Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FORUM
(Ropar)
CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. _______ OF 2020
Mr. Abhishek Malhotra S/o Shri ________ R/o _____ Landran, Mohali
Email id – ____________
COMPLAINANT
VERSUS
140307
Email id _________________
Punjab, 140003
Email id _______________
2 Memo of parties
3 Complaint
4 Affidavit
5 Annexure
6 Vakalatnama
Date -
Place -
Signature of Complainant.
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE
REDRESSAL FORUM AT ROPAR
VERSUS
PROCESS FEE
Date-
Place-
Advocate stamp and signature-
CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER
DATE EVENT
Date –
Place –
Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, ___, s/o Mr. _______, r/o Landran, Mohali
Email id – ____________
………………………………………………..
………………..Complainant
VERSUS
140307
Email id _________________
Punjab, 140003
Telephone no. __________
Email id _______________
3.2After 6-7 days when the consignment failed to reach my client on time,
then on 3/8/2020 i.e the day of Rakshabandhan, my client contacted the
Post Office, Landran but his phone calls were not addressed by the
Officials, failing which, he went to the office to ask for his consignment.
3.3 When my client asked for his consignment, the Official of the Post
Office, Landran blatantly without checking told my client that there was
no consignment on his name.
3.5 And when my client politely asked the officials of the Post Office,
Landran that why were they not picking up the class, they responded/lied
to my client that their telephone was out of service from may days but
when my client dialed the post office number in front of them, the
telephone rang. Further he was harassed more by the officials of Post
Office for the same reason when he inquired.
3.6 Complainant finally got the contact details of the Post Office,
Chandigarh. On making a call to ask about his consignment the
executive of the post office not only refused to help him but also
harassed him on the class.
3.7 Later my client contacted again and this time he was told that his
consignment won’t reach him on the day of Rakshabandhan. Finally the
consignment was received by my client on 12/8/2020, which is 17 days
after it was posted.
4.2 Precisely there was a delay of 9 days in the delivery of the consignment
and it did not reach the complainant on the desired time i.e before
3/08/20 this elucidate the nature of unfair trade practice adopted by the
trader u/s 2(r)(1)(ii) when it has clearly mentioned on the website online
that “Any local posts will be delivered within 2-3 days”.
4.4That Complainant’s sister sent the rakhi by speed post with a view that it
will reach the complainant before Rakshabandhan. But it reached the
complainant weeks after the festival. The Complainant told the Officials
a couple of times that it was necessary for the rakhi to reach him before
or on the day of festival, but request was not accepted rather he was
harassed. The religious sentiments of the Complainant have been hurt
which makes the Respondents liable according to Section-295(A) of the
Indian Penal Code,1860.
4.5 Respondents website Indian Post clearly says that any inland parcel will
be delivered within 2-3 days. Thus Complainant trusted and availed their
services but his consignment reached after a delay of 2 weeks. This delay
caused the respondents lead to a breach of trust of the Complainant and
hence the Respondents are liable under sections 406 read with 405 of the
Indian Penal Code,1860.
4.6 That both Respondents have acted negligently by not only performing
their duty but also by harassing the Complainant at both the Post Office
and over the call which has lead to sheer amount of mental agony. Hence
Respondents are jointly liable under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860. The Respondents are liable under sections 506 read with 503 and
504 of the Indian Penal Code,1860.
4.7 That the Complainant is entitled to receive the refund of the expenses
spent on the speed post under section-66 B (4) of the Indian Post Office
Rules,1933 because the consignment was not delivered at the stipulated
time.
5. That this case is not filed before any court till now and this is the first
time it is being filed. And the Complainant will file a separate complaint
pertaining to civil and criminal matters given in Para 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7
before the appropriate authority for availing appropriate remedies.
In the case of Post Office & Anr. vs Akhilesh Grover, Hon’ble National
Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission held that the OP has to pay
the said amount to the Complainant for for causing him mental, physical
harassment and agony including litigation costs because they failed to
deliver his consignment in time.
“Any statute providing immunity as to the liability of service provider does not come
in the way of right of consumer to the compensated in terms in section 14 (1) (d) of
the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, whereby Consumer Forum after satisfying about
the deficiency in service may order to pay such an amount as compensation for any
loss or injury including mental agony, harassment, physical discomfort suffered by
consumer due to the negligence of the OP, therefore, the immunity under the law of
any officer or of any Government authority is nothing to do with the concept of
compensation to a consumer as to the negligence of the OPs in not maintaining
standard of service.”
"..............................We are of the opinion that the complainant had prepared for the
examination and had undergone through a trauma when his application received
late and he had to undergone to litigation although he was not successful. In our
opinion some enhancement of the compensation is required because a sum of
Rs.50,000/- is very petty amount keeping in view of the deficiency in service of OPs.
In our view, Rs.1.00 lakh will be an adequate compensation.
10. That the first cause of action was on 27/7/20 and the last cause of action
was on 12/8/20 which implies that this dispute has been taken to the
court within its limitation period.
11. Hence, the complainant has brought this case before the Hon’ble Court
where he was the consumer of postal services rendered by the
Respondents who showed deficiency and sheer negligence in delivering
his consignment of Raakhi on the stipulated time thereby critically
injuring his religious sentiments and breaching his trust. There was
intentional harassment and laxity shown on part of the respondents. They
harassed the complainant merely because he requested for help. The
incident has tarnished his mental peace and he is suffering from mental
agony.
12. That in the interest of justice the claims of compensation and refund
should be allowed and also the interest as stated here befor
PRAYER
· That the officials of the respondents that harassed the complainant shall
be suspended for a period that is suitable to the Hon’ble Forum.
· That Hon’ble Forum may issue any other order or direction which is
deemed fit and proper in the fact and circumstances, in the interest of
justice.
Place – Ropar
Date -
Signature of Complainant
Signature of Advocate
VERIFICATION
……………………………………………………...
………..Complainant
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE
REDRESSAL FORUM AT ROPAR
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Abhishek Malhotra, s/o _____, aged_ years old, r/o Landran, Mohali,
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under -
3. That I know all the facts and circumstances of the incident stated above.
4. That I have read and fully understood the contents and particulars of the
above stated case and they are true and correct to the best of myl
knowledge and no material fact has been suppressed.
Signature of Complainant
5. That the complaint has been filed in good faith and to seek justice from
the Hon’ble Court.
DATE:
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
VERSUS
VAKALATNAMA
Date –
Place –
Signature of complainant -
Signature of Advocates -