Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/306421444
CITATIONS READS
10 609
3 authors:
Giovanni Avola
Italian National Research Council
55 PUBLICATIONS 660 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
SENTI - Sensori Elettronici, Nano Tecnologie, Informatica per l'agricoltura di precisione View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Fabio Gresta on 04 December 2017.
Scientia Horticulturae
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Saffron is an annual plant usually grown as a perennial crop, with well-known problems, which are
Received 21 April 2016 related to the reduction of soil fertility (mainly caused by weeds, biotic pathologies and micronutrients
Received in revised form 7 August 2016 scarcity) that in the long run determine a dramatic yield reduction and overexploitation of the soil. In this
Accepted 10 August 2016
view, crop rotations are considered the traditional antidote to the soil sickness. However, the evidence
of the effects of previous crop on saffron stigma yield and corm production is slender and fragmentary. A
Keywords:
two-year study was carried out to evaluate the effect of three different previous crops (faba bean, saffron
Saffron
and fallow) on saffron stigmas yield and replacement corms production. Two different corm densities (30
Previous crop
Sowing density
and 45 corms m−2 ) were also studied. Faba bean as previous crop determined the highest performance
Crop rotation in terms of flower number (up to 400 flowers m−2 ), stigma yield (up to 2 g m−2 ) and replacement corms
Stigma yield (up to 4.7 kg m−2 ). This paper, to our knowledge, is the first experimental based research on the effects
Corm production of previous crop on stigma and corm yield of saffron.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction taste and safranal responsible for the aroma (Lozano et al., 1999;
Carmona et al., 2006; Siracusa et al., 2011). These peculiar char-
Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is an autumn flowering geophyte acteristics of saffron make it one of the most appreciated spices
belonging to the Iridaceae family that has been cultivated in the available on the market.
Mediterranean Basin since the Late Bronze Age (Negbi, 1999; Gresta From an agronomic point of view, although saffron propagates
et al., 2008a). It is very famous for its very expensive dried dark-red vegetatively by means of corms, a some variability has been found
stigmas used as spice and condiment for food, as a dye for tex- among different geographical origins (Siracusa et al., 2013). Being
tiles and in traditional medicine from ancient times (Rios et al., well adapted to the Mediterranean area, saffron may represent
1996; Basker and Negbi, 1983; Negbi, 1999; Gresta et al., 2008a; an alternative profitable crop for this environment (Gresta et al.,
Fernández, 2004). Nowadays, it has a niche market and it is used 2008a). The scientific community has explored the effect of mother
almost exclusively to give colour, flavour and aroma to food and for corm dimensions (Gresta et al., 2008b; Koocheki and Seyyedi, 2015;
alcoholic beverages. Douglas et al., 2014), sowing time (Gresta et al., 2008b), environ-
In recent times, there has been a renewed interest in saffron mental conditions (Gresta et al., 2009; Siracusa et al., 2010a,b),
from both stakeholders and the scientific community focusing on soil texture (Gresta et al., 2010), organic and chemical fertilization
its biological properties such as anti-cancer, antioxidant and mem- (Khorramdel et al., 2015; Hosseini et al., 2004; Behnia et al., 1999;
ory enhancing activities (Abdullaev and Espinosa-Aguirre, 2004; Behzad et al., 1992) and irrigation (Yarami and Sepaskhah, 2015;
Magesh et al., 2006; Pitsikas et al., 2007; Ghadrdoost et al., 2011; Koocheki et al., 2014; de Juan et al., 2009) on saffron productiv-
Talaei et al., 2015). These particular and complex properties must ity and sometimes also on its aromatic profile. However, little and
be credited to the uncommon metabolic pool composed of crocetin fragmentary information is available on the effects of the previous
esters and crocetin, which has been ascertained to be responsi- crop on saffron yield. Saffron is usually grown as semi-perennial
ble for the dark red colour, picrocrocin responsible for the bitter crop, with well-known problems, which are related to the reduc-
tion of soil fertility (mainly caused by weeds, biotic pathologies and
micronutrients scarcity) that in the long term determine a dramatic
yield reduction and overexploitation of the soil. In this view, crop
∗ Corresponding author. rotations are considered the traditional antidote to the soil sickness.
E-mail address: fgresta@unirc.it (F. Gresta).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.007
0304-4238/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39 35
2.2. Field experiment and data collection sidered as random effect. Comparisons of treatment means were
made applying the Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD)
Saffron corms, coming from Sardinia, were planted in plots of post hoc test. Since no significative interaction emerged, in the text
15 m2 (3.0 m × 5.0 m) consisting of three beds of 0.60 m each sepa- we discussed the main factors.
rated by footpaths of 0.4 m, in which 3 rows of corms were planted
20 cm far at 10 cm depth. An intra-row distance of 10 cm for D1 3. Results and discussion
and 6.6 cm for D2 was adopted. Sowing was done on August 5th for
2005 and on August 25th for 2006. 3.1. Flower and stigmas yield
Since corm weight and horizontal diameter is strictly correlated
with the number of flowers per corm and thus with the quantity of The residual contribution of the previous crops had significant
spice (Gresta et al., 2008b; Renau-Morata et al., 2012), corms of a effect (P ≤ 0.01) on the flower production (Fig. 1). In both years, the
diameter of 3.5 cm (±0.2 cm) and average unitary weight of 21.5 g results clearly revealed that the highest flower yield was obtained
were selected for sowing in both years. when saffron followed faba bean (Fb). In these plots, during the
Manual hoe weeding was done to keep the experimental plots 2005 experimental trial, we counted 235 flowers per m−2 vs an
weed free. No fertilization was adopted on saffron to avoid any average of 203 flowers per m−2 where saffron followed itself (S)
interference with preceding crop effect. No irrigation was applied. and fallow (F), with an increase of 16%. A much higher difference
Flowers were gathered and counted daily in the first hours after (+83%) was recorded in the second year of experiment where the
sunrise: stigmas were separated soon after, dried at 35 ◦ C in an plots with faba bean as previous crop Exhibit 399 flowers per m−2
air-forced dryer, and weighted. vs an average of 217 flowers per m−2 of S and F plots.
On 10 flowers for each replication randomly sampled during As a consequence, a higher dried stigma yield (1.6 and 2.0 g m−2 ,
peak flowering periods, the stigma length was calculated by mea- in 2005 and 2006, respectively) was obtained in Fb plots compared
suring the distance between the point in which the stigma changes to the other treatments (Fig. 2). Even though the effect during the
colour (from yellow to red) and the distal extremity with a 1 mm first year is not statistically significant, the data supports the trend
scale graph paper. observed in the following year that Fb plots enhanced yield com-
At the end of the crop cycle of 2006, after leaves withering, corms pared to the S and F ones. For this reason this enhancement of yield
were counted and weighed; a batch of 60 randomly selected corms in terms of both flower and stigma production, could be mainly
from each plot were sampled to determine the treatment effects attributed to the nitrogen fixed into the soil by faba through sym-
on replacement corm size (longitudinal and transversal section). biotic nitrogen fixation. It is generally accepted that an appropriate
Temperatures and rainfall were recorded daily by means of a crop rotation improves soil structure increasing organic matter
data logger placed in the experimental field. resulting in higher yields of the following crop (Smith et al., 2008;
The data collected were subjected to analysis of variance Rao et al., 1995; Saxena et al., 1997). Crop rotation with legumes as
(ANOVA) to estimate the significance of treatments. Year was con- previous crop, furtherly increase crop performance since legumes
36 F. Gresta et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 211 (2016) 34–39
Fig. 3. Stigma length in relation to previous crop and sowing density in 2005 and
2006.
20 40
rainfall (mm)
rainfall
T min (°C)
15 30
T Min
10 20
5 10
0 0
80
Fallow
-2
40
n. flowers day m
60 20
-1
0
23/10 28/10 02/11 07/11 12/11 17/11 22/11
40
20
2005
0
23/10 27/10 31/10 04/11 08/11 12/11 16/11 20/11
Fig. 4. Flower calendar in relation to previous crop (main graph) and sowing density (small graph) in 2005.
20 40
rainfall (mm)
T min (°C)
15 30
10 20
5 10
0 0
80 SD1
80 Faba bean SD2
n. flower day-1 m-2
Saffron 60
Fallow
-2
40
n. flowers day m
60 20
-1
0
09/11 14/11 19/11 24/11 29/11 04/12 09/12
40
20
2006
0
09/11 13/11 17/11 21/11 25/11 29/11 03/12 07/12 11/12
Fig. 5. Flower calendar in relation to previous crop (main graph) and sowing density (small graph) in 2006.
tively. This shift could be related to the later sowing date of the Table 1
Climatic data from sowing to flowering in the two years of the experiment.
2006 compared to those of the 2005 (25 August vs 5 August).
As a whole, saffron flower length seems to be not affected by Experimental Year Temperature (◦ C) Rainy days Rainfall
previous crop and seems to be a quite stable variable. In previous
Average Max Min n mm
experiment on saffron, Gresta et al. (2009) found the same flower
2005 August 26.0 32.0 20.7 1 0.2
duration in saffron cultivation in two different environments. This
September 20.2 25.8 16.5 8 27.0
data are also in agreement with McGimpsey et al. (1997) whom, October 16.6 20.9 13.8 20 73.2
in the first year of a multi-year experiment, obtained a flowering November 13.4 17.8 9.4 8 27.4
period of about 30 days. It should be noted, however, that weather
2006 August 24.4 30.5 19.1 – –
conditions (temperature and rainfall) have very great effects on September 20.2 25.4 16.8 8 20.2
flowering induction and flower appearance in saffron (Molina et al., October 18.3 22.9 15.0 5 20.4
2004, 2005; Gresta et al., 2009). Although, the climatic data did not November 12.6 17.2 9.4 15 107.6
December 11.3 14.5 9.1 4 1.2
show marked differences from one year to the next (Table 1), the
second year of the experiment was characterized by a daily tem- 2005: from August 5th to November 20th.
perature 2–3 ◦ C lower compared to the first year and by a more 2006: from August 25th to December 7th.
Fig. 6. Weight and number of corms produced in relation to previous crop and
sowing density in 2006.
able agriculture, confirming its ability to exploit marginal land and McGimpsey, J.A., Douglas, M.H., Wallace, A.R., 1997. Evaluation of saffron (Crocus
previous crop benefits. sativus L.) production in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 25, 159–168.
Mir, J.I., Ahmed, N., Wafai, A.H., Qadri, R.A., 2012. Variability in stigma length and
apocarotenoid content in Crocus sativus L. selections of Kashmir. J. Spices
References Aromat. Crops 21, 169–173.
Mitsopoulou, T., Tsimidou, M.Z., 2004. Morphological characteristics of greek
Abdullaev, F.I., Espinosa-Aguirre, J.J., 2004. Biomedical properties of saffron and its saffron stigmas from Kozani region. Acta Hortic. 650, 189–193.
potential use in cancer therapy and chemoprevention trials. Cancer Detect. Mollafilabi, A., Koocheki, A., Moeinerad, H., Kooshki, L., 2013. Effect of plant density
Prev. 28, 426–432. and weight of corm on yield and yield components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.)
Basker, D., Negbi, M., 1983. Use of saffron. Econ. Bot. 37, 228–236. under soil, hydroponic and plastic tunnel cultivation. Acta Hortic. 997, 51–58.
Behnia, M.R., Estilai, A., Ehdaie, B., 1999. Application of fertilizers for increased Molina, R.V., Garcìa-Luis, A., Coll, V., Ferrer, C., Valero, M., 2004. Flower formation
saffron yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 182, 9–15. in the saffron Crocus (Crocus sativus L.). The role of temperature. Proceedings of
Behzad, S., Razavi, M., Mahajeri, M., 1992. The effect of various amount of the First International Symposium on Saffron Biology and Biotechnology, Acta
ammonium phosphate and urea on saffron production. Acta Hortic. 306, Hortic. 650, 39–47.
337–339. Molina, R.V., Valero, M., Navarro, Y., Guardiola, J.L., Garcia-Luis, A., 2005.
Carmona, M., Zalacain, A., Sanchez, A.M., Novella, J.L., Alonso, G.L., 2006. Crocetin Temperature effects on flower formation in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Sci.
esters, picrocrocin and its related compounds present in Crocus sativus stigmas Hortic. 103, 361–379.
and Gardenia jasminoides fruits tentative identification of seven new Negbi, M., 1999. Saffron cultivation: past, present and future prospects. In: Negbi,
compounds by LC–ESI–MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 973–979. M. (Ed.), Saffron: Crocus sativus L. Harwood Academic Publishers, Australia, pp.
de Juan, J.-A., López Córcoles, H., Muňoz, R.M., Picornell, M.R., 2009. Yield and yield 1–18.
components of saffron under different cropping systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 30, Nehvi, F.A., Wani, S.A., Dar, S.A., Makhdoomi, M.I., Allie, B.A., Mir, Z.A., 2007. New
212–219. emerging trends on production technology of saffron. Acta Hortic. 739, 36–37.
Dhar, A.K., 1992. Studies on saffron in Kashmir – V: variation in planting density in Pitsikas, N., Zisopoulou, S., Tarantilis, P.A., Kanakis, C.D., Polissiou, M.G., Sakellaridis,
relation to flower yield and corm production. Indian Perfum. 36, 192–195. N., 2007. Effects of the active constituents of Crocus sativus L., crocins on
Douglas, M.H., Smallfield, B.M., Wallace, A.R., McGimpsey, J.A., 2014. Saffron recognition and spatial rats’ memory. Behav. Brain Res. 183, 141–146.
(Crocus sativus L.) The effect of mother corm size on progeny multiplication, Rao, A.V., Tarafdar, J.C., Sharma, S.K., Kumar, P., Aggarwal, R.K., 1995. Influence of
flower and stigma production. Sci. Hortic. 166, 50–58. cropping systems on soil biochemical properties in an arid rain-fed
Fan, F.L., Zhang, F., Song, Y., Sun, J., Bao, X., Guo, T., Li, L., 2006. Nitrogen fixation of environment. J. Arid Environ. 31, 237–244.
faba bean (Vicia faba L.) interacting with a non-legume in two contrasting Renau-Morata, B., Nebauer, S.G., Sánchez, M., Molina, R.V., 2012. Effect of corm
intercropping systems. Plant Soil 283, 275–286. size, water stress and cultivation conditions on photosynthesis and biomass
Fernández, J.A., 2004. Biology, biotechnology and biomedicine of saffron. Recent partitioning during the vegetative growth of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ind.
Res. Dev. Plant Sci. 2, 127–159. Crops Prod. 30, 212–219.
Ghadrdoost, B., Vafaei, A.A., Rashidy-Pour, A., Hajisoltani, R., Bandegi, A.R., Rios, J.L., Recio, M.C., Giner, R.M., Manez, S., 1996. An update review of saffron and
Motamedi, F., 2011. Protective effects of saffron extract and its active its active constituents. Phytother. Res. 10, 189–193.
constituent crocin against oxidative stress and spatial learning and memory Sadeghi, B., 1980. Effect of chemical fertilizer on saffron production. In: Annual
deficits induced by chronic stress in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 667, 222–229. Report. Korasan Agriculture Research Centre.
Graham, P.H., Vance, C.P., 2003. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater Saxena, A., Singh, D.V., Joshi, N.L., 1997. Effects of tillage and cropping systems on
use. Plant Physiol. 131, 872–877. soil moisture balance and pearl millet yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 178, 251–257.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L., Ruberto, G., 2008a. Saffron, an alternative Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2010a. Influence of
crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, corms provenience and environmental conditions on yield and apocarotenoid
95–112. profiles in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 23, 394–400.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G.M., Siracusa, L., Ruberto, G., 2008b. Effect of mother corm Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Napoli, E.M., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2010b. Effect of
dimension and sowing time on stigmas yield: daughter corms and qualitative corms storage conditions on quantitative and qualitative traits of saffron: an
aspects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in a Mediterranean environment. J. Sci. agro-chemical study. Acta Hortic. 850, 185–189.
Food Agric. 88, 1144–1150. Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Ruberto, G., 2011. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) apocarotenoids:
Gresta, F., Siracusa, L., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Ruberto, G., 2009. Analysis of a review of their biomolecular features and biological activity perspectives. In:
flowering: stigmas yield and qualitative traits of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as Yamagughi, M. (Ed.), Carotenoids: Properties, Effects and Diseases. Nova
affected by environmental conditions. Sci. Hortic. 119, 320–324. Science Publ. Inc., NY, USA, pp. 145–178.
Gresta, F., Lombardo, G., Avola, G., 2010. Saffron stigma and corm production as Siracusa, L., Gresta, F., Avola, G., Lombardo, G.M., Albertini, E., Raggi, L., Marconi, G.,
affected by soil texture. Acta Hortic. 850, 153–159. Ruberto, G., 2013. Agronomic, chemical and genetic variability of saffron from
Hosseini, M., Sadeghiand, B., Aghamiri, S.A., 2004. Influence of foliar fertilization on Eurasia and Oceania by LC-UV–vis-DAD and AFLP analyses. Genet. Resour. Crop
yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Acta Hortic. 650, 207–209. Evol. 60 (2), 711–721.
Khorramdel, S., Nasrabadi, S.E., Mahmoodi, G., 2015. Evaluation of mother corm Smith, R., Gross, K., Robertson, G., 2008. Effects of crop diversity on agroecosystem
weights and foliar fertilizer levels on saffron (Crocus sativus L.) growth and function: crop yield response. Ecosystem 11, 355–366.
yield components. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2, 9–14. Talaei, A., Moghadam, M.H., Tabassi, S.A.S., Mohajeri, S.A., 2015. Crocin, the main
Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S.M., 2015. Relationship between nitrogen and phosphorus active saffron constituent, as an adjunctive treatment in major depressive
use efficiency in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as affected by mother corm size and disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial. J.
fertilization. Ind. Crops Prod. 71, 128–137. Affect. Disord. 174, 51–56.
Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S.M., Eyni, M.J., 2014. Irrigation levels and dense planting Tammaro, F., 1999. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in Italy. In: Negbi, M. (Ed.), Saffron:
affect flower yield and phosphorus concentration of saffron corms under Crocus sativus L. Harwood Academic Publishers, Australia, pp. 53–62.
semi-arid region of Mashhad, Northeast Iran. Sci. Hortic. 180, 147–155. Temperini, O., Rea, R., Temperini, A., Colla, G., Rouphel, Y., 2009. Evaluation of
Kumar, R., Singh, V., Devi Ki Sharma, M., Singh, M.K., Ahuja, P.S., 2009. State of art saffron (Crocus sativus L.) production in Italy: effects of the age of saffron fields
of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) agronomy a comprehensive review. Food Rev. Int. and plant density. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 19–23.
25, 44–85. Wright, A.T., 1990. Yield effect of pulses on subsequent cereal crops in the
Lozano, P., Castellar, M.R., Simancas, M.J., Iborra, J.L., 1999. Quantitative high Northern Prairies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 7, 1023–1032.
performance liquid chromatographic method to analyse commercial saffron Yarami, N., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2015. Saffron response to irrigation water salinity, cow
(Crocus sativus L.) products. J. Chromatogr. A 830, 477–483. manure and planting method. Agric. Water Manag. 150, 57–66.
Magesh, V., Singh, J.P.V., Selvendiran, K., Ekambaram, G., Sakthisekaran, D., 2006.
Antitumour activity of crocetin in accordance to tumor incidence, antioxidant
status, drug metabolizing enzymes and histopathological studies. Mol. Cell.
Biochem. 287, 127–135.