You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/306421444

Crop rotation as an effective strategy for saffron (Crocus sativus L.)


cultivation

Article  in  Scientia Horticulturae · November 2016


DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.007

CITATIONS READS

10 609

3 authors:

Fabio Gresta Carmelo Santonoceto


Università degli Studi di Messina Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria
61 PUBLICATIONS   1,141 CITATIONS    27 PUBLICATIONS   400 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Giovanni Avola
Italian National Research Council
55 PUBLICATIONS   660 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

SENTI - Sensori Elettronici, Nano Tecnologie, Informatica per l'agricoltura di precisione View project

SSNIF-TRAINING: SERVIZI SENSORIALI NOSE INDEX FACTORY View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Fabio Gresta on 04 December 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Scientia Horticulturae
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti

Crop rotation as an effective strategy for saffron (Crocus sativus L.)


cultivation
Fabio Gresta a,∗ , Carmelo Santonoceto a , Giovanni Avola b
a
Department AGRARIA, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Loc Feo di Vito, 89122, Reggio Calabria, Italy
b
Trees and Timber Institute, IVALSA, CNR, Via Paolo Gaifami, 18, Catania, Italy

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Saffron is an annual plant usually grown as a perennial crop, with well-known problems, which are
Received 21 April 2016 related to the reduction of soil fertility (mainly caused by weeds, biotic pathologies and micronutrients
Received in revised form 7 August 2016 scarcity) that in the long run determine a dramatic yield reduction and overexploitation of the soil. In this
Accepted 10 August 2016
view, crop rotations are considered the traditional antidote to the soil sickness. However, the evidence
of the effects of previous crop on saffron stigma yield and corm production is slender and fragmentary. A
Keywords:
two-year study was carried out to evaluate the effect of three different previous crops (faba bean, saffron
Saffron
and fallow) on saffron stigmas yield and replacement corms production. Two different corm densities (30
Previous crop
Sowing density
and 45 corms m−2 ) were also studied. Faba bean as previous crop determined the highest performance
Crop rotation in terms of flower number (up to 400 flowers m−2 ), stigma yield (up to 2 g m−2 ) and replacement corms
Stigma yield (up to 4.7 kg m−2 ). This paper, to our knowledge, is the first experimental based research on the effects
Corm production of previous crop on stigma and corm yield of saffron.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction taste and safranal responsible for the aroma (Lozano et al., 1999;
Carmona et al., 2006; Siracusa et al., 2011). These peculiar char-
Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is an autumn flowering geophyte acteristics of saffron make it one of the most appreciated spices
belonging to the Iridaceae family that has been cultivated in the available on the market.
Mediterranean Basin since the Late Bronze Age (Negbi, 1999; Gresta From an agronomic point of view, although saffron propagates
et al., 2008a). It is very famous for its very expensive dried dark-red vegetatively by means of corms, a some variability has been found
stigmas used as spice and condiment for food, as a dye for tex- among different geographical origins (Siracusa et al., 2013). Being
tiles and in traditional medicine from ancient times (Rios et al., well adapted to the Mediterranean area, saffron may represent
1996; Basker and Negbi, 1983; Negbi, 1999; Gresta et al., 2008a; an alternative profitable crop for this environment (Gresta et al.,
Fernández, 2004). Nowadays, it has a niche market and it is used 2008a). The scientific community has explored the effect of mother
almost exclusively to give colour, flavour and aroma to food and for corm dimensions (Gresta et al., 2008b; Koocheki and Seyyedi, 2015;
alcoholic beverages. Douglas et al., 2014), sowing time (Gresta et al., 2008b), environ-
In recent times, there has been a renewed interest in saffron mental conditions (Gresta et al., 2009; Siracusa et al., 2010a,b),
from both stakeholders and the scientific community focusing on soil texture (Gresta et al., 2010), organic and chemical fertilization
its biological properties such as anti-cancer, antioxidant and mem- (Khorramdel et al., 2015; Hosseini et al., 2004; Behnia et al., 1999;
ory enhancing activities (Abdullaev and Espinosa-Aguirre, 2004; Behzad et al., 1992) and irrigation (Yarami and Sepaskhah, 2015;
Magesh et al., 2006; Pitsikas et al., 2007; Ghadrdoost et al., 2011; Koocheki et al., 2014; de Juan et al., 2009) on saffron productiv-
Talaei et al., 2015). These particular and complex properties must ity and sometimes also on its aromatic profile. However, little and
be credited to the uncommon metabolic pool composed of crocetin fragmentary information is available on the effects of the previous
esters and crocetin, which has been ascertained to be responsi- crop on saffron yield. Saffron is usually grown as semi-perennial
ble for the dark red colour, picrocrocin responsible for the bitter crop, with well-known problems, which are related to the reduc-
tion of soil fertility (mainly caused by weeds, biotic pathologies and
micronutrients scarcity) that in the long term determine a dramatic
yield reduction and overexploitation of the soil. In this view, crop
∗ Corresponding author. rotations are considered the traditional antidote to the soil sickness.
E-mail address: fgresta@unirc.it (F. Gresta).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.007
0304-4238/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39 35

To overcome this problem, saffron in Abruzzo (central Italy) – one


of the areas in which the highest world productions are recorded
(Tammaro, 1999) – is not grown in the same site continuously, but
annual crop cycle is adopted, with a six-or-more-year rotation with
other crops (Tammaro, 1999). The only information in the literature
on this topic is reported by the same author (Tammaro, 1999), who
observed a decrease in stigma production and an increase in weed
number when saffron was cultivated or the second year on the same
soil.
Improved knowledge on how saffron can be introduced into tra-
ditional crop rotations and with which effects, could contribute to
the diffusion of the crop, even as a profitable break crop in mono-
culture systems.
With this in mind, the aim of the present research was to evalu-
ate the effects of three different previous crops (faba bean, saffron
and fallow) and two sowing densities (30 and 45 corms m−2 ) on
flower yield, flower calendar and corm production.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental site and plan

Researches were conducted for two years (2005 and 2006) in an


experimental field located in Enna, Sicily, Southern Italy (37◦ 37 N
and 14◦ 14 E, 510 m a.s.l.) to evaluate the residual effects of two
crops, saffron (S) and faba bean (Fb), together with a fallow period
(F) on the flower yield and corm production of the succeeding
saffron crop. In both years two wide corm arrangements (D1 = 30
corms m−2 and D2 = 45 corms m−2 ) to better analyse the previous
crop effect were also studied. The six treatments (3 previous crops
x 2 sowing densities) replicated three times for two years were laid Fig. 1. Number of flowers in relation to previous crop and sowing density in 2005
out in a randomized block design. and 2006.

2.2. Field experiment and data collection sidered as random effect. Comparisons of treatment means were
made applying the Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD)
Saffron corms, coming from Sardinia, were planted in plots of post hoc test. Since no significative interaction emerged, in the text
15 m2 (3.0 m × 5.0 m) consisting of three beds of 0.60 m each sepa- we discussed the main factors.
rated by footpaths of 0.4 m, in which 3 rows of corms were planted
20 cm far at 10 cm depth. An intra-row distance of 10 cm for D1 3. Results and discussion
and 6.6 cm for D2 was adopted. Sowing was done on August 5th for
2005 and on August 25th for 2006. 3.1. Flower and stigmas yield
Since corm weight and horizontal diameter is strictly correlated
with the number of flowers per corm and thus with the quantity of The residual contribution of the previous crops had significant
spice (Gresta et al., 2008b; Renau-Morata et al., 2012), corms of a effect (P ≤ 0.01) on the flower production (Fig. 1). In both years, the
diameter of 3.5 cm (±0.2 cm) and average unitary weight of 21.5 g results clearly revealed that the highest flower yield was obtained
were selected for sowing in both years. when saffron followed faba bean (Fb). In these plots, during the
Manual hoe weeding was done to keep the experimental plots 2005 experimental trial, we counted 235 flowers per m−2 vs an
weed free. No fertilization was adopted on saffron to avoid any average of 203 flowers per m−2 where saffron followed itself (S)
interference with preceding crop effect. No irrigation was applied. and fallow (F), with an increase of 16%. A much higher difference
Flowers were gathered and counted daily in the first hours after (+83%) was recorded in the second year of experiment where the
sunrise: stigmas were separated soon after, dried at 35 ◦ C in an plots with faba bean as previous crop Exhibit 399 flowers per m−2
air-forced dryer, and weighted. vs an average of 217 flowers per m−2 of S and F plots.
On 10 flowers for each replication randomly sampled during As a consequence, a higher dried stigma yield (1.6 and 2.0 g m−2 ,
peak flowering periods, the stigma length was calculated by mea- in 2005 and 2006, respectively) was obtained in Fb plots compared
suring the distance between the point in which the stigma changes to the other treatments (Fig. 2). Even though the effect during the
colour (from yellow to red) and the distal extremity with a 1 mm first year is not statistically significant, the data supports the trend
scale graph paper. observed in the following year that Fb plots enhanced yield com-
At the end of the crop cycle of 2006, after leaves withering, corms pared to the S and F ones. For this reason this enhancement of yield
were counted and weighed; a batch of 60 randomly selected corms in terms of both flower and stigma production, could be mainly
from each plot were sampled to determine the treatment effects attributed to the nitrogen fixed into the soil by faba through sym-
on replacement corm size (longitudinal and transversal section). biotic nitrogen fixation. It is generally accepted that an appropriate
Temperatures and rainfall were recorded daily by means of a crop rotation improves soil structure increasing organic matter
data logger placed in the experimental field. resulting in higher yields of the following crop (Smith et al., 2008;
The data collected were subjected to analysis of variance Rao et al., 1995; Saxena et al., 1997). Crop rotation with legumes as
(ANOVA) to estimate the significance of treatments. Year was con- previous crop, furtherly increase crop performance since legumes
36 F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39

Fig. 3. Stigma length in relation to previous crop and sowing density in 2005 and
2006.

even though with smaller corms dimension. Mollafilabi et al. (2013)


obtained the highest yield 0.74 g m−2 with a density of 150 corms
Fig. 2. Stigma yield in relation to previous crop and sowing density in 2005 and m−2 sowing corms, with corms just heavier than 10 g. In a corm
2006. density study (Temperini et al., 2009) the highest stigmas yield was
reached with a corm density included between 111 and 119 corms
m−2 . Anyway, de Juan et al. (2009), comparing two sowing den-
make substantial net N contributions to soil fertility (Fan et al.,
sity of 69 corms m−2 and 51 corms m−2 , found the highest stigmas
2006), increasing yields in succeeding crops (Wright, 1990; Graham
production per unit of surface at the high density, while highest
and Vance, 2003). Wright (1990) comparing the crop sequences
stigmas production per number of corms in the lowest density,
faba bean-barley-wheat and barley-barley-wheat, assessed that
indicating that a competition between corms already started over
faba as previous crop was able to increasing subsequent cereal
51 corms m−2 . Dhar (1992), comparing 10 planting densities from
yield, on average, by 2l% in the first and 12% in the second year.
49 to 256 corms m−2 , found that the arrangement of 49 corm m−2
The nitrogen fertilizer equivalence value of faba bean was esti-
(14 × 14 cm) recorded the highest flower yield in Kashmir, India.
mated to 120 kg N ha−1 . In this view, Behzad et al. (1992) found that
For this reason, in our trial, we destined a wide sowing density to
annual distribution of 50 kg/ha of nitrogen increased saffron yields,
avoid competition that could interfere with previous crop effect.
and that phosphorus and potassium seems unnecessary, as well as
The stigmas length (Fig. 3) did not differ statistically among
Sadeghi (1980) reported nitrogen as the most essential element
studied treatments (previous crop and density) and year of cul-
needed for plant growth and development in saffron.
tivation. The average stigma length was 29.5 mm and 29.9 mm for
The productive performance of saffron in the plots succeeding
2005 and 2006, respectively. These findings are in agreement with
faba bean are fully comparable with the results obtained using
Mitsopoulou and Tsimidou (2004), who report average values of
the typically applied crop techniques. Tammaro (1999), in fact,
stigma length below 30 mm. In a study on Kashmir saffron, Nehvi
reported for saffron field in Navelli (Italy), where the saffron crop
et al. (2007), reported stigma lengths ranging from 24.1 to 38.7 mm,
rotation is traditionally applied, an average yield of the dry stig-
while Mir et al. (2012) on 31 selections of saffron found values
mas per hectare of 10–16 kg, corresponding to 1.0–1.6 g m−2 . Gresta
ranging from 28.6 to 48.4 mm.
et al. (2008a,b) in a trial carried out in 2004 in Sicily, reported peak
values of 1.24 g m−2 for the stigmas and 3.2 kg m−2 of total weight
of replacement corms, that are values lower than those obtained in 3.2. Flowering calendar
this trial with the faba bean as previous crop.
The sowing rate also showed significant effects (P ≤ 0.01) on The flowering calendars (Figs. 4 and 5) in the two years of
flower production and stigma yield. In both years, the higher sow- experiment, showed a similar pattern in relation to the studied
ing rate caused an increment of approximately 50% on flower factors (previous crop and density), although some differences can
production and stigma yield. Sowing density in saffron is extremely be observed. Flowering lasted 27 days in both years, but it started
variable. Kumar et al. (2009) in a review on agronomic aspects of 17 days later in 2006 (10th November in 2006 and 24th October in
saffron, reports as best corm density spacing from less than 50 2005). In both years, five main production peaks can be detected
corms m−2 up to 300 corms m−2 . Anyway, generally the highest with the highest daily flower production in the plots succeeding
stigmas yield are reported in literature with highest corm densities, faba bean that reached values of 58 and 70 flowers m−2 , respec-
F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39 37

20 40

rainfall (mm)
rainfall

T min (°C)
15 30
T Min
10 20

5 10

0 0
80

n. flower day-1 m-2


80 Faba bean SD1
SD2
Saffron 60

Fallow
-2

40
n. flowers day m

60 20
-1

0
23/10 28/10 02/11 07/11 12/11 17/11 22/11

40

20

2005
0
23/10 27/10 31/10 04/11 08/11 12/11 16/11 20/11

Fig. 4. Flower calendar in relation to previous crop (main graph) and sowing density (small graph) in 2005.

20 40

rainfall (mm)
T min (°C)

15 30

10 20

5 10

0 0
80 SD1
80 Faba bean SD2
n. flower day-1 m-2

Saffron 60

Fallow
-2

40
n. flowers day m

60 20
-1

0
09/11 14/11 19/11 24/11 29/11 04/12 09/12

40

20

2006
0
09/11 13/11 17/11 21/11 25/11 29/11 03/12 07/12 11/12

Fig. 5. Flower calendar in relation to previous crop (main graph) and sowing density (small graph) in 2006.

tively. This shift could be related to the later sowing date of the Table 1
Climatic data from sowing to flowering in the two years of the experiment.
2006 compared to those of the 2005 (25 August vs 5 August).
As a whole, saffron flower length seems to be not affected by Experimental Year Temperature (◦ C) Rainy days Rainfall
previous crop and seems to be a quite stable variable. In previous
Average Max Min n mm
experiment on saffron, Gresta et al. (2009) found the same flower
2005 August 26.0 32.0 20.7 1 0.2
duration in saffron cultivation in two different environments. This
September 20.2 25.8 16.5 8 27.0
data are also in agreement with McGimpsey et al. (1997) whom, October 16.6 20.9 13.8 20 73.2
in the first year of a multi-year experiment, obtained a flowering November 13.4 17.8 9.4 8 27.4
period of about 30 days. It should be noted, however, that weather
2006 August 24.4 30.5 19.1 – –
conditions (temperature and rainfall) have very great effects on September 20.2 25.4 16.8 8 20.2
flowering induction and flower appearance in saffron (Molina et al., October 18.3 22.9 15.0 5 20.4
2004, 2005; Gresta et al., 2009). Although, the climatic data did not November 12.6 17.2 9.4 15 107.6
December 11.3 14.5 9.1 4 1.2
show marked differences from one year to the next (Table 1), the
second year of the experiment was characterized by a daily tem- 2005: from August 5th to November 20th.
perature 2–3 ◦ C lower compared to the first year and by a more 2006: from August 25th to December 7th.

uniform and effective distribution of rainfall just before and during


the flowering period. Molina et al. (2005) reported that the optimal
38 F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39

Fig. 6. Weight and number of corms produced in relation to previous crop and
sowing density in 2006.

temperature for flower emergence is around 15–17 ◦ C. On the same


topic, Gresta et al. (2009) concluded that to trigger saffron flower-
ing, it is necessary that a not yet fully understood combination of
temperature and soil water content occurs. In our trial, the greater
flower production occurred in 2006 could be related to the com-
bination of air temperature of around 10 ◦ C and rainfall of at least
20 mm.

3.3. Replacement corms


Fig. 7. Box plot of the corm weight, longitudinal and transversal section. Box plots
show median values (the black line in the box structures), mean (the dash line in
The replacement corms were harvested after leaf withering in
the box structures), 50th percentile values (box outlines), 90th percentile values
July 2006 to determine their dimensions. The positive effect of the (whiskers) and 95th percentile values (dots).
residual contribution of the faba bean as previous crop was con-
firmed by the three-fold corm yield and the almost two-fold corm
number obtained in Fb plots (Fig. 6) when compared to the other 4. Conclusions
previous crops, which showed no difference between them (4.7 vs
1.6 kg m−2 and 364 vs 198 corms m−2 , respectively). The results reported here from a two-year experiment clearly
As seen in Fig. 7, the corm dimensions of the replacement corms demonstrated how saffron was able to exploit the residual contri-
was greatly affected by the residual effect of the previous crop. The bution of the faba bean as previous crop, and that it is possible to
highest median values in terms of corm weight and dimensions grow saffron with good yields following a break crop. In fact, faba
were recorded when faba bean was previous crop, whereas previ- bean as previous crop greatly promotes stigmas and replacement
ous saffron and fallow plots which exhibited the same value. Fig. 6 corm yield of saffron. Also the highest corm density of 45 corms
also shows the distribution of the aforesaid data for each previous m−2 increased stigmas and corm production compared to the low-
crop; although faba plots revealed a marked skew in the data, 50% est corm density. Flower calendar was not affected by previous crop
of measurements of corm weight and longitudinal section have val- and corm density. In other words, soil fertility and crop manage-
ues higher than the 75th percentile of all the other previous plots, ment for saffron can be mainly based on a simply crop rotation with
except the saffron plots at the highest density. legumes. Saffron represents an alternative viable crop for sustain-
F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39 39

able agriculture, confirming its ability to exploit marginal land and McGimpsey, J.A., Douglas, M.H., Wallace, A.R., 1997. Evaluation of saffron (Crocus
previous crop benefits. sativus L.) production in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 25, 159–168.
Mir, J.I., Ahmed, N., Wafai, A.H., Qadri, R.A., 2012. Variability in stigma length and
apocarotenoid content in Crocus sativus L. selections of Kashmir. J. Spices
References Aromat. Crops 21, 169–173.
Mitsopoulou, T., Tsimidou, M.Z., 2004. Morphological characteristics of greek
Abdullaev, F.I., Espinosa-Aguirre, J.J., 2004. Biomedical properties of saffron and its saffron stigmas from Kozani region. Acta Hortic. 650, 189–193.
potential use in cancer therapy and chemoprevention trials. Cancer Detect. Mollafilabi, A., Koocheki, A., Moeinerad, H., Kooshki, L., 2013. Effect of plant density
Prev. 28, 426–432. and weight of corm on yield and yield components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.)
Basker, D., Negbi, M., 1983. Use of saffron. Econ. Bot. 37, 228–236. under soil, hydroponic and plastic tunnel cultivation. Acta Hortic. 997, 51–58.
Behnia, M.R., Estilai, A., Ehdaie, B., 1999. Application of fertilizers for increased Molina, R.V., Garcìa-Luis, A., Coll, V., Ferrer, C., Valero, M., 2004. Flower formation
saffron yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 182, 9–15. in the saffron Crocus (Crocus sativus L.). The role of temperature. Proceedings of
Behzad, S., Razavi, M., Mahajeri, M., 1992. The effect of various amount of the First International Symposium on Saffron Biology and Biotechnology, Acta
ammonium phosphate and urea on saffron production. Acta Hortic. 306, Hortic. 650, 39–47.
337–339. Molina, R.V., Valero, M., Navarro, Y., Guardiola, J.L., Garcia-Luis, A., 2005.
Carmona, M., Zalacain, A., Sanchez, A.M., Novella, J.L., Alonso, G.L., 2006. Crocetin Temperature effects on flower formation in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Sci.
esters, picrocrocin and its related compounds present in Crocus sativus stigmas Hortic. 103, 361–379.
and Gardenia jasminoides fruits tentative identification of seven new Negbi, M., 1999. Saffron cultivation: past, present and future prospects. In: Negbi,
compounds by LC–ESI–MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 973–979. M. (Ed.), Saffron: Crocus sativus L. Harwood Academic Publishers, Australia, pp.
de Juan, J.-A., López Córcoles, H., Muňoz, R.M., Picornell, M.R., 2009. Yield and yield 1–18.
components of saffron under different cropping systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 30, Nehvi, F.A., Wani, S.A., Dar, S.A., Makhdoomi, M.I., Allie, B.A., Mir, Z.A., 2007. New
212–219. emerging trends on production technology of saffron. Acta Hortic. 739, 36–37.
Dhar, A.K., 1992. Studies on saffron in Kashmir – V: variation in planting density in Pitsikas, N., Zisopoulou, S., Tarantilis, P.A., Kanakis, C.D., Polissiou, M.G., Sakellaridis,
relation to flower yield and corm production. Indian Perfum. 36, 192–195. N., 2007. Effects of the active constituents of Crocus sativus L., crocins on
Douglas, M.H., Smallfield, B.M., Wallace, A.R., McGimpsey, J.A., 2014. Saffron recognition and spatial rats’ memory. Behav. Brain Res. 183, 141–146.
(Crocus sativus L.) The effect of mother corm size on progeny multiplication, Rao, A.V., Tarafdar, J.C., Sharma, S.K., Kumar, P., Aggarwal, R.K., 1995. Influence of
flower and stigma production. Sci. Hortic. 166, 50–58. cropping systems on soil biochemical properties in an arid rain-fed
Fan, F.L., Zhang, F., Song, Y., Sun, J., Bao, X., Guo, T., Li, L., 2006. Nitrogen fixation of environment. J. Arid Environ. 31, 237–244.
faba bean (Vicia faba L.) interacting with a non-legume in two contrasting Renau-Morata, B., Nebauer, S.G., Sánchez, M., Molina, R.V., 2012. Effect of corm
intercropping systems. Plant Soil 283, 275–286. size, water stress and cultivation conditions on photosynthesis and biomass
Fernández, J.A., 2004. Biology, biotechnology and biomedicine of saffron. Recent partitioning during the vegetative growth of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ind.
Res. Dev. Plant Sci. 2, 127–159. Crops Prod. 30, 212–219.
Ghadrdoost, B., Vafaei, A.A., Rashidy-Pour, A., Hajisoltani, R., Bandegi, A.R., Rios, J.L., Recio, M.C., Giner, R.M., Manez, S., 1996. An update review of saffron and
Motamedi, F., 2011. Protective effects of saffron extract and its active its active constituents. Phytother. Res. 10, 189–193.
constituent crocin against oxidative stress and spatial learning and memory Sadeghi, B., 1980. Effect of chemical fertilizer on saffron production. In: Annual
deficits induced by chronic stress in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 667, 222–229. Report. Korasan Agriculture Research Centre.
Graham, P.H., Vance, C.P., 2003. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater Saxena, A., Singh, D.V., Joshi, N.L., 1997. Effects of tillage and cropping systems on
use. Plant Physiol. 131, 872–877. soil moisture balance and pearl millet yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 178, 251–257.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L., Ruberto, G., 2008a. Saffron, an alternative Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2010a. Influence of
crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, corms provenience and environmental conditions on yield and apocarotenoid
95–112. profiles in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 23, 394–400.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L., Ruberto, G., 2008b. Effect of mother corm Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Napoli, E.M., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2010b. Effect of
dimension and sowing time on stigmas yield: daughter corms and qualitative corms storage conditions on quantitative and qualitative traits of saffron: an
aspects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in a Mediterranean environment. J. Sci. agro-chemical study. Acta Hortic. 850, 185–189.
Food Agric. 88, 1144–1150. Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Ruberto, G., 2011. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) apocarotenoids:
Gresta, F., Siracusa, L., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2009. Analysis of a review of their biomolecular features and biological activity perspectives. In:
flowering: stigmas yield and qualitative traits of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as Yamagughi, M. (Ed.), Carotenoids: Properties, Effects and Diseases. Nova
affected by environmental conditions. Sci. Hortic. 119, 320–324. Science Publ. Inc., NY, USA, pp. 145–178.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G., Avola, G., 2010. Saffron stigma and corm production as Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Albertini, E., Raggi, L., Marconi, G.,
affected by soil texture. Acta Hortic. 850, 153–159. Ruberto, G., 2013. Agronomic, chemical and genetic variability of saffron from
Hosseini, M., Sadeghiand, B., Aghamiri, S.A., 2004. Influence of foliar fertilization on Eurasia and Oceania by LC-UV–vis-DAD and AFLP analyses. Genet. Resour. Crop
yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Acta Hortic. 650, 207–209. Evol. 60 (2), 711–721.
Khorramdel, S., Nasrabadi, S.E., Mahmoodi, G., 2015. Evaluation of mother corm Smith, R., Gross, K., Robertson, G., 2008. Effects of crop diversity on agroecosystem
weights and foliar fertilizer levels on saffron (Crocus sativus L.) growth and function: crop yield response. Ecosystem 11, 355–366.
yield components. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2, 9–14. Talaei, A., Moghadam, M.H., Tabassi, S.A.S., Mohajeri, S.A., 2015. Crocin, the main
Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S.M., 2015. Relationship between nitrogen and phosphorus active saffron constituent, as an adjunctive treatment in major depressive
use efficiency in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as affected by mother corm size and disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial. J.
fertilization. Ind. Crops Prod. 71, 128–137. Affect. Disord. 174, 51–56.
Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S.M., Eyni, M.J., 2014. Irrigation levels and dense planting Tammaro, F., 1999. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in Italy. In: Negbi, M. (Ed.), Saffron:
affect flower yield and phosphorus concentration of saffron corms under Crocus sativus L. Harwood Academic Publishers, Australia, pp. 53–62.
semi-arid region of Mashhad, Northeast Iran. Sci. Hortic. 180, 147–155. Temperini, O., Rea, R., Temperini, A., Colla, G., Rouphel, Y., 2009. Evaluation of
Kumar, R., Singh, V., Devi Ki Sharma, M., Singh, M.K., Ahuja, P.S., 2009. State of art saffron (Crocus sativus L.) production in Italy: effects of the age of saffron fields
of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) agronomy a comprehensive review. Food Rev. Int. and plant density. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 19–23.
25, 44–85. Wright, A.T., 1990. Yield effect of pulses on subsequent cereal crops in the
Lozano, P., Castellar, M.R., Simancas, M.J., Iborra, J.L., 1999. Quantitative high Northern Prairies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 7, 1023–1032.
performance liquid chromatographic method to analyse commercial saffron Yarami, N., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2015. Saffron response to irrigation water salinity, cow
(Crocus sativus L.) products. J. Chromatogr. A 830, 477–483. manure and planting method. Agric. Water Manag. 150, 57–66.
Magesh, V., Singh, J.P.V., Selvendiran, K., Ekambaram, G., Sakthisekaran, D., 2006.
Antitumour activity of crocetin in accordance to tumor incidence, antioxidant
status, drug metabolizing enzymes and histopathological studies. Mol. Cell.
Biochem. 287, 127–135.

View publication stats

You might also like