Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.vertical Gardens Toby Beale Sally Farrah
2.vertical Gardens Toby Beale Sally Farrah
Vertical Gardens
ALVA
VERTICAL GARDENS
An invesgaon of the environmental &
social benets of vercal gardening
ALVA
VERTICAL GARDENS Acknowledgements
Tobias Beale The compleon of this research project would not have been
BEnvDes possible without the assistance and guidance of Dr. Helen
Whitbread, UWA’s Associate Director of Built Environment.
Sally Farrah Thank you to Philip Bay for his role as our academic supervisor,
BEnvDes whose knowledge of sustainable systems and calculaon
methods was imperave to this report.
Introduction
A study of the site and the larger campus illuminated the need
to reference the historical merit of the pre-exisng architecture.
It was decided that the collonade was to be reinterrogated
to achieve a contemporary soluon in the form of a planted
canopy.
This has allowed us to use the exisng irrigaon system that runs
east-west under James Oval parallel to both Social Sciences
buildings.
To construct a vercal garden on one of these blank walls, shading would need
to be provided. For this reason we designed a canopy that would shade the
facades of the buildings and the thoroughfare.
By using a canopy, we were able to explore the opportunity there exists for
dierent summer and winter experiences. Deciduous trees and creepers allow
for the garden to become more heavilly planted to provide shading, and in
winter allow the soer sun to penetrate onto the thoroughfare and green wall. 12pm wind 3pm wind
NW SW
The canopy also provides wind protecon through creang a buer, which will 10-20km/h 20-35km/h
provide signicant shelter from the south-west.
12pm & 3pm
12pm
9am
3pm
9am
Informed by the historical context of the university, namely the iconic collonades which frequently appear across the campus, the vercal garden aims to recontextualize the arch.
Concept
The project was concerned with the creaon of an engaging and widely
accessible sustainable system, rather than something by which the sole
benefactor would be the adjacent building and its users.
From looking at the site plan, either side north and south of the
thoroughfare, there exists vast planng of large trees and hence
comfortable thoroughfares. We aimed to replicate this condion along
the length of the unprotected thoroughfare; an extension of a pre-exist-
ing canopy.
The canopy structure became the bridging element between the built
form and the site, metaphoric of our intenons. The transion as one
moves from inside Social Sciences to the expansive oval and footpath
is made less abrupt through the creaon of an intermediary, sheltered
zone.
Each cable alternates between xing to the rst oor and second
oor slabs, which in conjuncon with alternang tower heights,
forms a parabolic canopy. The parabola, a naturally ocurring and
strengthening form, was employed to act as a canopy, and meta-
phorically as the arch of the collonade.
Reinforced Concrete
refer to S.E. Details
Mid Level Planter Box
refer to S.E. Details
Concrete Foongs
refer to S.E. Details
Connections
Tower: Major cables are aached to steel xing plates which are
precast into the concrete panels o site. The plates are structurally
ed into the concrete reinforcement.
Social Sciences Floor Slabs: The cable network is alligned with the
column grid (which we assumed to be at 3m intervals) and aached
to the 1st and 2nd oor slabs of both buildings. A paral course of
brickwork is removed and steel xing plates are aached to the oor
slabs by chemical anchors.
Green Wall
Construction
The planng strategy was conceived of as a linkage element between the Low maintenance Low maintenance Low maintenance
two disnct built elements of the project. deciduous vines deciduous vines succulent planng
A plant that does not rely on constant watering (ie. one suited to the
Western Australian climate) or replacement is a plant that is sustainable.
The image of the prisne and lush green wall that is so oen touted in
the world of contemporary ‘green design’ is essenally impossible for the
chosen locaon if it is to exist as a sustainable enty.
Chosen Vegetation
Infrastructure Strategy
The university could water the canopy or a typical green wall system by either;
i. Rain water harvesng along the roof and all adjacent paved surfaces
ii. Connecng to the exisng irrigaon system
It was recognised that there existed potenal to use the harvested rain water by passing
through a green wall puricaon system. However, this would require the installaon of
substanal rain water tanks, in excess of 200 000L. These will either need to be located
underground in an area which is already overburdened with services, or above ground where a
substanal volume (in excess of 8m in diameter x 1.8m high) would be required.
Because it was determined early that the only viable planng on the west facade are succulents,
which require minimal watering, that the capital outlay for a green wall puricaon system
would not be jused. Considering the exisng irrigaon system and ongoing and set up costs,
it would be far cheaper and more praccal for a system to be connected to the exisng irriga-
on.
Due to the sucient plaorm and planter box structure we have provided for the canopy, the
cheapest and easiest watering opon is to connect to the exisng irrigaon system that runs
North-South. This system is low cost and low maintenance, as the planng only needs to be
watered as much as residenal water restricons allow, which would be a fracon of the
current usage for James Oval.
The opon of grey water for a vercal garden was ruled out early into the research. A large
benet from vercal gardens is biophilia as the result of people interacng with plants in close
proximity. Recycling of grey water is not praccal in this situaon under the current Western
Australia health & regulatory code. Drip water systems become complex at heights of 3 storeys,
and are substanally more costly to install than convenonal irrigaon.
Benefits
We have researched both the benets of placing vercal gardens, versus our
canopy design to demonstrate to the university the dierent environmental and
social benets from each.
The green wall acng as the second skin to the built form contributes many
benets for the occupants indoors, and passers-by in close proximity. However, it
does not provide amenity for many passers-by through the thoroughfare.
The canopy provides ‘bioprotecon’1 to the West facade of Social Sciences North
and South and for pedestrians through the outdoor thoroughfare through mild
moderaon in temperature and relave humidity.2
1
Alan Cathersides, Troy Sternberg and Heather Viles, “Evaluang the role of ivy (Hedera helix) in
moderang wall surface microclimates and contribung to the bioprotecon of historic buildings,”
Building and Environment 46 (2011): 293.
2
ibid.
Benefits
(a) Canopy
As discussed earlier, in the aernoon due to James Oval the strong aernoon * Palio de Bougainvilleas
south-west winds are very unpleasant. The vegetated cable network not only Puerto Rico. West 8, 2005.
provides extra shading in summer, but reduces the speed of cold wind in winter
through the interlacing of the creeper.3
3
L. Labaki & D. Morelli, “Green Walls: Environmental Quality in Buildings.” Document sans nom.
PLEA 2009 – QUEBEC, 22 June 2009. Web. 8th January 2011.
4
Liat Margolis & Alexander Robinson, Living Systems: Innovave Materials & Technologies for
Landscape Architecture (Berlin, Birkhauser, 2007): 26.
Benefits:
Canopy
ii. Reduced Energy Usage due to Conducon
From a shade projecon of the West façade, the amount of shading the canopy Nyuk Hien Wong et al’s model suggests from a TAS simulaon that on the west
provides onto Social Sciences North & South can be esmated. façade, 100% vercal greenery cover on an opaque wall reduces mean radiant
temperature by an average of 9°C.
From this projecon, it is possible to compare the tangible benets of the canopy for
west facade. We have used Nyuk Hien Wong et al’s model for calculang reduced Social Sciences north (SSn) has a west façade surface area of 464m², and Social Sci-
mean radiant temperature by percentage of west facade coverage. ences south (SSs) has an area of 307.3m². The shading projecon shows that 262m²
is shaded on SSn, and 155.3m² on SSs. Hence, Social Sciences north has 56.5%
This research was carried out on dierent orientaons, so we will apply the results shaded west facade, and social sciences south 50.5%. Therefore the average shade
for the West façade. The research was completed in Singapore, and despite having a coverage for both buildings is 53.5%.
more tropical climate than Perth, the results apply due to similar temperature ranges.
As vercal gardening is a contemporary concept, there is a lack of experiments and This compares to slightly less then the opaque wall coverage of our proposed green
results that are directly relevant for Australian cies. However we deemed this model wall system for both buildings at 56.4% (see secon 5bi). Hence the added R-value
to be quite relevant for Perth’s temperate climate. and resistance from heat gain via conducon is 2.9% more eecve for the green
. wall.
Benefits:
Canopy
iii. The eect of Solar Radiaon on Internal Temperature iv. Esmated Temperature Reducon (Conducon + Radiaon)
The canopy provides shading not only for the west facade but also for the The recommended internal temperature for a classroom or oce is approximately
thoroughfare. This reduces heat gain via the west facade for 2 reasons; 18°C.6
a. Reduced conducon from the shaded pavement, and
b. Reduced direct solar radiaon through openings. Nyuk Hien Wong et al’s results showed that 100% opaque coverage of the west
façade reduced energy usage by 74%, translang to reducing mean radiant
Where openings exist on the façade, the eect of reducing indoor temperature is temperature inside the building by 9°C. However, for the same 10 storey building
minimised due to solar radiaon. In our research, we considered this and because the when windows were introduced, consisng of 31% of the west façade area,
Social Sciences buildings have many openings, the canopy design prevents heat gain energy usage was reduced by 10% which translated roughly to 1°C.7
via direct solar radiaon.
Hence we can roughly esmate that the canopy that provides 52.2% coverage on
The pavement in summer would heat up to nearly 60°C, as brick has a high thermal a theorecally opaque west wall, which would reduce energy usage by roughly
conducvity value.5 This contributes to a high U-value and low resisvity, which in 40-50%. By extrapolang Nyuk Hien Wong et al’s results, this should reduce the
Perth’s temperate climate means they retain heat for long periods throughout the interior temperature of Social Sciences North and South by 6-7°C, which becomes
day in summer. signicant in Perth’s high summer temperatures.
The canopy acts as a mediator for the brick pavement’s high U-value, by reducing
the heat gain of the pavement in summer and hence the Social Sciences buildings via
convecon and radiaon, and protecng the thoroughfare from wind in winter which
would cool the bricks.
However, we must also calculate how the canopy prevents heat gain due to solar
radiaon. Considering the sun’s changing path daily and seasonally, we will say of the
area shaded by the heavily planted canopy, heat gain transmied through direct solar
radiaon via openings is 2.5%. This radiaon amount is small due to windows being
shaded, and the shaded footpath.
6
5
Peter Burberry, Building for Energy Conservaon (London: Architectural Press, 1978): 182. ibid., 184.
7
Nyuk Hien Wong et al., “Energy Simulaon of Vercal Greenery Systems,” In Energy & Buildings 4
(Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009): 1403.
Benefits:
Canopy
v. Low Maintenance Cost
Green wall systems are highly expensive in terms of on-going maintenance costs.
The two issues of placing green walls on the large blank wall areas of Social Sciences
*
North and South are;
a. Expensive constant drip watering system contribung to large maintenance
costs
b. A 3-storey high green wall is dicult to access for maintenance, for example
if the drip watering system was in need of repair.
Our canopy and plaorm design has a relavely large capital cost (see secon 8 for
cosng). However, maintenance costs are reduced for two main reasons
a. The canopy is more easily maintained as it is not 3 storeys tall. This is
because the cables must be aached to a oor plate or column grid.
b. The chosen creepers and planng require lile watering. This watering
system is connected to the exisng irrigaon pipes underground which has
substanally lower set up costs.
With 100% green wall coverage with no openings on the west facade, Nyuk Hien Below is the recommended vercal greenery coverage suitable for Social Sciences
Wong et al’s model suggests from a TAS simulaon that mean radiant temperature is north and Social Sciences south buildings at UWA (gure 3).
reduced by roughly 70%. The study shows that throughout the day of heat
uctuaons between 30 and 34°C on the west facade, the mean radiant temperature The appropriate areas for green wall planng, excluding openings, on each façade
inside remained at 24°C. allows 243.65m² on social sciences north, and 185m² on social sciences south.
Where openings exist on the façade, the eect of vercal greenery reducing indoor Hence, social sciences north has 52.5% green wall coverage, and social sciences
temperature is reduced due to signicant heat gain through solar radiaon. In our south 60.2%. Therefore the average coverage for both buildings is 56.4%.
research, we considered this and because the social sciences buildings have many
openings, the canopy design prevents heat gain via solar radiaon.
Benefits
(b) Green Wall
iii. Esmated Temperature Reducon (Conducon + Radiaon)
ii. The Eect of Solar Radiaon on Internal Temperature
The reducon in mean radiant temperature is explained by the vercal greenery
The green wall however, in the areas of opaque coverage, 9.5% of the façade of Social acng as added insulaon, hence increasing the R-value of the wall reducing heat
Sciences north is transparent and eected by direct solar radiaon and 7.1% of Social transfer inside via conducon.
Sciences south, an average of 8.3%, which becomes a signicant amount of heat gain
from the western aernoon sun. However, the larger source of heat gain in Perth’s climate is heat transfer via radia-
on, which explains why the benets decline with less vercal greenery, and facades
This value compared to the 2.5% esmate for the canopy is signicantly larger and with openings.
would eect the indoor temperature of Social Sciences noceably.
However, because 8.3% of the green wall areas consist of windows, the energy us-
age would be reduced by a less amount, roughly 20-30% correlang to a reducon
of interior temperature by only 2-3°C. This heat gain for radiaon is not outweighed
by the 2.9% higher R-value then the canopy, which eecvely reduces temperature
inside via the west facade by 6-7°C.
Nyuk Hien Wong et al’s results show that protecon from direct solar radiaon,
provided by the canopy and not vercal gardening, is required in order to signicantly
reduce the energy cooling load.
Costing: + Timber decking: 179m²
Platform
Standard grade treated Jarrah at $90.80/sqm
Esmated cost = $16255
+ Timber structure:
- 100 x 45 H3 Treated Pine Joists
287m @ $23.70/sqm
Esmated Cost = $6820
- 150 x 45 H3 Treated Pine Bearers
169m @ $11.50/sqm
Esmated Cost = $1945
Network Fixings
+ Pergola xing plates:
- 16 @ $80
- Esmated Cost = $ 1280
+ Floor Slab Fixing plates
- 9 @ $80
- Esmated Cost = $ 720
+ Chemical anchors
- 16 12 x 160 @ $32.80
- Esmated Cost = $ 524
+ Ground xing plates
- 3 @ $150
- Esmated Cost = $450
+ Bougainvillea
Esmated Cost (@ $80 approx) = $720
+ Star Jasmine
Esmated Cost (@ $12 approx) = $160
+ Boston Ivy
Esmated Cost (@ $12 approx) = $120
+ Grass (Middle plaorm): 75.8 m²
Valued at $6.50/sqm
Esmated Cost = $492.70
+ Irrigaon
Esmated @ $300 per tower
Esmated Cost = $2700
+ Succulent planng
- Modules accomodate 16 plants per module
- 1530 modules required for wall coverage of: 428.65m2
- 24480 juvenile succulent plants required @ 50c each
- Esmated Cost (Planng and Labour inc.) = $24480
We wanted our design to be about process, like that of a tree growing. Instead of We understand however that the university might express concerns as to how
erecng a pre-planted mature structure, we believe in the natural gradual long it will take before the benets of our project will come to fruion, as it
process of erecng the infrastructure and seeing the plants grow and relies mainly on the growth of vegetaon. For this reason, we suggest a
transform the space from residual into ameny space. This approach will yield temporary lightweight shade cloth could be used on the canopy and plaorm
more rewarding and long lasng results and will also help to minimize costs pergola framework to provide shading whilst the plants grow.
associated with the purchase of mature plants.
We recognise that the construcon of the enre proposal is a substanal
Below is a breakdown of the construcon stages their associated esmated me undertaking nancially therefore we have made it possible to constuct the
of compleon per plaorm. plaorms as singular enes, grouping the constucon of the associated
towers in to managable sets of 3. The exisng residual space surrounding the
STAGE ONE: Sub-Structure (1 week per plaorm) site would would also render the construcon process relavely unobtrusive to
-Earthworks the daily operaons of the site.
-Irrigaon
-Pouring of concrete foongs
STAGE FOUR: Planng (3 days per plaorm) Therefore the nal compleon me of the enre proposal is esmated to be
-Planng of Bougainvilleas approximately 10 weeks.
-Planng of mid-level vines
-Plang of ground based vines
In only 3 years, the bouganvillea would reach a very dense growth.
Costing:
Government Funding/Initiatives
8
Commonwealth of Australia (2009), Living Sustainably: The Australian Government’s Naonal Acon Plan
for Educaon for Sustainability (Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage &
the Arts, Canberra): 4.
Discussion
i.
ii.
The social, nancial and environmental benets of the canopy scheme
However, both schemes share a number of benets.
illustrate that if built, this scheme would be a posive addion to the UWA
campus.
Sound Insulaon
Both act as a noise buer by reducing noise and vibraon from outdoor into
Unlike a convenonal green wall, the canopy scheme embodies and
indoor spaces due to the density of planng.9
embraces the dicules of the site, rather than ignoring them and
aempng to create something that is simply not suited to the harsh
Building Envelope Protecon
condions.
Both systems contribute to the protecon of Social Sciences’ western facades,
and research has shown this helps to maintain the building for longer.10
As calculated in secon 7, the recommended green wall system suitable
for Social Sciences would correlate to a reducon of interior temperature
Improved Air Quality
by 2-3°C. Despite having a higher insulaon value than the canopy, due to
Through the natural process of photosynthesis, both systems eecvely convert
reduced solar radiaon via shading, the canopy was shown to reduce
CO2 into oxygen, cleaning up the air.
temperature inside via the west facade by 6-7°C.
Increased biophilia
In our calculaons of material and labour costs, the green wall system would
Biophilia is the posive eect that plants and their qualies (i.e. scent,
be $553 860, whereas the canopy system was costed at $367 298. In addion
aesthecs) have on people. It has also been published that seasonally changing
to these set up costs, maintenance costs of the canopy scheme were far less
gardens are also benecial.11
than a green wall system that would yeild comparable thermal benets.
9
Jamil Binabid, “Vercal Garden: The Study of Vercal Gardens and their benets for low-rise buildings in
moderate & hot climates” (PhD diss., University of Southern California, 2010): 13.
10
L. Labaki & D. Morelli, op. cit.
11
Binabid, op. cit.
Discussion
iii. iv.
The relave non-specicity of our design provides further opportunity for the We believe strongly that our design is benecial for the university both tangibly in
University of Western Australia to connue to research and implement contemporary, energy savings, but further in non-physical terms by providing amenity spaces for the
ecological means. student body, and giving the University of Western Australia a reputaon amongst a
green-minded community.
Our sustainable framework is both a physical and theoreccal ‘plaorm’ for the Uni-
versity of Western Australia to expand on its sustainable ambions. Everything proposed is jused twofold. The shading device is not soley a shading
device. The plaorms are not solely plaorms. As a whole, the project does not fulll
PV cells one sole purpose, but many. This mulplicity of benets from the canopy scheme
PV cells are an elegant soluon to provide shading whilst absorbing direct solar radia- simply does not exist with a green wall system.
on. Transparent in appearance, they could be used in conjuncon with the raised
steel pergola’s above the plaorms along James Oval. The scheme oers a vision of sustainability that is not solely focused on saving energy
but also preserving and promong a social sustainability.
Solar energy
We designed the concrete planter boxes to be tall to provide enough structure for We hope that this report has explained the benets of the canopy scheme that can
the tensile canopy, but they also provide an excellent opportunity for the placement be appreicated by both the UWA student body, and the senate. If the University of
of solar panels. This could be used in conjuncon with another UWA based research Western Australia is not prepared to build this project, we at least hope that our de-
project into the feasibility of solar powered bicycles, which could easily be integrated sign and research will guide the university in their future decision in keeping with our
into the plaorm network. idea of social sustainability.
Bibliography
• Binabid, Jamil. “Vercal Garden: The Study of Vercal Gardens and • Margolis, Liat & Robinson, Alexander. Living Systems: Innovave Materials
their benets for low-rise buildings in moderate and hot climates.” PhD & Technologies for Landscape Architecture. Berlin: Birkhauser, 2007.
diss., University of Southern California, 2010.
• Wong, N. H., et al. “Energy simulaon of vercal greenery systems.” In
• Blanc, Patrick. The Vercal Garden: From Nature to the City. New Energy and Buildings 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009.
York: W. W. Norton, 2008.