Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date: 12/01/2021
A. Communication:
Taking place between us right now. Sender is sending the message to the receiver and
receiver is receiving message. That is communication. Personal, Organisational
communication
Date: 14/01/2021
B. Characteristics of communication
1. Always takes place btw two or more people. There has to be a sender and a receiver
2. Communication requires an exchange of facts, ideas, opinions, emotions or thoughts
3. Comm uses verbal and non-verbal modes of interaction
4. Common ground: Comm needs a mutuality of understanding btw the sender and the
receiver
5. Two-way process. For successful comm, sender has to see to it that receiver has
interpreted the msg in the same manner. So that can be identified through a feedback
mechanism. Receiver has to understand the message from the perspective of the
sender. If taken a different meaning, then not a successful comm.
C. Role of communication
1. It helps in quicker problem solving: If comm is done, the problem can be solved because
the sup-sub communication is successful, then becomes easier for sub to follow the
instructions of the superior. But if sub not able to interpret msg in a successful manner,
then problem might not be eradicated completely
2. Stronger decision making: Meeting- issues- need to take a call- if info is comm to sup by
sub and if that info is complete in all respects and whatever questions raised have been
handled by sub, the decision taken will be very fruitful- Stronger decision making. Have
not left out any info which is relevant, then decision will be strong.
3. Increased productivity: effective comm- directions/ instructions clearly given by mgmt. to
organisation workers- there is going to be increased productivity, will know what to do,
so there will not be any unnecessary discrepancy. Also, the manner in which you are
motivating your workers and employees- enhancing the morale of the workers, have to be
good in communication.
4. Steadier workflow: When workers know what they are supposed to do, will result into a
constant kind of productivity from them. There is not going to be any deviation. Work
flow which is not un-put by any disruptions. And when achieved a steadier workforce,
then increased productivity
5. Stronger business relationships: Suppliers, intermediaries, customers, government
officials, the relationship with them will be stronger if proper comm, very good public
relations with diff outside agencies, effective comm- will result in dev. strong relations
with outside people.
6. Clearer promotional materials: When communicating to customers, the ads, the message
that we are comm should be short and precise and should be able to comm the benefits of
using the product also. If this is clear, it will directly hit out on the customers.
Promotional campaigns will have a max impact if comm is clear
7. Effective comm. results in enhanced professional image: If PR is very good, good rel with
ppl, if customers are able to identify the uses of the products, then professional image of
the org also increases
8. Improved stakeholder response: When org comm with customer, shareholders on regular
basis, improved stakeholder response. Business rel good, Ppl will be more receptive to
the comm of the organisation
9. To inform people about the existence of product in the market: Or new policy coming in
10. To persuade: persuasive advertising- to buy the product
11. To entertain
12. Motivating employee
13. Controls member behaviour: If someone is not adhering to the rules, eg: always coming
late, thru comm, sup will make sure that sub is adhering to the rules. If not showing
productivity- either negative or positive motivation
14. Fulfilment of social needs: Informal grps will survive only when comm takes place btw
them. Experiment by Elton mayo: not only monetary benefit, not only incentive, but
workers will also get a sense of belongingness, dev of informal grp, which will also
motivate them to work. Trying to fulfil social needs. The also motivate the others to
perform well. Person working in formal and informal grp, that way his social needs are
also fulfilled. Sense of belongingness.
15. Effective comm will result into emotional expression of feelings: If performed sub very
well, then leader will express feelings emotionally If a person has truly done very well.
Through comm, release of feelings.
Sender
Encoding message
NOISE FEEDBACK
Message Channel
Decoding Message
Receiver
1. Sender: the party that wants to send the message. From where the message originates.
Source
2. Development of a message or transforming the thoughts or info that is to be conveyed
in a form which can be communicated
3. Channel of comm. From which channel message is going to be sent. Through mobile,
TV, radio etc. deciding most appropriate channel
4. Interpretation of the message or mentally processing message and trying to
understand it
5. Receiving the message in the same manner and perceiving it in the same manner
INTERNAL NOISE: Something to do with the person who is receiving the message.
receiver.
1. Physiological noise: Having a headache, taking medicine, will have an effect on way
you receive message. Drowsiness, so may not be able to receive the message in the
same manner.
2. Psychological: biasness to a certain person. If you like that person, will leave it, if not
will take the negative aspect only. If boss is angry. The attitude of a particular person
External: 1. Physical: phone call, but driving car, need to see safety also. Mind is focusing
on something else, so may not be listening properly
20/01/2021
1. Sender:
2. Ideas: wrt to the message to be sent.
3. Encoding
4. Communication channel
5. Receiver
6. Decoding
7. Feedback
8. Context: environment in which the message is being delivered. In terms of the
channels that are selected.
9. Noise
Facilitators of Communication: (3)
Logic: Very essential. If people are communicated to in a systematic manner, using info that
targets a particular need, then there is some logic and the message makes some sense. Clear
message is going to be developed. Sensodyne toothpaste, shown that how usage is going to
strengthen the gums. Cause and effect relationship is shown. They also get to know the
rationale behind it.
Two-way process: perspective of anchors and viewers, those who watch it sitting at home:
not communication.
D. Barriers to communication
1. Noise
2. Filtering: Sender manipulates info so that it is seen more favourably by the receiver
3. Selective perception: As a receiver, only what I want to hear, I listen. Receiver
selectively selecting info on the basis of their own interest. Listening only to that info
that is relevant to him as per his needs.
4. Information overload: Situation when you give lot of info to the receiver. A condition
when the info exceeds the processing capacity of the individual. A condition when the
information in-flow exceeds an individual’s processing capacity. So has to
communicate it slowly, separately.
5. Defensiveness: Either try to defend yourself, or there will be no communication When
the receiver interprets the message of the sender a threatening, there will be a
retardation. So the sender and receiver are not of the same platform, so will not be
effective communication. No feedback at all. There is distortion in the communication
process. Receiver will be defensive. Maybe that sender is superior and receiver is
subordinate.
6. Jargons: Specialised terminologies or technical language that members of a group use
to aid communication among themselves. Eg: legal terminology not understood by the
group.
7. Stereotyping: Categorising ppl according to what you expect those ppl to be. Done
wrt to a particular community, a part group of ppl. Sometimes ppl may feel that the
receiver is a person who might not have got education from a premiere institute, so a
stereotype that the person might not be able to interpret, Even from receiver’s side,
there is stereotyping, might not take the info in the same manner.
G. Communication models:
Speaker
Speech
(Occasion)
Audience
Effect
Mass Communication Model: Model focuses more on public speaking rather than
interpersonal communication.
Concepts:
1. Ethos: Means that a particular trait which makes the speaker credible before the audience.
If a politician is corrupt, no credibility, so audience will not believe in him.
2. Pathos: There has to be some sort of an emotional connect with the audience. What one
says should matter or matters to the audience. If a village needs water, but politician speaks
about building roads, maybe ppl will not get influenced.
3. Logos: Logic. You need to present factual data to the audience for them to believe in you.
People will believe only if they are in a position to understand or reason out.
Criticisms:
Sender: originator of the message. Choosing channel and sending message. Makes the
message. This is based on technical aspects.
Decoder: at the receiver’s end where the signals are converted into message and receiver is
the destination.
CRITICISMS:
Communicator or sender has all the power in relation to identifying the message, choosing
the channel. This is called as control analysis. Communicator can control the message, the
channel. Emphasis on control. Control analysis takes place in the first block and it is done by
the sender.
Says what? Hovers around the message. Reflects upon content. Content analysis. What kind
of message and how much info is to be communicated to the receiver
In which channel? Complete media analysis. This means that which medium is to be selected
such that max impact is felt. What timing.
Analysis of effect. Effect analysis. It is in the end for what impact this part message thru this
particular channel. What is the outcome of the comm?
CRITCISM:
Again focusing only on mass communication. One-way. More suitable for mass
communication.
No feedback as such
Aim of sender not only to send the message but also to envisage the outcome so will
manipulate it in a way so that right effect will achieve. Sender himself is trying to identify
outcome. Keeps outcome into consideration such that easier for receiver. There is a
possibility of manipulation of message which can have a positive or negative effect.
Sender and receiver have to be on the same level. For comm to take place, they have to be on
the same level.
Source: Person from where the message originates. Source of sender: Parameters: comm
skills, if excellent, comm will be successful. If comm skills are below avg, then sender might
not be able to express what to communicate. Ability to read write listen. If receiver is lagging
behind, Attention criteria, to listen carefully to sender is not there, then comm might not be
successful. Sender and receiver have to match. Com skill of sender: if good, then sender will
be in a position to express in terms of a message what he intends to communicate, but if
comm skills are not good, then will not be in a position to properly justify his point. Comm
skill: individual’s skill to communicate, ability to read.
Attitude of sender towards the audience: Whether sender is taking a humane approach? He
should not seem insulting towards the audience. When talking about the attitude of the
receiver towards the sender, if there is a biased opinion, then there will be a problem as far as
communication. Attitude towards the subject is also very important- whether starts from a
very basic level? Receiver: Might show arrogance that he knows much more than the sender.
Attitude: Sender: to give something more than what audience expects and receiver ‘s attitude
should be to grasp what is said.
S- Source
M- Message
C-Channel
R- Receiver
Basic premise of this model- The sender and receiver have to be on the same level for a
successful communication
Source- The person from where the message originates. Important parameters:
1. Communication skill:
- If it is excellent then, communication is successful. If the skill is below average, the
sender will not be at a position to express himself.
- In receiver also, the communication skill should be at par with that of the sender.
- The individuals skill to communication, ability to speak, read, write and listen is the
communication skill.
- If the receiver lags behind then there may be a problem with the communication. The
criteria to listen carefully to what the sender is saying (paying attention) is not there then, the
communication may not be successful.
2. Attitude
- Sender: towards the audience. That is, whether the sender is thinking from the point of
view of audience, is the sender trying to dominate over audience, does the sender try to take a
humane approach and then approach the audience so that he does not seem insulting to the
audience
- Attitude of receiver: does he have a biased opinion towards the sender. If unbiased then,
successful communication
- Attitude towards the subject: Sender: Whether the sender starts from the beginning/ basic
level and then slowly brings the audience to the technical aspect or whether he starts directly
from the technical topic. Of the receiver- the arrogance of the receiver that he knows much
more than the sender then, it may be problematic.
- Sender- give something more than what the receiver expects. Receiver must try to simply
listen and grasp what is being said.
- Knowledge: How knowledgeable the sender is on the topic. Whether the receiver or
audience members are well versed with the area on which the sender is going to communicate
with them. The message that the sender is going to communicate should not come as a
surprise to them. The receiver should be aware of the communication
- Social system: Culture is a sub-part of this. Social system refers to the values, beliefs,
value system, general society etc. If you are conversing with someone who is from another
social system, you will need to draft your message accordingly. If a person is from another
cultural background then also you need to be careful. This applies to both the sender and
receiver.
4. Message:
- Elements- non-verbal things like body language and gestures. In print ads, the pictures
etc, if there are 2 people then, their body language, tone etc. will be included.
- Treatment- something that is referred to as packing if the message. Manner in which the
message is to be delivered- if a superior has to fire an employee, he had to be authoritative
(talk sternly etc.) in his approach rather than friendly and casual (you smile and talk etc.)
How you communicate the message. This is different from non-verbal communication.
Everything together (content+ tone+ body language etc.) is treatment- combination with non-
verbal cues here.
- Structures- arrangement of message in various parts. How do you arrange the message.
What should be the introduction, body, conclusion etc. This is structuring of message. Will
you start with highlighting main points of discussion, then go ahead with discussion and
finally conclude? This is structuring of the message.
- Code- the form in which the message will be sent. Language- usage of words, videos,
sms etc.
- Smelling: perfume
6. Decoding
CRITICISM:
It requires people to be on the same level for effective communication to happen. However,
that rarely happens in everyday life.
CRITICISMS
Other variables are also there, which might affect the communication process
Not necessary that communication is always continuous, there can be breaks. But there is
some continuity.
First interaction should always be positive, only then there will be continuity.
F: Feedback
B: Readers or audience
ETHICS
Establish ethical standards that people down the line will implement and apply. The concept
of business ethics is study of where the business determines what is the moral right for its
organisation and also assesses the dimension of wrong, determines a standard. BE is a
specialisation of determining what is moral right for a business practice and also assess the
wrong in conduct of the business and set standard to ensure that ppl in the organisation
follow.
Concept of BE: Institution itself determines. There may not be any kind of body. Institution
with its maturity, intent will determine what is right for them within its internal system, Will
spell out the right assessment and wrong assessment. Self-evolving concept.
Is it a requirement? Should a manager churn this down to determine what is right or wrong,
or should it do this to in fact be a business.
Mgmt of org is binding ppl to look into the business framework from a particular perspective
only. But what if this poses hindrances?
What stage should ethics be embraced? Maybe in inception, may not be very concerned.
Question of ethics comes when there is a knowledge of what is unethical. Later stage when it
has a certain kind of standing in the market, then they may contemplate ethics. Eg:-
corruption going on, But now want to change it, so bring in a system of ethics. Now want to
ensure that all kind of sacrosanct practices are followed.
2. Many org will not have the courage to introduce a system of ethics because it is a
reflection of how business is done. Some business, will not even give weightage to this, and
will continue to do what they are doing because it is prevalent. But large org like WIPRO
have put in effort to bring in what they think as ethical process, brought a code, tried to
reduce ambiguity. Eg: Johnson & Johnson- tries to bring in interest of stakeholders, and
ensure that stakeholders are also fall in line with the ethical principles. To do business with
J&J, they have to fall in line with ethical principles. Corp will have its own principles; it is
the stakeholders who have to follow it. Choice lies with the corporation. There has to be a
consensus- broad as to what is ethical, for acceptance to be there. Ethics is how an employer
deals with employees and the stakeholders.
2. Ethics as a concept may have different interpretation. They will try to influence others
irrespective of whether management has a code of ethics in place or not. influence choices of
others and ensure that other understand what is the right way of doing things and ensure that
other fall in line
Business ethics- whose ethics is right and whose ethics is wrong? Everyone’s interpretation
might be different. Each individual will assess
When we deal with business ethics, whether the course of action initiated leads to a broad
conclusion or not is it determined by some investigation. To understand whose all ethical
principle is right or wrong. When people try to thrust decisions, there is a dead end. People
might have an apprehension. Everyone will have different situational encounter.
Two aspects: why should we agree with someone else’s measure of right or wrong. We need
not directly accept.
Course of action- is it leading to broad conclusion of determination of right or wrong. Is the
outcome beneficial for everyone?
NORMATIVE STUDY What is good for larger number of people. What is best for all?
Reasons entailed in making the decision. In normative- Why is a person saying so?
Investigation, examination. When talking about business ethics, how is course of action of
righteousness is determined? Figure out how this has emerged. when new practice comes up,
there will be questions about such practices. There could be some kind of analytical info.
Narrow down info to say that course of action is relevant.
Descriptive STUDY. Need to describe what is actually wrong in this. Descriptive info itself
will help in making a conclusion.
To determine right itself, two course of actions. Make our own assessment about how we
do our business practice and determine righteousness. What ought to be done. Reflects
about upbringing of family, how much we are concerned about the stakeholders. Become
more concerned about economic factors, legal factors. Determining larger good for larger
number of people. Course of action: in BE we are not standardising anything by a
measurement. A particular way in which a person conducts a business is questionable in
nature. Cannot standardise an intention of a person. Determining the right course of
action- what ought to be. Puristic form of an outcome. Code of ethics. We are
determining the right way of doing things rather than fixing a standard.
29/01/2021
Question: Man intends to steal because wife is dying out of cancer. Is there any question
of morality here. Question is about stealing. May justify the stealing by giving the reason
of dying wife. Taken loan and then bought medication. When stealing- putting down self-
esteem. A matured person- taking loan. A person is seeking charity, putting down self-
esteem to a certain level. Whether the person has a moral stand?
Lawrence Coleberg Stages of moral development, his q of inquiry: when does moral dev
start in a person, when does he or she decide? Evaluation of q: Raised this question before
a group of children.
Focus of Coleberg: interviewed 72 male children on the moral dilemma. He conducted his
finding and drew a comprehensive understanding of how this develops.
Children form a morality based on the environment in which he grows. Indoctrinate right
or wrong through punishment. Based on self-absorption or avoidance of pain, As children
mature- teenager- adult etc, the question of standards also change and based on that
conventional understanding of right and wrong also say, there will be some element of
inquisitiveness.
STAGE 1:
Punishment and obedience orientation: Child has limited choices, no awareness about the
world. So behaviour based on punishment. Age 1 to 5. In an environment- restricted
space, constantly monitoring of parents, and constant indoctrination, systematically
telling what is right or wrong. Can a child rebel? Not really. Child may not have
knowledge about the world. Their cognitive level of showing anger has not developed.
Trust the other person a lot. Parents transfer their value to the child. May also do it to
ensure that child has a more comfortable life. Parents in a more assertive position. Child
has limited needs and desires. When a person sacrifices something or shares something,
then they may feel uncomfortable, needs to ensure that something gets back
STAGE 2: Instrumental and relative orientation: right actions are those which satisfy the
needs of the child. Maybe aware that other needs are also imp. May draw a comparison
btw their needs and others needs If I do this, parents will be happy and so I will get
something in return, or parents may become angry. Someone else in home, an element of
sharing. What if I do will I get a return. Child will make assessment of course of action
and the outcome also. In ensuring that they share, sacrifice or so on, they get an element
of satisfaction. Child becomes aware that others happiness is also important to them –
relative orientation in becoming compassionate, sharing etc. In relative orientation, the
child may be willing to sacrifice something so that the other person is also happy and she
is also happy. Child is aware that if behaves in a certain manner, will get a reward and
lead to satisfaction of someone else. In instrumental, child is trying to demonstrate a
behaviour where the other person is satisfied and pleased. This is also a kind of
indoctrination. Respect other, the elders. EXPRESSION OF CARE, give something that
you have to your brother or sister.
LEVEL 2: Conventional Stage: people try to maintain expectations from family, peer
group etc. Gives an entitlement to person to be part of family, peer group. Their
expectation is that family should stand by them. Tries to draw a sense of loyalty. A person
will try to fall in line with such orientation and they try to meet with such expectations.
Righteous behaviour determines on what family says So becomes subservient t moral
ideas of family. Child feels that if they do not, may face hostility, isolation, humiliation.
So people think from perspective of larger aspect of life. So think to become more loyal.
WHAT WILL OTHERS THINK. Give more weightage to what others think.
STAGE 4: Law and order orientation: Originates from principles of law of a particular
nation. If laws upheld, then righteous.
Autonomous or principled stage: May look into evaluation of provision of law and may
even question it. May question what is right and fair, based on human rights. May assess
legal provisions and values associated with it and may seek a remedy.
STAGE 5: Social contract orientation: Aware of the fact that individuals have a variety of
contradicting views and a person searches for consensus and formulation of agreement.
Norms relative and might change and to develop new norm, there needs to be democratic
consensus. Develops a sense of respect for diff views and interpretations. Contemplating
at arriving at best of solution. People may believe that democratic consensus can be
developed to bring in justice of a realm of righteous way of thinking.
STAGE 6: Universal ethical principles. An action is considered as right based on
universality and consistence. Preventing child abuse
Moral Reasoning
Ethical Relativism