Professional Documents
Culture Documents
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
where P1 is the upstream pressure in psia, P is the critical limit in psi, and Cf is a characteristic
*
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 1. Subcritical vapor control valve case calculated in Aspen HYSYS using PSV Plus equations
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 68.64
Z = 0.68
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Subtracting the normal flowrate of 9,000 lb/h gives a required relief load of 1,737 lb/h.
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Control Valve Failure with
Subcritical Vapor Flow
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
M = 68.64
Z = 0.624
Figure 2. Critical vapor control valve case calculated in Aspen HYSYS using PSV Plus equations
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
𝑃𝑣
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28√ (Eq. 5)
𝑃𝑐
∆𝑃∗ = 𝐶𝑓 2 (𝑃1 − 𝐹𝐹 𝑃𝑣 ) (Eq. 6)
where FF is a calculated critical flow parameter, Pv is the vapor pressure / bubble point pressure
of the liquid in psia, and Pc is the critical pressure of the liquid in psia.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
∆𝑃𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑄 = 𝐶𝑣 √ (Eq. 7)
𝑆𝐺
where Pmin is the smaller of the actual pressure drop across the valve and the critical pressure
drop across the valve, SG is the specific gravity of the fluid at upstream conditions relative to
water at 60 F (15.6 C), and Q is the capacity of the control valve in gpm.
The required relief load in gpm may be converted to lb/h:
60 min 1 ft³
𝑤=𝑄× × ×𝜌 (Eq. 8)
1h 7.4805 gal
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
Pc = 562.6 psia
Pv = 216.1 psia
= 29.95 lb/ft³ hence SG = 29.95/62.3 = 0.4807
The critical pressure drop is calculated from (Eq. 5) and (Eq. 6):
216.1
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28√ = 0.7865
562.6
The pressure drop at relief conditions is 51.3 psi, which is less than the critical limit, so flow is
unchoked. The required relief load is calculated from (Eq. 7) and (Eq. 8):
51.3
𝑄 = 8√ = 82.6 gpm
0.4807
60 min 1 ft³
𝑤 = 82.6 gpm × × × 29.95 lb/ft 3 = 19,840 lb/h
1h 7.4805 gal
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 3. Unchoked liquid control valve case calculated in Aspen HYSYS using PSV Plus equations
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 3.
Table 3. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Control Valve Failure with
Subcritical Liquid Flow using PSV Plus equations
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the upstream conditions will yield the following properties:
Pc = 583.5 psia
Pv = 247.1 psia
= 30.85 lb/ft³ hence SG = 30.85/62.3 = 0.495
The critical pressure drop is calculated from (Eq. 5) and (Eq. 6):
247.1
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28√ = 0.778
583.5
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 4. Choked liquid control valve case calculated in Aspen HYSYS using PSV Plus equations
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The pressure drop at relief conditions is 144.8 psi, which is greater than the critical limit, so flow
is choked. The required relief load is calculated from (Eq. 7) and (Eq. 8):
46.6
𝑄 = 120√ = 1164 gpm
0.495
60 min 1 ft³
𝑤 = 1164 gpm × × × 30.85 lb/ft 3 = 288,100 lb/h
1h 7.4805 gal
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 4.
Table 4. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Control Valve Failure with
Critical Liquid Flow using PSV Plus equations
a. Vapor Equations
As with control valves, vapor flow through a tube rupture is subject to a critical flow limit. The
downstream critical limit pressure may be calculated as
𝑘
2 ⁄𝑘−1
𝑃𝑐𝑓𝑟 = 𝑃1 [ ] (Eq. 9)
𝑘+1
where Pcfr is the critical limit pressure in psia, P1 is the high-pressure-side pressure in psia, and
k is the ideal gas specific heat ratio CP/(CP - R) at relief conditions.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
where w is the required relief load in lb/h, C is the orifice coefficient, A is the total rupture area in
in², P is the pressure difference between the P1 and the greater of the downstream relief
pressure or Pcfr, and is the vapor density at upstream conditions in lb/ft³.
For flow from the tube side into the shell side, the orifice coefficient used is typically 0.74 (so the
product with the leading coefficient is 1,781.7), and the expansion coefficient Y may be
calculated as
∆𝑃
𝑌 = 1 − 0.4 (Eq. 11)
𝑃1
For flow from the shell side into the tube side, the orifice coefficient used is typically 0.6 (so the
product with the leading coefficient is 1,444.6), and the expansion coefficient may be calculated
as
∆𝑃
𝑌 = 1 − 0.317 (Eq. 12)
𝑃1
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions will yield the following
properties:
= 0.7756 lb/ft³
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 5. Subcritical vapor exchanger tube rupture case calculated in Aspen HYSYS
Since the critical pressure of 64.9 psia is less than the low-pressure side relief pressure of
80.7 psia, flow is not choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 29.3 psi.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 10) and (Eq. 12) as
𝜋
𝐴 = 2 (0.709 in)2 = 0.7896 in²
4
29.3
𝑌 = 1 − 0.317 = 0.9156
110
𝑤 = 1444.6(0.7896)(0.9156)√(29.3)(0.7756) = 4,979 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 5.
Table 5. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Exchanger Tube Rupture with
Subcritical Vapor Flow
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions will yield the following
properties:
= 2.493 lb/ft³
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 6. Critical vapor exchanger tube rupture case calculated in Aspen HYSYS
Since the critical pressure of 162.0 psia is greater than the low-pressure side relief pressure of
80.7 psia, flow is choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 113.0 psi.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 10) and (Eq. 11) as
𝜋
𝐴 = 2 (1.18 in)2 = 2.187 in²
4
113.0
𝑌 = 1 − 0.4 = 0.8356
275
𝑤 = 1781.7(2.187)(0.8356)√(113.0)(2.493) = 54,650 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 6.
Table 6. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Exchanger Tube Rupture with
Critical Vapor Flow
d. Liquid Equations
Liquid flow is not checked for choking. The flow through the rupture is given by
As with vapor cases, for a tube-into-shell break, a value of 0.74 is typically used for the orifice
coefficient, giving a combined leading coefficient of 1781.7. For a shell-into-tube break, a value
of 0.6 is typically used for the orifice coefficient, giving a combined leading coefficient of 1444.6.
e. Liquid Example with Tube-Into-Shell Flow
The example is based on the following conditions:
Composition: 35% n-heptane, 35% n-decane, 30% n-C13 using the HYSYS SRK package for
physical properties
High-pressure side conditions: 740 psia / 120 F
Relief pressure: 400 psig set pressure + 10% allowable overpressure = 440 psig
Tubes have an inner diameter of 1.375 in
Setting up a stream in HYSYS at the high-pressure side conditions will yield the following
properties:
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
= 44.3 lb/ft³
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Table 7. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Exchanger Tube Rupture with
Liquid Flow
𝑥 𝑁ℓ
𝑓𝑣 = (Eq. 16)
(1 − 𝑥)𝑁𝑣 + 𝑥 𝑁ℓ
where C is the orifice coefficient, typically 0.6 for shell-into-tube flow or 0.74 for tube-into-shell
flow, Y is the vapor expansion coefficient computed using (Eq. 11) or (Eq. 12) as appropriate,
P is the pressure drop across the tube break subject to the downstream critical limit, values
are the respective phase densities, and x is the vapor mass fraction at the low-pressure-side
pressure subject to the downstream critical limit.
Then, the required relief load is calculated as the sum of the vapor and liquid flows:
𝑤𝑣 = 𝑓𝑣 𝐴 𝑁𝑣 (Eq. 17)
𝑤ℓ = (1 − 𝑓𝑣 ) 𝐴 𝑁ℓ (Eq. 18)
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
𝑤 = 𝑤𝑣 + 𝑤ℓ (Eq. 19)
Figure 8. Mixed phase, subcritical exchanger tube rupture case calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 9. Mixed phase, critical exchanger tube rupture case calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Since the critical pressure of 278.9 psia is less than the low-pressure side relief pressure of
289.7 psia, flow is not choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 180.3 psi. Liquid
and vapor properties may be obtained in HYSYS at the high side pressure using the previously-
flashed stream, yielding:
𝜌ℓ = 28.74 lb/ft³
𝜌𝑣 = 4.529 lb/ft³
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 12) and (Eq. 14) through (Eq. 19):
𝜋
𝐴 = 2 (1.18 in)2 = 2.187 in²
4
180.3
𝑌 = 1 − 0.4 = 0.8466
470
𝑁𝑣 = 1781.7(0.8466)√(180.3)(4.529) = 43103
𝑁ℓ = 1781.7√(180.3)(28.74) = 128255
(0.2588)(128255)
𝑓𝑣 = = 0.5096
(1 − 0.2588)(43103) + (0.2588)(128255)
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Since the critical pressure of 278.7 psia exceeds the low-pressure side relief pressure of
179.7 psia, flow is choked and the pressure drop across the break P = 191.3 psi. Liquid and
vapor properties may be obtained in HYSYS at the high side pressure using the previously-
flashed stream, yielding:
𝜌ℓ = 28.74 lb/ft³
𝜌𝑣 = 4.529 lb/ft³
The required relief load may be calculated using (Eq. 11) and (Eq. 14) through (Eq. 19):
𝜋
𝐴 = 2 (1.18 in)2 = 2.187 in²
4
191.3
𝑌 = 1 − 0.317 = 0.8710
470
𝑁𝑣 = 1444.6(0.8710)√(191.3)(4.529) = 37036
𝑁ℓ = 1444.6√(191.3)(28.74) = 107114
(0.2718)(107114)
𝑓𝑣 = = 0.5191
(1 − 0.2718)(37036) + (0.2718)(107114)
𝑤𝑣 = (0.5191)(2.187)(37036) = 42,050 lb/h
𝑤ℓ = (1 − 0.5191)(2.187)(107114) = 112,700 lb/h
𝑤 = 𝑤𝑣 + 𝑤ℓ = 154,800 lb/h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 9.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Table 9. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Exchanger Tube Rupture with
Critical Mixed Phase Flow
3. Hydraulic Expansion
a. Equations
For a scenario where heat input causes hydraulic expansion in blocked-in, liquid-full equipment
or process piping, API Standard 521 gives two equations for calculating the required relief load,
one for U.S. customary units and one for SI units. [1] These equations may be combined and
written as
𝛼𝑉 𝜙
𝑞= (Eq. 20)
𝑁 𝑆𝐺 𝐶𝑃
where q is the volumetric required relief load in m³/s or gpm, N is a dimensional constant with a
value of 1000 for SI units or 500 for U.S. customary units, V is the cubic expansion coefficient
in 1/K or 1/R, is the total heat transfer rate in W or BTU/h, SG is the specific gravity of the fluid
referenced to water at 60 F or 15.6 C (a reference density of 998.9 kg/m³ or 62.3 lb/ft³), and CP
is the fluid heat capacity in J/kg-K or BTU/lb-R.
b. Example
The example is based on the following conditions:
f = 500,000 kcal/h = 2,093,400 kJ/h = 581.5 kW
aV = 0.0085 1/K
SG = 0.63
CP = 0.591 kcal/kg-K = 2.474 kJ/kg-K
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 20), and converted to a mass flow rate:
(0.0085)(581,500)
𝑞= = 0.00317 m3 /s
1000(0.63)(2,474)
3600 s
𝑤 = 0.00317 m³/s × × (0.63)(998.9 kg/m3 ) = 7182 kg/h
1h
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 10.
Table 10. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for Hydraulic Expansion
4. Fire
a. Wetted Fire Equations
The required relief load due to vaporization of liquid inventory is calculated using equations
obtained from API Standard 521. [1]
The required relief load is calculated using the following equations:
where Q is the rate at which heat is added to the vessel contents in W; CDF is a constant to
account for the presence or absence of adequate draining and firefighting, with a value of
43,200 when adequate drainage and firefighting are present or 70,900 when they are not; F is
an environment factor to account for the presence of fireproof insulation, with a value of 1.0 for a
vessel without fireproof insulation; Aws is the exposed wetted surface area of the vessel, subject
to certain conditions, in m².
Per the standard, for horizontal and vertical vessels, only the portion of the liquid inventory
within 7.6 m of grade should be considered. For spherical vessels, the portion of the liquid
inventory within 7.6 m of grade or up to the maximum horizontal diameter, whichever is greater,
should be considered.
where w is the required relief load in kg/h and l is the latent heat of the vessel contents at
appropriate relieving conditions in kJ/kg
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 11. External fire case with a wetted vertical vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
No correction needs to be made to the portion of liquid inventory that is considered, as the
normal liquid level is less than 7.6 m above grade. The wetted surface area is computed as
follows:
𝐴𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = 𝜋 𝐷 𝐿𝐿 = 32.99 m²
𝐴ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 = 1.084 𝐷2 = 13.28 m²
𝐴𝑤𝑠 = 1.10 × (𝐴𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 + 𝐴ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 ) = 50.9 m²
The required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 21) and (Eq. 22):
𝑄 = (43200)(1.0)(50.9)0.82 = 1,084,000 W
(1,084,000)
𝑤 = 3.6 = 13,900 kg/h
280.8
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 11.
Table 11. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for External Fire on a Vertical
Wetted Vessel
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 12. External fire case with a wetted horizontal vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The fraction of the total area of the horizontal shell that is wetted may be computed by
𝑟−ℎ
cos 𝜃 =
𝑟
𝜃 = 1.427
2𝜃 𝜃
𝑓𝑤𝑠 = = = 0.454
2𝜋 𝜋
𝐴𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = 𝑓𝑤𝑠 𝜋 𝐷 𝐿 = 39.97 m²
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Table 12. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for External Fire on a Horizontal
Wetted Vessel
Five variations will be considered: (i) elevation of 6 m, liquid level of 2 m; (ii) elevation of 6 m,
liquid level of 3 m; (iii) elevation of 5 m, liquid level of 2 m; (iv) elevation of 5 m, liquid level of
3 m; (v) elevation of 4 m, liquid level of 3 m.
The wetted area exposed to heat input will be calculated using the following equation:
The appropriate value for h depends on the variation of the example that we consider. In
case (i), the liquid level is above 7.6 m above grade, but below the equator of the vessel, so the
full level of 2 m is considered. In case (ii), the liquid level is above 7.6 m above grade and
above the equator of the vessel; the equator is higher, so that level of 2.5 m is used. In case
(iii), the liquid level is not above 7.6 m above grade nor above the equator of the vessel, so the
full level of 2 m is considered. In case (iv), the liquid level is above 7.6 m above grade and
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
above the equator of the vessel; 7.6 m above grade is higher, so a level of (7.6 m – 5 m = 2.5
m) is used. In case (v), the liquid level is below 7.6 m above grade and below the equator of the
vessel, so the full level of 3 m is considered.
Figure 13. External fire case with a wetted spherical vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The results calculated above for case (iii) are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in
Table 13.
Table 13. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for External Fire on a Spherical
Wetted Vessel
𝑘+1
2 𝑘−1
𝐶 = 0.0395√𝑘 (
(Eq. 24)
)
𝑘+1
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
𝑝1
𝑇 𝑇1 = (Eq. 25)
𝑝𝑛 𝑛
where T1 is the temperature at the upstream relieving pressure in K, Tn is the normal operating
temperature in K, and p1/pn is the ratio of relief to normal operating pressure in kPaa.
𝐴′(𝑇𝑤 − 𝑇1 )1.25
𝑤 = 0.2772√𝑀 ⋅ 𝑝1 [ ] (Eq. 27)
𝑇11.1506
where w is the required relief load in kg/h, M is the molecular weight of the fluid, and A’ is the
vessel area exposed to fire, which is calculated using the same method as the wetted area for a
liquid-full vessel exposed to fire.
Then, the required relief load is calculated using (Eq. 24), (Eq. 26), and (Eq. 27):
1.210+1
2 1.210−1
𝐶 = 0.0395√(1.210) ( ) = 0.0257
1.210 + 1
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
Figure 14. External fire case with an unwetted horizontal vessel calculated in Aspen HYSYS
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®
The results calculated above are compared to results obtained in Aspen HYSYS in Table 14.
Table 14. Comparison of Example Calculation and Aspen HYSYS Calculation for External Fire on a Horizontal
Unwetted Vessel
REFERENCES
[1] American Petroleum Institute, API Standard 521 6th Ed.: Pressure-relieving and
Depressuring Systems, Washington, DC: API Publishing Services, 2014.
[2] W. Y. Wong, "PRV sizing for exchanger tube rupture," Hydrocarbon Processing, pp. 59-64,
February 1992.
[3] W. Y. Wong, "Correction to 'PRV sizing for exchanger tube rupture'," Hydrocarbon
Processing, p. 44, May 1992.
© 2015 Aspen Technology, Inc. AspenTech , aspenONE , the aspenONE logo, the Aspen leaf logo, and OPTIMIZE are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. All rights
® ® ®