonomous, being
supplied from a voltage source. The robot’s autonomy can
be increased by eliminating the wires used for powering, and
replacing them with accumulators.
The second minirobot prototype is energetically
autonomous.
This kind of minirobots has the advantage of being able to
move in any direction with a high positioning precision.
This minirobots can be used in both educational and
research purposes.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Siegwart, I. Nourbackhsh, Introduction to Autonomous Mobile
Robots, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2004.
[2] J. Angeles, “An Innovative Drive for Wheeled Mobile Robots”,
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 10, No. 1, February
2005, pp. 43-49.
[3] P.J, Mc Kerrow, Introduction to Robotics, Adison - Wessley Co,
1991.
[4] R. L. Williams II, B. E. Carter, P. Gallina, G. Rosati, Dynamic Model
with Slip for Wheeled Omni-Directional Robots, IEEE Transactions
on Robotics and Automation, March 2002.
[5] O. Diegel, A. Badve, G. Bright, J. Potgieter, S. Tlale “Improved
Mecanum Wheel Design for Omnidirectional Robots”, Proc. 2002
Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, Auckland 27
-29 November 2002 pp. 117—122.
[6] O. Tătar, D. Mândru, I. Lungu, “Minirobot omnidirectional”, The 2nd
International Conference ″Computational Mechanics and Virtual
Engineering″ COMEC 2007, 11 – 13 October 2007, Brasov,
Romania, pp. 203-206, ISBN 978-973-598-117-4.
[7] V. Breaz, Studii privind miniroboti mobili pe roti, Lucrare de
dizertatie – Universitatea Tehnică din Cluj-Napoca, 2004,
Conducător ştiinţific: Şef lucr.dr.ing. Tătar Olimpiu.
[8] I. Poka, Proiectarea si realizarea unui robot mobil omnidirectional,
Proiect de diploma- Universitatea Tehnică din Cluj-Napoca, 2006,
Conducător ştiinţific: Şef lucr.dr.ing. Tătar Olimpiu.
[9] A. Mateiu, Proiectarea si realizarea unui robot mobil
omnidirectional, Proiect de diploma- Universitatea Tehnică din Cluj-
Napoca, 2007, Conducător ştiinţific: Şef lucr.dr.ing. Tătar Olimpiu.
[10] http://www.igusa.com/dcmotors/N2738.htm
[11] http://www.atmel.com
[12] O. Tătar, V, Mătieş D, Mândru, Mini şi microroboţi, Editura
Todesco, Cluj–Napoca, 2005.
76