Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In a study entitled “Filipino Coaches’ Attitudes Toward Sport Psychology” by Guinto (2016), it
aimed to investigate the coaches’ attitudes toward sport psychology through measures developed and
revised by Zakrajsek and Zizzi (2008) from the original work of Martin, Kellmann, Lavallee, and Page
(2002). The developed Sport Psychology Attitude-Revised Coaches (SPARC-2) has the following
subscales:
(1) “confidence in Sport Psychology Consultation” or the belief that SP consultation and mental training is
beneficial,
(2) “stigma tolerance” or the expected negative consequences of seeking SP consultation,
(3) “personal openness” or the willingness of the respondent to try SP consultation and mental training, and
(4) “cultural preference” or the identification with own nationality, ethnicity, culture, or race.
One-hundred forty-nine Filipino coaches from ten colleges and universities were surveyed on their
attitudes toward sport psychology consultation. The results showed that that there are three primary
dimensions underlying coaches’ attitudes toward sport psychology consultation as measured by the
SPARC-2.Phil: (a) confidence in SP consultation or the belief that SP consultation is useful, (b) stigma
tolerance or the perceived negative consequences of seeing SP consultation and (c) personal similarity
preference or the partiality for a SP consultant perceived to have similarities with the coach and his or her
athletes. The dimension of personal openness was not upheld in the current study among Filipino coaches.
Findings from the current study suggest that personal openness is not as strong of a factor in the
perceptions of Filipino coaches toward SP in relation to the strength of the other factors of confidence in the
SPC, stigma tolerance and personal similarity preference.
The present study further asserts the importance of the SP consultant investing time on building a
relationship of trust with coaches. Given the results that highlight the dimension of perceived similarity
preference as an important factor in the attitudes of Filipino coaches toward SPC, the consultant must
make an effort to understand the coach and his goals for his team, the nature of the sport in which the
consultation is requested, the gender differences intrinsic to the sport, and the values espoused by the
coach for the team. The work of the SP consultant must be perceived as complementary rather than
undermining the role and authority of the coach in relation to his or her athletes.
References:
Guinto M.L. (2016) Filipino Coaches' Attitudes Toward Sport Psychology, 1(1), 30- 38, Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/22886675/Filipino_Coaches_Attitudes_Toward_Sport_Psychology
Casuga S. (2011) The Filipino Athlete’s Experience of the Bahala Na Attitude in International Sporting
Competition, Retrieved from http://rizalls.lib.admu.edu.ph:8080/proquestfil/3516477.pdf
Lopez A. & Santelices O. (2011) Personality characteristics of elite table tennis athletes of the Philippines:
basis for a proposed recruitment program, Retrieved from http://kajiantenismeja.com/wp-
content/uploads/2019/11/Rani-Meika-1702925-4.pdf