Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor: Dr. Rizwan Tirmizi/Dr. Fahad Submission Date: January 30, 2021
a) A firm report that 25 percent of its accounts receivable from other business firms are overdue
due to economic conditions. If an accountant takes a random sample of seven such accounts,
determine the probability of each of the following events by use of the formula for binomial
probabilities:
(i) none of the accounts is overdue, and, (ii) exactly two accounts are overdue,
Solution
We are given
p = 25% = 0.25
n=7
Let x be a random variable which represent the number of accounts which are receivable aver
due and p is the probability of success for accounts receivable aver due. Then
So,
P( x=0)=0.1335
5
P ( x=2 )=21∗0.0625∗( 0.75 )
P ( x=2 )=21∗0.0625∗0.237 3
P ( x=2 )=0.311 4
b) On average, six people per hour conduct transactions at a special services desk in a
commercial bank. Assuming that the arrival of such people is independently distributed and
equally likely throughout the period of concern, what is the probability that more than 12
people will wish to conduct transactions at the special services desk during a particular hour?
Solution
We are given
μ=6
t=1 hour
Let x be a random variable which represent the number of people which conduct transaction.
Then,
x ~ poi(μ=6)
So,
∞
e−μt ∗μ t x
P( x >12)= ∑
x=13 x!
12
e−6 (1)∗6 (1) x
P ( x>12 ) =¿1 – ∑
x=0 x!
+0.1339+0.1606+0.1606+0.1377+0.1032 +0.0688+0.0413+0.0225+0.0112)
P ( x>12 ) =1−0.991 2
P ( x>12 ) =0.008 8
Question Number 02 [04 Marks]
a) The packaging process in a breakfast cereal company has been adjusted so that an average of
μ=12.0 oz of cereal is placed in each package. Of course, not all packages have precisely
12.0 oz because of random sources of variability. The standard deviation of the actual net
weight is σ =0.2 oz, and the distribution of weights is known to follow the normal probability
distribution. Determine the probability that a randomly chosen package will contain between
13.0 and 13.2 oz of cereal and illustrate the proportion of area under the normal curve which
is associated with this probability value.
Solution
We are given
μ=12.0
σ =0. 2
x−μ
Using standard normal z=
σ
13−13
z= =0.00
0.1
13 .2−13
z= =2 .00
0.1
b) Given a normal distribution with μ=30 and σ =6, find the two values of x that contain the
middle 75% of the normal curve area.
Solution
We are given
μ=30
σ =6
two values of x that contain the middle 75% of the normal curve area = ?
1−0.75
=0.12 5
2
P ¿) = 0.125
P ¿) = 0.125
x−30
= -1.15 (using z score table)
6
x= 30 – (1.15)*6
x= 30 -6.9
x= 23.1
P(X>x)=0.125
P ¿) = 1 - 0.125 = 0.875
P ¿) = 0.875
x−30
= 1.15 (using z score table)
6
x= 30 + (1.15)*6
x= 30 + 6.9
x= 36.9
So, two values of x that contain the middle 75% of the normal curve area are 23.1 and 36.9
Solution
We are given
μ=28
σ=5
n=40
P(X ≥ 30) =?
x−μ
z=
σ /√n
30−28
z=
5
√ 40
z=2.52 98
30−28
P ( X ≥30 )=P(Z ≥ )=P (z ≥ 2.5298)
5
√ 40
P ( X ≥30 )= 1−0.9943
P ( X ≥30 )= 0.0057
b) Suppose that the standard deviation of the tube life for a particular brand of TV picture tube
is known to be σ =400, but that the mean operating life is not known. Overall, the operating
life of the tubes is assumed to be approximately normally distributed. For a sample of n=15,
the mean operating life is X́ =8900 hr. Determine (i) the 95 percent and (ii) the 90 percent
confidence intervals for estimating the population mean.
(i) the 95 percent confidence intervals for estimating the population mean.
Solution
We are given
X́ =8900
σ=400
n = 15
Based on the provided information, the critical z-value for α=0.05 is z_c = 1.96.
The 95% confidence for the population means μ is computed using the following
eexpression
CI =¿´¿)
Therefore, based on the information provided, the 95 % confidence for the population
mean μ is
CI =¿)
CI = (8900−202.424, 8900+202.424)
CI = (8697.576, 9102.424)
(ii) the 90 percent confidence intervals for estimating the population mean.
Based on the provided information, the critical z-value for α=0.1 is z_c = 1.645.
The 90% confidence for the population means μ is computed using the following expression
CI =¿´¿)
Therefore, based on the information provided, the 90 % confidence for the population
mean μ is
CI =¿)
CI = (8900−169.88, 8900+169.88)
CI = (8730.12, 9069.88)
a) A marketing research analyst collects data for a random sample of 100 customers out of the
4,000 who purchased a particular “coupon special.” The 100 people spent a sample average
of X́ =$ 24.57 in the store with a standard deviation of σ =$ 6.60. Before seeing these sample
results, the marketing manager had claimed that the average purchase by those responding to
the coupon offer would be at least (not less than) $25.00. Can this claim be rejected, using the
5 percent level of significance?
Solution
We are given
X́ =24.57
s = 6.6
n = 100
Testing
Ho: μ = 25
Ha: μ > 25
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown
population standard deviation will be used.
Alpha = ɑ = 5%
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, and the critical value for
a right-tailed test is t_c = 1.66.
X́=−μ
t=
s/ √ n
24.57−25
t=
6.6 / √ 100
t = -0.652
Step 5: Conclusion
Since it is observed that t =−0.652 ≤ t_c =1.66, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is
not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population means μ is greater than
25, at the 0.05 significance level.
b) A survey conducted by a research institute lists median salaries for associate professors of
statistics at public sector institutions and at private sector institutions in Pakistan. Assume
that a sample of 100 associate professors from public sector institutions has an average salary
of PKR 72,000 per month with a standard deviation of PKR 6000. Assume also that a sample
of 150 associate professors from private sector institutions has an average salary of PKR
78,000 with a standard deviation of PKR 5000. Test the hypothesis that the mean salary for
associate professors in private institutions is PKR 1500 higher than for those in other
institutions. Use a 0.01 level of significance.
Solution
We are given
X́ 1= 78000
X́ 2=72000
s1 = 5000
s2=6000
Testing
Ho: μ1 = μ2
Ha: μ1 > μ2
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two
independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
Alpha = ɑ = 0.01
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01, and the degrees of
freedom are df = 248.
In fact, the degrees of freedom are computed as follows, assuming that the population
variances are equal:
Hence, it is found that the critical value for this right-tailed test is t_c = 2.341, for α=0.01 and
df = 248.
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is
R ={t:t>2.341}.
Since it is assumed that the population variances are equal, the t-statistic is computed as
follows:
X́ 1− X́ 2
t=
( n 1−1 ) s + ( n 2−1 ) s 22 1 1
2
√ 1
n 1+n 2−2
( + )
n1 n2
78000−72000
t=
( 150−1 ) 500 02❑+ ( 100−1 ) 60002❑ 1
√ 150+100−2
( +
1
150 100
)
t=8.573
Step 5: Conclusion
Since it is observed that t =8.573 > t_c=2.341, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is
rejected.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1 is greater than μ2,
at the 0.01 significance level.
a) Two salesmen A and B are working in a certain district. From a sample survey conducted by
the Head Office, the following results are obtained as shown in Table 1. State whether there
is any significant difference in the average sales between the two salesmen. Assume the
populations to be approximately normally distributed with equal variances.
Table 1: Comparison of Salesman A and B
Salesman
A B
No. of Samples 20 18
Average Sales (Rs. In Thousands) 175 210
Standard Deviation (Rs. In Thousands) 20 25
Solution
We are given
n1= 20
X́ 1=175
s1= 20 and
n2= 18
X́ 2=210
Testing
Ho: μ1 = μ2
H1: μ1 ≠ μ2 (The claim is whether there is any significant difference in the average sales
between the two salesmen)
Alpha = ɑ = 0.05
follows a t distribution with n1+n2 - 2 df. The critical region is R = { t |t| > 2.0281 }
Since the samples are drawn from Normal population with equal variance, we shall apply a
two-sample independent t-test with equal variance,
X́ 1− X́ 2
t=
1 1
√
s∗ ( + )
n1 n2
Where
2 ( n 1−1 ) s 21 + ( n 2−1 ) s 22
s= is the pooled variance of the two samples.
n 1+n 2−2
18225
s2=
36
s2=506.2 5
s= √ 506.25
s=22.5
So,
175−210
t=
1 1
√
22.5∗ ( + )
20 18
−35
t=
22.5∗ √0.10 56
−35
t=
7.3101
t=−4.7879
Step 5: conclusion
Since the absolute value of |t| = 4.7879 falls in the region of rejection, we reject the null
hypothesis. Since the null hypothesis is rejected, we conclude that there is enough evidence to
claim that here is any significant difference in the average sales between the two salesmen.
b) The Energy Information Administration gathers data on residential energy consumption and
expenditures and publishes its findings in Residential Energy Consumption Survey:
Consumption and Expenditures. The independent simple random samples of households in
the four U.S. regions yielded the data on last year’s energy consumptions are shown in Table
2. At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a
difference exists in last year’s mean energy consumption by households among the four U.S.
regions?
Table 2: Last year’s energy consumptions for samples of households in the four U.S. regions
Northeast Midwest South West
15 17 11 10
10 12 7 12
13 18 9 8
14 13 13 7
13 15 - 9
- 12 - -
Solution
We are given
This testing the mean energy consumption of four regions and we use one way ANOVA.
number of regions k=4 and
n1= 5
n2= 6
n3= 4
n4 = 5
so,
n= n1+n1+n2+n3+n4
n= 5+6+4+5
n= 20
Testing
Ho: μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = μ4
Alpha = ɑ = 0.05
Let Y ijbe the energy consumption of the j th residence in the i th region . The raw data with the
marginal totals:
G. T 2
CF =
N
2382
CF =
20
56644
CF =
20
CF = 2832.2
Now
TSS=3012−2832.2
TSS=179.8
R S S=845+1261.5+ 400+423.2−2832.2
R S S=2929.7−2832.2
R S S=97.5
ESS = 82.3
ANOVA
Step 5: Conclusion
Since the calculated value of F is >the critical value (3.2389), (p-value<0.05), we reject the
null hypothesis. Since the null hypothesis is rejected, we conclude that there is sufficient
evidence to claim that a difference exists in last year’s mean energy consumption by
households among the four U.S. regions