Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pros Ja Pedro
Pros Ja Pedro
- versus -
- for –
ROBBY L. REEM and Mak
Nacao ROBBERY
A.k.a. “Rob” and “Mk” (Art. 302 of
the Revised Penal Code)
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT OF
CHITO S. CHISMOSO
(1) all the allegations in the robbery case; including all the
ANNEXES appended thereto, which she respectfully requests to
be correspondingly marked as EXHIBITS in this case;
and
(2) all matters related thereto, with reservation to present
additional exhibits in the course of the proceeding of the instant
case.
A: Yes sir.
A: Yes sir.
A: Yes sir.
17. Q: Have they told you anything where they got it?
A: No sir.
19. Q: Then?
20. Q: When did you know that the items you bought were the
same items that was reported as stolen?
25. Q: Do you confirm that you have answered all the questions
asked of you, fully aware that you did so under oath?
A: Yes sir.
26. Q: Do you also confirm that if you have not answered all the
above questions truthfully, you may face criminal liability for
false testimony or perjury.
A: Yes sir.
PEDRO P. PENDUKO
AFFIANT
th
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 27 day of
September , 2020, in Batangas City.
th
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME this 27 day of
March 2020, affiant personally known to me and exhibiting to me his
Driver’s License No. ABC-12345, issued at Batangas City.
NOTARY PUBLIC