I don't think it is fair that Luke gives anyone data on the discharge, be it a family, or partners.

In times of data, the relationship between private and transparent is being increasingly
blurred. News and articles have secret sources that expose company mysteries and policy
decisions. The content on the Facebook and myspace sites is being distributed slowly across
the Internet and thereby open up private information without the writer's permission. To
explain, nothing is holy. We have to become more and more mindful of what we are doing to
exchange information with others or to express personal concerns with others.

Requirements for the required Privacy Agreement:

Confidentiality Agreements indicate that knowledge and resources on individual projects or
jobs can be closely segregated during work. Both knowledge or input on innovations,
formulas, and works involving major inventions and imaginative activity are limited to the
direct or indirect exchange of information. Concerning the television and film industry,
secrecy requirements are designed not to carry out any function or not to be disclosed. For eg,
no contact methods can be used by the employee. Electronic or some other sharing mode with
third parties who are not connected to function.
Requirement for Unacceptable Privacy Agreement:
Both staff must be granted full secrecy and complete confidence under the confidentiality
agreements. Any information or suggestions related to existing works, concepts, proposals,
and works of art will be revealed to everyone outside the company. It's a crime to trade some
new industry intellectual property. Any employee must have a strict code of ethics for
externals and employee oversight is given to any abusses and wrong behavior.

Yeah, it is wrong to release the trailer for Luke's unknown colleague, although he makes the
movie more publicity. That goes against the rules of the privacy agreement and violates the
intellectual property rights of the company. The unidentified associate has committed a
serious offense by releasing the trailer and has violated all the rules of confidentiality. If the
film was made more publicly available, it would significantly damage the business' reputation
and workplace. Revealing or denying the following film trailers is an offense on behalf of the
employee and is a breach of trust. The release of the trailer is unconstitutional without
management's consent and a huge violation of rights. It may have been revealing
unintentionally, but it is not right to suggest the unjust publication of a teaser is not the best
thing.

In this regard, the boss sets a bad precedent by not digging into the leak. The board
undoubtedly made this action that the organization was not affected in any way. Without
approval from the management of the firm, the employee may have committed to increasing
ads by printing. The entertainment industry could have wanted to look harder into the issue if
the reasons for the film's popularity were to be over-weighed. But this decision could prove
disastrous in some other situation. It should not investigate the leak; it should conduct an
internal inquiry to find a source of leakage by the staff.
A leaked video does much harm and when the trailer launches it decides whether or not the
film is successful. The beginning and the following of the trailer before the start of the film
were articulate and very professional. The leaked trailer disturbs the whole operation and
threatens the full rights of the film that badly disrupts company proceedings. So before the
programmed date of film release, no trailer should be leaks by any workers. All staff have the
duty to protect the film actors.