Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
Contents
List of figures ix
List of contributors xii
Acknowledgements xix
PART ONE 9
Shopping, spaces and globalisation
1 David Gilbert 11
A NEW WORLD ORDER? FASHION AND ITS CAPITALS
IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
3 Clare M. Wilkinson-Weber 43
INDIA AND FASHION’S NEW GEOGRAPHY
vi CONTENTS
5 Sally Gray 64
‘SYDNEY STYLE’: CAMPING IT UP IN THE EMERALD
CITY
PART TWO 75
Changing imagery, changing media
6 Caroline Evans 77
YESTERDAY’S EMBLEMS AND TOMORROW’S
COMMODITIES: THE RETURN OF THE REPRESSED
IN FASHION IMAGERY TODAY
CONTENTS vii
viii CONTENTS
Index 401
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
Chapter 2
Just a few years ago, Brazil’s only famous fashion exports were bikinis,
Havaianas and Victoria’s Secret models. Now, established brands such
as Osklen, Issa, Carlos Miele, Pedro Lourenço, Alexandre Herchcovitch
and Lucas Nascimento sell internationally, and at home a diverse camp
of designers is proving that Brazilian fashion has grown up.
(Helen Jennings, Guardian, 22 November 2012)
Global fashion
It may be that the emergence of new circuits of production, distribution and
exhibition that see the current balance of power shift to the emerging economies
of the BRICs will mark a dramatic change in the industrial practices of clothing
production. The move away from the model of global convergence (multinational
conglomerates housing super-brands reliant on delocalised labour practices) to a
more self-contained model in which global brands produce locally – in Brazil for
Brazil for example – would involve exploiting the growth of an affluent middle
class and relying on local design talent and creative industries. This shift in the
location and production of global fashion would have the potential to feed back
into the overall branding strategy of the label, thereby varying its geographical
focus and displacing the current top-down focus of the super-brands whose design
creativity and corporate implementation strategies are driven almost entirely from
the Western fashion capitals.
This potential recalibration of the global assembly line would short-circuit
some of the current geographical disadvantages of de-territorialised production,
namely distance, complex delivery schedules, quality control, labour exploitation,
and the risk of devaluation in the case of the high-end fashion and luxury goods
that superficially bear a heritage stamp of approval. In fact they are often in part
outsourced to any number of interchangeable contractors and anonymous
subcontractors on the fringes of Europe (Romania, Morocco and Turkey), or in
China, Mexico and Bangladesh. Since the shift towards a globalised network
economy in the early 1980s the main preoccupations of Western fashion cultures
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
have been more obviously focused on advertising imagery, brand identity and
patterns of consumption rather than the less visibly attractive modes and circuits
of production (Rabine 2010: 372). Such shifts in the material organisation of the
global fashion industry signal more problematic tensions between the promotion
of local specificity and individual creativity; between the specifically local and the
broader cosmopolitan appeal of fashion design; in short, between the promotion
of a discrete national identity and a specific design identity.
For Brazilian designers the difficulty is how to find a language that can speak
to the domestic market and translate to the sensibilities of global consumers, a
productive tension paralleled by the global super-brands whose own aspirations
are similarly founded on the contrived promotion of their national provenance –
Louis Vuitton’s elaborate articulation of a specifically French design heritage of
luxury travel, for example. In their discussion of the relationship between fashion,
identity and globalisation, Eugenia Paulicelli and Hazel Clark explain how locally
specific designs are both formative of a national fabric while also circulating widely
within a global market (Paulicelli and Clark 2009: 2). The branding of Brazilian
fashion involves not only the circulation of consumables domestically and inter-
nationally, but also the exportation of a Brazilian design identity channelled through
the iconographic branding of the nation. In her historical assessment of Brazilian
fashion in terms of its stylistic influences blending the exotic, the urban and the
marginal, Valéria Brandini raises the issue of cultural identity in the definition of
a specific Brazilian design heritage, one including the imposed and assumed exotic
stereotypes of Latin physicality and the more varied cosmology of local street
culture. Brandini asks ‘whether fashion expropriates cultural meanings for
commercial ends, or whether it elevates them, turning their aesthetic content into
clothes that exalt cultural richness’ (Brandini 2009: 167), thereby differentiating
between the two ends of the spectrum, from the textile industry’s mass production
of apparel to the individual creative strategies of contemporary Brazilian designers
working through questions of cultural specificity and ethnic diversity.
The polarising image of contemporary Brazilian fashion as framed by the
dominance of mass-produced clothing complemented by a limited number of
designers – from established names Alexandre Herchcovitch and Carlos Miele to
the emerging talents Pedro Lourenço and Lucas Nascimento – reflects broader
tensions relating to the integrative processes of globalisation. The view of globalisa-
tion as the import and export of culture shows how it operates as a portmanteau
term for a number of competing economic, political and socio-cultural shifts in
connectivity, or else ‘a communicational concept, which alternately masks and
transmits cultural or economic meanings’ (Jameson 1998: 55). It is axiomatic in
understandings of globalisation to assume that the process does not only reproduce
the homogenising effect of Western imperialism but also signals the more complex
commercial engagement in intercultural exchange between the ‘peripheries’ and
the ‘centre’. By tracking the global flows of capital, commodities, ideas, images
and people, anthropologists Jonathan Xavier Inda and Renato Rosaldo build on the
preoccupation with the shrinking globe – the speeding-up and shortening of time
that geographer David Harvey earlier theorised as the fundamental compression of
space and time in postmodernity (Harvey 1989). Inda and Rosaldo accept the basic
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
The history of trade between Brazil and the West positions Brazilian fashion on
the cusp – at once in creative dialogue and commercial exchange with the West,
yet also stylistically and culturally distinct from it. Riello and McNeil point to
the history of exchange between French couture and the metropolitan centres
of South America, as well as their instrumental position in the change of perspective
from a Eurocentric appreciation of fashion to its global recalibration in terms
of industrial production, consumer base and cultural specificity. However, this
global perspective should not simply equate to fashion history rewritten from an
integrative vantage point (Riello and McNeil: 5). Against this image of convergence,
we argue that the emerging Brazilian fashion industry, while eager for European
recognition of its creative innovations, is more preoccupied with the consumer
demands of its own affluent middle class. The key to understanding the recent
global strategy of Brazilian fashion is to be found closer to home.
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
The stylistic sensibilities of the elites, however, were still orientated towards
the traditional models of French haute couture. Dener, the prestigious imitator of
haute couture, aspired to reproduce the aura of the star couturier for the Brazilian
elites, editing French designs for his sophisticated public. He claimed to direct
consumer tastes towards the dominant styles of haute couture in order to reflect
back a specifically Brazilian image, thereby removing the stigma attached to wearing
locally designed and manufactured garments. The cultural shift marked by the
fashionable pop styles of the 1960s was also reflected in changes to the relation-
ship between the Brazilian clothing industry and its French design templates. Trade
between the two countries took off in the 1960s following the expansion of the
French chemical company Rhodia to Brazil. Rhodia organised trade fairs and intro-
duced synthetic fibres, publicising their advantages to receptive local consumers
preoccupied with modernisation and efficiency. Rhodia essentially used these
collections to communicate, touring Europe with Brazilian-themed fashion shows
such as the ‘Coffee Collection’ presented in Paris at an exclusive function in 1960.
This was followed by collections promoting ‘Brazilian Nature’ in 1962 and
‘Brazilian Style’ in 1964, both manipulating cultural identity not to sell the designs
themselves but to showcase the country’s manufacturing. The designs worked as
pastiche copies of Parisian haute couture transposed to local fabrics, including
explicit homages to Dior’s New Look graphically adapted to tropical prints. These
commercial operations were not primarily concerned with promoting Brazilian
design to a European audience, but had the inadvertent knock-on effect of creating
a national design identity based on the skilful packaging of tropical exoticism. These
operations began with the presentations in Europe and were adapted to Brazil
following international attention. A few select presentations in France and Italy
would be rolled out months later in cities across Brazil. The story of European
approval was spun as a narrative for the domestic market, thereby laying the
foundations for the clothing industry to create in embryonic form a national design
tradition.
Figure 2.1 Fraga’s runway look here combines, in one image, the myth of the
forest and of football with the bamboo frame, constructed across
the catwalk. From Summer 2014 collection. Copyright Ronaldo
Fraga. Reproduced by courtesy of Fotosite.
models of the 2000s – all gained attention due to their healthy shapes and cultivated
sexiness. But no Brazilian model has had the individual appeal, media coverage and
commercial success of Gisele Bündchen, the most lucrative player in Brazilian
global fashion, worth an estimated 250 million dollars in 2012. A German-Brazilian
in origin, discovered as a teenager in the mid-1990s, Gisele is seen as the heir to
the late twentieth-century prenominal super-models and was known at the height
of her fame for her contract with Victoria’s Secret, which raided the bank of Latin
clichés, reuniting mixed ethnicity, tropical ‘exoticism’ and curvaceous sexiness.
Early in her career Vogue used a black-and-white photo of Gisele to illustrate an
editorial called ‘The Return of the Curve’ for its July 1999 issue, allegedly photo-
shopping the image to augment the model’s cleavage. Gisele went on to appear
on a further three Vogue covers in 2000 alone, and in so doing launched a trend
for Brazilian models.
Beyond this focus on the international profiles of celebrity models, the Brazilian
clothing industry also began to brand its fashion culture more persuasively. Foreign
journalists were invited to catwalk shows, to lecture and to visit boutiques on all-
expenses-paid tours. An example of this common practice of industry lobbying
was the late, iconic fashion editor for the Sunday Times, Isabella Blow, who was
invited to Brazil in January 2000 to attend the São Paulo Fashion Week, at the
time called Morumbi Fashion (Roberts 2012). With Blow allegedly cashing a cheque
for 15,000 dollars for her services (Marthe 2000), the operation was deemed
successful and six months later Blow was invited back along with eighteen foreign
journalists to participate in a round table discussion on the international image of
Brazilian fashion. Blow’s function was to lend an aura of personal glamour and
critical credibility to Brazilian fashion through her status as a nomadic ambassador,
whose presence at such events led to increased foreign press attention.
The economic reason for the relatively modest exportation of Brazilian fashion
is that the production costs are prohibitively high, making the final product exces-
sively expensive for international consumers. Herchcovitch can be as expensive as
Prada or Gucci, minus the global brand appeal, therefore out-pricing the local
designer from the international market. Prohibitively high import-export taxes
represent a further obstacle for the long-term global sustainability of Brazilian
trade. Take, for example, the urban sports label Osklen, whose fashion-forward
profile has been hyped in recent years. The label’s founder, Oskar Metsavaht,
began in 1989 with leisure and sportswear collections, before turning to beachwear
in the 1990s and luxury ready-to-wear in 2003 with the launch of the Osklen
Collection, an urban style with touches of surf culture channelled through an
ecological lens. The local fashion media mention Osklen as if he were widely
celebrated in Europe and the USA. His collections are found in a handful of
department stores and luxury multi-brand boutiques and the label does own stores
Figure 2.2 Osklen’s outfit blends the straw top (typical Brazilian natural
material) with the Brazilian cultural cliché of the beach print on
the skirt. From Summer 2013 collection. Copyright Osklen.
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
in Italy, Japan and the USA; but in sales terms this is relatively marginal. Being
visible at L’Eclaireur in Paris is only a minimal entry into the global luxury market
considering that Osklen’s overall international sales account for a mere 5 percent
of the label’s total turnover (Viturino 2011).
Brazilian fashion designers and brands are torn between the power of the
cultural legacy, heritage and craftsmanship of the European tradition – with its
haute couture model of apprenticeship and succession – and the ‘American’ myth-
ology of the self-taught designer breaking free from the constraints of European
tradition. Working outside the apprentice model whereby a designer would gain
experience by working for an illustrious fashion house, ‘the new Brazilian fashion
is not established in the couture tradition, with its references to high art, but
derives its aesthetic from local culture and ethnicity’ (Brandini 2009: 165). True,
but the value of international approval, measured through geographical positioning
and press visibility, nonetheless locks the Brazilian consumer mentality into a neo-
imperial relationship of cultural dependency with its global partners.
Since the start of the global economic recession in 2008, there has been some
hope that the emerging economies of the BRICS would decouple and continue to
expand despite the downturn experienced elsewhere – a hope undermined by the
reported slowdown of both the Brazilian and Chinese economies in 2012. Global
luxury brands are nevertheless prioritising the BRICS as key expanding markets to
underwrite and revitalise the Western design houses. To achieve this goal the
luxury conglomerates are investing massively in the consumer potential of Brazil.
Despite the barrier of fiscal protectionism, the big-name fashion brands are moving
in en masse. The luxury shopping malls of Cidade Jardim or JK Iguatemi in São
Paulo host the majority of the recognisable super-brands, illustrating the decision
to plug the luxury gap before the full emergence of local design. Brazil has
understood the shift in global power and is staking out a more strategic position
on the fashion map – not simply as a consumer of global brands or as a manufacturer
of textiles but as a creative force in itself. The challenge is how to define a stylistic
grammar adapted to the ‘new’ economic order while responding to the demands
of the expanding domestic market.
Design, the creative backbone of the industry, now constitutes the main focus
of attention in Brazilian fashion culture. Designer brands are torn between the
model of cross-cultural exchange with European heritage and the ‘American’ model
of fashion empires. Although the new Brazilian fashion is embedded in local forms
of popular culture and ethnic specificity, the commercial value of cross-cultural
interaction and European recognition is not to be underestimated in the domestic
positioning and promotion of Brazilian fashion. External approval is still seen as
necessary for the domestic market, conceived in the terms of marketing discourse
as immature – however problematic the use of this linguistic imperialism to qualify
emerging markets. Nevertheless, the ideal of a creative and dynamic Brazil shared
by millions of Brazilians – an image the nation seeks actively to export – still
requires a global stamp of approval for national consumers to believe in the
economic miracle, the term used in the past to denote periods of growth such as
the 1970s, a period of parallel European economic ‘stagflation’. Ultimately, Europe
is used strategically as an adoring mirror for Brazilian fashion to reflect back its
own self-promotional ideal to domestic consumers.
Copyrighted material - Provided by Taylor & Francis
Dr Nick Rees-Roberts. University of Bristol. 12/01/2015
References
Amado, Gilberto (1954) Mocidade no Rio e primeira viagem à Europa, Rio de Janerio:
José Olympio.
Andrade, Rita (2005) ‘Mappin Stores: adding an English Touch to the São Paulo Fashion
Scene’, in Regina A. Root (ed.), The Latin American Fashion Reader, Oxford: Berg,
pp. 176–87.
Appadurai, Arjun (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization,
Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Braga, João and Prado, André Luis do (2011) História da Moda no Brasil – das Influências
às Autorreferências, São Paulo: Disal Edita/Pyxis Editorial.
Brandini, Valéria (2009) ‘Fashion Brazil: South American Style, Culture and Industry’,
in Eugenia Paulicelli and Hazel Clark (eds), The Fabric of Cultures: Fashion, Identity
and Globalization, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 164–76.
Carelli, Mario (1993) Cultures croisées: histoire des échanges culturels entre la France et le
Brésil de la découverte aux temps modernes, Paris: Nathan.
Harvey, David (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural
Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Inda, Jonathan Xavier and Rosaldo, Renato (2008) ‘Tracking Global Flows’, in Jonathan
Xavier Inda and Renato Rosaldo (eds), The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader
(second edition), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–46.
Jameson, Fredric (1998) ‘Notes on Globalization as a Philosophical Issue’, in Fredric
Jameson and Masao Miyoshi (eds), The Cultures of Globalization, Durham and
London: Duke University Press, pp. 54–77.
Marthe, Marcelo (2000) ‘A lobista da moda’, Veja Magazine, 15 November.
Paulicelli, Eugenia and Clark, Hazel (2009) ‘Introduction’, in Eugenia Paulicelli and
Hazel Clark (eds), The Fabric of Cultures: Fashion, Identity, and Globalization,
Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–11.
Rabine, Leslie W. (2010) ‘Globalization’, in Valerie Steele (ed.), The Berg Companion
to Fashion, London: Berg, pp. 372–4.
Riello, Giorgio and McNeil, Peter (eds) (2010) The Fashion History Reader: Global
Perspectives, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Roberts, Michael (2012) ‘Brazilian Blow Out’, The Wall Street Journal, 15 June.
Skidmore, Thomas E. (1994) O Brasil visto de fora, Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Trebay, Guy (2000), ‘Big Models, Big Brands: The Year in Fashion; The Noise from
Brazil’, The New York Times, 26 December.
Viturino, Robson (2011) ‘A nova multinacional brasileira’, Época Negócios, 31 January.