Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Home All Posts About FAQ Contact ebook Get new articles by email:
All Posts > Math you@youremail.com Sign up
Categories
Business
Next, take the product, group by real/imaginary parts: General
Guides
Math
Calculus
Vector Calculus
Observations
Personal Development
Programming
Lastly, notice how this matches the sine and cosine angle addition formulas: Web
And there you have it! What’s that? You don’t intuitively think in terms of sine and cosine
expansions? Too bad, the math checks out!
Still here? Good. The problem is we’ve lost the magic: it’s like saying two poems are
similar because we analyzed the distribution of letters. Accurate but unsatisfying!
I like sine as much as anyone, but the details come after seeing the relationship click.
That is, take our original (4), make it 3 times larger (4 * 3) and then add the effect of
rotation (+4i). Again, if we wanted only rotation, we’d multiply by “i”. If we wanted only
scaling we’d multiply by plain old 3. A complex number (a + bi) has both effects.
Now we’re talking! I see this as “Make a scaled version of our original triangle (times 2)
and add a scaled/rotated triangle (times 3i)”. The final endpoint is the new complex
number.
Instead of grouping the multiplication by triangle, we analyze each part of the FOIL (first,
outside, inside, last). Adding each component takes us along a path and ends in the same
spot!
Captain Geometry to the rescue! Oh, how I’ve missed you from 9th grade. Is the the
result (dotted blue line) at the same angle as plopping the triangles on each other?
In the normal case, we start with a triangle (3 + 4i) and plop on the other (2 + 3i) to
get the combined angle.
After the multiplication, we start with a scaled triangle (2x) and plop on another scaled
triangle (times 3i). Even though it’s larger, similar triangles have the same angles —
they’re just bigger (but don’t ask about its size, ok?).
We scaled up the original triangle (no change in angle) and “plopped on” another scaled
triangle (no change in angle), so the result is the same! I love seeing this come together
— we scale up, rotate out, and boom — we’re at the combined angle. This isn’t about
“imaginary numbers” — it’s a way to combine triangles without trigonometry!
Well, let’s call our original length “x”. Whatever it is, we end up getting a new triangle
layered on top, with a size of 2x + 3x (a + bi in general). And from Pythagoras (I love
that gentleman) the “real” distance is
That is, we take our original distance (x) and scale it by the size of the new triangle (size
of a + bi).
A Few Thoughts
I don’t hate rigorous proofs — I hate pretending they’re helpful when they’re not. Proofs
have two goals: