You are on page 1of 3

Some specific defences are available in a suit for tort.

These defences are specific


and find application in relation to a fixed nature of tort. Other defences are general
in nature and can be classified as:
·
 The defence of Consent
 When plaintiff is the wrongdoer
 Inevitable Accident
 Act of God
 Act in relation to Private Defence
 Mistake
 Necessity
 Act in respect to Statutory Authority

The defence of Consent: This defence is based on the principle of ‘Volenti non fit
Injuria’.A person, who has voluntarily agreed to suffer harm, cannot claim
damages for such harm. This consent to suffer harm can be either express or even
implied.However, such consent must be given freely and not obtained by fraud or
any other illegal means.

When plaintiff is the wrongdoer: This defense is based on the maxim ‘Ex turpi
causa non oritur actio’ which means ‘no action rises from an immoral cause’. So,
when the action of the plaintiff is unlawful itself, it might lead to a defence in
general.

Inevitable accident – As the name suggests, it is used to refer to an accident that


can’t be avoided by ordinary prudence and caution of human beings, given the
circumstances. It is something that happens against the will of the tort-feasor (the
one who commits the tort) and can’t be taken care of. It is beyond the normal
standard of care of a reasonable man.

Act of God or, Vis Major, (as most atheists would put it) – It talks about an
extraordinarily major intervention, something which is a consequence of furious
working of natural forces. Act of God is not within the possibility of foresight and
preventability of a reasonable human being.

Necessity If damage is caused to avoid a greater damage, it becomes a good


defence.
Act in respect to Statutory Authority Any damage arising out of an act that the law
prescribes or the statute authorises will never become actionable even though in
absence of such statutory authority it is an offence in tort.

Act in relation to Private Defence


The fifth defence that comes under the General Defences in Torts Law is Private
Defence.So here are the notes for Private Defence with all the leading cases.

The law permits use of reasonable force to protect one’s person or property.If
defendant uses force which is necessary for self defence,he will not liable for the
harm caused thereby.

The use of force should be justified only for the purpose of defence.There should
be imminent threat to the personal safety or property.

The force should not be excessive.


Ramanaju Mudali V. M Gangan
Defendant laid some live wires around his house.Plaintiff,trespasser received shock
due to those live wires and was severely  injured.Since there was no warning
given,defendant was held liable.

MISTAKE 

The sixth defence that comes under the General Defences in Torts Law is
Mistake.So here are the notes for Mistake with all the leading cases.

Mistake either of fact or law,is generally no defence to n action for tort.When a


person carefully interferes with the rights of another person,it is no defence to say
that he had honestly believed that there was some justification for the same.

Case Laws : 
Consolidated Co. V. Curtis & sons
Auctioneer was asked to auction certain goods by his customers.Auctioneer
believing to customer auctioned them and paid the customer.But those goods
belonged to someone else.
NECESSITY 

The next defence that comes under the General Defences in Torts Law is
Necessity.So here are the notes for Necessity with all the leading cases.

An act causing damage,if done under the necessity to prevent a greater evil is not
actionable even though the har was caused intentionally.

Maxim : Salus Populi is Supreme Law.


Meaning : Welfare of people is supreme law.

Case Laws :
Leigh V. Gladstone
Forcible feeding of hungry striking labour to save her life was held to be good
defence.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

Act in respect to Statutory Authority Any damage arising out of an act that the
law prescribes or the statute authorises will never become actionable even though
in absenceof such statutory authority it is an offence in tort

You might also like