Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laboratory Experiments F( )
Figure 4: Section of the pore system Δu = cn − cp (9)
𝜀
We measured complex resistivity spectra for four samples P0,
√
▶ EDL region: thickness 𝜆D = 𝜀kT
P2, P4 and P5 characterised by different grain sizes (Figure 1). 2e2C
▶ EDL region: ion mobilities 𝜇p < 𝜇n 𝜇(p/n)kT
2-point measurements are made with respect to the ’high’ frequeny The Einstein relation D(p/n) = relates the diffusion coeffi-
▶ Free electrolyte: ion mobilities 𝜇n = 𝜇p e
range f > 104 Hz. The 4-point measurement arrangement allows cients D(p/n) and the mobilities 𝜇(p/n) of the different ions.
the characterisation of the ’low’ frequency range f < 104 Hz by
avoiding contact impedance effects. While the pore structure varies Resulting Spectra
Notation: Faraday’s constant F, temperature T, elementary charge
due to the use of the different samples the effect of the electrolyte e, Boltzmann’s constant k and permittivity 𝜀.
The resulting spectra show two different characteristic minima in the
concentration is studied by changing the pore fluid.
frequency range 10−3 Hz − 108 Hz. The effects of the fluid permit-
. Verification of the Modelling Approach
tivity are neglegted. We distinguish between the low (< 104 Hz)
.
and high frequency (> 104 Hz) region and study the influencing pa-
To verifiy our modelling concept, we compare the results of a one-
rameters on the amplitude 𝜙min and the position fmin of the phase
dimensional pore system - a sequence of active and passive zones -
minima.
to
1 the analytical solution according to Marshall and Madden (1959).
3D model and experimental results:
1D model results:
0 0
−10
φρ /mrad
−20
L =1µm,L =1µm
1 2
−20 −500 −30
analytical solution
−40
φ / mrad
L =1.5µm,L =0.5µm
1 2
−50 analytical solution
L1=0.5µm,L2=1.5µm
ρ
−60
analytical solution
−70
−40 −1000
−2 0 2 4 6 8
log(f/Hz) −80
Figure 1: Computer tomography −90
pictures of the four rock samples Figure 2: Experimental setup for 2-point Figure 6: Experimental results: 2-point
Figure 5: Modelling result for pore −100
Results for the phase minimum at f < 104 Hz Results for the phase minimum at f > 104 Hz
For high differences of the large and small pores a phase minimum at frequencies f < 104 Hz We obtain a second characteristic phase minimum in the frequency range 104 Hz − 108 Hz, caused by
can be found. While the dependence of the phase amplitude is not in agreement with the SNP or charge accumulation at the interface between regions with different electrical properties. Since we use
1D Marshall-Madden model (Figure 8), it is in agreement with these theories with respect to the the ion mobilities as the only decisive parameter, we present preliminary results in this section. For a
behaviour of the characteristic frequency (Figure 9). The difference in the absolute values of fmin is complete model in this frequency range the different permittivities in the free electrolyte and the EDL
an effect of the pore geometry (see Figure 11). Although the amplitudes do not agree with current would have to be considered as well as the permittivity of the sorrounding rocks. Nevertheless even
and classical theories, the simulation shows qualitative agreement with experiments (Figure 10). for this simple model we obtain spectra which confirm the concept of small pore throats responsible
The influence of pore geometry is associated with the length of the larger pores Llarge (Figure 11). for noticable phase values (Figures 16 and 17). The position of the minimal phase shift and the con-
The nearly quadratic dependence on geometric pore properties is known from experiments (Figure 12). centration dependence are in agreement with the classical Maxwell-Wagner theory (Maxwell, 1873;
Wagner, 1914) and experiments (Figure 15). Our simple model − although in this case in agreement
Influence of Concentration: with Maxwell-Wagner theory − does not predict any influence of pore geometry on relaxation times we
. see in experiments (Figure 15).
1 for model results r No influence of concentration
.∣𝜙min∣ ∼ C
∣𝜙 ∣ ∼ 1 for model results
model results on fmin min C Influence of Concentration:
0 6
.
.∣𝜙min∣ ∼ √1 for all models fmin ∼ C for all models
−5 5 C
φmin / mrad
/Hz)
−10 4
0 8.5
min
Simulation
SNP model
log(f
−15 8
|φ | ∼ C−1 Marshall−Madden model 3 −20
min
−20 7.5
log(fmin/Hz)
Simulation
/ mrad
2 −40
Maxwell model
7
−25 Maxwell−Wagner model
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 −60 f ∼C
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 6.5 min
min
−3
log(C/mol⋅m ) −3
|∼C
−1/2
log(C/mol⋅m ) −80 |φ
φ
min
6
Figure 8: Dependence of the minimal Figure 9: Dependence of the Figure 10: Experimental results (absolute −100 5.5
phase shift on electrolyte frequency of the minimum on values); Data from Breede and Weller −120 5
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
concentration electrolyte concentration (2006) log(C/mol⋅m ) −3
log(C/mol⋅m ) −3
Influence of Pore Size: Figure 13: Dependence of the minimal Figure 14: Dependence of the
. phase shift on the concentration frequency of the minimum on the Figure 15: Experimental results for the
−1,7 −1,8 concentration different samples; relaxation time
. fmin ∼ L1 and fmin ∼ L1 𝜏 ∼ 1/fmin , resistivity 𝜌 ∼ 1/C; pore radii
for model results decrease from P0 to P5
6 Influence of Pore Size:
5 .
. ∣𝜙min∣ → 0 for Rlarge → Rsmall ∣𝜙min∣ → 0 for Rsmall → Rsmall
)/Hz)
SNP model
2 Marshall−Madden model
0 0
1
−50
0
−6 −5.5 −5 −4.5 −10
/ mrad
log(Llarge/m) −100
/ mrad
Simulation
−20 Maxwell model −150
Figure 11: Dependence of fmin on the Maxwell−Wagner model
min
min
−200
larger pore length Llarge ; crosses:
φ
φ
−30
C = 1 mol m−3, points: C = 0,1 mol m−3 Figure 12: Experimental Results for the
−250
diameter; Data from Kruschwitz (2007) Figure 17: Dependence of the minimal
Figure 16: Dependence of the minimal
phase shift on the larger pore radius phase shift on the smaller pore radius
Rlarge Rsmall
Conclusion and Outlook
We developed a simple three-dimensional pore system model which produces phase spectra in quali- References
tative agreement with experimental results, partially confirmed by classical theories, partially extending Binley, A., Slater, L.D., Fukes, M. and Cassiani, G. 2005. Relationship between spectral induced polarization and hydraulic properties of saturated and unsaturated sandstone. Water Resources Research 41, W12417.
Doi:10.1029/2005WR004202.
them. Breede, K. and Weller, A. 2006. SIP-Messungen mit unterschiedlichen Salzlösungen steigender Konzentration an Sandsteinen. Technische Mitteilungen Essen.
Börner, F.D., Schopper, J.R. and Weller, A. 1996. Evaluation of transport and storage properties an the soil and groundwater zone from induced polarization measurements. Geophysical Prospecting 44: 583–601.
In the future more realistic geometries will be modelled, based on CT or SEM pictures. Furthermore, Kruschwitz, S. 2007. Assessment of the complex resistivity behavior of salt affected building materials. Dissertation, Fakultät VI - Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universität Berlin.
Marshall, D.J. and Madden, T.K. 1959. Induced polarization, a study of its causes. Geophysics 24 (4): 790–816.
we aim at the up-scaling from pore scale to sample scale, using network models or Lattice Boltzmann Maxwell, J.C. 1873. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Volume I. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
methods in order to deduce an interpretation sheme for broadband SIP measurements. Wagner, K.W. 1914. Erklärung der dielektrischen Nachwirkunsvorgänge auf Grund Maxwellscher Vorstellungen. Archiv für Elektrotechnik 2 (9): 371–387.
Institute of Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy – E.ON Energy Research Center – RWTH Aachen University – Aachen, Germany Mail: j.volkmann@geophysik.rwth-aachen.de Web: http://www.geophysik.rwth-aachen.de/