NAME: NIKKA Y.

ABENION

Task 3 - Drafting the Title, Conceptual Framework, SOP and Hypothesis

Instructional Technology and the Academic Performance of Grade 10 students in

Mathematics

TITLE APPROVED

Instructional Technology Academic Performance of Grade 10 Students

Independent Variable Dependent Variable Respondents

(Presumed Cause) (Presumed Effect) (Who?)

Independent Variable Dependent variable

Instructional Technology Academic Performance

● Interactive White Boards ● Knowledge and

● Websites and Blogs Comprehension Level
● Projector ● Valuing
● Learning Adaptation

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework of the Study

 Statement of the Problem

This study aims to find out the instructional technology and academic
performance of grade 10 students in Mathematics . Specifically, it aims to answer the
following questions:

1. What is the level of instructional technology of Grade 10 students when

analyzed in terms of:
1.1 Interactive White Boards
1.2 Websites and Blogs
1.3 Projector

2. What is the level of academic performance of Grade 10 students when

analyzed in terms of:
2.1 Knowledge and Comprehension
2.2 Valuing
2.3 Learning Adaptation

3. Is there a significant relationship between instructional technology and

academic performance of Grade 10 students?

Hypothesis

This study will be tested at .05 level of significance.

There is no significant relationship between instructional technology and

academic performance of Grade 10 students.

References

Katie Tonarely (2008),Types of Instructional Technology for the Classroom, Retrieved

on
 August 29, 2020 from https://classroom.synonym.com/types-instructional-
technology-classroom-5970349.html

PISA (2021) ICT Framework, Retrieved on August 29, 2020 from

https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-ICT-Framework.pdf

Rogers, C. (2010). Student Outcomes and Performance Indicators, Retrieved on

August
29, 2020 https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/program-outcomes-
and-performance-indicators.pdf