Professional Documents
Culture Documents
∂ξ A ∂ξ B
gµν (x) = ηAB . (2)
∂xµ ∂xν
(b) Determine the Minkowski metric ds2 = −dt2 + dx2 in Rindler coordinates
(T, X), t = X sinh T, x = X cosh T .
(c) Show that the inverse metric g µν , i.e. g µν gνλ = δ µλ is given by
∂xµ ∂xν
g µν = η AB (3)
∂ξ A ∂ξ B
d2 xµ ν
µ dx dx
λ
+ Γ νλ =0 (4)
dτ 2 dτ dτ
where
∂xµ ∂ 2 ξ A
Γµνλ = . (5)
∂ξ A ∂xν ∂xλ
Show that this pseudo-force term Γ arising in the xµ coordinate system is related
to the metric gµν (eq. (2)) in these coordinates by
Γµνλ = g µρ Γρνλ
1
Γµνλ = 2 (gµν ,λ +gµλ ,ν −gνλ ,µ ) (6)
where g µν is the inverse metric and gµν ,λ is short-hand for the partial derivative
(∂gµν /∂xλ ).
1
3. Christoffel Symbols and Coordinate Transformations
The Christoffel symbols Γµνλ and Γµνλ associated to a metric gµν are defined as in
Exercise 2, eq. (6) (but now for an arbitrary metric). Manipulating and calculating
these Christoffel symbols is one of the less pleasant tasks in GR - but it has got
to be done. It is also a good warm-up exercise for learning how to manipulate
(correctly!) objects with multiple indices, summations etc.
(a) Use the tensorial behaviour of the metric under a coordinate transformation
0
xµ → y µ (xµ ) to show that the Christoffel symbols transform as
µ0 ∂xν ∂xλ ∂y µ ∂ 2 xµ
0
0 µ ∂y
Γµν 0 λ0 = Γ νλ µ 0 0 + . (7)
∂x ∂y ν ∂y λ ∂xµ ∂y ν 0 ∂y λ0
(b) Show that, as a consequence of (7), ẍµ + Γµνλ ẋν ẋλ transforms as a vector
under coordinate transformations, i.e. that one has
0
µ0 0 0 0 ∂y µ µ
ÿ + Γµν 0 λ0 ẏ ν ẏ λ = ẍ + Γ µ ν λ
νλ ẋ ẋ (8)
∂xµ
Hint: you may have to use an identity which follows from differentiating
0 0
(∂xρ /∂y µ )(∂y µ /∂xλ ) = δ ρλ . (9)
Remark: If you don’t want to do 3a and 3b, then just do 3b, using the
result (7) of 3a. First of all, it is easier (shorter), and secondly it is more
rewarding / satisfactory to cancel non-tensorial terms rather than generate
them . . .