You are on page 1of 21

What is ATEX ?

The European Regulatory Framework for


Manufacture, Installation and Use of
Equipment in Explosive Atmospheres

Ron Sinclair MBE


Chair – IECEx ExTAG
ATEX ?

 ATEX = Atmosphères Explosibles


 ATEX refers to two separate (but related) European
Union (EU) Directives
 94/9/EC The “Equipment” Directive
• Concerned with the manufacture and sale of Ex
Equipment
 1999/92/EC The “Use” Directive
• Concerned with Classification of Hazardous Areas and the
correct selection, installation, inspection and maintenance
of Ex Equipment
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2
94/9/EC – EQUIPMENT

 The ATEX Equipment Directive is primarily


concerned about TRADE
 It applies minimum Essential Health and Safety
Requirements (EHSRs) to avoid concerns over
safety being a barrier to trade
 94/9/EC is not, itself, law but becomes law in each
member state of the EU when it is “adopted”.
• Adoption without variation is compulsory so it is common
to refer to 94/9/EC as if it is an EU wide law
• Applies to the whole of the EEA (EU plus EFTA)
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 3
1999/92/EC – USE

 The ATEX Use Directive is primarily about safety of


workers employed in hazardous atmosphere
installations
 It specifies MINIMUM requirements but each country
can ADD to, or modify, the requirements
 It requires all equipment with a potential ignition
source (electrical and non-electrical) to comply with
94/9/EC
 Thus all Ex Equipment sold or installed in the EEA
after June 2003 must comply with ATEX 94/9/EC
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4
HARMONISED STANDARDS

 All ATEX EC-Type Examination Certificates are


issued in respect of conformity with the EHSRs
 An ATEX Certificate does NOT confirm conformity
with any particular standard
 Certain standards are designated as “harmonised”
 Conformity to one or more harmonised standards is
ONE way to demonstrate conformity to the EHSRs
 Most of the IEC 60079 series equipment standards
(in their EN version) are listed as harmonised
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 5
CATEGORIES / EPLs

 ATEX divides equipment into Categories according


to how well the equipment is protected against
becoming an active ignition source
 IEC TC31 subsequently devised a similar scheme
referring to Equipment Protection Levels (EPLs)
 Although the definitions are worded differently, for
most purposes the relevant Category and EPL can
be considered the same
 There is a “normal” allocation of Category or EPL to
a given Zone though this can be varied
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 6
CATEGORIES / EPLs

Category EPL Zone


1G Ga 0
2G Gb 1
3G Gc 2
1D Da 20
2D Db 21
3D Dc 22
M1 Ma Energised in gas
M2 Mb De-energised in gas
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 7
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT
Categories 1 + M1 2 + M2 2 + M2 3
(Annex in 94/9/EC) Electrical Non-electrical
EC-Type Examination (III) NB NB

Production QA (IV) NB

Product Verification (V) NB

Conformity to Type (VI) NB + M

Product QA (VII) NB

Internal Control of M
M
Production (VIII) (+ deposit file)

Unit Verification (IX) (NB) (NB) (NB) (NB)


© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 8
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT

 A Notified Body (NB) is a certification body which is


appointed by a member state in the EEA and
“notified” to the European Commission for particular
directives
 Some, but not all NBs have accreditation for the
activity
 The module “internal control of production” does not
require the intervention of a NB
 In some cases, the market will not accept this and
most NBs also issue voluntary Cat 3 certification
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9
PRODUCTION SURVEILLANCE

 Production Quality Control – based on ISO 9002


current in 1994
 Product Quality Control – based on ISO 9003
current in 1994 – not normally used
 Product Verification – suitable only for very low
production runs – NB inspects every item produced
 Conformity to Type – a hybrid involving inspection by
the manufacturer to a quality plan agreed with NB
 Unit Verification – a hybrid of Type Examination plus
Product Verification concurrently
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 10
PRODUCTION SURVEILLANCE

 Production Quality Control


 ATEX document Quality Assessment Notification
(QAN)
 Identical process to IECEx Quality Assessment
Report (QAR)
 Most ATEX NBs which are also members of IECEx
use a common system
• ISO/IEC 80079-34 supports and extends current ISO 9001
• EN 80079-34 has additional information relating to non-
electrical equipment
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 11
ATEX TOP DOCUMENT

 Declaration of Conformity (DoC)


 Document created by the manufacturer without NB
involvement
 Signed on behalf of the manufacturer “on the day”
the equipment is dispatched
 Based on the manufacturer engaging a NB for some
equipment and only on the manufacturer’s own
internal processes for other equipment

© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 12


ATEX SUPERVISION

 Technical – ExNB Working Group


• The ATEX equivalent of IECEx ExTAG
• Chair – Martin Thedens (PTB, Germany)
• Vice Chair – Thierry Houiex (Ineris, France)
• Vice Chair – Ron Sinclair (SGS Baseefa, UK)
 Legal – EU Commission Standing Committee WG
• Partly equivalent to ExMC in IECEx
• Provides mainly non-technical interpretations
• Issues “ATEX Guidelines”
• Formally issues ExNB Decision Sheets to public
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 13
ATEX SUPERVISION

 Standardisation
• EU Commission mandate CEN and CENELEC to write
standards “in support of the EHSRs”
– In practice many are EN versions of IEC or ISO text
• Mandated standards are reviewed by the EU
Commission’s ATEX Consultant, to confirm the standard
does support the EHSRs
• Mandated standards accepted by the consultant are
“harmonised” when their number is published in the
Official Journal of the EU (OJ)
• Conformity to a harmonised standard is deemed to confirm
conformity to the EHSRs
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 14
WEAKNESSES OF ATEX

 Variable level of accreditation of NBs


• Differs from country to country
 Variable level of Conformity Assessment
• Rules are clear but not well understood by the market
 Certificates are against the EHSRs and not the
standards
• Even if standards are used to support the EHSRs there is
nothing to prevent “alternative approaches” which are not
clear on the marking or front page of the certificate

© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 15


STRENGTHS OF ATEX

 Legal system with obligatory application in EEA


• Removes barriers to trade within EEA
 The name “ATEX” has become well known
worldwide
• Although as IECEx Certificate Numbers grow, IECEx is
“taking over” outside EEA
 Certificates are against the EHSRs and not the
standards
• This allows flexibility in adopting new technology ahead of
standardisation (Ex s IEC 60079-33 has been introduced
to allow IECEx to do the same but under more control)
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 16
NEW LEGISLATIVE
FRAMEWORK (NLF)

 ATEX is one of a number of “New Approach”


directives (including Machinery, EMC, etc.)
 Because they were written at different times some
wording differs unnecessarily
 Wording to be aligned where possible
 New tightened rules on accreditation of NBs
 NO change to technical requirements
 Existing EC-Type Examination Certificates will
remain valid
© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 17
IECEx AND ATEX

 In 99.5% of cases an IECEx ExTR can underpin an


ATEX EC-Type Examination Certificate as the
technical requirements (IEC and EN standards) are
normally identical
• Only additional marking required
 In all cases an IECEx Quality Assessment Report
(QAR) underpins the ATEX Quality Assessment
Notification (QAN)

© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 18


IECEx AND ATEX

 A European IECEx ExCB will often issue both IECEx


and ATEX documentation at the same time
 A manufacturer elsewhere in the world can obtain
IECEx reports (ExTR and QAR) locally and submit to
a NB for issue of ATEX Documentation
 This is essentially the same process as obtaining
Inmetro Ordnance 179 Certification for Brasil
• In both cases, the receiving certification body will review
the reports and, if necessary, seek clarification, before
issuing local certification

© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 19


IECEx AND ATEX –
THE FUTURE

 EU Commission certainly aware of IECEx and the


UNECE initiative
• EU Commission representative attended a similar UNECE
workshop in 2011
 NLF activity has delayed any possible other changes
to ATEX 94/9/EC
 Future revisions are possible and may allow for the
specific use of IECEx documents as a direct input
• But even now, an IECEx Certificate can directly underpin a
DoC for Category 3 Equipment, without involving a NB

© SGS SA 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 20


Thank You

www.sgs.com www.sgs.co.uk/sgsbaseefa

You might also like