Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARM Final Paper1
ARM Final Paper1
What is a novel approach you followed for writing your research paper introduction?
The novelty of my introduction is i discussed all the variables and relate to transgender theory,
which support my model. My introduction was consisted on 1158 words and these 1158 words
were divided in 3 parts
First 758 words were about the background and history of the variables, aim of the study and
limitation of the variables, 183 words on Problem Statement and the last 178 words were on
future research directions, summary of the introduction and supporting theory.
How you will explain a systematic steps used in your research paper for writing literature review
and explain the concept of synthetization?
1. All the variables, which are included in my model and important for my research paper,
were discussed in the literature review.
6. Testability and replicability of the findings of the current research are enhanced
Synthetization: it is the conclusion of your paragraph or work. It started with the under the light
of above-mentioned studies.
What research design you will adopt for your study and why it is suitable to address your
research question?
More scientific
Objective
Focused
Acceptable
What is a sampling technique you followed for your research paper and why?
Question 2: Design Model of the study with the approach discussed in class and develop the
research hypotheses after reading a scenario.
IV perceived organizational support
DV job satisfaction
Hypothesis:
The following example, drawn from Howell (2009), explains each step of Baron and Kenny's
requirements to understand further, how a mediation effect is characterized.
There should be positive relationship between indirect variable and direct variable. Indirect
Variable and Mediating variable have positive relationship
Mediating variable and direct variable have positive relationship
There should be significant relationship between i.v and d.v while controlling mediator
variable.
Preacher and Hayes Method for Mediation:
Question 4:
a. There is a company consisting of 500 employees at different levels. A researcher wants to
collect some information from all the employees of the company, for which he has to select
a sample. What would be the most suitable sampling technique, which may be used for the
selection of sample? Explain, what are the various steps that will be applied for a
particular sampling technique, and Why that sampling technique will be used, support
your answer with appropriate example?
We will use simple random sampling. In a simple random sample, each member in the target
population has an equal chance of being selected. It is assumed that the population is
homogeneous with respect to the random variable under study (i.e. the sampling units share
similar views on the research question(s); or the objects in a population are influenced by the
same background factors). A random sample can be selected by using random numbers. These
numbers can be generated by a computer program or by a table of random numbers (random
number table) and lottery method.
An example of a simple random sample would be the names of 25 employees being chosen out
of a hat from a company of 250 employees. In this case, the population is all 250 employees, and
the sample is random because each employee has an equal chance of being chosen. Random
sampling is used in science to conduct randomized control tests or for blinded experiments.
b. A group consists of 20 workers with equal gender proportion (Male & Female). All the
workers produced different units of output. The manager wants to see whether the average
production made by male and female were equal or not. Suggest the primary scale of
measurement and descriptive and inferential statistical test, which may be used.
We will use nominal scale and in descriptive statistical tool, we use arithmetic mean.
Question 5: Understand the question carefully and answer the following questions given
below?
We have seven items in a scale the reliabilities of the items are .61
1- Test–retest reliability
2- A general accepted rule is that α (Cronbach alpha) of 0.6-0.7 indicates an acceptable
level of reliability, and 0.8 or greater a very good level. However, values higher than
0.95 are not necessarily good, since they might be an indication of redundancies.