Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
Troubleshooting Inter-RAT Handovers
This section provides information required to troubleshoot inter-RAT handover faults. The information includes
fault descriptions, background information, possible causes, and fault handling method and procedure.
Inter-RAT handover faults are complex and you need to determine whether an inter-RAT handover fault occurs
in the entire network or in a cell based on the fault scope and background. If the fault occurs in the entire
In a PS handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN, the eNodeB did not deliver a PS handover command but delivered a
redirection command to the UE.
The result of tracing the network access procedure found that the UE did not support inter-RAT handover. If a
UE does not support inter-RAT handover, the eNodeB will redirect the UE to UTRAN.
The problem was solved after a UE that supports inter-RAT handover was used.
1.4.2.2 Case 2:
In a test of PS handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN, the eNodeB did not deliver a PS handover command.
In a test of PS handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN in a laboratory at a site, after the UE reported B1
measurement results to the eNodeB, the eNodeB did not deliver a PS handover command.
The result of tracing the network access procedure found that the UE supported inter-RAT handover. The PS
handover switch was checked on the eNodeB. The check result indicated that the switch was turned on. Then,
the neighboring cell relationships were checked. The check result shows that a RAC was not configured for the
neighboring UTRAN cell.
The problem was resolved after an RAC was added to the neighboring UTRAN cell.
1.4.2.3 Case 3:
In a test of PS handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN, the eNodeB sent the MME a PSHO Required message. After
two seconds, the eNodeB sent the MME a PSHO Cancel message.
In a test of PS handover from E-UTRAN to UTRAN in a laboratory at a site, the 4G EPC and eNodeB were
provided by vendor Y and the 3G core network and radio network controller (RNC) were provided by vendor Z.
After handover conditions were met, the eNodeB sent the MME a PSHO Required message. After two seconds,
the eNodeB sent the MME a PSHO Cancel message.
Uu and S1 signaling was traced. The tracing result shows that the eNodeB sent the MME a HO Cancel command
after the UE reported B1 measurement results to the MME and the eNodeB sent the MME a HO Required
command. The reason why the eNodeB sent the HO Cancel command was that the MME did not respond to
the HO Required command. The length of WaitInterRATSysHoRspTimer configured on the eNodeB was 2
seconds. The eNodeB did not receive a response from the MME when the timer expired. As a result, the
eNodeB sent the Handover Cancel command to cancel the handover. The MME log was checked. The check
result shows that the MME received the HO Required command but did not forward the command to the
SGSN. The reason why the MME did not forward the command is that the Gn interface was not configured
The problem was solved after the Gn interface was reconfigured between the MME and SGSN.
2. Diagram
IRAT HO SR False
i slow ?
True
UE False Replca UE
supports
IRAT HO?
True
True
Correct
neighboring
configuration False Reconfigure/add/delete
and parameters? neighbors and parameters
True
True
True
True