Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Process of Science: 11 Adapted From SUNY Courtland, Bio 110-111 Lab Manual, 1998
The Process of Science: 11 Adapted From SUNY Courtland, Bio 110-111 Lab Manual, 1998
Introduction
Lab 2
In the 1980s Sigma Xi, a scientific research honor society, asked its members the ques-
tion, “What is science?” Nearly all of the scientists replied that science is best defined as
a process by which scientists conduct their work. This process includes objective collec-
tion of information and logical analysis of this information in order to gain knowledge
about the universe. The process of science is dynamic and therefore difficult to reduce to
a set of steps or a scientific method that is rigidly followed each time a scientific investi-
gation is conducted. Nevertheless, while the process of science varies somewhat from one
study to the next, its basic components can be outlined as follows:
Formulate Hypothesis
Test Hypothesis
Draw Conclusions
Make Observations
“Rats! My car won't start!”
Ask Questions
“What's wrong with my car?”
Formulate Hypothesis
“My car must be out of gas.”
Make Predictions
“If this hypothesis is correct,
and I put gas in my tank,
then my car should start.”
Run Experiment
“I put gas in my tank.”
Make Conclusions
Based on experimental results.
ACTIVITY I
Discuss the following questions with fellow students and decide which of them can be
answered scientifically. Give reasons for your decisions.
1. Does polluting a river with copper cause decreased growth of fishes?
12
Lab 2
5. Are children more assertive in kindergarten if they spend a year in nursery school?
Formulating Hypotheses
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a particular observation or answer for a ques-
tion; it can be thought of as an “educated guess.” For this guess to be indeed “educated,”
one should first examine previous data to gather information on the problem being
studied. Then inductive reasoning is used to formulate a hypothesis. Inductive reason-
ing uses previous information, logic, and creative thinking to come up with a possible
explanation or answer for an observation or question.
ACTIVITY II
Working in your groups, write hypotheses for the questions in Activity I that you deter-
mined could be answered scientifically.
Testing Hypotheses
Experimentation is a common way of testing a hypothesis. In designing experiments,
deductive reasoning comes into play. Deductive reasoning often involves forming an
“If... then...” statement as a way of predicting the outcome of an experiment that would
support your hypothesis. For example, suppose you hypothesize that fruit production
by tomato plants is greater when magnesium is present as a soil nutrient. Deductive
reasoning leads you to state, “If tomato plants are treated with magnesium-containing
fertilizer, then they will produce more fruit.” You then use this statement to design an
13
The Process of Science
experiment that tests your hypothesis. Certain parameters will change during the course
of an experiment; these are called variables. The independent variable (also known as
the experimental variable) is the parameter that is changed by the investigator. The
dependent variable is what is expected to change as a result of changes in the independent
variable. In the above example, the presence of magnesium is the independent variable
and fruit production is the dependent variable (i.e., fruit production depends on the
presence of magnesium). The effect of only one independent variable can be investigated
at a time. Therefore, all other parameters must be held constant or controlled during the
course of an experiment. Then any changes measured in the dependent variable can be
attributed to the independent variable being studied.
ACTIVITY III
Identify the independent variable and dependent variable in each of the following stud-
ies; include parameters that may have to be held constant or controlled in each.
2. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the weight of tomatoes produced per plant is
studied.
3. A study examining the effect of the length of a soccer player’s leg on the velocity
with which the player can kick a soccer ball.
experimental group may not be so easily identified. For example, an experiment designed
to examine the effect of temperature on fruit production by tomato plants may consist of
plants growing at several different temperatures. While control and experimental groups
may not be clearly defined in this case, the experiment will nevertheless be a controlled
experiment as long as temperature is the only parameter that differs for these plants.
The mean is the arithmetic average of a set of values and is calculated as follows:
/ x1
x=
N
Symbols
x = mean
R = sum of
The standard deviation is the average deviation (+ or -) of the values in a set from the
mean and is calculated as follows:
/ _x1 - x i2
S=
N-1
S = standard deviation
It might seem that all we need to know is whether the means of two sets of values are
different in order to accept or reject a hypothesis. However, in order to determine if the
means are significantly different from one another, we must take into account the varia-
tion in the data. The Student’s t-Test is an example of a statistical test that can be used
to determine the probability that the difference between the means of two sets of values
is the result of chance and therefore not significant. In general, the greater the difference
between two means, the lower the probability that the difference is due to chance. If the
probability is less than 5% (p < 0.05) that the difference between the means of two sets
of values is due to chance, then the difference is deemed significant.
Drawing Conclusions
Interpretation of data from a controlled experiment enables one to conclude that the
results either support or falsify (disprove) the hypothesis. If the data obtained are incon-
sistent with a hypothesis, then the hypothesis is proven false. However, if data support a
hypothesis, scientists do not say that the data “prove” the hypothesis to be true. Science
is a continual process of acquiring information and using this information to explain
things. Therefore, there is always a possibility that future experiments (perhaps using
more sophisticated technology) will yield data that are inconsistent with a hypothesis
that has previously found support. Scientists draw conclusions and offer explanations
that are consistent with currently available information, but due to the dynamic nature
of science, they must always be willing to revise explanations and hypotheses in light of
new information.
PROCEDURE
1. The class will formulate a hypothesis to be investigated as a group. Provide the fol-
lowing information.
Independent variable:
16
Lab 2
Dependent variable:
Control variables:
2. Working in pairs, each member of a pair will act as both the experimenter and the
subject. The actual experiment proceeds as follows:
a. The experimenter holds a meter stick (or half-meter stick) between the thumb
and middle finger of the subject’s hand. The subject’s arm should be resting on
the lab bench, with the hand hanging over the edge of the bench and 10 cm be-
tween the thumb and middle finger. The experimenter should position the meter
stick such that the 0 cm end is even with the subject’s thumb and middle finger.
b. The experimenter releases the meter stick and the subject catches it between
the thumb and middle finger. Reaction time is recorded at the cm mark where
the subject’s thumb/middle finger is when the meter stick is caught.
2
4
Centimeters 1
3
2
©Hayden-McNeil, LLC
Centimeters 1
c. Repeat the above procedure 10 times for each of the treatments being examined.
Record the reaction time for each trial on the accompanying table (Table 2.1).
17
The Process of Science
f. Compile class data. Calculate the mean of the mean reaction times for each
treatment and determine the standard deviation for each set of values. The
Student’s t-Test (or another statistical test) can now be used to determine if the
independent variable has a significant effect on reaction time.
g. Discuss class data. Draw conclusions as to whether the results support or falsify
the hypothesis chosen by the class.
18