Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 9 - Nanocellulose I
Lecture 9 - Nanocellulose I
modification
CHEM-E2140
Cellulose-based fibres
Eero Kontturi
Why nanocellulose?
- high strength
- low density
- renewable and abundant
- very high aspect ratio
(length/width especially in
the case of nanofibrils)
Why do we want nanocellulose?
Example
Nanocomposite made of poly(lactic acid)
as a continuous matrix and nanofibrillar
cellulose as the reinforcing phase
Turbak et al. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp. 1983, 37, 815.
Preparation of nanofibrillar cellulose:
mechanical disintegration
Enzymatic pretreatment to bleached sulphite pulp.
TEM
AFM
wood
cotton
pulp
bacterial
tunicate
cellulose
DP after TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2
(oxidation for 3 days, pH 5.8): 490
DP after TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO
( 2 hours, pH 10): 40
- the microfibrils from bacterial cellulose are larger than in plant cellulose:
cross section > 70-140 nm × 7 nm
Proposition:
cellulose runs through alternating
crystalline and “ amorphous” regions.
Structure of cellulose microfibril
SANS* pattern of untreated ramie
DP of ramie fibres after
HCl hydrolysis
LODP
crystalline amorphous
controlled
acid
hydrolysis
6
- higher amount of shorter
4 (c) Dried in RH50%
nanocrystals in dried samples
2
6
4 (d) Never dried,
beaten ACID HYDROLYSIS IS MORE
2
EFFECTIVE ON DRIED FIBRES.
15 40 65 90 115 140 165 190
Length [nm]
OH OSO3
O OH O
HO HO O
O O
HO HO n /2
OH O OH
OH
electrostatic repulsion
Photograph of rodlike
nanocrystals in aqueous
suspension. tight packing by the
The liquid crystal phase chiral interaction of
has been formed.
screwlike rods
3500
DPv
3000
20% HCl (2.1% in vapour phase)
2500
2000
23% HCl (15%)
1500
1000 28% HCl (38%)
Because HCl resides originally in vapour phase, it must reach the fibres
by adsorption
0.08
g(HCl)/g(fibre)
60
(HCl/water)
0.06
40
m-%
0.04
0.02 20
0.00 0
0 2 4 6 8
0 2 4 6 8
pHCl/kPa
22 µm2
Dispersing the powder
in formic acid
CNC dispersion from hydrolysed fibres
• Different dispersion methods trialled for HCl (g) hydrolysed CNCs
CMC
CMC - Carboxymethyl cellulose
HFBI-dCBM
dCBM XG -Xyloglucan
XG
HFBI - hydrophobin
dCBM - cellulose binding domain
• Carboxymethyl cellulose works reasonably well for dispersing the CNC
from fibres that have been hydrolysed with HCl vapour
Fang et al. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1458.
Nanofibrillar cellulose: modifications
Strategies for NFC modification
• Functional groups are attached on the surface of NFC and the interior semi-
crystalline microfibril remains intact
isopropanol
OH Cl-
OH
O
O HO
+
HO O
O
OH
OH 2,3-epoxypropyl
trimethylammonium chloride
(EPTMAC)
NaOH
isopropanol
Acetyl content
OH
OH
O
O HO
O C N
HO O
+ R
O
OH
OH Octadecyl isocyanate
toluene
110C
R=
HO O
+ (g)
O
OH R Cl
OH
Plamitoyl chloride
160-190C
R=
• However, water is a tricky medium for organic synthesis: most reactions will
not work
• Nearly all CNC modification methods are designed to occur after the CNC
preparation (no pre-treatments because of harsh preparation conditions)
HO O
+ (g)
O
OH R Cl
OH
Plamitoyl chloride
160-190C
R=
• The method for NFC works also for freeze dried CNC
• Similar functionalization
on CNCs is then carried
out with an alkyne group
Attachment of poly(styrene) or
poly(tert-butyl acrylate) on whisker
surface (grafting-to)
(1) CMC is functionalized with azide or alkyne which enable click reaction
(3) Click reaction on the modified CMC on the cellulose surface is performed
Double click: method description
- Chemically pure cellulose - Not pure cellulose but uronic acid groups
(if left unmodified) on the nanofibril surface
Different types of nanocellulose
– a comparison
Cellulose nanofibrils Cellulose nanocrystals
- Very high aspect ratio (l/d can - Not very high aspect ratio
be ~1000)
- Behaviour not always well defined - Single crystals, very well defined and
characterized
On nanofibrillar cellulose :
Siró and Plackett Cellulose 2010, 17, 459.
On cellulose nanocrystals:
Habibi et al. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3479.
Eichhorn Soft Matter 2011, 7, 303.
Fleming et al. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1831.
De Souza Lima et al. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 771.
On bacterial cellulose:
Iguchi et al. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 261.
On nanocellulose modification:
Habibi Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1519.
Eyley and Thielemans Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7764.