You are on page 1of 14

Evaluation Of Service Quality For Undergraduate Programs At

Andalas University

Nilda Tri Putri1*, Alexie Herryandhi Broto Adi2, Ryan Kamal Fikri3
1,2,3Faculty of
Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Andalas University
Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang West Sumatra, 25163
Email: nildatriputri@gmail.com*, riankamalfikri@gmail.com

Abstract

Total Quality Management is a philosophy and key to bring success in the industry for this
era. Total Quality Management plays an important role in the management system and
culture to create or produce a good products and service. Andalas University is one object
of the application of Total Quality Management in the education sector. Research carried
out aims to describe the service quality for undergraduate programs at the Andalas
University. Based on the measurement of the service quality, obtained the information
related to the level of student satisfaction each Departments and priority improvements to
service variable. The study used a questionnaire with two instrument ratings. The
instruments rating are an assessment of the level of service and service priority. The
calculation for service quality used CSI (Customer Satisfaction Index) method. The
recommendations for improve service quality used IPA (Importance Performance
Analysis) Method. Based on research conducted, service quality Undergraduate Program
at Andalas University can be categorized as low. It was based on the value of CSI located
on the 4th lowest category, which is one of courses in Very Poor category, 9 courses in
Poor category, 3 courses in the Cause for Concern category, and 1 course on Borderline
category. While the dimensions of which are in the service of a general improvement
priorities is the Tangible and Reliability dimension.

Keywords: Customer Satisfaction Index, Important Performance Analysis, Service


Quality
similarities to the manufacturing
1. Introduction industry. Total Quality Management
plays an important role in the
University is the best medium in management system and culture to
apply the concept of Total Quality create or produce a good products
Management. This is evidenced by and service. The products that
the function of universities that have

129
produce by university is students program C.
and knowledge, and service quality This proves that some
was produced by academic staff and courses have to do a self-evaluation
employees. The needed of Total in order to improve the internal
Quality Management in higher quality of the courses themselves
education also occurred in with the guidelines provided by
Indonesia. Not all University has National Accreditation Board of
applied the concept of Total Quality Higher Education in Indonesia. One
Management properly. The success of the self-evaluation needs to be
of universities in Indonesia in the done is an internal evaluation
application of Total Quality program of study in terms of service
Management can be assessed from quality. Service Quality becomes
the accreditation which is owned by the main focus in the internal
the University. The relationship evaluation of study programs as
between the success of the closely associated with the process
application of Total Quality and outcomes of courses. Therefore,
Management to this accreditation it is necessary to conduct further
can be seen from the similarities research related to service quality
between the assessment standards for each program of study at the
established by the National Andalas University.
Accreditation Board of Higher
Education in Indonesia with the 2. Literature Review
output of Total Quality
Management is a product In the study conducted by Todorut
(university graduates and (2013), Total Quality Management
knowledge) and service quality. means the whole set of elements that
Andalas University is one of exist within an organization ranging
the oldest universities in Indonesia. from the process, training, systems,
In general, Andalas University, has and method and entirely belonging
applied the concept of Total Quality to the quality of a product or service.
Management properly. This is The main objective of Total Quality
indicated by the University of Management is to create
Andalas valuable accreditation A. comfortable conditions for all
However, it can not be assumed that existing resources capable of being
the application of Total Quality used in a creative and efficient in its
Management has been applied for management. Additionally Hellsten,
each program of study at the H and Klefsjo, B. (2000) in Todorut
University of Andalas. One of the (2013) Total Quality Management
problems that happened was that can also be defined as a
there was still an accredited study management strategy focused on
130
three units, namely core values, Owlia and Aspinwall in Sudha
tools, and technique. (2013) shown in Table 1.
There are several points to
consider in Total Quality Table 1: Quality Dimensions in Higher
Education (Sudha, 2013)
Management, namely (Todorut,
Dimension Characteristics
2013): Change, Customer
Sufficients equipments / facilities
Orientation, Communication,
Continuous Improvement, Ease of acces
Tangible
Corrective Measure, Cost of Poor Visually appealing environment
Quality, and organisational structure Support services (accomdation,
sports, etc)
of the network type in the Process or
Sufficients staff (academic)
case management, Imagination,
Theoretical and practical
Creativity, Information Technology, Competence knowledge, qualifications
Organizational Culture, Team, Teaching Experience,
communication
Orientation towards the Future.
Understanding students needs
Application of Total Quality
Willingness to help
Management in Higher Education Attitude Availability for guidence and
has the potential to (Hebert et al., device
(1995); Vazzana et al., (1997) in Giving personal attention
Cruickshank, 2010): Administration Relevance of curriculum to the
of University Function, Curricula future jobs of the student
Communication skill and team
dan Core Learning Processes, work
Content
Teaching Methods, Research Flexibility of knowledge, being
cross-diciplinary
Activities, non-Academic functions Containing primary
[Hebert et al. 1995; Vazzana et al. knowledge/skills
1997]. Effective presentation

Sequencing timeliness
3. Methodology Delivery Consistency, fairness of
examinations
3.1. Dimensions of Service
Feedback from students
Quality Measurement
Trustworthiness

The instrument used to measure the Reliability Giving valid award


service quality for undergraduate Handling complaints, solving
problems
program at Andalas University is a
questionnaire. Questionnaires are 3.2. Custumer Satisfaction Index
designed using variables of service (CSI) Method
quality that is formed from multiple
dimensions. Questionnaire survey Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI)
used in this research can be seen at is useful to know the level of
Appendix A. Dimensions of service customer satisfaction with services
quality were based on research provided by the service provider.
131
Steps to calculate the value of CSI of the value of the CSI (Customer
are as follows (Syukri, 2014): Satisfaction Index can be seen in
1. Determine the Value of Mean Table 2:
Importance Score (MIS) for
each variable question 3.5. Important Performance
2. Identify Weight Factor (WF) Analysis (IPA) Method
for each variable question. This
weight is obtained by dividing Importance Performance
the MIS per variable with a total Analysis (IPA) method is used to
value of MIS see the improvement priority. In
3. Determining Mean Satisfaction general, Importance Performance
Score (MSS) for each variable Analysis (IPA) dividing
question improvement priorities into four
4. Calculate Weight Score (WSk) quadrants as shown in Figure 1:
for each variable question. This
value is obtained by Extremely Important
A. Concentrate Here B Keep Up The Good Work
multiplying the value of MSS
with WF. Fair Excellent
5. Calculate the value of Customer Performance Performance
Satisfaction Index (CSI) using
the formula: C. Low priority D. Possible Overkill
Slightly Important

∑𝑝𝑘=1 𝑊𝑆𝑘 Figure 1:. Importance Performance


𝐶𝑆𝐼 = 𝑥 100% Analysis (IPA) Matrix (Martilla & James,
𝐻𝑆 1977 in Kitcharoen, 2004)

4. Results and Discussion


Table 2: Interpretation of CSI
(Customer Satisfaction Index) The Calculation of CSI (Customer
(Syukri, 2014) Satisfaction Index) is used to
Index Range Interpretation determine the level of customer
X > 87% Excellent satisfaction with the services
84% < X ≤ 87% Very Good provided. The value of the CSI
80% < X ≤ 84% Good (Customer Satisfaction Index) is
77% < X ≤ 80% Borderline shown as a percentage. Table 3
71% < X ≤ 77% Cause for Concern
shows a recapitulation of the value
64% < X ≤ 71% Poor
X ≤ 64% Very Poor of CSI (Customer Satisfaction
X = Costumer Satisfaction Index Index) for the entire Department:

Highest Scale (HS) is the Table 3: Recapitulation of Costumer


maximum scale used. Interpretation Satisfaction Index for
132
Undergraduate Program at Andalas Borderline category with a CSI
University score of 79.48%. This interpretation
Department
Accredi-
CSI Category
shows that the level of student
tation satisfaction with service qualitys
Indonesian provided by Program classified as
Borderline
Literature B 79.48%
normal. This interpretation occurs
Biology A 73.55%
Cause For because the performance of
Physics B 72.98% Concern academic staff of Indonesian
Japanese
Literature C 71.00% Literature Department in providing
International services of various variables ratings
Relations
Science B 70.66% considered quite good by the
Mechanical students. Pretty good service is
Engineering A 70.07%
Computer coupled with expectations of
Science C 69.14% students that did away with the
Nursing
Program B 68.51% service qualitys provided by the
Poor Program.
Pharmacy A 67.83%
Enviromental
The next interpretation is the
Engineering B 67.67% interpretation of CSI by category
Management A 67.28% Cause for Concern. Courses that are
Industrial included in this category is the
Engineering A 66.18%
Department Biology, Physics, and
Agribusiness B 64.58% Japanese Literature. This category
Dentist
Very Poor indicates the service qualitys
Program C 61.14%
provided by the Program are advised
According to the table, there to conduct the evaluation. This
was information that on the 14 happens because the gap between
department, interpretation of the students 'perceptions of academic
results obtained 4 CSI (Customer staff's performance in terms of
Satisfaction Index). The service to the students' expectations
interpretation is Borderline, Cause of service delivery. Gaps are not too
for Concern, Poor and Very Poor. significant, so that the performance
This assessment is at its lowest 4 of evaluation program of study in
7 interpretations of interpretations terms of service do not need to be
on CSI (Customer Satisfaction done immediately.
Index). This interpretation shows
that the level of customer Interpretation with the
satisfaction of 14 depatments is still highest Studies Program is the
relatively low in general. interpretation of the value of CSI
Interpretation with the with the Poor category. There are
highest ratings is the Literary nine courses of study that fit into this
Studies Program Indonesia with category, namely the International
133
Relations Science, Mechanical Important Performance
Engineering, Computer Science, Analysis for each service dimension
Nursing, Pharmacy, Environmental for Undergraduate Program at
Engineering, Management, Andalas University can be seen
Industrial Engineering and generally at Figure 2.
Agribusiness. This category
indicates that the level of student
satisfaction on the performance of
service Department is low. The
main issues contained in this
category are the presence of some of
the Department with accreditation
by 4 courses. This shows that the
accreditation owned courses are not
relevant to the current level of
student satisfaction. The low value
of the CSI is the case because of the Figure 2: Important Performance Analysis
for Undergraduate Program at Andalas
large gaps between performance University
studies program in providing
services with the expectation of Based on Figure 2, there was
service desired by the students. information that the main issues for
The lowest category is very each program of S-1 at Andalas
poor. Courses that fit into this University are a dimension Tangible
category is a Dentist Education. and Reliability. This shows still
This category indicates that the level need to be evaluated related
of student satisfaction dental facilities and infrastructure of
education as very low. Students academic and non-academic. In
assess that performance in the addition to the means-and the
Department provides academic academic infrastructure, the
services is very far from the evaluation also needs to be made to
expectations of students to these services that are of Student Affairs.
services. Department should While the dimensions of
conduct an evaluation of the service Competence, performance of
quality as soon as possible. The academic services is considered
level of student satisfaction is also very good and should be
relevant to the accreditation of maintained. This is evidenced by the
educational courses dentists still dimensions of Competence which
worth C. Moreover, this gap occurs are in quadrant II, whereas the low
because this program is still priority occurs on the dimensions of
relatively new. Attitude. This shows that the
134
students assess these dimensions At dimensions of Reliability,
needs to be improved, but not a top repairs need to be done are in
priority. High expectations occur on softksill training, socialization race
the dimensions of Content and or national and international events,
Delivery. This indicates that the scholarships institutional and non-
service performance is very high but institutional, seminars and
not so important by students. workshops related to the world of
At Tangible dimension, work, research information, the
improvement needs to be done provision of facilities in
completeness of laboratory extracurricular activities and social
equipment, completeness and activities. Improvements on this
recency collection of the library variable refer to the Standards of
department, the ease of access to e- Quality Standards Internal Affairs
journal of research, and the Component 6 14 Number 47 which
cleanliness of the toilet majors. This explains the importance of
needs to be considered by the university services to students,
Andalas University, because especially to components such as
according to Internal Quality Policy interest and talent, scholarship,
Andalas University Year 2013-2016 health. While the Standard
Chapter III Article 14 Paragraph 3 Components 65 14 No. 50, there's a
describes the obligation of Andalas need for the University to improve
University in developing research student achievement in both the
infrastructure and facilities that are academic and non-academic. Surely
easily accessible all the this is the basis of the University in
academicians and the user developing any activities, facilities
community. Academicians in the and infrastructure, as well as
Quality Policy Internal Andalas information relating to Student
University Year 2013-2016 Chapter Affairs.
I Article 1 Paragraph 15 is Lecturers
and Students Unand. This shows References:
that the research facilities must be Cruickshank, Mary. (2010). Total
easily accessible to students and Quality Management in the Higher
always developed by the Andalas Education Sector: A Literature
University. In addition, based on Review from An International and
Internal Quality Standards Andalas Australian Perspective. TQM and
University Year 2013-2017 9 Part Business Excellence. Volume 14,
28 Standards No. 82 stated that the No. 10, Hal 1159-1167
laboratory should have equipment
with the type and amount balanced Hebert, F.J., Dellana, S.A. & Bass,
with practical activities and student K. (1995) Total quality management
research. in the business school: the faculty
135
viewpoint, Advanced Management Sciences 83 (2013). No. 1105 –
Journal, 60, pp. 20–31. 1110.

Hellsten H. & Klefsjo, B. (2000). Vazzana, G., Bachman, D. &


“TQM as Management in Higher Elfrink, J. (1997) Does higher
Education”. Asian Journal of education practice what it teaches?:
Business Management. No.2, pp 9- A study of total quality
16. management processes in academia
answers this question, Quality
Kitcharoen, Krisana. (2004). The Progress, 30, pp. 67–74.
Importance Performance Analysis
of Service Quality In Administrative
Departments Of Private Universities
In Thailand. ABAC Journal.
Volume 24, Number 3. Hal 20-46

Martilla, J. and James J. (1977),


‘Importance- Performance
Analysis’, Journal of Marketing, 14
(January): pp. 77-79

Sudha, T. (2013). Total Quality


Management In Higher Education
Institutions. International Journal of
Social Science & Interdisiplinery
Research Volume 2, No. 6, ISSN
2277 3630

Syukri, Siti Husna Ainu. (2014).


Penerapan Customer Satisfaction
Index (CSI) dan Analisis Gap Pada
Kualitas Pelayanan Trans Jogja.
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri.
Volume 13, Nomor 2. ISSN 1412-
6869

Todorut, Amalia Venera. (2013).


The Need of Total Quality
Management in Higher Education.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral
136
APPENDIX A
Survey Instruction

Part 1 : Respondent Identity

Before answer the questionnaire, please fill in your data on this field:

 Name :
 Student Number :
 Gender : Male / Female
 Faculty :
 Study Program :
 BSS Status : Ever / Never

Part 2 :Survey Instruction

Please checklist (√) in the column provided on the right side of the question in accordance with
your perception of quality. The assessment:

Assessment of Quality Level of Service Importance

Criteria Code Criteria Code

Not Very Good VNG Not Very Important NVI

Not Good NG Not Important NI

Moderate M Moderate M

Good G Important I

Very Good VG Very Important VI

Here is an example of the filling survey:


Assessment of Quality Level of Service Importance
Questionnaire
VNG NG M G VG NVI NI M I VI

Question 1 √ √

Question 2 √ √

Question 3 √ √

137
138
139
140
141
142

You might also like