Dalit-Online

Weekly e news paper

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.17....Issue. 03................17/01/2021

RTI APPLICATION TO CPIO RESERVE BANK OF INDIA MUMBAI

Refer RTI APPLICATION No:

RBIND/R/E/20/04870

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /

ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )

ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.

WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21

ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985

Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the

mid of 1979 ?

2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good

Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your

inspection division working properly ?

3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit

out of premises ?

4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of

value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction

, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,

value of notes issued for sorting ?

5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all

the employees of those sections ?

6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective

documents relating to such high profile crime ?

7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &

waited till 1983 ?

8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same

sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic

enquiry ?

9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before

the court ?

10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested

interests ?

11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while

preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of

independent investigation ?

12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused

the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic

enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records

have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of

evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?

13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations

for preserving old documents / records ?

14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken

utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for

producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,

why ?

15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,

with the criminals ?

16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead

of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of

defense ?

17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic

enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one

another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of

domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour

the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?

18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was

framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?

19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,

manipulate evidences ?

20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note

packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?

21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher

officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,

if not why ?

22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high

ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?

23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,

negligent higher officials ?

24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the

line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative

of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become

illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?

25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct

any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the

misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though

mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his

pension ?

26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,

domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic

enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't

reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?

27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is

proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the

bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.

But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking

previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?

28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000

to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was

nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to

mr.G.Hariram , why ?

29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should

be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court

of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges

in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.

To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much

beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does

the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above

the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?

30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court

against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But

it was not done , why ?

31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension

period ?

32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of

key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in

giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central

board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher

management. What disciplinary action has been taken against

J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?

33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?

34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate

mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge

sheet ?

35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual

happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation

towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?

36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of

bundled verified defective note packets ?

37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted

officers illegal ?

38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went

missing ?

39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?

40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /

expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed

from packets made into new bundles , right ?

41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst

treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?

42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,

putting some innocents seals over the notes ?

43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification

section ?

44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?

45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?

46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &

1979 ?
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing

internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court

proceedings ?

48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are

smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has

clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he

himself is not 100% sure ?

49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,

on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?

50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.

However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no

action has been taken ?

51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have

specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those

departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet

nos , bag nos , etc ?

52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of

innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?

53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not

there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged

sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what

date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?

54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up

officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?

55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from

original criminals ?

56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79

mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not

withheld ?

57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for

picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal

prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?

58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why

you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone

legal prosecution ?

59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?

60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are

more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed

95% lot , isn't it ?

61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections,

some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being

charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?

62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the

alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?

63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,

dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?

64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that

mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's

office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the

alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?

65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those

departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?

66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out

of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of

1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those

sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those

sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management

expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction

certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say

on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they

were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by

mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI

higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?

67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of

crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst

treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off

why ?

68. the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of

defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say

substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between

loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?

69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not

count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of

bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles

containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the

failure of statuotary system of work practices ?

70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI

were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original

criminals ?

Questions with respect to other cases :

71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as

directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks

have invested ?

73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank

officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,

etc ?

74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over

assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank

officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in

the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such

cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude

with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than

permissible ?

75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.

76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose

companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,

before investing in new companies promoted by them.

77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through

rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for

aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.

10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a

debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?

but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?

80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer

by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

81. what action has been taken against those involved ?

82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi

during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are

powerful & bigwigs ?

83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities ,

money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,

foreign donations by many NGOs ?

85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn

brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?

Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE

86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at

security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?

87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for

what criminal roles ?

88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the

security set-up in R.B.I ?

90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are

accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?

91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process

are accounted for?

92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?

93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of

all the above?

94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?

95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?

96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the

post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the

year 1996-1998 ?

99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary

laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?

100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous

information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons

will come out of cubboard ?

101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI

Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of

rupees ? if not why ?

102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused

to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?

103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing

huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?

104. To my previous rti requests and appeals you gave half truth information to few
questions and for most questions you didn't answer. Your denial of
information helped crime cover ups and aided criminals to escape & commit more crimes
unabated. Crime cover up and aid to crime in itself is one more crime. Why should not you be
together with RBI governor legally prosecuted for the same.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell : 91 8970318202

WhatsApp 91 8970318202

Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com

Contact : editor@dalitonline.in ,

editor.dalitonline@gmail.com