Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sol-Gel Processing
sitional sensitivities in other bioactive glass and glass- TABLE 1. Compositions of Gel Powders (mol./)
ceramic systems. Sample SiOz P205 CaO
(2) Process steps of grinding, polishing, fritting, sieving,
49s 50 4 46
etc., all expose a bioactive powder to potential con- 54s 55 4 41
taminants and the negative effects on bioactivity de- 58s 60 4 36
scribed above. 63s 65 4 31
(3)There is a compositional limitation imposed on bioac- 68s 70 4 26
tive glasses and glass-ceramics made by conventional 72s 75 4 21
high-temperature processes. This is due to the ex- 77s 80 4 16
tremely high equilibrium liquidus temperature of 81s 85 4 11
S O z , 1713"C, and the extremely high viscosity of sili- 86s 90 4 6
90s 95 4 1
cate melts with high SiOz content.
(4) High-temperature processing in platinum crucibles
were prepared from tetraethyoxysilane (TEOS), triethyl
and multiple handling steps also increase production
phosphate [OP(OEt)3], and calcium nitrate [Ca(N03)2 .
costs considerably. The additional costs are not only
4H20]. Nitric acid was added to accelerate the hydrolysis
in energy, but also in capital equipment, labor,
reaction of TEOS. After mixing the components, the sol
maintenance, quality assurance, quality control, etc.
was cast into a polyethylene container and placed inside
Lowering the processing temperature lowers such
an oven at 60-280°C where the sol was gelled, aged, and
costs considerably.
dried. The dried gels were heated in a silica crucible at a
temperature range of 600-700°C for several hours in a
Low-temperature sol-gel processing offers an alterna-
nitrogen atmosphere. The material then was ground into
tive to conventional glass and glass-ceramic processing
powders with a particle size range of 100-700 pm.
with the potential advantages indicated above.
Previous studies indicate that the essential condition
The sol-gel process has become a widely spread re-
for a material to bond with bone is the formation of the
search field during the last decade.I5-" Basically, the pro-
surface hydroxyapatite layer in t h e body environment.
cess involves the synthesis of an inorganic network
Therefore, the powders made as described above were
by mixing the metal alkoxides in solution, followed by
subjected to an in vitro solution test to evaluate the po-
hydrolysis, gelation, and low-temperature firing to pro-
tential bioactivity of t h e material. In the in vitro test
duce a glass. Inherent in this process is the ability to
procedure, the gel powders were reacted with a Tris-
modify the network structure through controlled hy-
buffered solution (pH = 7.2 5 0.1) at 37°C for various
drolysis and polycondensation reactions.'"'y Thus, struc-
times. The resultant reacted powders were then cxam-
tural variation can be produced without compositional
ined by Fourier Transform Infrared Reflection (FTIR)
changes. Because the glasses can be prepared from gels
Spectroscopy on a Nicolet 20SXB Spectrometer with a
by sintering at relatively low temperatures (600-70OoC),
diffuse reflectance stage between 1400 and 400 c m - ' .
most of the disadvantages of high-temperature process-
Also, to ensure that the gel powders did not undergo any
ing can be eliminated with much higher control over pu-
reaction prior to the in vitro testing, unreacted powders
rity. Also, sol-gel processing offers potential advantages
were tested by FTIR.
of ease of powder production, a broader range of bioac-
There are several solution test procedures which can
tivity, and a better control of bioactivity by changing ei-
be used for powders.'" The one which gave a more reli-
ther the composition or the microstructure through
able and reproducible result for the bioactive gel powders
processing parameters.
is dynamic rather than static. In this study, powders were
Thus, the objectives of this work are: (a) synthesize
poured directly into the Tris-buffered solution in a
bioactive gel powders through sol-gel processing by con-
Nalgene container and agitated in an incubator shaker
trolling the hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions;
for the reaction times indicated. This shaker is designed
(b) eliminate NazO from the compositions by taking ad-
to deliver orbital motion in a controlled temperature en-
vantage of low-temperature mixing of CaO-P2OS-SiO2
vironment. T h e operating temperature remained at
sols; (c) determine the compositional dependence (Si02
37°C i 1°C and the spinning rate was 220 rpm. This dy-
content variation) of the formation of hydroxyapatite;
namic test procedure allowed the reacting solution to
and (d) compare the bioactivity range of melt-derived
surround and react with the powders continuously.
bioactive glasses with the bioactive gel powders made
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to study the pow-
through sol-gel processing.
ders after heating between 600 and 700°C and after
reaction in the in vitro test solution. The XRD range was
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE from 5" to 85" 20 at a rate of 3"/min, using Cu-K., radia-
tion at 40 KV. A Quanta Chrome Autosorb-6 was
Table I shows the compositions of CaO-P20,-Si02 gel employed to measure the surface area and pore size dis-
powders investigated in the present studies. The samples tributions of the samples using N2 as an absorbent.
BIOACTIVE GLASS POWDERS 233
50s
\
54s
A\--- 49s
A------------&--.----
100 ZOO 300 400 500
~~------
600 700 800
r
DEGREES 2c)
Figure 1. The comparison of x-ray diffraction data of the bioactive gel powders listed in Table I after
heating to 600°C and 4585 BiogIassB by standard melting and casting.
234 LI, CLARK. AND HENCH
n
G
a
?J
w
ti4
9
a
U
L
w
0
ft
2
-1
LA
w
oc
a-"
45S5-10HR
w w
Figure 9. FT-IRRS spectrum for 86s bioactive gel powder after 7 days reaction in simulated in vivo
solution.
= I
ol- a
a
~
new composition
range of bioactive
gel powders
Williams, D. F. cd. Boca Raton:CRC Press; 1982; Vol. I ,
Chap. 4.
5. Wilson, J.; Pigott, G . H.; Schoen, F. J.; Hench, L. L. Toxi-
zz cology and biocompatibility of bioglasses". J. Biomed.
a 5 Matcrs. Res. 15:805; 1981.
oi= 6. Wilson, J.; Merwin, G.E.; Rodgers, L.W.; Martin, R.G.;
u 02 Non-Glass Spilman, D. Facial bone augmentation using Bioglass in
am_ Forming dogs. Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Bio-
2 materials, Christel, P.; Meunier, A; Lee, A. J. C. eds.
Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1963:93.
7. Clark, A . E. Solubility and biocompatibility of glass,
0 20 40 60 80 100 Gainesvil1e:Univ. Florida; 1974. Disscrtation.
Mol O h SiOz 8. Hench, L. L. Bioactive ceramics. Bioceramics: Material
Characteristics Versus In Vivo Behavior, Ducheyne, P.;
Figure 10. The difference in range of bioactivity for the bioactive gel Lemons, J.E. cds. New York:The New York Academy of
vs. melt-derived Bioglasses". Scienccs; 1988:54.
9. Wilson, J.; Low, S.; Fetner, A,; Hench, L. L. Bioactive
Materials for Periodontal Treatment -A Comparative
(3)The compositional boundary of HA formation has Study in Biomaterials Clinical Applications. Pizzoferrato,
been significantly extended through sol-gel de- A.; Marchetti, P.G.; Ravaglioli, A.; Lee, A. J. C. eds.
rived bioactive gel powders over the melt-derived Amsterdam:Elsevier. 1987:223.
Bioglass@powders. The upper limit is approximately 10. Ramer, M. Bioglass"-hylan suspension for treatment of
urinary incontinence. Gainesville: Univ. Florida; 1990.
90 mol% SiO,. MS Thcsis.
11. Gross, U. M.; Strunz, V. The anchoring of glass ceramics
of different solubility in the femur of the rat. J. Biomed.
NIDR, P50DE09307-01; AFOSR, 49620-88-C-0073. Mater. Res. 14:607; 1980.
12. Greenspan, D; Hench, L . L . Chemical & mechanical he-
havior of Bioglass coated alumina. J. Biomcd. Mater. Res.
REFERENCES 10:503; 1976.
13. Kitsugi, T.; Yamamuro, T.; Nakamura, T.; Kotani, S.;
1. Hench, L. L.; Splinter, R. J.; Greenlee, T. K.; Allen, W. C. Kokubo, T.; Effects of varying amounts of A1203 on the
Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic bond between A-W glass ceramics and bone. Oonishi, H.;
materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2:117; 1971. Aoki, H.; Sawai, K. eds. Bioceramics, Vol. 1. Ishiyaku
2. Hench, L. L.; Ethridige, E. C. Biomaterials-An Inter- Euro America Inc.; 1989.
facial Approach. New York: Academic Prcss; 1982. 14. Kokubo, T.; Ito, S.; Huang, Z.T.; Hayashi, T.; Sakka, S.;
3. Hench, L. L.; Clark, A. E. Biocompatibility of Orthopedic Kitsugi, T.; and Yamamuro, T. Ca, P-rich layer formed on
Implants. Williams, D. F. ed., Boca Raton:CRC Press; high-strength bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J. Biomed.
1982:Vol. 2, Chap. 6. Mater. Rcs. 24:331; 1990.
BIOACTTVE GLASS POWDERS 239
15. Sakka, S. Glasses and glass-ceramics from gels, J. Non- 22. Gaskell, P. H. Vibrational spectra of simple silicate glasses.
Cryst. Solids 73:651; 1985. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 50232; 1970.
16. Zarcycki, J. Processing of gel glasses. Uhlman, D.R., 23. Fowlcr, B.O. Infrared studies of apatites, I. Vibrational
Kreidl, N. J. eds. Glass Science and Tcchnology. Vol. 2 , 209. assignments for calcium, strontium and barium hydroxy-
17. Orgaz-Orgaz, F. Gel to glass conversion: Densification ki- apatites utilizing isotopic substitution. Inorg. Chem.
netics and controlling mechanisms. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 13:194; 1974.
100:115; 1988. 24. Ogino, M.; Hench, L. L. Compositional dependence of the
18. Brinker, C. J.; Scherer, G.W. Sol-gel glass: I. Gelation and formation of calcium phosphate films on Bioglass'".
gel structurc. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 70:301; 1985. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 14:55; 1980.
19. Pope, E. J. A.; Mackenzie, J. D.; Sol-gel processing of silica. 25. Walker, M. M. An investigation into the bonding mecha-
11. The role of the catalyst. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 87:185; 1986. nisms of Bioglass Gainesville: Univ. Florida; 1977. MS
I".